Buford
Last seen for girls in 1952 at #5,563 · #10,695 for boys in 2025, 6 births
Given to boys 99.0% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1910 · 63 births
- Debut · boys
- 11 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 10,854since 1880
Buford over time
Rank among boys' names. Buford has never cracked the top 300 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #10,695 | 6 | |
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | #12,239 | 5 | |
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | — | — | ||
| 2018 | — | — | ||
| 2017 | — | — | ||
| 2016 | — | #12,185 | 5 | |
| 2015 | — | — | ||
| 2014 | — | — | ||
| 2013 | — | — | ||
| 2012 | — | #12,274 | 5 | |
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | — | — | ||
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | — | #10,662 | 6 | |
| 2005 | — | #7,096 | 10 | |
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | #8,643 | 7 | |
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | #6,839 | 9 | |
| 1999 | — | #7,874 | 7 | |
| 1998 | — | #8,479 | 6 | |
| 1997 | — | #8,110 | 6 | |
| 1996 | — | #7,136 | 7 | |
| 1995 | — | #5,928 | 9 | |
| 1994 | — | #7,770 | 6 | |
| 1993 | — | #4,697 | 12 | |
| 1992 | — | #7,422 | 6 | |
| 1991 | — | #4,476 | 12 | |
| 1990 | — | #3,467 | 17 | |
| 1989 | — | #4,017 | 13 | |
| 1988 | — | #3,523 | 14 | |
| 1987 | — | #3,201 | 15 | |
| 1986 | — | #2,429 | 22 | |
| 1985 | — | #2,226 | 24 | |
| 1984 | — | #2,824 | 16 | |
| 1983 | — | #2,577 | 18 | |
| 1982 | — | #1,774 | 32 | |
| 1981 | — | #2,496 | 19 | |
| 1980 | — | #1,852 | 30 | |
| 1979 | — | #1,510 | 39 | |
| 1978 | — | #1,718 | 31 | |
| 1977 | — | #1,571 | 35 | |
| 1976 | — | #1,608 | 33 | |
| 1975 | — | #1,258 | 46 | |
| 1974 | — | #1,439 | 36 | |
| 1973 | — | #1,548 | 31 | |
| 1972 | — | #1,771 | 25 | |
| 1971 | — | #1,214 | 46 | |
| 1970 | — | #1,132 | 53 | |
| 1969 | — | #1,027 | 56 | |
| 1968 | — | #1,083 | 47 | |
| 1967 | — | #1,102 | 45 | |
| 1966 | — | #1,164 | 41 | |
| 1965 | — | #897 | 67 | |
| 1964 | — | #967 | 62 | |
| 1963 | — | #1,027 | 54 | |
| 1962 | — | #939 | 65 | |
| 1961 | — | #855 | 80 | |
| 1960 | — | #905 | 70 | |
| 1959 | — | #950 | 65 | |
| 1958 | — | #928 | 67 | |
| 1957 | — | #845 | 79 | |
| 1956 | — | #708 | 108 | |
| 1955 | — | #756 | 93 | |
| 1954 | — | #732 | 97 | |
| 1953 | — | #686 | 108 | |
| 1952 | #5,563 | 5 | #660 | 109 |
| 1951 | — | #675 | 107 | |
| 1950 | — | #599 | 130 | |
| 1949 | — | #550 | 148 | |
| 1948 | — | #560 | 143 | |
| 1947 | — | #526 | 166 | |
| 1946 | — | #534 | 145 | |
| 1945 | — | #525 | 129 | |
| 1944 | — | #464 | 172 | |
| 1943 | — | #451 | 198 | |
| 1942 | — | #457 | 182 | |
| 1941 | — | #432 | 183 | |
| 1940 | #4,349 | 5 | #427 | 186 |
| 1939 | — | #446 | 164 | |
| 1938 | — | #405 | 196 | |
| 1937 | — | #406 | 193 | |
| 1936 | #3,376 | 7 | #445 | 160 |
| 1935 | — | #424 | 174 | |
| 1934 | — | #374 | 211 | |
| 1933 | — | #418 | 169 | |
| 1932 | — | #368 | 228 | |
| 1931 | — | #399 | 200 | |
| 1930 | — | #370 | 240 | |
| 1929 | — | #378 | 230 | |
| 1928 | #4,195 | 6 | #379 | 240 |
| 1927 | #4,805 | 5 | #377 | 242 |
| 1926 | #3,046 | 10 | #359 | 264 |
| 1925 | — | #347 | 283 | |
| 1924 | — | #334 | 304 | |
| 1923 | #3,971 | 7 | #352 | 279 |
| 1922 | #4,011 | 7 | #334 | 305 |
| 1921 | — | #318 | 334 | |
| 1920 | #4,975 | 5 | #353 | 278 |
| 1919 | #4,251 | 6 | #357 | 258 |
| 1918 | #3,869 | 7 | #370 | 252 |
| 1917 | #4,594 | 5 | #353 | 249 |
| 1916 | #4,417 | 5 | #341 | 244 |
