Burnell

Last seen for girls in 1964 at #6,009 · Last seen for boys in 2022 at #12,330
Given to boys 82.5% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · boys
1920 · 67 births
Debut · boys
5 births
In top 100 · boys
never
of 146 years
Total births · boys
2,790
since 1906

Burnell over time

girlsboys

Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201943peak #1,555, 1929peak #816, 1920girlsboys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025——
2024——
2023——
2022—#12,3305
2021——
2020—#12,0225
2019——
2018——
2017—#12,2465
2016—#12,1855
2015——
2014——
2013—#7,53710
2012——
2011—#9,6007
2010—#9,6937
2009——
2008——
2007——
2006—#10,6626
2005——
2004—#8,1438
2003—#10,8945
2002——
2001—#10,5565
2000—#10,3495
1999—#5,31712
1998—#5,15912
1997——
1996—#6,4968
1995—#8,8685
1994——
1993—#4,44713
1992—#4,87211
1991—#4,76011
1990—#3,60716
1989—#3,61815
1988—#4,7869
1987—#4,23910
1986—#4,4579
1985—#3,80511
1984—#3,10714
1983—#3,23013
1982—#3,48212
1981—#2,77916
1980—#3,25613
1979—#3,16813
1978—#2,47318
1977—#2,91014
1976—#2,70915
1975—#2,54016
1974—#2,79913
1973—#2,31117
1972—#2,81912
1971—#3,14610
1970—#1,98920
1969—#1,91419
1968—#1,54426
1967—#1,57324
1966—#2,46511
1965—#1,98716
1964#6,0096#1,61524
1963#6,5925#2,04416
1962—#1,38732
1961#6,5675#1,99717
1960—#1,43431
1959—#1,50128
1958#6,1035#1,30535
1957#4,2029#1,25039
1956—#1,20340
1955#3,77810#1,41929
1954#4,2788#1,38230
1953#3,48011#1,01551
1952#2,80615#1,02749
1951#4,8336#1,29532
1950—#1,28931
1949#3,8928#1,07243
1948#3,5939#1,07943
1947#4,3457#1,09344
1946#4,4176#1,17635
1945#3,1329#1,01639
1944#2,40114#1,07038
1943#1,59128#1,17034
1942#2,21416#1,08939
1941#3,5597#93846
1940#2,57211#90449
1939#2,12515#1,05237
1938#2,44712#97742
1937#1,78419#86950
1936#2,15314#97241
1935#3,1568#90349
1934#2,74110#1,00741
1933#2,68810#82456
1932#2,03716#92449
1931#1,80319#93948
1930#1,74821#90954
1929#1,55525#93052
1928#1,96119#95051
1927#3,8757#1,00149
1926#2,16517#94452
1925#1,84722#87159
1924#2,13718#96053
1923#2,09118#91356
1922#3,15210#90559
1921#2,12018#86864
1920#2,01519#81667
1919#2,51513#1,02444
1918#2,02918#94350
1917#3,0929#98244
1916#2,36813#97243
1915#3,7956#87949
1914#2,6388#1,12726
1913#2,1649#93028
1912#2,9795#93523
1911—#1,11710
1910—#1,1189
1909—#1,0209
1908——
1907——
1906—#1,2535
1905——
1904——
1903——
1902——
1901——
1900——
1899——
1898——
1897——
1896——
1895——
1894——
1893——
1892——
1891——
1890——
1889——
1888——
1887——
1886——
1885——
1884——
1883——
1882——
1881——
1880——
First appearance
1906

The first year at least five boys were named Burnell! It came in at #1,253, and was given to 5 baby boys.


Quietest stretch: 1906–1908, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.

Where Burnell is popular in 1943

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedMNIllinois: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedILWisconsin: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedMINew York: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedCTCalifornia: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedCAUtah: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedOKLouisiana: #402 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 3,877 boysLAMississippi: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedHITexas: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedTXFlorida: fewer than 5 boys named Burnell, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · boys
  1. Louisiana#402 · 1 in 3,877

Best ever in a state: #142 in South Dakota, 1920.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Louisiana#40271 in 3,877
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
California———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Illinois———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
New York———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Texas———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Burnell
Momentum · boys
Faded out
  • Not published in 2025; last seen 2022
  • Biggest jump: 248 spots in 1915 (#1,127 → #879)
  • Biggest drop: 197 spots in 1914 (#930 → #1,127)
Rise & fade · boys
14 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1906
  • Peaked 1920 at #816 (67 births)
  • Births halved by 1950, 30 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 25 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 25 yrs · run 1920–1926
Share of babies · boys
1 in 15,886
  • Highest: 1 in 15,886 boys born in 1920 were named Burnell (0.01%)
  • Latest: 1 in 349,202 boys born in 2022 (0.00%)
Era · boys
The 1920s
  • 20.1% of all boys named Burnell (562) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Never flipped
  • The majority has never changed
all girlsall boys
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1900s14#1,020 (1909)#1,137
1910s326#879 (1915)#1,003
1920s562#816 (1920)#916
1930s467#824 (1933)#938
1940s410#904 (1940)#1,061
1950s364#1,015 (1953)#1,269
1960s216#1,387 (1962)#1,796
1970s148#1,989 (1970)#2,686
1980s122#2,779 (1981)#3,676
1990s88#3,607 (1990)#5,441
2000s29#8,143 (2004)#10,121
2010s34#7,537 (2013)#10,252
2020s10#12,022 (2020)#12,176

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Burnell in 1943

girls
#1,591
28 births · 1 in 49,832 girls
boys
#1,170
34 births · 1 in 41,979 boys

Top girls' names in 1943

  1. #1Mary66,174
  2. #2Barbara43,432
  3. #3Patricia39,620
  4. #4Linda38,439
  5. #5Carol31,686
  6. #6Sandra25,990
  7. #7Judith25,214
  8. #8Sharon24,712
  9. #9Nancy23,988
  10. #10Betty21,596
  11. #1,591Burnell28

Top boys' names in 1943

  1. #1James80,278
  2. #2Robert74,892
  3. #3John68,929
  4. #4William55,904
  5. #5Richard46,339
  6. #6David37,240
  7. #7Charles36,632
  8. #8Thomas32,874
  9. #9Ronald29,239
  10. #10Michael24,745
  11. #1,170Burnell34
More about 1943

girls

1,395,293 girls got a published name in 1943; 1 in 49,832 of them was named Burnell, which outranked 70.4% of the 5,367 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 24.4% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Burnell
  1. #1,556Tonie29
  2. #1,556Verlie29
  3. #1,556Waneta29
  4. #1,591Burnell28
  5. #1,591Ardyce28
  6. #1,591Aretha28
  7. #1,591Bari28
  8. #1,625Arlean27
  9. #1,625Betti27
  10. #1,625Carolene27

Tied with 33 names at #1,591; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1942
Risers
  1. ↑ 878Tana#1,559 → #681
  2. ↑ 754Rozanne#1,706 → #952
  3. ↑ 722Cheryle#1,592 → #870
  4. ↑ 596Tena#1,592 → #996
  5. ↑ 525Alexis#1,349 → #824
Fallers
  1. ↓ 594Florida#997 → #1,591
  2. ↓ 467Jerilynn#581 → #1,048
  3. ↓ 364Lorelei#864 → #1,228
  4. ↓ 308Kaaren#536 → #844
  5. ↓ 305Erna#864 → #1,169

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

boys

1,427,297 boys got a published name in 1943; 1 in 41,979 of them was named Burnell, which outranked 71.0% of the 4,040 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 34.1% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Burnell
  1. #1,155Nevin35
  2. #1,155Odie35
  3. #1,155Wendel35
  4. #1,170Burnell34
  5. #1,170Alec34
  6. #1,170Allison34
  7. #1,170Casper34
  8. #1,187Acie33
  9. #1,187Bartholomew33
  10. #1,187Darl33

Tied with 16 names at #1,170; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1942
Risers
  1. ↑ 514Derek#1,228 → #714
  2. ↑ 465Armond#1,421 → #956
  3. ↑ 368Les#1,214 → #846
  4. ↑ 347Aron#1,244 → #897
  5. ↑ 321Edsel#1,167 → #846
Fallers
  1. ↓ 500Humberto#780 → #1,280
  2. ↓ 352Chauncey#928 → #1,280
  3. ↓ 352Clearence#991 → #1,343
  4. ↓ 344Macarthur#512 → #856
  5. ↓ 325Reyes#933 → #1,258

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1943 →