Caleb
Last seen for girls in 2024 at #10,271 · #58 for boys in 2025, 5,217 births
Given to boys 99.8% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2009 · 11,001 births
- Debut · boys
- 27 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 37 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 324,350since 1880
Caleb over time
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #58 | 5,217 | |
| 2024 | #10,271 | 9 | #49 | 5,795 |
| 2023 | #11,169 | 8 | #51 | 5,533 |
| 2022 | #8,542 | 12 | #52 | 5,778 |
| 2021 | #10,292 | 9 | #51 | 5,964 |
| 2020 | #13,453 | 6 | #56 | 5,616 |
| 2019 | #8,138 | 13 | #51 | 6,416 |
| 2018 | #15,682 | 5 | #45 | 6,997 |
| 2017 | #9,943 | 10 | #50 | 7,154 |
| 2016 | #10,859 | 9 | #44 | 7,982 |
| 2015 | #9,481 | 11 | #37 | 8,826 |
| 2014 | #8,053 | 14 | #35 | 9,245 |
| 2013 | #7,372 | 16 | #32 | 9,612 |
| 2012 | #7,804 | 15 | #32 | 9,977 |
| 2011 | #11,181 | 9 | #32 | 10,040 |
| 2010 | #6,904 | 18 | #32 | 10,485 |
| 2009 | #8,888 | 13 | #31 | 11,001 |
| 2008 | #10,807 | 10 | #34 | 10,579 |
| 2007 | #10,818 | 10 | #36 | 10,954 |
| 2006 | #10,611 | 10 | #34 | 11,001 |
| 2005 | #5,113 | 25 | #35 | 10,894 |
| 2004 | #2,711 | 60 | #33 | 11,307 |
| 2003 | #5,235 | 23 | #34 | 11,643 |
| 2002 | #5,897 | 19 | #35 | 11,665 |
| 2001 | #4,447 | 27 | #37 | 11,177 |
| 2000 | #5,705 | 19 | #38 | 9,866 |
| 1999 | #4,870 | 22 | #41 | 9,281 |
| 1998 | #4,636 | 23 | #42 | 9,028 |
| 1997 | #7,742 | 11 | #47 | 7,775 |
| 1996 | #5,531 | 17 | #48 | 7,550 |
| 1995 | #7,041 | 12 | #54 | 6,655 |
| 1994 | #7,097 | 12 | #60 | 6,161 |
| 1993 | #5,419 | 17 | #66 | 5,788 |
| 1992 | #7,512 | 11 | #74 | 5,042 |
| 1991 | #6,976 | 12 | #78 | 4,864 |
| 1990 | #7,303 | 11 | #88 | 4,154 |
| 1989 | #5,545 | 15 | #91 | 3,788 |
| 1988 | #5,598 | 14 | #108 | 2,817 |
| 1987 | #4,857 | 16 | #115 | 2,502 |
| 1986 | #5,757 | 12 | #131 | 2,097 |
| 1985 | #5,348 | 13 | #136 | 2,083 |
| 1984 | #4,166 | 18 | #163 | 1,650 |
| 1983 | #5,824 | 11 | #159 | 1,716 |
| 1982 | #5,911 | 11 | #170 | 1,583 |
| 1981 | #8,128 | 7 | #175 | 1,428 |
| 1980 | #7,418 | 8 | #235 | 980 |
| 1979 | — | #247 | 860 | |
| 1978 | — | #275 | 702 | |
| 1977 | — | #274 | 712 | |
| 1976 | — | #330 | 525 | |
| 1975 | — | #381 | 415 | |
| 1974 | — | #460 | 301 | |
| 1973 | — | #584 | 185 | |
| 1972 | — | #740 | 114 | |
| 1971 | — | #789 | 104 | |
| 1970 | — | #832 | 94 | |
| 1969 | — | #873 | 77 | |
| 1968 | — | #930 | 61 | |
| 1967 | — | #1,253 | 36 | |
| 1966 | — | #916 | 63 | |
| 1965 | — | #1,189 | 41 | |
| 1964 | — | #989 | 58 | |
| 1963 | — | #1,121 | 47 | |
