Camila
#19 for girls in 2025, 6,591 births · #8,910 for boys in 2025, 8 births
Given to girls 99.9% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2020 · 8,165 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 18 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 123,854since 1914
Camila over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #19 | 6,591 | #8,910 | 8 |
| 2024 | #11 | 7,625 | #7,765 | 10 |
| 2023 | #13 | 7,581 | #8,921 | 8 |
| 2022 | #12 | 8,001 | #9,823 | 7 |
| 2021 | #12 | 8,036 | #10,799 | 6 |
| 2020 | #11 | 8,165 | #10,605 | 6 |
| 2019 | #15 | 7,846 | #8,889 | 8 |
| 2018 | #18 | 7,508 | #7,617 | 10 |
| 2017 | #23 | 6,776 | #8,140 | 9 |
| 2016 | #32 | 6,054 | #8,146 | 9 |
| 2015 | #43 | 5,275 | — | |
| 2014 | #41 | 5,220 | #9,642 | 7 |
| 2013 | #39 | 5,147 | #9,655 | 7 |
| 2012 | #48 | 4,791 | #8,864 | 8 |
| 2011 | #48 | 4,972 | #12,287 | 5 |
| 2010 | #61 | 4,307 | — | |
| 2009 | #80 | 3,737 | #10,994 | 6 |
| 2008 | #83 | 3,847 | — | |
| 2007 | #129 | 2,665 | #8,915 | 8 |
| 2006 | #180 | 1,962 | — | |
| 2005 | #201 | 1,719 | — | |
| 2004 | #288 | 1,154 | — | |
| 2003 | #300 | 1,033 | — | |
| 2002 | #454 | 636 | — | |
| 2001 | #576 | 443 | — | |
| 2000 | #659 | 370 | — | |
| 1999 | #659 | 349 | — | |
| 1998 | #815 | 261 | — | |
| 1997 | #875 | 232 | — | |
| 1996 | #1,186 | 152 | — | |
| 1995 | #1,346 | 122 | — | |
| 1994 | #1,277 | 133 | — | |
| 1993 | #1,447 | 111 | — | |
| 1992 | #1,600 | 96 | — | |
| 1991 | #1,933 | 72 | — | |
| 1990 | #1,892 | 74 | — | |
| 1989 | #2,072 | 60 | — | |
| 1988 | #2,131 | 54 | — | |
| 1987 | #2,199 | 49 | — | |
| 1986 | #2,724 | 35 | — | |
| 1985 | #2,362 | 42 | — | |
| 1984 | #4,318 | 17 | — | |
| 1983 | #3,806 | 20 | — | |
| 1982 | #3,898 | 20 | — | |
| 1981 | #4,344 | 17 | — | |
| 1980 | #3,992 | 19 | — | |
| 1979 | #3,236 | 25 | — | |
| 1978 | #4,242 | 16 | — | |
| 1977 | #5,532 | 11 | — | |
| 1976 | #3,540 | 19 | — | |
| 1975 | #3,514 | 19 | — | |
| 1974 | #3,313 | 20 | — | |
| 1973 | #4,362 | 13 | — | |
| 1972 | #3,404 | 18 | — | |
| 1971 | #5,136 | 10 | — | |
| 1970 | #4,492 | 12 | — | |
| 1969 | #3,619 | 15 | — | |
| 1968 | #3,789 | 13 | — | |
| 1967 | #2,781 | 20 | — | |
| 1966 | #3,959 | 11 | — | |
| 1965 | #4,494 | 9 | — | |
| 1964 | #4,355 | 10 | — | |
| 1963 | #3,635 | 13 | — | |
| 1962 | #5,293 | 7 | — | |
| 1961 | #4,546 | 9 | — | |
| 1960 | #5,168 | 7 | — | |
| 1959 | #3,619 | 12 | — | |
| 1958 | #3,925 | 10 | — | |
| 1957 | #6,086 | 5 | — | |
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | #4,655 | 7 | — | |
| 1953 | #4,595 | 7 | — | |
| 1952 | #5,563 | 5 | — | |
| 1951 | #4,011 | 8 | — | |
| 1950 | #4,738 | 6 | — | |
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | #4,205 | 7 | — | |
| 1947 | #4,345 | 7 | — | |
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | #3,388 | 8 | — | |
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | #3,847 | 6 | — | |
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | #4,204 | 5 | — | |
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | #4,218 | 5 | — | |
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | #4,725 | 5 | — | |
