Burnett

Last seen for girls in 1970 at #7,995 · Last seen for boys in 1994 at #8,800
Given to boys 84.7% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · boys
1887 · 9 births
Debut · boys
5 births
In top 100 · boys
never
of 146 years
Total births · boys
1,561
since 1882

Burnett over time

girlsboys

Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201928peak #2,360, 1912peak #631, 1887girlsboys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025——
2024——
2023——
2022——
2021——
2020——
2019——
2018——
2017——
2016——
2015——
2014——
2013——
2012——
2011——
2010——
2009——
2008——
2007——
2006——
2005——
2004——
2003——
2002——
2001——
2000——
1999——
1998——
1997——
1996——
1995——
1994—#8,8005
1993——
1992——
1991——
1990——
1989——
1988——
1987—#5,4597
1986—#4,8538
1985——
1984——
1983——
1982—#5,6196
1981—#3,85810
1980—#5,5256
1979——
1978—#5,0596
1977——
1976—#5,5875
1975——
1974—#4,1907
1973—#3,22310
1972—#4,9865
1971—#3,9637
1970#7,9955#2,39915
1969—#3,5957
1968#5,1478#3,3657
1967—#3,5596
1966—#2,46511
1965#6,5395#2,08415
1964—#2,04016
1963—#2,30013
1962#6,5785#1,75721
1961—#2,40912
1960#5,6966#1,85819
1959—#1,86519
1958#6,1035#1,72421
1957—#1,75121
1956#4,8377#1,88618
1955#5,8285#1,53825
1954#3,32512#1,62822
1953#2,92114#1,83618
1952#4,4837#1,93916
1951—#2,24612
1950#3,05212#1,46425
1949#4,6736#1,70219
1948#4,2057#1,32330
1947#4,7646#1,78618
1946#4,9605#1,38226
1945—#1,58118
1944#4,0546#1,31126
1943#3,8017#1,28029
1942—#1,46723
1941#3,2528#1,48521
1940—#1,33425
1939#3,7826#1,03338
1938—#1,47621
1937—#1,75616
1936#3,1038#1,72316
1935—#1,49421
1934#3,8026#1,26628
1933#2,8689#1,40523
1932—#1,28628
1931—#1,53821
1930—#1,46325
1929#3,3948#1,84817
1928#4,1956#1,32330
1927#3,2849#1,26733
1926#4,3066#1,46625
1925#3,6648#1,18436
1924#5,0615#1,20436
1923#4,3766#1,10142
1922—#1,25933
1921#2,94111#1,15938
1920#3,09710#1,07343
1919#3,2199#1,13937
1918#3,2449#1,34328
1917#4,5945#1,03340
1916#3,2588#1,15732
1915#4,2745#1,05437
1914—#1,15325
1913#3,1875#1,17319
1912#2,3607#1,09518
1911—#1,11710
1910—#85913
1909——
1908—#65716
1907—#1,0947
1906—#1,1116
1905——
1904——
1903——
1902——
1901——
1900—#78511
1899——
1898—#1,1215
1897——
1896—#1,1015
1895——
1894——
1893——
1892——
1891——
1890——
1889——
1888—#9176
1887—#6319
1886——
1885—#8366
1884——
1883——
1882—#9435
1881——
1880——
First appearance
1882

The first year at least five boys were named Burnett! It came in at #943, and was given to 5 baby boys.


Quietest stretch: 1882–1884, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.

Where Burnett is popular in 1928

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedMNIllinois: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedILWisconsin: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedMINew York: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedCTCalifornia: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedCAUtah: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedHITexas: #889 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 11,606 boysTXFlorida: fewer than 5 boys named Burnett, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · boys
  1. Texas#889 · 1 in 11,606

