Caitlin
#2,326 for girls in 2025, 78 births · Last seen for boys in 2004 at #6,138
Given to girls 99.7% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1988 · 7,246 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 17 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 112,143since 1955
Caitlin over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,326 | 78 | — | |
| 2024 | #1,681 | 121 | — | |
| 2023 | #2,288 | 80 | — | |
| 2022 | #2,193 | 86 | — | |
| 2021 | #2,186 | 85 | — | |
| 2020 | #1,792 | 110 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,523 | 142 | — | |
| 2018 | #1,360 | 166 | — | |
| 2017 | #1,416 | 161 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,152 | 218 | — | |
| 2015 | #610 | 477 | — | |
| 2014 | #496 | 628 | — | |
| 2013 | #468 | 654 | — | |
| 2012 | #424 | 741 | — | |
| 2011 | #393 | 803 | — | |
| 2010 | #339 | 945 | — | |
| 2009 | #267 | 1,216 | — | |
| 2008 | #235 | 1,459 | — | |
| 2007 | #230 | 1,530 | — | |
| 2006 | #209 | 1,653 | — | |
| 2005 | #193 | 1,778 | — | |
| 2004 | #161 | 2,050 | #6,138 | 12 |
| 2003 | #142 | 2,311 | — | |
| 2002 | #123 | 2,743 | — | |
| 2001 | #89 | 3,456 | — | |
| 2000 | #76 | 4,102 | #10,349 | 5 |
| 1999 | #93 | 3,461 | #8,704 | 6 |
| 1998 | #78 | 4,175 | #8,479 | 6 |
| 1997 | #88 | 3,862 | #7,281 | 7 |
| 1996 | #84 | 4,268 | #6,496 | 8 |
| 1995 | #81 | 4,384 | #4,508 | 13 |
| 1994 | #78 | 4,654 | #7,770 | 6 |
| 1993 | #64 | 5,428 | #8,700 | 5 |
| 1992 | #62 | 5,391 | #4,564 | 12 |
| 1991 | #55 | 6,384 | #4,476 | 12 |
| 1990 | #50 | 7,026 | #3,058 | 20 |
| 1989 | #49 | 7,025 | #1,733 | 44 |
| 1988 | #44 | 7,246 | #2,197 | 28 |
| 1987 | #63 | 4,989 | #2,215 | 26 |
| 1986 | #69 | 3,881 | #3,005 | 16 |
| 1985 | #77 | 3,593 | #3,216 | 14 |
| 1984 | #118 | 2,343 | #2,364 | 21 |
| 1983 | #153 | 1,885 | #4,499 | 8 |
| 1982 | #219 | 1,192 | #4,593 | 8 |
| 1981 | #309 | 784 | #5,468 | 6 |
| 1980 | #365 | 646 | — | |
| 1979 | #677 | 254 | — | |
| 1978 | #711 | 222 | — | |
| 1977 | #854 | 172 | — | |
| 1976 | #956 | 133 | — | |
| 1975 | #1,219 | 94 | — | |
| 1974 | #1,323 | 80 | — | |
| 1973 | #1,433 | 68 | — | |
| 1972 | #1,313 | 77 | — | |
| 1971 | #1,376 | 77 | — | |
| 1970 | #1,154 | 100 | — | |
| 1969 | #1,153 | 93 | — | |
| 1968 | #1,244 | 77 | — | |
| 1967 | #1,416 | 61 | — | |
| 1966 | #1,568 | 51 | — | |
| 1965 | #1,993 | 34 | — | |
| 1964 | #2,530 | 24 | — | |
| 1963 | #2,424 | 25 | — | |
| 1962 | #3,438 | 14 | — | |
| 1961 | #3,189 | 16 | — | |
| 1960 | #3,212 | 15 | — | |
| 1959 | #4,625 | 8 | — | |
| 1958 | #4,890 | 7 | — | |
| 1957 | #3,309 | 13 | — | |
| 1956 | #3,321 | 13 | — | |
| 1955 | #5,828 | 5 | — | |
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Caitlin! It came in at #5,828, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1955, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Caitlin is popular in 2001
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Massachusetts#45 · 1 in 218
- Maine#47 · 1 in 178
- Wyoming#52 · 1 in 137
- Vermont#56 · 1 in 168
- Connecticut#57 · 1 in 253
Best ever in a state: #21 in New Hampshire, 1988.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Massachusetts | #45 | 144 | 1 in 218 |
| Maine | #47 | 25 | 1 in 178 |
| Wyoming | #52 | 8 | 1 in 137 |
| Vermont | #56 | 10 | 1 in 168 |
| Connecticut | #57 | 59 | 1 in 253 |
| District of Columbia | #60 | 16 | 1 in 226 |
| New Hampshire | #67 | 20 | 1 in 242 |
| Tennessee | #68 | 101 | 1 in 299 |
| New Jersey | #72 | 124 | 1 in 334 |
| Rhode Island | #72 | 16 | 1 in 249 |
| West Virginia | #72 | 25 | 1 in 285 |
| Arkansas | #73 | 38 | 1 in 307 |
| New York | #73 | 266 | 1 in 368 |
| Kentucky | #75 | 60 | 1 in 332 |
| Nebraska | #78 | 26 | 1 in 315 |
| New Mexico | #78 | 28 | 1 in 287 |
| Pennsylvania | #78 | 157 | 1 in 357 |
| Indiana | #79 | 92 | 1 in 359 |
| Colorado | #81 | 68 | 1 in 360 |
| Georgia | #83 | 117 | 1 in 412 |
| South Carolina | #84 | 44 | 1 in 382 |
| Maryland | #85 | 60 | 1 in 400 |
| Wisconsin | #86 | 69 | 1 in 366 |
| Virginia | #87 | 82 | 1 in 428 |
| Alabama | #89 | 49 | 1 in 407 |
| Minnesota | #89 | 70 | 1 in 361 |
| North Carolina | #89 | 102 | 1 in 434 |
| Ohio | #89 | 139 | 1 in 429 |
| Oregon | #89 | 40 | 1 in 398 |
| Washington | #90 | 71 | 1 in 405 |
| Michigan | #91 | 119 | 1 in 419 |
| Iowa | #93 | 36 | 1 in 381 |
| Mississippi | #96 | 26 | 1 in 446 |
| Alaska | #98 | 8 | 1 in 292 |
| Florida | #100 | 165 | 1 in 469 |
| Idaho | #101 | 17 | 1 in 365 |
| Hawaii | #106 | 10 | 1 in 344 |
| North Dakota | #113 | 7 | 1 in 364 |
| Louisiana | #114 | 40 | 1 in 519 |
| Illinois | #116 | 132 | 1 in 533 |
| South Dakota | #116 | 8 | 1 in 380 |
| Kansas | #123 | 27 | 1 in 491 |
| Arizona | #127 | 60 | 1 in 534 |
| Oklahoma | #129 | 32 | 1 in 523 |
| Missouri | #132 | 46 | 1 in 622 |
| Delaware | #138 | 6 | 1 in 504 |
| Texas | #138 | 241 | 1 in 636 |
| Montana | #145 | 6 | 1 in 465 |
| California | #156 | 307 | 1 in 724 |
| Utah | #178 | 24 | 1 in 723 |
| Nevada | #193 | 13 | 1 in 761 |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Caitlin
- 645 spots since 2024 (#1,681 → #2,326)
- 534 spots since 2020 (#1,792 → #2,326)
- 1,716 spots since 2015 (#610 → #2,326)
- Biggest jump: 312 spots in 1980 (#677 → #365)
- Biggest drop: 542 spots in 2016 (#610 → #1,152)
- Debuted 1955
- Peaked 1988 at #44 (7,246 births)
- Births halved by 1999, 11 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 17 yrs · run 1985–2001
- Top 1,000: 40 yrs · run 1976–2015
- Highest: 1 in 246 girls born in 1988 were named Caitlin (0.41%)
- Latest: 1 in 20,606 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 43.7% of all girls named Caitlin (49,033) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 46 | #3,309 (1957) | #4,395 |
| 1960s | 410 | #1,153 (1969) | #2,217 |
| 1970s | 1,277 | #677 (1979) | #1,102 |
| 1980s | 33,584 | #44 (1988) | #147 |
| 1990s | 49,033 | #50 (1990) | #73 |
| 2000s | 22,298 | #76 (2000) | #173 |
| 2010s | 4,935 | #339 (2010) | #818 |
| 2020s | 560 | #1,681 (2024) | #2,078 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Caitlin in 2001
Top girls' names in 2001
More about 2001
girls
1,800,624 girls got a published name in 2001; 1 in 521 of them was named Caitlin, which outranked 99.5% of the 17,978 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.8% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.