| 1962 | — | #1,137 | 46 | |
| 1961 | — | #1,262 | 39 | |
| 1960 | — | #1,098 | 50 | |
| 1959 | — | #1,156 | 45 | |
| 1958 | — | #1,026 | 55 | |
| 1957 | — | #1,151 | 45 | |
| 1956 | — | #1,092 | 48 | |
| 1955 | — | #1,181 | 40 | |
| 1954 | — | #1,311 | 33 | |
| 1953 | — | #1,245 | 36 | |
| 1952 | — | #1,182 | 39 | |
| 1951 | — | #1,150 | 39 | |
| 1950 | — | #1,203 | 36 | |
| 1949 | — | #1,297 | 31 | |
| 1948 | — | #1,160 | 38 | |
| 1947 | — | #1,093 | 44 | |
| 1946 | — | #1,236 | 32 | |
| 1945 | — | #1,536 | 19 | |
| 1944 | — | #1,328 | 25 | |
| 1943 | — | #1,214 | 32 | |
| 1942 | — | #1,316 | 28 | |
| 1941 | — | #1,152 | 33 | |
| 1940 | — | #1,227 | 30 | |
| 1939 | — | #1,194 | 30 | |
| 1938 | — | #1,062 | 37 | |
| 1937 | — | #1,288 | 27 | |
| 1936 | — | #1,225 | 29 | |
| 1935 | — | #1,273 | 28 | |
| 1934 | — | #1,038 | 39 | |
| 1933 | — | #1,078 | 37 | |
| 1932 | — | #1,004 | 43 | |
| 1931 | — | #1,394 | 25 | |
| 1930 | — | #1,602 | 21 | |
| 1929 | — | #1,312 | 29 | |
| 1928 | — | #1,448 | 26 | |
| 1927 | — | #1,080 | 43 | |
| 1926 | — | #1,144 | 39 | |
| 1925 | — | #900 | 56 | |
| 1924 | — | #1,071 | 44 | |
| 1923 | — | #1,177 | 37 | |
| 1922 | — | #977 | 52 | |
| 1921 | — | #1,159 | 38 | |
| 1920 | — | #960 | 52 | |
| 1919 | — | #1,207 | 34 | |
| 1918 | — | #949 | 49 | |
| 1917 | — | #946 | 46 | |
| 1916 | — | #1,028 | 39 | |
| 1915 | — | #1,015 | 39 | |
| 1914 | — | #907 | 36 | |
| 1913 | — | #1,023 | 24 | |
| 1912 | — | #1,023 | 20 | |
| 1911 | — | #856 | 15 | |
| 1910 | — | #782 | 15 | |
| 1909 | — | #756 | 14 | |
| 1908 | — | #1,021 | 8 | |
| 1907 | — | #866 | 10 | |
| 1906 | — | #640 | 14 | |
| 1905 | — | #836 | 9 | |
| 1904 | — | #760 | 10 | |
| 1903 | — | #696 | 11 | |
| 1902 | — | #687 | 11 | |
| 1901 | — | #779 | 8 | |
| 1900 | — | #785 | 11 | |
| 1899 | — | #857 | 7 | |
| 1898 | — | #885 | 7 | |
| 1897 | — | #725 | 9 | |
| 1896 | — | #592 | 13 | |
| 1895 | — | #685 | 10 | |
| 1894 | — | #954 | 6 | |
| 1893 | — | #615 | 11 | |
| 1892 | — | #641 | 11 | |
| 1891 | — | #766 | 7 | |
| 1890 | — | #739 | 8 | |
| 1889 | — | #415 | 19 | |
| 1888 | — | #464 | 17 | |
| 1887 | — | #488 | 13 | |
| 1886 | — | #491 | 14 | |
| 1885 | — | #462 | 16 | |
| 1884 | — | #450 | 17 | |
| 1883 | — | #448 | 16 | |
| 1882 | — | #355 | 25 | |
| 1881 | — | #395 | 18 | |
| 1880 | — | #325 | 27 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Caleb was already there! It came in at #325, and was given to 27 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1894, when fewer than 7 boys a year got the name.
Where Caleb is popular in 2019
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Maryland#23 · 1 in 153
- Georgia#24 · 1 in 188
- Hawaii#28 · 1 in 155
- Virginia#33 · 1 in 185
- South Carolina#35 · 1 in 184
Best ever in a state: #4 in Arkansas, 2002.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maryland | #23 | 170 | 1 in 153 |
| Georgia | #24 | 276 | 1 in 188 |
| Hawaii | #28 | 25 | 1 in 155 |
| Virginia | #33 | 214 | 1 in 185 |
| South Carolina | #35 | 112 | 1 in 184 |
| Massachusetts | #37 | 163 | 1 in 173 |
| North Carolina | #37 | 241 | 1 in 208 |
| Florida | #41 | 412 | 1 in 230 |
| Minnesota | #45 | 116 | 1 in 226 |
| Wisconsin | #45 | 111 | 1 in 226 |
| Connecticut | #47 | 73 | 1 in 181 |
| Ohio | #48 | 236 | 1 in 240 |
| Pennsylvania | #48 | 254 | 1 in 220 |
| District of Columbia | #49 | 20 | 1 in 187 |
| New Hampshire | #49 | 26 | 1 in 166 |
| Rhode Island | #50 | 20 | 1 in 167 |
| Kansas | #51 | 61 | 1 in 232 |
| New York | #51 | 345 | 1 in 271 |
| North Dakota | #51 | 20 | 1 in 190 |
| Delaware | #52 | 19 | 1 in 170 |
| New Jersey | #52 | 161 | 1 in 247 |
| Vermont | #52 | 10 | 1 in 147 |
| Alaska | #53 | 16 | 1 in 182 |
| Texas | #53 | 712 | 1 in 245 |
| Michigan | #54 | 177 | 1 in 249 |
| Oregon | #54 | 68 | 1 in 242 |
| Alabama | #55 | 91 | 1 in 249 |
| Colorado | #55 | 99 | 1 in 261 |
| California | #56 | 760 | 1 in 267 |
| Mississippi | #56 | 56 | 1 in 228 |
| Montana | #56 | 18 | 1 in 185 |
| Arkansas | #57 | 53 | 1 in 251 |
| South Dakota | #59 | 19 | 1 in 198 |
| Indiana | #63 | 124 | 1 in 272 |
| Tennessee | #63 | 130 | 1 in 271 |
| Oklahoma | #65 | 68 | 1 in 271 |
| New Mexico | #66 | 30 | 1 in 253 |
| Illinois | #67 | 199 | 1 in 289 |
| Utah | #67 | 67 | 1 in 289 |
| Nebraska | #68 | 35 | 1 in 258 |
| Washington | #68 | 120 | 1 in 284 |
| Maine | #73 | 17 | 1 in 233 |
| Arizona | #74 | 119 | 1 in 281 |
| Iowa | #80 | 46 | 1 in 313 |
| Kentucky | #81 | 65 | 1 in 315 |
| Louisiana | #87 | 65 | 1 in 348 |
| Missouri | #88 | 86 | 1 in 346 |
| Wyoming | #88 | 6 | 1 in 233 |
| Nevada | #91 | 37 | 1 in 347 |
| West Virginia | #92 | 24 | 1 in 305 |
| Idaho | #93 | 24 | 1 in 326 |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Caleb
- 9 spots since 2024 (#49 → #58)
- 2 spots since 2020 (#56 → #58)
- 21 spots since 2015 (#37 → #58)
- Biggest jump: 323 spots in 1968 (#1,253 → #930)
- Biggest drop: 339 spots in 1894 (#615 → #954)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 2009 at #31 (11,001 births)
- Births halved by 2025, 16 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 37 yrs · run 1989–2025
- Top 1,000: 97 yrs · run 1968–2025
- Highest: 1 in 166 boys born in 2002 were named Caleb (0.60%)
- Latest: 1 in 327 boys born in 2025 (0.31%)
- Its best rank, #31 in 2009, was only 1 in 180 (0.55%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 33.9% of all boys named Caleb (110,087) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 182 | #325 (1880) | #429 |
| 1890s | 89 | #592 (1896) | #746 |
| 1900s | 106 | #640 (1906) | #783 |
| 1910s | 317 | #782 (1910) | #974 |
| 1920s | 416 | #900 (1925) | #1,123 |
| 1930s | 316 | #1,004 (1932) | #1,216 |
| 1940s | 312 | #1,093 (1947) | #1,256 |
| 1950s | 416 | #1,026 (1958) | #1,170 |
| 1960s | 518 | #873 (1969) | #1,077 |
| 1970s | 4,012 | #247 (1979) | #491 |
| 1980s | 20,644 | #91 (1989) | #148 |
| 1990s | 66,298 | #41 (1999) | #60 |
| 2000s | 110,087 | #31 (2009) | #35 |
| 2010s | 86,734 | #32 (2010) | #39 |
| 2020s | 33,903 | #49 (2024) | #53 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Caleb in 2019
Top girls' names in 2019
Top boys' names in 2019
More about 2019
girls
1,678,366 girls got a published name in 2019; 1 in 129,105 of them was named Caleb, which outranked 54.8% of the 18,024 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #7,716Ziyanna14
- #7,716Zurielle14
- #7,716Zylie14
- #8,138Caleb13
- #8,138Aaisha13
- #8,138Aamina13
- #8,138Aaryahi13
- #8,597Aafiya12
- #8,597Aamilah12
- #8,597Aarnika12
Tied with 458 names at #8,138; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,794,216 boys got a published name in 2019; 1 in 280 of them was named Caleb, which outranked 99.6% of the 14,133 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 7.9% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.