Beverley
#8,362 for girls in 2025, 12 births · Last seen for boys in 1963 at #3,646
Given to girls 97.0% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1938 · 407 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 13,062since 1912
Beverley over time
Rank among girls' names. Beverley has never cracked the top 300 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #8,362 | 12 | — | |
| 2024 | #12,161 | 7 | — | |
| 2023 | #8,055 | 13 | — | |
| 2022 | #8,542 | 12 | — | |
| 2021 | #11,146 | 8 | — | |
| 2020 | #12,142 | 7 | — | |
| 2019 | #10,473 | 9 | — | |
| 2018 | #9,806 | 10 | — | |
| 2017 | #11,615 | 8 | — | |
| 2016 | #12,876 | 7 | — | |
| 2015 | #16,419 | 5 | — | |
| 2014 | #16,513 | 5 | — | |
| 2013 | #10,235 | 10 | — | |
| 2012 | #16,869 | 5 | — | |
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | #17,294 | 5 | — | |
| 2008 | #17,504 | 5 | — | |
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | #12,420 | 8 | — | |
| 2005 | #14,502 | 6 | — | |
| 2004 | #16,099 | 5 | — | |
| 2003 | #11,325 | 8 | — | |
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | #15,031 | 5 | — | |
| 1999 | #14,411 | 5 | — | |
| 1998 | #12,426 | 6 | — | |
| 1997 | #12,070 | 6 | — | |
| 1996 | #10,567 | 7 | — | |
| 1995 | #10,514 | 7 | — | |
| 1994 | #10,569 | 7 | — | |
| 1993 | #10,588 | 7 | — | |
| 1992 | #7,512 | 11 | — | |
| 1991 | #5,659 | 16 | — | |
| 1990 | #4,694 | 20 | — | |
| 1989 | #7,449 | 10 | — | |
| 1988 | #7,691 | 9 | — | |
| 1987 | #7,987 | 8 | — | |
| 1986 | #6,612 | 10 | — | |
| 1985 | #5,678 | 12 | — | |
| 1984 | #5,539 | 12 | — | |
| 1983 | #6,212 | 10 | — | |
| 1982 | #6,371 | 10 | — | |
| 1981 | #4,963 | 14 | — | |
| 1980 | #5,245 | 13 | — | |
| 1979 | #5,092 | 13 | — | |
| 1978 | #4,242 | 16 | — | |
| 1977 | #3,486 | 21 | — | |
| 1976 | #3,002 | 24 | — | |
| 1975 | #3,259 | 21 | — | |
| 1974 | #2,757 | 26 | — | |
| 1973 | #2,349 | 32 | — | |
| 1972 | #1,946 | 42 | — | |
| 1971 | #2,064 | 40 | — | |
| 1970 | #2,081 | 39 | — | |
| 1969 | #1,546 | 59 | — | |
| 1968 | #1,406 | 64 | — | |
| 1967 | #1,360 | 65 | — | |
| 1966 | #1,312 | 68 | — | |
| 1965 | #1,252 | 74 | — | |
| 1964 | #955 | 121 | — | |
| 1963 | #1,052 | 104 | #3,646 | 6 |
| 1962 | #925 | 131 | #4,033 | 5 |
| 1961 | #916 | 139 | #4,065 | 5 |
| 1960 | #782 | 171 | — | |
| 1959 | #789 | 167 | — | |
| 1958 | #686 | 206 | — | |
| 1957 | #638 | 236 | — | |
| 1956 | #630 | 231 | — | |
| 1955 | #599 | 237 | — | |
| 1954 | #557 | 253 | — | |
| 1953 | #554 | 249 | — | |
| 1952 | #539 | 251 | #3,373 | 6 |
| 1951 | #492 | 277 | #3,714 | 5 |
| 1950 | #482 | 283 | — | |
| 1949 | #498 | 265 | #3,019 | 7 |
| 1948 | #452 | 313 | #3,668 | 5 |
| 1947 | #421 | 373 | #2,356 | 11 |
| 1946 | #412 | 352 | #2,919 | 7 |
| 1945 | #420 | 286 | — | |
| 1944 | #364 | 367 | — | |
| 1943 | #363 | 394 | #2,074 | 13 |
| 1942 | #360 | 377 | #2,712 | 8 |
| 1941 | #355 | 348 | #3,505 | 5 |
| 1940 | #343 | 350 | #2,478 | 9 |
| 1939 | #344 | 341 | #2,609 | 8 |
| 1938 | #309 | 407 | #2,868 | 7 |
| 1937 | #322 | 371 | #2,680 | 8 |
| 1936 | #317 | 370 | #3,147 | 6 |
| 1935 | #341 | 350 | #2,246 | 11 |
| 1934 | #341 | 347 | #1,932 | 14 |
| 1933 | #356 | 310 | #2,542 | 9 |
| 1932 | #345 | 337 | #2,638 | 9 |
| 1931 | #361 | 318 | #2,101 | 13 |
| 1930 | #350 | 360 | #2,293 | 12 |
| 1929 | #378 | 315 | #2,589 | 10 |
| 1928 | #378 | 321 | #2,162 | 14 |
| 1927 | #418 | 272 | #2,121 | 15 |
| 1926 | #448 | 227 | #2,186 | 14 |
| 1925 | #516 | 187 | #2,755 | 10 |
| 1924 | #619 | 147 | #2,132 | 15 |
| 1923 | #642 | 131 | #2,224 | 14 |
| 1922 | #734 | 98 | #2,040 | 16 |
| 1921 | #757 | 93 | #2,376 | 13 |
| 1920 | #850 | 72 | #2,336 | 13 |
| 1919 | #925 | 58 | #2,665 | 10 |
| 1918 | #879 | 66 | #2,543 | 11 |
| 1917 | #1,013 | 48 | #2,091 | 14 |
| 1916 | #1,380 | 28 | #2,389 | 11 |
| 1915 | #1,439 | 25 | #2,070 | 13 |
| 1914 | #3,188 | 6 | #1,772 | 13 |
| 1913 | #2,827 | 6 | #2,821 | 5 |
| 1912 | #2,634 | 6 | #2,045 | 7 |
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Beverley! It came in at #2,634, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1999–2002, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Beverley is popular in 1933
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Vermont#61 · 1 in 210
- Oregon#124 · 1 in 518
- Colorado#161 · 1 in 760
- Washington#167 · 1 in 937
- Michigan#174 · 1 in 1,242
Best ever in a state: #61 in Vermont, 1933.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vermont | #61 | 11 | 1 in 210 |
| Oregon | #124 | 9 | 1 in 518 |
| Colorado | #161 | 10 | 1 in 760 |
| Washington | #167 | 9 | 1 in 937 |
| Michigan | #174 | 28 | 1 in 1,242 |
| California | #178 | 36 | 1 in 914 |
| Minnesota | #194 | 13 | 1 in 1,410 |
| Maine | #198 | 5 | 1 in 1,184 |
| Massachusetts | #199 | 14 | 1 in 1,970 |
| Nebraska | #248 | 5 | 1 in 1,956 |
| New York | #263 | 32 | 1 in 2,584 |
| Iowa | #265 | 7 | 1 in 2,461 |
| Wisconsin | #275 | 7 | 1 in 3,066 |
| Virginia | #276 | 10 | 1 in 2,263 |
| Ohio | #280 | 15 | 1 in 2,864 |
| Illinois | #283 | 18 | 1 in 2,673 |
| Indiana | #293 | 7 | 1 in 3,065 |
| Kansas | #306 | 5 | 1 in 2,568 |
| Pennsylvania | #353 | 14 | 1 in 4,901 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Beverley
- 3,799 spots since 2024 (#12,161 → #8,362)
- 3,780 spots since 2020 (#12,142 → #8,362)
- 8,057 spots since 2015 (#16,419 → #8,362)
- Biggest jump: 134 spots in 1918 (#1,013 → #879)
- Biggest drop: 297 spots in 1965 (#955 → #1,252)
- Debuted 1912
- Peaked 1938 at #309 (407 births)
- Births halved by 1959, 21 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 46 yrs · run 1918–1962
- Highest: 1 in 2,711 girls born in 1938 were named Beverley (0.04%)
- Latest: 1 in 133,939 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 26.9% of all girls named Beverley (3,511) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 243 | #879 (1918) | #1,786 |
| 1920s | 1,863 | #378 (1928) | #574 |
| 1930s | 3,511 | #309 (1938) | #339 |
| 1940s | 3,425 | #343 (1940) | #399 |
| 1950s | 2,390 | #482 (1950) | #597 |
| 1960s | 996 | #782 (1960) | #1,151 |
| 1970s | 274 | #1,946 (1972) | #3,028 |
| 1980s | 108 | #4,963 (1981) | #6,375 |
| 1990s | 92 | #4,694 (1990) | #9,901 |
| 2000s | 42 | #11,325 (2003) | #14,882 |
| 2010s | 59 | #9,806 (2018) | #13,101 |
| 2020s | 59 | #8,055 (2023) | #10,068 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Beverley in 1933
Top girls' names in 1933
Top boys' names in 1933
More about 1933
girls
1,007,932 girls got a published name in 1933; 1 in 3,251 of them was named Beverley, which outranked 92.7% of the 4,858 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.8% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
boys
991,524 boys got a published name in 1933; 1 in 110,169 of them was named Beverley, which outranked 38.8% of the 4,156 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #2,368Windel10
- #2,368Woodroe10
- #2,368Yale10
- #2,542Beverley9
- #2,542Aime9
- #2,542Albion9
- #2,542Alfonsa9
- #2,738Acey8
- #2,738Aden8
- #2,738Aldean8
Tied with 195 names at #2,542; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.