Bexley
- #960 for girls in 2025, 268 births
- #6,143 for boys in 2025, 14 births
- Given to girls 92.7% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2021 · 378 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 3,239since 2009
Bexley over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #960 | 268 | #6,143 | 14 |
| 2024 | #1,128 | 214 | #5,443 | 17 |
| 2023 | #1,055 | 237 | #5,075 | 19 |
| 2022 | #888 | 314 | #5,019 | 19 |
| 2021 | #752 | 378 | #3,582 | 31 |
| 2020 | #840 | 325 | #3,734 | 28 |
| 2019 | #951 | 278 | #4,639 | 21 |
| 2018 | #908 | 296 | #5,320 | 17 |
| 2017 | #925 | 286 | #2,891 | 41 |
| 2016 | #973 | 276 | #6,349 | 13 |
| 2015 | #1,215 | 204 | #8,744 | 8 |
| 2014 | #2,714 | 64 | #7,048 | 11 |
| 2013 | #2,973 | 56 | #9,655 | 7 |
| 2012 | #6,576 | 19 | #8,864 | 8 |
| 2011 | #10,374 | 10 | — | |
| 2010 | #12,276 | 8 | — | |
| 2009 | #15,242 | 6 | — | |
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
2009
The first year at least five girls were named Bexley! It came in at #15,242, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 2009–2010, when fewer than 9 girls a year got the name.
Where Bexley is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Nebraska#296 · 1 in 1,014
- Ohio#371 · 1 in 1,576
- Arkansas#376 · 1 in 1,324
- Mississippi#441 · 1 in 1,483
- Kentucky#443 · 1 in 1,917
Best ever in a state: #113 in South Dakota, 2016.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nebraska | #296 | 7 | 1 in 1,014 |
| Ohio | #371 | 30 | 1 in 1,576 |
| Arkansas | #376 | 8 | 1 in 1,324 |
| Mississippi | #441 | 6 | 1 in 1,483 |
| Kentucky | #443 | 9 | 1 in 1,917 |
| Indiana | #444 | 15 | 1 in 1,861 |
| Kansas | #445 | 7 | 1 in 1,687 |
| Oklahoma | #483 | 8 | 1 in 1,848 |
| Utah | #490 | 8 | 1 in 2,135 |
| Iowa | #565 | 5 | 1 in 2,354 |
| Missouri | #589 | 9 | 1 in 2,700 |
| Tennessee | #645 | 11 | 1 in 2,916 |
| Minnesota | #731 | 6 | 1 in 3,580 |
| Michigan | #735 | 10 | 1 in 3,573 |
| South Carolina | #773 | 5 | 1 in 3,658 |
| Louisiana | #776 | 5 | 1 in 3,274 |
| Pennsylvania | #871 | 10 | 1 in 4,669 |
| Illinois | #1,014 | 8 | 1 in 5,541 |
| Virginia | #1,037 | 6 | 1 in 5,624 |
| North Carolina | #1,138 | 7 | 1 in 6,640 |
| Texas | #1,154 | 23 | 1 in 6,980 |
| Florida | #1,170 | 12 | 1 in 7,230 |
| Georgia | #1,358 | 6 | 1 in 7,535 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Bexley
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 168 spots since 2024 (#1,128 → #960)
- 120 spots since 2020 (#840 → #960)
- 255 spots since 2015 (#1,215 → #960)
- Biggest jump: 242 spots in 2016
- Biggest drop: 167 spots in 2023
Rise & fade · girls
12 yrs to peak
- Debuted 2009
- Peaked 2021 at #752 (378 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 8 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 8 yrs · run 2016–2022
Share of babies · girls
1 in 4,341
- Highest: 1 in 4,341 girls born in 2021 were named Bexley (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 5,997 girls born in 2025 (0.02%)
Era · girls
The 2020s
- 53.6% of all girls named Bexley (1,736) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Never flipped
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6 | #15,242 (2009) | #15,242 |
| 2010s | 1,497 | #908 (2018) | #3,989 |
| 2020s | 1,736 | #752 (2021) | #937 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Bexley ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: