Blayke
- #2,076 for girls in 2025, 90 births
- #9,714 for boys in 2025, 7 births
- Given to girls 70.8% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2019 · 194 births
- Debut · girls
- 7 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 1,822since 1989
Blayke over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,076 | 90 | #9,714 | 7 |
| 2024 | #2,178 | 87 | #6,199 | 14 |
| 2023 | #1,813 | 111 | #7,289 | 11 |
| 2022 | #1,518 | 142 | #7,262 | 11 |
| 2021 | #1,416 | 153 | #5,776 | 15 |
| 2020 | #1,389 | 157 | #5,451 | 16 |
| 2019 | #1,203 | 194 | #5,153 | 18 |
| 2018 | #1,506 | 145 | #7,136 | 11 |
| 2017 | #1,210 | 198 | #3,993 | 26 |
| 2016 | #1,815 | 114 | #4,776 | 20 |
| 2015 | #3,024 | 56 | #5,289 | 17 |
| 2014 | #3,549 | 44 | #4,014 | 25 |
| 2013 | #3,465 | 45 | #3,339 | 32 |
| 2012 | #4,121 | 36 | #2,954 | 39 |
| 2011 | #3,781 | 40 | #3,306 | 33 |
| 2010 | #4,735 | 30 | #3,014 | 38 |
| 2009 | #4,805 | 30 | #2,623 | 47 |
| 2008 | #8,529 | 14 | #3,486 | 31 |
| 2007 | #15,491 | 6 | #3,090 | 37 |
| 2006 | #13,606 | 7 | #3,384 | 31 |
| 2005 | — | #3,319 | 30 | |
| 2004 | #9,892 | 10 | #4,421 | 19 |
| 2003 | #15,784 | 5 | #3,119 | 30 |
| 2002 | #9,482 | 10 | #3,554 | 24 |
| 2001 | #12,056 | 7 | #4,121 | 19 |
| 2000 | #6,808 | 15 | #3,764 | 21 |
| 1999 | #11,385 | 7 | #4,762 | 14 |
| 1998 | — | #4,413 | 15 | |
| 1997 | #9,017 | 9 | #4,668 | 13 |
| 1996 | #8,812 | 9 | #3,202 | 22 |
| 1995 | — | #3,854 | 16 | |
| 1994 | #5,713 | 16 | #4,094 | 15 |
| 1993 | #8,719 | 9 | #5,771 | 9 |
| 1992 | #13,317 | 5 | #6,670 | 7 |
| 1991 | #9,336 | 8 | #4,760 | 11 |
| 1990 | #11,409 | 6 | #7,178 | 6 |
| 1989 | #9,681 | 7 | — | |
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1989
The first year at least five girls were named Blayke! It came in at #9,681, and was given to 7 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1995, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Blayke is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Louisiana#677 · 1 in 2,728
- Indiana#1,032 · 1 in 5,582
- Ohio#1,438 · 1 in 9,454
- Texas#1,902 · 1 in 14,595
- California#3,095 · 1 in 32,345
Best ever in a state: #168 in Montana, 2017.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Louisiana | #677 | 6 | 1 in 2,728 |
| Indiana | #1,032 | 5 | 1 in 5,582 |
| Ohio | #1,438 | 5 | 1 in 9,454 |
| Texas | #1,902 | 11 | 1 in 14,595 |
| California | #3,095 | 5 | 1 in 32,345 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Blayke
Momentum · girls
Falling
- 102 spots since 2024 (#2,178 → #2,076)
- 687 spots since 2020 (#1,389 → #2,076)
- 948 spots since 2015 (#3,024 → #2,076)
Rise & fade · girls
30 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1989
- Peaked 2019 at #1,203 (194 births)
- Births halved by 2024, 5 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · girls
1 in 8,651
- Highest: 1 in 8,651 girls born in 2019 were named Blayke (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 17,859 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · girls
The 2010s
- 49.5% of all girls named Blayke (902) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 2013
- Mostly boys until 2012, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 7 | #9,681 (1989) | #9,681 |
| 1990s | 69 | #5,713 (1994) | #9,714 |
| 2000s | 104 | #4,805 (2009) | #10,717 |
| 2010s | 902 | #1,203 (2019) | #2,841 |
| 2020s | 740 | #1,389 (2020) | #1,732 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Blayke ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: