Branden
Last seen for girls in 1997 at #12,070 · #3,314 for boys in 2025, 35 births
Given to boys 98.8% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1987 · 913 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 27,537since 1959
Branden over time
Rank among boys' names. Branden has never cracked the top 200 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #3,314 | 35 | |
| 2024 | — | #2,595 | 51 | |
| 2023 | — | #2,480 | 54 | |
| 2022 | — | #2,793 | 46 | |
| 2021 | — | #2,349 | 58 | |
| 2020 | — | #1,872 | 79 | |
| 2019 | — | #1,954 | 75 | |
| 2018 | — | #1,506 | 114 | |
| 2017 | — | #1,460 | 116 | |
| 2016 | — | #1,234 | 151 | |
| 2015 | — | #1,057 | 188 | |
| 2014 | — | #1,004 | 205 | |
| 2013 | — | #988 | 201 | |
| 2012 | — | #850 | 250 | |
| 2011 | — | #691 | 336 | |
| 2010 | — | #630 | 385 | |
| 2009 | — | #588 | 444 | |
| 2008 | — | #586 | 431 | |
| 2007 | — | #481 | 556 | |
| 2006 | — | #471 | 566 | |
| 2005 | — | #444 | 588 | |
| 2004 | — | #421 | 618 | |
| 2003 | — | #395 | 662 | |
| 2002 | — | #369 | 714 | |
| 2001 | — | #339 | 811 | |
| 2000 | — | #338 | 810 | |
| 1999 | — | #310 | 918 | |
| 1998 | — | #309 | 909 | |
| 1997 | #12,070 | 6 | #305 | 889 |
| 1996 | #11,807 | 6 | #288 | 939 |
| 1995 | — | #291 | 910 | |
| 1994 | #9,586 | 8 | #270 | 1,038 |
| 1993 | #10,588 | 7 | #270 | 1,071 |
| 1992 | #8,065 | 10 | #252 | 1,150 |
| 1991 | — | #267 | 1,011 | |
| 1990 | #9,247 | 8 | #299 | 849 |
| 1989 | #7,449 | 10 | #262 | 970 |
| 1988 | #3,585 | 26 | #262 | 894 |
| 1987 | #5,613 | 13 | #251 | 913 |
| 1986 | #3,757 | 22 | #259 | 858 |
| 1985 | #3,852 | 21 | #265 | 810 |
| 1984 | #3,990 | 19 | #283 | 735 |
| 1983 | #4,286 | 17 | #308 | 640 |
| 1982 | #3,530 | 23 | #320 | 597 |
| 1981 | #3,253 | 26 | #317 | 600 |
| 1980 | #3,318 | 25 | #407 | 398 |
| 1979 | #4,842 | 14 | #483 | 293 |
| 1978 | #5,563 | 11 | #523 | 246 |
| 1977 | #4,425 | 15 | #526 | 252 |
| 1976 | #6,048 | 9 | #614 | 177 |
| 1975 | #5,984 | 9 | #564 | 205 |
| 1974 | #6,900 | 7 | #625 | 165 |
| 1973 | #6,666 | 7 | #673 | 141 |
| 1972 | #7,292 | 6 | #770 | 107 |
| 1971 | — | #920 | 78 | |
| 1970 | #7,995 | 5 | #931 | 73 |
| 1969 | — | #1,570 | 27 | |
| 1968 | — | #1,282 | 35 | |
| 1967 | — | #1,609 | 23 | |
| 1966 | — | #1,963 | 16 | |
| 1965 | — | #1,720 | 21 | |
| 1964 | — | #4,039 | 5 | |
| 1963 | — | #2,673 | 10 | |
| 1962 | — | #3,305 | 7 | |
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | #3,077 | 8 | |
| 1959 | — | #3,988 | 5 | |
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Branden! It came in at #3,988, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1961, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Branden is popular in 2009
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Michigan#405 · 1 in 2,468
- Georgia#406 · 1 in 2,270
- New Mexico#409 · 1 in 2,120
- California#415 · 1 in 2,989
- New Jersey#446 · 1 in 2,974
Best ever in a state: #90 in Wyoming, 1975.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan | #405 | 20 | 1 in 2,468 |
| Georgia | #406 | 26 | 1 in 2,270 |
| New Mexico | #409 | 5 | 1 in 2,120 |
| California | #415 | 81 | 1 in 2,989 |
| New Jersey | #446 | 15 | 1 in 2,974 |
| Maryland | #459 | 10 | 1 in 2,876 |
| Pennsylvania | #471 | 18 | 1 in 3,451 |
| Wisconsin | #478 | 9 | 1 in 3,189 |
| Florida | #489 | 30 | 1 in 3,177 |
| Arizona | #503 | 12 | 1 in 3,328 |
| Louisiana | #512 | 9 | 1 in 2,782 |
| New York | #524 | 30 | 1 in 3,590 |
| Ohio | #540 | 16 | 1 in 3,916 |
| Tennessee | #544 | 10 | 1 in 3,632 |
| Massachusetts | #547 | 7 | 1 in 4,437 |
| Minnesota | #633 | 6 | 1 in 4,867 |
| Texas | #647 | 38 | 1 in 4,907 |
| Missouri | #663 | 7 | 1 in 4,780 |
| Indiana | #695 | 7 | 1 in 5,341 |
| Illinois | #696 | 14 | 1 in 5,182 |
| Washington | #803 | 6 | 1 in 6,160 |
| Virginia | #838 | 6 | 1 in 7,026 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Branden
- 719 spots since 2024 (#2,595 → #3,314)
- 1,442 spots since 2020 (#1,872 → #3,314)
- 2,257 spots since 2015 (#1,057 → #3,314)
- Biggest jump: 639 spots in 1970 (#1,570 → #931)
- Biggest drop: 159 spots in 2012 (#691 → #850)
- Debuted 1959
- Peaked 1987 at #251 (913 births)
- Births halved by 2008, 21 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 44 yrs · run 1970–2013
- Highest: 1 in 1,737 boys born in 1992 were named Branden (0.06%)
- Latest: 1 in 48,802 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #251 in 1987, was only 1 in 2,045 (0.05%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 35.2% of all boys named Branden (9,684) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 5 | #3,988 (1959) | #3,988 |
| 1960s | 152 | #1,282 (1968) | #2,360 |
| 1970s | 1,737 | #483 (1979) | #663 |
| 1980s | 7,415 | #251 (1987) | #293 |
| 1990s | 9,684 | #252 (1992) | #286 |
| 2000s | 6,200 | #338 (2000) | #443 |
| 2010s | 2,021 | #630 (2010) | #1,137 |
| 2020s | 323 | #1,872 (2020) | #2,567 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Branden in 2009
Top boys' names in 2009
More about 2009
boys
1,983,573 boys got a published name in 2009; 1 in 4,468 of them was named Branden, which outranked 96.0% of the 14,540 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.2% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).