| 1915 | #4,274 | 5 | #372 | 209 |
| 1914 | — | #368 | 165 | |
| 1913 | #2,827 | 6 | #357 | 136 |
| 1912 | #2,144 | 8 | #370 | 108 |
| 1911 | — | #389 | 53 | |
| 1910 | #2,140 | 6 | #311 | 63 |
| 1909 | — | #408 | 36 | |
| 1908 | #2,101 | 5 | #326 | 47 |
| 1907 | — | #464 | 25 | |
| 1906 | — | #400 | 29 | |
| 1905 | — | #329 | 37 | |
| 1904 | — | #417 | 25 | |
| 1903 | — | #401 | 24 | |
| 1902 | — | #583 | 14 | |
| 1901 | — | #466 | 17 | |
| 1900 | — | #477 | 23 | |
| 1899 | — | #438 | 18 | |
| 1898 | — | #485 | 18 | |
| 1897 | — | #515 | 15 | |
| 1896 | — | #500 | 17 | |
| 1895 | — | #437 | 20 | |
| 1894 | — | #480 | 17 | |
| 1893 | — | #572 | 12 | |
| 1892 | — | #547 | 14 | |
| 1891 | — | #524 | 12 | |
| 1890 | — | #533 | 13 | |
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | #554 | 13 | |
| 1887 | — | #631 | 9 | |
| 1886 | — | #758 | 7 | |
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | #613 | 10 | |
| 1883 | — | #597 | 10 | |
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | #595 | 9 | |
| 1880 | — | #571 | 11 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Buford was already there! It came in at #571, and was given to 11 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1882, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Buford is popular in 1939
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Tennessee#150 · 1 in 966
- Virginia#204 · 1 in 1,445
- Kentucky#210 · 1 in 1,708
- Alabama#234 · 1 in 1,996
- Mississippi#238 · 1 in 1,919
Best ever in a state: #78 in Tennessee, 1910.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tennessee | #150 | 28 | 1 in 966 |
| Virginia | #204 | 16 | 1 in 1,445 |
| Kentucky | #210 | 16 | 1 in 1,708 |
| Alabama | #234 | 14 | 1 in 1,996 |
| Mississippi | #238 | 11 | 1 in 1,919 |
| West Virginia | #247 | 9 | 1 in 2,108 |
| Arkansas | #298 | 7 | 1 in 2,588 |
| Georgia | #346 | 8 | 1 in 3,818 |
| Oklahoma | #358 | 5 | 1 in 4,171 |
| Missouri | #366 | 5 | 1 in 5,589 |
| North Carolina | #402 | 7 | 1 in 5,169 |
| Texas | #487 | 12 | 1 in 4,905 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Buford
- Biggest jump: 182 spots in 1903 (#583 → #401)
- Biggest drop: 267 spots in 1966 (#897 → #1,164)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1910 at #311 (63 births)
- Births halved by 1972, 62 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 82 yrs · run 1890–1962
- Highest: 1 in 3,083 boys born in 1910 were named Buford (0.03%)
- Latest: 1 in 284,679 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 25.4% of all boys named Buford (2,759) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 69 | #554 (1888) | #617 |
| 1890s | 156 | #437 (1895) | #503 |
| 1900s | 277 | #326 (1908) | #427 |
| 1910s | 1,737 | #311 (1910) | #359 |
| 1920s | 2,759 | #318 (1921) | #353 |
| 1930s | 1,935 | #368 (1932) | #406 |
| 1940s | 1,652 | #427 (1940) | #493 |
| 1950s | 963 | #599 (1950) | #754 |
| 1960s | 587 | #855 (1961) | #997 |
| 1970s | 375 | #1,132 (1970) | #1,477 |
| 1980s | 203 | #1,774 (1982) | #2,692 |
| 1990s | 88 | #3,467 (1990) | #6,536 |
| 2000s | 32 | #6,839 (2000) | #8,310 |
| 2010s | 10 | #12,185 (2016) | #12,230 |
| 2020s | 11 | #10,695 (2025) | #11,467 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Buford in 1939
Top boys' names in 1939
More about 1939
boys
1,106,852 boys got a published name in 1939; 1 in 6,749 of them was named Buford, which outranked 88.8% of the 3,968 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).