Blakley
#2,822 for girls in 2025, 60 births · Last seen for boys in 1996 at #7,136
Given to girls 94.0% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2021 · 65 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 767since 1987
Blakley over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,822 | 60 | — | |
| 2024 | #2,749 | 62 | — | |
| 2023 | #2,936 | 57 | — | |
| 2022 | #3,033 | 54 | — | |
| 2021 | #2,638 | 65 | — | |
| 2020 | #3,221 | 48 | — | |
| 2019 | #3,085 | 52 | — | |
| 2018 | #4,144 | 34 | — | |
| 2017 | #4,220 | 34 | — | |
| 2016 | #4,345 | 33 | — | |
| 2015 | #5,653 | 23 | — | |
| 2014 | #5,025 | 27 | — | |
| 2013 | #6,017 | 21 | — | |
| 2012 | #6,872 | 18 | — | |
| 2011 | #10,374 | 10 | — | |
| 2010 | #7,880 | 15 | — | |
| 2009 | #6,544 | 20 | — | |
| 2008 | #10,807 | 10 | — | |
| 2007 | #8,520 | 14 | — | |
| 2006 | #13,606 | 7 | — | |
| 2005 | #16,462 | 5 | — | |
| 2004 | #9,892 | 10 | — | |
| 2003 | #7,580 | 14 | — | |
| 2002 | #8,837 | 11 | — | |
| 2001 | #12,056 | 7 | — | |
| 2000 | #9,163 | 10 | — | |
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | #12,426 | 6 | — | |
| 1997 | #13,724 | 5 | — | |
| 1996 | #13,518 | 5 | #7,136 | 7 |
| 1995 | #11,783 | 6 | — | |
| 1994 | — | #8,800 | 5 | |
| 1993 | #10,588 | 7 | #8,700 | 5 |
| 1992 | #13,317 | 5 | — | |
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | #10,193 | 7 | #6,415 | 7 |
| 1989 | — | #7,905 | 5 | |
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | #11,325 | 5 | — | |
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | #6,315 | 5 | |
| 1983 | — | #6,238 | 5 | |
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | #5,845 | 5 | |
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | #4,048 | 5 | |
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Blakley! It came in at #11,325, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1987–1989, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Blakley is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Kentucky#744 · 1 in 3,450
- Tennessee#1,127 · 1 in 6,415
- Texas#2,921 · 1 in 26,757
Best ever in a state: #649 in Kentucky, 2023.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kentucky | #744 | 5 | 1 in 3,450 |
| Tennessee | #1,127 | 5 | 1 in 6,415 |
| Texas | #2,921 | 6 | 1 in 26,757 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Blakley
- 73 spots since 2024 (#2,749 → #2,822)
- 399 spots since 2020 (#3,221 → #2,822)
- 2,831 spots since 2015 (#5,653 → #2,822)
- Debuted 1987
- Peaked 2021 at #2,638 (65 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 25,244 girls born in 2021 were named Blakley (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 26,788 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 45.1% of all girls named Blakley (346) were born in this decade
- Mostly boys until 1996, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 5 | #11,325 (1987) | #11,325 |
| 1990s | 41 | #10,193 (1990) | #12,221 |
| 2000s | 108 | #6,544 (2009) | #10,347 |
| 2010s | 267 | #3,085 (2019) | #5,762 |
| 2020s | 346 | #2,638 (2021) | #2,900 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Blakley ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: