Blakeley
- #2,542 for girls in 2025, 69 births
- Last seen for boys in 2015 at #10,644
- Given to girls 93.0% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2024 · 96 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 1,351since 1977
Blakeley over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,542 | 69 | — | |
| 2024 | #2,033 | 96 | — | |
| 2023 | #2,555 | 69 | — | |
| 2022 | #3,073 | 53 | — | |
| 2021 | #2,892 | 58 | — | |
| 2020 | #2,682 | 62 | — | |
| 2019 | #2,376 | 75 | — | |
| 2018 | #2,084 | 92 | — | |
| 2017 | #3,014 | 54 | — | |
| 2016 | #2,798 | 61 | — | |
| 2015 | #2,471 | 73 | #10,644 | 6 |
| 2014 | #3,272 | 49 | — | |
| 2013 | #2,726 | 63 | — | |
| 2012 | #2,426 | 76 | #10,770 | 6 |
| 2011 | #5,207 | 26 | — | |
| 2010 | #6,182 | 21 | #12,231 | 5 |
| 2009 | #6,091 | 22 | — | |
| 2008 | #8,965 | 13 | — | |
| 2007 | #7,092 | 18 | — | |
| 2006 | #7,142 | 17 | — | |
| 2005 | #7,138 | 16 | #11,472 | 5 |
| 2004 | #7,391 | 15 | — | |
| 2003 | #7,998 | 13 | — | |
| 2002 | #8,837 | 11 | #10,667 | 5 |
| 2001 | #10,102 | 9 | — | |
| 2000 | #7,158 | 14 | — | |
| 1999 | #7,716 | 12 | — | |
| 1998 | #6,073 | 16 | — | |
| 1997 | #5,010 | 20 | — | |
| 1996 | #7,574 | 11 | #9,015 | 5 |
| 1995 | #5,677 | 16 | #6,992 | 7 |
| 1994 | #7,097 | 12 | — | |
| 1993 | #4,826 | 20 | — | |
| 1992 | #8,734 | 9 | — | |
| 1991 | #5,399 | 17 | #5,521 | 9 |
| 1990 | #4,694 | 20 | #8,117 | 5 |
| 1989 | #5,545 | 15 | — | |
| 1988 | #6,666 | 11 | #5,751 | 7 |
| 1987 | #8,778 | 7 | — | |
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | #6,523 | 5 | |
| 1984 | #7,398 | 8 | #4,215 | 9 |
| 1983 | — | #6,238 | 5 | |
| 1982 | — | #5,003 | 7 | |
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | #5,525 | 6 | |
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | #8,562 | 6 | #5,772 | 5 |
| 1977 | #8,444 | 6 | — | |
| 1976 | — | #5,587 | 5 | |
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1977
The first year at least five girls were named Blakeley! It came in at #8,444, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1979–1983, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Blakeley is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kentucky | #653 | 6 | 1 in 2,875 |
| Alabama | #819 | 5 | 1 in 3,664 |
| Florida | #1,887 | 6 | 1 in 14,460 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Blakeley
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 509 spots since 2024 (#2,033 → #2,542)
- 140 spots since 2020 (#2,682 → #2,542)
- 71 spots since 2015 (#2,471 → #2,542)
Rise & fade · girls
47 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1977
- Peaked 2024 at #2,033 (96 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · girls
1 in 16,877
- Highest: 1 in 16,877 girls born in 2024 were named Blakeley (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 23,294 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 2010s
- 43.7% of all girls named Blakeley (590) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 1987
- Mostly boys until 1986, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 12 | #8,444 (1977) | #8,503 |
| 1980s | 41 | #5,545 (1989) | #7,097 |
| 1990s | 153 | #4,694 (1990) | #6,280 |
| 2000s | 148 | #6,091 (2009) | #7,791 |
| 2010s | 590 | #2,084 (2018) | #3,256 |
| 2020s | 407 | #2,033 (2024) | #2,630 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Blakeley ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: