Caeden
Last seen for girls in 2011 at #16,764 · #3,658 for boys in 2025, 30 births
Given to boys 98.7% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2002 · 127 births
- Debut · boys
- 6 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 2,181since 1994
Caeden over time
Rank among boys' names. Caeden has never cracked the top 1,000 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #3,658 | 30 | |
| 2024 | — | #3,455 | 33 | |
| 2023 | — | #3,228 | 37 | |
| 2022 | — | #2,675 | 49 | |
| 2021 | — | #2,918 | 42 | |
| 2020 | — | #2,886 | 41 | |
| 2019 | — | #2,943 | 41 | |
| 2018 | — | #2,893 | 41 | |
| 2017 | — | #2,798 | 43 | |
| 2016 | — | #2,228 | 60 | |
| 2015 | — | #1,895 | 77 | |
| 2014 | — | #1,979 | 72 | |
| 2013 | — | #1,733 | 84 | |
| 2012 | — | #1,637 | 94 | |
| 2011 | #16,764 | 5 | #1,459 | 112 |
| 2010 | — | #1,408 | 118 | |
| 2009 | #13,704 | 7 | #1,202 | 150 |
| 2008 | #17,504 | 5 | #1,263 | 138 |
| 2007 | #15,491 | 6 | #1,287 | 135 |
| 2006 | — | #1,289 | 129 | |
| 2005 | — | #1,372 | 109 | |
| 2004 | #14,179 | 6 | #1,251 | 120 |
| 2003 | — | #1,348 | 101 | |
| 2002 | — | #1,127 | 127 | |
| 2001 | — | #1,629 | 72 | |
| 2000 | — | #1,815 | 59 | |
| 1999 | — | #2,608 | 33 | |
| 1998 | — | #5,466 | 11 | |
| 1997 | — | #8,110 | 6 | |
| 1996 | — | #7,971 | 6 | |
| 1995 | — | #8,868 | 5 | |
| 1994 | — | #7,770 | 6 | |
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Caeden! It came in at #7,770, and was given to 6 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1994–1997, when fewer than 7 boys a year got the name.
Where Caeden is popular in 2002
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Nebraska#349 · 1 in 2,050
- Utah#490 · 1 in 3,578
- Washington#634 · 1 in 5,589
- Ohio#804 · 1 in 9,572
- Texas#857 · 1 in 10,268
Best ever in a state: #320 in Nebraska, 2005.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nebraska | #349 | 5 | 1 in 2,050 |
| Utah | #490 | 6 | 1 in 3,578 |
| Washington | #634 | 6 | 1 in 5,589 |
| Ohio | #804 | 7 | 1 in 9,572 |
| Texas | #857 | 17 | 1 in 10,268 |
| Michigan | #974 | 5 | 1 in 11,227 |
| Georgia | #1,062 | 5 | 1 in 11,162 |
| California | #1,323 | 11 | 1 in 22,278 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Caeden
- 203 spots since 2024 (#3,455 → #3,658)
- 772 spots since 2020 (#2,886 → #3,658)
- 1,763 spots since 2015 (#1,895 → #3,658)
- Debuted 1994
- Peaked 2002 at #1,127 (127 births)
- Births halved by 2016, 14 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 13,224 boys born in 2009 were named Caeden (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 56,936 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #1,127 in 2002, was only 1 in 15,288 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 52.3% of all boys named Caeden (1,140) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 67 | #2,608 (1999) | #6,799 |
| 2000s | 1,140 | #1,127 (2002) | #1,358 |
| 2010s | 742 | #1,408 (2010) | #2,097 |
| 2020s | 232 | #2,675 (2022) | #3,137 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Caeden in 2002
Top boys' names in 2002
More about 2002
boys
1,941,514 boys got a published name in 2002; 1 in 15,288 of them was named Caeden, which outranked 91.0% of the 12,489 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 12.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).