Best ever in a state: #209 in Kansas, 1917.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Texas#88951 in 11,606
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
California———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Illinois———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
New York———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Burnett
Momentum · boys
Faded out
  • Not published in 2025; last seen 1994
  • Biggest jump: 437 spots in 1908 (#1,094 → #657)
  • Biggest drop: 286 spots in 1888 (#631 → #917)
Rise & fade · boys
5 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1882
  • Peaked 1887 at #631 (9 births)
  • Births halved by 1889, 2 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 7 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 7 yrs · run 1887–1888
Share of babies · boys
1 in 9,646
  • Highest: 1 in 9,646 boys born in 1908 were named Burnett (0.01%)
  • Latest: 1 in 386,406 boys born in 1994 (0.00%)
  • Its best rank, #631 in 1887, was only 1 in 11,268 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 1920s
  • 21.3% of all boys named Burnett (333) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 1969
  • Mostly girls until 1968, mostly boys since
all girlsall boys
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s26#631 (1887)#832
1890s10#1,101 (1896)#1,111
1900s40#657 (1908)#912
1910s259#859 (1910)#1,112
1920s333#1,073 (1920)#1,288
1930s237#1,033 (1939)#1,444
1940s235#1,280 (1943)#1,465
1950s197#1,464 (1950)#1,788
1960s127#1,757 (1962)#2,543
1970s55#2,399 (1970)#4,201
1980s37#3,858 (1981)#5,063
1990s5#8,800 (1994)#8,800

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Burnett in 1928

girls
#4,195
6 births · 1 in 192,220 girls
boys
#1,323
30 births · 1 in 36,920 boys

Top girls' names in 1928

  1. #1Mary66,871
  2. #2Betty36,083
  3. #3Dorothy33,733
  4. #4Helen22,937
  5. #5Margaret20,295
  6. #6Ruth17,859
  7. #7Doris16,575
  8. #8Barbara14,872
  9. #9Virginia14,500
  10. #10Shirley14,215
  11. #4,195Burnett6

Top boys' names in 1928

  1. #1Robert60,701
  2. #2John53,760
  3. #3James52,752
  4. #4William49,118
  5. #5Charles31,243
  6. #6Richard28,793
  7. #7Donald25,704
  8. #8George24,391
  9. #9Joseph22,322
  10. #10Edward18,492
  11. #1,323Burnett30
More about 1928

girls

1,153,318 girls got a published name in 1928; 1 in 192,220 of them was named Burnett, which outranked 22.9% of the 5,440 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.4% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Burnett
  1. #3,743Zenola7
  2. #3,743Zenora7
  3. #3,743Zoa7
  4. #4,195Burnett6
  5. #4,195Ader6
  6. #4,195Adina6
  7. #4,195Agusta6
  8. #4,725Adamae5
  9. #4,725Adelma5
  10. #4,725Adlena5

Tied with 529 names at #4,195; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1927
Risers
  1. ↑ 2,165Jeanine#3,053 → #888
  2. ↑ 1,368Joline#2,256 → #888
  3. ↑ 1,101Lorelei#2,095 → #994
  4. ↑ 1,063Jeannine#1,384 → #321
  5. ↑ 859Romona#1,456 → #597
Fallers
  1. ↓ 860Valencia#924 → #1,784
  2. ↓ 547Kazuko#955 → #1,502
  3. ↓ 386Matilde#924 → #1,310
  4. ↓ 368Glendora#747 → #1,115
  5. ↓ 366Hilma#924 → #1,290

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

boys

1,107,613 boys got a published name in 1928; 1 in 36,920 of them was named Burnett, which outranked 72.0% of the 4,723 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.2% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Burnett
  1. #1,293Norma31
  2. #1,293Ruffus31
  3. #1,293Therman31
  4. #1,323Burnett30
  5. #1,323Albino30
  6. #1,323Braxton30
  7. #1,323Burnice30
  8. #1,353Adrien29
  9. #1,353Alcide29
  10. #1,353Alvah29

Tied with 29 names at #1,323; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1927
Risers
  1. ↑ 1,009Fidencio#1,959 → #950
  2. ↑ 766Hoover#1,128 → #362
  3. ↑ 700Reyes#1,692 → #992
  4. ↑ 441Arlen#1,227 → #786
  5. ↑ 392Arland#1,372 → #980
Fallers
  1. ↓ 2,975Shoji#722 → #3,697
  2. ↓ 529Alvan#951 → #1,480
  3. ↓ 418Watson#964 → #1,382
  4. ↓ 412Judge#911 → #1,323
  5. ↓ 363Donato#990 → #1,353

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1928 →