Brandi
#4,758 for girls in 2025, 28 births · Last seen for boys in 2006 at #10,662
Given to girls 99.6% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1981 · 5,527 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 15 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 101,906since 1949
Brandi over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #4,758 | 28 | — | |
| 2024 | #4,294 | 33 | — | |
| 2023 | #3,476 | 45 | — | |
| 2022 | #2,956 | 56 | — | |
| 2021 | #2,674 | 64 | — | |
| 2020 | #2,931 | 55 | — | |
| 2019 | #2,752 | 61 | — | |
| 2018 | #2,869 | 58 | — | |
| 2017 | #2,338 | 78 | — | |
| 2016 | #2,308 | 82 | — | |
| 2015 | #1,883 | 108 | — | |
| 2014 | #2,256 | 83 | — | |
| 2013 | #1,539 | 142 | — | |
| 2012 | #1,432 | 159 | — | |
| 2011 | #1,335 | 174 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,450 | 156 | — | |
| 2009 | #1,234 | 201 | — | |
| 2008 | #1,043 | 251 | — | |
| 2007 | #979 | 274 | — | |
| 2006 | #973 | 269 | #10,662 | 6 |
| 2005 | #780 | 333 | — | |
| 2004 | #666 | 411 | — | |
| 2003 | #606 | 449 | — | |
| 2002 | #525 | 523 | — | |
| 2001 | #458 | 604 | — | |
| 2000 | #388 | 744 | — | |
| 1999 | #302 | 1,023 | — | |
| 1998 | #257 | 1,202 | #8,479 | 6 |
| 1997 | #199 | 1,484 | #9,265 | 5 |
| 1996 | #161 | 1,952 | #7,971 | 6 |
| 1995 | #124 | 2,571 | #6,992 | 7 |
| 1994 | #122 | 2,635 | — | |
| 1993 | #124 | 2,692 | #8,700 | 5 |
| 1992 | #110 | 2,968 | #5,660 | 9 |
| 1991 | #110 | 3,090 | #5,521 | 9 |
| 1990 | #103 | 3,338 | #8,117 | 5 |
| 1989 | #98 | 3,250 | #2,989 | 20 |
| 1988 | #91 | 3,169 | #3,915 | 12 |
| 1987 | #88 | 3,244 | #3,339 | 14 |
| 1986 | #79 | 3,432 | #2,684 | 19 |
| 1985 | #69 | 4,045 | #2,598 | 19 |
| 1984 | #61 | 4,848 | #1,979 | 27 |
| 1983 | #56 | 5,203 | #2,408 | 20 |
| 1982 | #55 | 5,469 | #2,426 | 20 |
| 1981 | #50 | 5,527 | #2,138 | 24 |
| 1980 | #63 | 4,703 | #2,110 | 25 |
| 1979 | #61 | 4,609 | #1,943 | 27 |
| 1978 | #61 | 4,500 | #2,068 | 23 |
| 1977 | #71 | 3,885 | #2,008 | 24 |
| 1976 | #79 | 3,537 | #2,601 | 16 |
| 1975 | #88 | 3,369 | #3,659 | 9 |
| 1974 | #106 | 2,809 | #3,120 | 11 |
| 1973 | #109 | 2,843 | #2,513 | 15 |
| 1972 | #141 | 2,055 | #4,441 | 6 |
| 1971 | #330 | 795 | — | |
| 1970 | #365 | 676 | — | |
| 1969 | #464 | 436 | — | |
| 1968 | #500 | 378 | — | |
| 1967 | #738 | 175 | — | |
| 1966 | #849 | 138 | — | |
| 1965 | #1,009 | 107 | — | |
| 1964 | #1,246 | 78 | — | |
| 1963 | #1,262 | 76 | — | |
| 1962 | #2,113 | 31 | — | |
| 1961 | #2,839 | 19 | — | |
| 1960 | #2,246 | 27 | — | |
| 1959 | #4,031 | 10 | — | |
| 1958 | #5,408 | 6 | — | |
| 1957 | #4,536 | 8 | — | |
| 1956 | #2,453 | 21 | — | |
| 1955 | #5,208 | 6 | — | |
| 1954 | #3,157 | 13 | — | |
| 1953 | #4,226 | 8 | — | |
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | #5,244 | 5 | — | |
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Brandi! It came in at #5,244, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1949–1952, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Brandi is popular in 2005
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Kentucky#357 · 1 in 1,790
- Alabama#382 · 1 in 1,645
- Mississippi#394 · 1 in 1,654
- Louisiana#412 · 1 in 1,968
- Tennessee#419 · 1 in 2,072
Best ever in a state: #15 in Idaho, 1973.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kentucky | #357 | 11 | 1 in 1,790 |
| Alabama | #382 | 12 | 1 in 1,645 |
| Mississippi | #394 | 7 | 1 in 1,654 |
| Louisiana | #412 | 10 | 1 in 1,968 |
| Tennessee | #419 | 15 | 1 in 2,072 |
| South Carolina | #474 | 8 | 1 in 2,181 |
| Missouri | #520 | 10 | 1 in 2,901 |
| Pennsylvania | #565 | 16 | 1 in 3,429 |
| Wisconsin | #566 | 8 | 1 in 3,131 |
| Arizona | #569 | 13 | 1 in 2,733 |
| Georgia | #576 | 17 | 1 in 3,023 |
| Minnesota | #609 | 7 | 1 in 3,716 |
| Ohio | #632 | 14 | 1 in 4,091 |
| Oklahoma | #671 | 5 | 1 in 3,334 |
| Indiana | #677 | 8 | 1 in 4,063 |
| Florida | #700 | 20 | 1 in 4,285 |
| Virginia | #706 | 9 | 1 in 4,123 |
| Illinois | #787 | 14 | 1 in 4,797 |
| Texas | #802 | 33 | 1 in 4,867 |
| North Carolina | #858 | 9 | 1 in 5,044 |
| Michigan | #871 | 8 | 1 in 5,920 |
| New York | #1,127 | 12 | 1 in 7,923 |
| California | #1,230 | 24 | 1 in 9,601 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Brandi
- 464 spots since 2024 (#4,294 → #4,758)
- 1,827 spots since 2020 (#2,931 → #4,758)
- 2,875 spots since 2015 (#1,883 → #4,758)
- Biggest jump: 238 spots in 1968 (#738 → #500)
- Biggest drop: 193 spots in 2006 (#780 → #973)
- Debuted 1949
- Peaked 1981 at #50 (5,527 births)
- Births halved by 1993, 12 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 15 yrs · run 1975–1989
- Top 1,000: 42 yrs · run 1966–2007
- Highest: 1 in 302 girls born in 1981 were named Brandi (0.33%)
- Latest: 1 in 57,402 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 42.1% of all girls named Brandi (42,890) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 5 | #5,244 (1949) | #5,244 |
| 1950s | 72 | #2,453 (1956) | #4,146 |
| 1960s | 1,465 | #464 (1969) | #1,327 |
| 1970s | 29,078 | #61 (1979) | #141 |
| 1980s | 42,890 | #50 (1981) | #71 |
| 1990s | 22,955 | #103 (1990) | #161 |
| 2000s | 4,059 | #388 (2000) | #765 |
| 2010s | 1,101 | #1,335 (2011) | #2,016 |
| 2020s | 281 | #2,674 (2021) | #3,515 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Brandi in 2005
Top girls' names in 2005
More about 2005
girls
1,847,842 girls got a published name in 2005; 1 in 5,549 of them was named Brandi, which outranked 95.9% of the 19,199 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).