Caiden
- Last seen for girls in 2024 at #15,293
- #602 for boys in 2025, 475 births
- Given to boys 97.8% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 2008 · 1,403 births
- Debut · boys
- 6 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 23,341since 1990
Caiden over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Caiden has never cracked the top 200 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #602 | 475 | |
| 2024 | #15,293 | 5 | #545 | 544 |
| 2023 | #12,197 | 7 | #496 | 608 |
| 2022 | #15,306 | 5 | #434 | 713 |
| 2021 | #11,146 | 8 | #420 | 735 |
| 2020 | #7,969 | 13 | #383 | 801 |
| 2019 | #9,112 | 11 | #354 | 931 |
| 2018 | #7,762 | 14 | #348 | 948 |
| 2017 | #7,442 | 15 | #325 | 1,049 |
| 2016 | #5,622 | 23 | #312 | 1,133 |
| 2015 | #7,266 | 16 | #284 | 1,295 |
| 2014 | #6,451 | 19 | #272 | 1,354 |
| 2013 | #5,317 | 25 | #271 | 1,301 |
| 2012 | #5,557 | 24 | #295 | 1,195 |
| 2011 | #5,728 | 23 | #287 | 1,228 |
| 2010 | #4,735 | 30 | #266 | 1,297 |
| 2009 | #4,013 | 38 | #262 | 1,329 |
| 2008 | #3,779 | 42 | #250 | 1,403 |
| 2007 | #3,482 | 47 | #284 | 1,213 |
| 2006 | #5,086 | 27 | #312 | 1,032 |
| 2005 | #3,587 | 41 | #349 | 849 |
| 2004 | #4,601 | 29 | #399 | 657 |
| 2003 | #4,943 | 25 | #512 | 471 |
| 2002 | #7,045 | 15 | #681 | 269 |
| 2001 | #8,758 | 11 | #978 | 157 |
| 2000 | — | #1,187 | 115 | |
| 1999 | — | #1,383 | 85 | |
| 1998 | — | #1,957 | 49 | |
| 1997 | — | #2,546 | 31 | |
| 1996 | #9,581 | 8 | #3,202 | 22 |
| 1995 | — | #3,693 | 17 | |
| 1994 | — | #3,215 | 21 | |
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | #5,942 | 8 | |
| 1990 | — | #7,178 | 6 | |
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1990
The first year at least five boys were named Caiden! It came in at #7,178, and was given to 6 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1992–1993, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Caiden is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- Connecticut#281 · 1 in 1,201
- Mississippi#333 · 1 in 1,204
- South Carolina#372 · 1 in 1,514
- Kentucky#375 · 1 in 1,580
- New Jersey#377 · 1 in 1,894
Best ever in a state: #100 in Delaware, 2015.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connecticut | #281 | 11 | 1 in 1,201 |
| Mississippi | #333 | 9 | 1 in 1,204 |
| South Carolina | #372 | 14 | 1 in 1,514 |
| Kentucky | #375 | 13 | 1 in 1,580 |
| New Jersey | #377 | 21 | 1 in 1,894 |
| Massachusetts | #378 | 13 | 1 in 2,079 |
| Virginia | #408 | 19 | 1 in 1,961 |
| Florida | #421 | 46 | 1 in 2,077 |
| Maryland | #437 | 11 | 1 in 2,082 |
| North Carolina | #447 | 24 | 1 in 2,145 |
| Alabama | #450 | 11 | 1 in 1,956 |
| Louisiana | #450 | 10 | 1 in 1,913 |
| Kansas | #468 | 7 | 1 in 2,007 |
| New York | #481 | 34 | 1 in 2,483 |
| Ohio | #513 | 20 | 1 in 2,627 |
| Georgia | #541 | 19 | 1 in 2,643 |
| Wisconsin | #570 | 8 | 1 in 2,929 |
| Indiana | #579 | 11 | 1 in 2,878 |
| Pennsylvania | #605 | 15 | 1 in 3,484 |
| Illinois | #606 | 15 | 1 in 3,303 |
| Tennessee | #638 | 11 | 1 in 3,343 |
| Minnesota | #640 | 7 | 1 in 3,500 |
| Missouri | #709 | 7 | 1 in 3,973 |
| Michigan | #715 | 10 | 1 in 4,019 |
| Texas | #749 | 36 | 1 in 4,863 |
| Colorado | #756 | 6 | 1 in 4,475 |
| California | #776 | 33 | 1 in 5,317 |
| Arizona | #844 | 6 | 1 in 5,454 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Caiden
Momentum · boys
Falling
- 219 spots since 2020 (#383 → #602)
- Biggest jump: 297 spots in 2002
- Biggest drop: 62 spots in 2023
Rise & fade · boys
18 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1990
- Peaked 2008 at #250 (1,403 births)
- Births halved by 2023, 15 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 25 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 25 yrs · run 2001–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 1,419
- Highest: 1 in 1,419 boys born in 2014 were named Caiden (0.07%)
- Latest: 1 in 3,596 boys born in 2025 (0.03%)
- Its best rank, #250 in 2008, was only 1 in 1,454 (0.07%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 2010s
- 50.3% of all boys named Caiden (11,731) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 239 | #1,383 (1999) | #3,640 |
| 2000s | 7,495 | #250 (2008) | #521 |
| 2010s | 11,731 | #266 (2010) | #301 |
| 2020s | 3,876 | #383 (2020) | #480 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Caiden ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: