Brooke

#313 for girls in 2025, 972 births · Last seen for boys in 2019 at #12,145
Given to girls 99.0% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
2003 · 5,971 births
Debut · girls
7 births
In top 100 · girls
31 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
198,491
since 1934

Brooke over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201963peak #43, 2003girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#313972—
2024#308999—
2023#2991,033—
2022#2701,181—
2021#2621,186—
2020#2361,262—
2019#2111,441#12,1455
2018#2011,527#10,7606
2017#1931,619#9,6967
2016#1731,871—
2015#1502,150—
2014#1392,392#10,7176
2013#1152,754—
2012#1022,976—
2011#863,372—
2010#733,706#10,7666
2009#544,798—
2008#525,186#8,3249
2007#455,508#4,80819
2006#445,747#7,9989
2005#475,571#6,22612
2004#465,712#4,00522
2003#435,971#6,71510
2002#525,338#7,6438
2001#575,213#6,9359
2000#515,642#5,29713
1999#476,066#4,76214
1998#466,346#4,19716
1997#456,671#5,28811
1996#456,724#2,91125
1995#526,377#3,85416
1994#545,973#3,21521
1993#526,161#3,14121
1992#595,771#2,99922
1991#655,551#2,82823
1990#704,990#2,55326
1989#744,148#2,78422
1988#873,416#1,87935
1987#942,955#2,83818
1986#1042,698#2,51021
1985#1022,726#3,21614
1984#992,749#2,03626
1983#962,862#1,90528
1982#923,144#1,77432
1981#525,328#1,47942
1980#574,951#1,29152
1979#853,505#1,31949
1978#1152,533#1,41043
1977#1501,871#1,45040
1976#1751,463#1,41140
1975#2081,182#1,20849
1974#260964#1,35140
1973#302771#1,08256
1972#321736#1,17748
1971#347729#1,23545
1970#345758#1,05160
1969#480403#1,19843
1968#527326#1,25037
1967#585268#1,25336
1966#562286#1,28235
1965#822146#1,40530
1964#940126#1,19941
1963#856149#1,35433
1962#922132#1,23040
1961#987120#1,09751
1960#1,063102#1,29537
1959#1,25673#1,58825
1958#1,28268#1,37032
1957#1,28967#1,54726
1956#1,11685#1,82119
1955#1,22967#1,79119
1954#965101#1,59323
1953#798133#1,76519
1952#1,35151#1,58223
1951#1,30351#1,90416
1950#1,25054#1,94115
1949#1,10467#1,82017
1948#1,42242#1,32330
1947#1,46141#1,78618
1946#1,31843#2,40310
1945#1,26140#1,58118
1944#1,25540#2,19511
1943#1,52730#1,39925
1942#1,16246#1,53721
1941#1,29435#1,58819
1940#1,59124#2,32210
1939#2,9229#2,05012
1938#3,1818#2,8687
1937——
1936—#3,1476
1935#4,2045#2,02913
1934#3,4497#2,39310
1933—#3,0047
1932—#3,7765
1931—#3,3906
1930—#3,0228
1929—#3,5596
1928—#3,6976
1927—#3,1518
1926—#3,3857
1925—#3,7416
1924—#4,3475
1923——
1922—#3,0149
1921—#4,3225
1920—#3,2088
1919—#2,66510
1918—#3,7286
1917——
1916——
1915——
1914—#3,2645
1913——
1912——
1911——
1910——
1909——
1908——
1907——
1906——
1905——
1904——
1903——
1902——
1901——
1900——
1899——
1898——
1897——
1896——
1895——
1894——
1893——
1892——
1891——
1890——
1889——
1888——
1887——
1886——
1885——
1884——
1883——
1882——
1881——
1880——
First appearance
1934

The first year at least five girls were named Brooke! It came in at #3,449, and was given to 7 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1935–1937, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.

Where Brooke is popular in 1963

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Brooke, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Brooke, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Brooke, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Brooke, so not publishedNHWashington: #513 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 5,121 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Brooke, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Brooke, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Brooke, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Brooke, so not publishedMNIllinois: #610 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 7,625 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Brooke, so not publishedWIMichigan: #850 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 16,012 girlsMINew York: #581 for girls · 25 births · 1 in 6,531 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Brooke, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Brooke, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Brooke, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Brooke, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Brooke, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Brooke, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Brooke, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Brooke, so not publishedINOhio: #703 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 11,976 girlsOHPennsylvania: #725 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 12,723 girlsPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Brooke, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Brooke, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #687 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 7,570 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Brooke, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Brooke, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Brooke, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Brooke, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Brooke, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Brooke, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Brooke, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Brooke, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Brooke, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Brooke, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Brooke, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Brooke, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Brooke, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Brooke, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Brooke, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Brooke, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Brooke, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Brooke, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Brooke, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Brooke, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Brooke, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Brooke, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Brooke, so not publishedHITexas: fewer than 5 girls named Brooke, so not publishedTXFlorida: #787 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 9,704 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Washington#513 · 1 in 5,121
  2. New York#581 · 1 in 6,531
  3. Illinois#610 · 1 in 7,625
  4. California#687 · 1 in 7,570
  5. Ohio#703 · 1 in 11,976

Best ever in a state: #11 in Montana, 1997.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Washington#51351 in 5,121
New York#581251 in 6,531
Illinois#610131 in 7,625
California#687231 in 7,570
Ohio#70381 in 11,976
Pennsylvania#72581 in 12,723
Florida#78751 in 9,704
Michigan#85051 in 16,012
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Texas———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Brooke
Momentum · girls
Falling
  • 5 spots since 2024 (#308 → #313)
  • 77 spots since 2020 (#236 → #313)
  • 163 spots since 2015 (#150 → #313)
  • Biggest jump: 553 spots in 1953 (#1,351 → #798)
  • Biggest drop: 264 spots in 1955 (#965 → #1,229)
Rise & fade · girls
69 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1934
  • Peaked 2003 at #43 (5,971 births)
  • Births halved by 2012, 9 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 31 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 31 yrs · run 1987–2011
  • Top 1,000: 67 yrs · run 1961–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 261
  • Highest: 1 in 261 girls born in 1996 were named Brooke (0.38%)
  • Latest: 1 in 1,654 girls born in 2025 (0.06%)
  • Its best rank, #43 in 2003, was only 1 in 306 (0.33%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1990s
  • 30.5% of all girls named Brooke (60,630) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1930s29#2,922 (1939)#3,439
1940s408#1,104 (1949)#1,340
1950s750#798 (1953)#1,184
1960s2,058#480 (1969)#774
1970s14,512#85 (1979)#231
1980s34,977#52 (1981)#86
1990s60,630#45 (1996)#54
2000s54,686#43 (2003)#49
2010s23,808#73 (2010)#144
2020s6,633#236 (2020)#281

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Brooke in 1963

girls
#856
149 births · 1 in 12,936 girls
boys
#1,354
33 births · 1 in 61,548 boys

Top girls' names in 1963

  1. #1Lisa56,047
  2. #2Mary41,546
  3. #3Susan33,991
  4. #4Karen32,492
  5. #5Linda27,727
  6. #6Donna25,405
  7. #7Patricia25,374
  8. #8Lori23,899
  9. #9Sandra21,621
  10. #10Cynthia21,589
  11. #856Brooke149

Top boys' names in 1963

  1. #1Michael83,771
  2. #2John78,636
  3. #3David78,444
  4. #4James71,294
  5. #5Robert70,007
  6. #6Mark49,342
  7. #7William44,453
  8. #8Richard40,772
  9. #9Thomas35,490
  10. #10Jeffrey31,701
  11. #1,354Brooke33
More about 1963

girls

1,927,507 girls got a published name in 1963; 1 in 12,936 of them was named Brooke, which outranked 88.8% of the 7,661 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 16.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Brooke
  1. #852Tamie151
  2. #854Beatriz150
  3. #854Cathie150
  4. #856Brooke149
  5. #856Annetta149
  6. #856Elva149
  7. #856Trena149
  8. #861Collette148
  9. #861Hillary148
  10. #861Margot148

Tied with 4 names at #856; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1962
Risers
  1. ↑ 631Zena#1,323 → #692
  2. ↑ 623Zina#992 → #369
  3. ↑ 540Trisha#1,020 → #480
  4. ↑ 457Shirl#1,304 → #847
  5. ↑ 396Glynis#992 → #596
Fallers
  1. ↓ 1,195Marnita#727 → #1,922
  2. ↓ 255Velvet#623 → #878
  3. ↓ 235Delphine#904 → #1,139
  4. ↓ 224Rosita#934 → #1,158
  5. ↓ 197Lindy#885 → #1,082

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

boys

2,031,078 boys got a published name in 1963; 1 in 61,548 of them was named Brooke, which outranked 70.7% of the 4,621 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 28.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Brooke
  1. #1,338Reagan34
  2. #1,338Tyree34
  3. #1,338Werner34
  4. #1,354Brooke33
  5. #1,354Abner33
  6. #1,354Colby33
  7. #1,354Conley33
  8. #1,375Ari32
  9. #1,375Bo32
  10. #1,375Brennan32

Tied with 20 names at #1,354; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1962
Risers
  1. ↑ 1,551Tal#2,364 → #813
  2. ↑ 1,141Jaimie#1,962 → #821
  3. ↑ 540Stoney#1,038 → #498
  4. ↑ 364Pamela#1,311 → #947
  5. ↑ 331Giovanni#1,242 → #911
Fallers
  1. ↓ 324Olin#871 → #1,195
  2. ↓ 295Enoch#984 → #1,279
  3. ↓ 285Rand#953 → #1,238
  4. ↓ 283Vernell#996 → #1,279
  5. ↓ 269Bentley#926 → #1,195

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1963 →