| 1927 | #4,286 | 6 | — | |
| 1926 | #4,851 | 5 | — | |
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | #3,125 | 10 | — | |
| 1922 | #2,780 | 12 | — | |
| 1921 | #3,400 | 9 | — | |
| 1920 | #3,957 | 7 | — | |
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | #3,512 | 8 | — | |
| 1917 | #3,344 | 8 | — | |
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | #3,134 | 8 | — | |
| 1914 | #3,618 | 5 | — | |
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1914
The first year at least five girls were named Camila! It came in at #3,618, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1916, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Camila is popular in 2008
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Arizona#16 · 1 in 164
- California#22 · 1 in 209
- Nevada#26 · 1 in 187
- Texas#27 · 1 in 225
- Florida#40 · 1 in 278
Best ever in a state: #2 in California, 2020.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arizona | #16 | 223 | 1 in 164 |
| California | #22 | 1,095 | 1 in 209 |
| Nevada | #26 | 65 | 1 in 187 |
| Texas | #27 | 747 | 1 in 225 |
| Florida | #40 | 310 | 1 in 278 |
| New Mexico | #46 | 37 | 1 in 229 |
| District of Columbia | #49 | 16 | 1 in 200 |
| Illinois | #57 | 213 | 1 in 311 |
| Colorado | #70 | 71 | 1 in 345 |
| Georgia | #103 | 109 | 1 in 485 |
| New Jersey | #107 | 85 | 1 in 462 |
| Washington | #111 | 64 | 1 in 502 |
| Connecticut | #112 | 28 | 1 in 465 |
| New York | #116 | 167 | 1 in 572 |
| Oregon | #122 | 34 | 1 in 488 |
| Rhode Island | #123 | 8 | 1 in 406 |
| Utah | #130 | 37 | 1 in 534 |
| North Carolina | #147 | 71 | 1 in 677 |
| Nebraska | #152 | 15 | 1 in 555 |
| Virginia | #152 | 55 | 1 in 684 |
| Wisconsin | #167 | 35 | 1 in 716 |
| Delaware | #182 | 5 | 1 in 577 |
| Arkansas | #186 | 17 | 1 in 719 |
| Massachusetts | #194 | 31 | 1 in 878 |
| Iowa | #202 | 17 | 1 in 796 |
| Oklahoma | #207 | 20 | 1 in 872 |
| Idaho | #208 | 10 | 1 in 737 |
| Kansas | #210 | 17 | 1 in 813 |
| Indiana | #224 | 32 | 1 in 1,016 |
| Minnesota | #229 | 27 | 1 in 954 |
| Maryland | #245 | 25 | 1 in 1,011 |
| Tennessee | #284 | 25 | 1 in 1,288 |
| Missouri | #321 | 19 | 1 in 1,549 |
| Michigan | #324 | 28 | 1 in 1,588 |
| South Carolina | #401 | 11 | 1 in 1,745 |
| Pennsylvania | #449 | 24 | 1 in 2,306 |
| Louisiana | #487 | 9 | 1 in 2,247 |
| Mississippi | #488 | 6 | 1 in 2,080 |
| Alabama | #490 | 9 | 1 in 2,331 |
| Kentucky | #623 | 6 | 1 in 3,371 |
| Ohio | #676 | 14 | 1 in 4,028 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Camila
Momentum · girls
Falling
- 8 spots since 2024 (#11 → #19)
- 8 spots since 2020 (#11 → #19)
- 24 spots since 2015 (#43 → #19)
- Biggest jump: 311 spots in 1997 (#1,186 → #875)
- Biggest drop: 8 spots in 2025 (#11 → #19)
Rise & fade · girls
106 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1914
- Peaked 2020 at #11 (8,165 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 18 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 18 yrs · run 2008–2025
- Top 1,000: 29 yrs · run 1997–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 198
- Highest: 1 in 198 girls born in 2020 were named Camila (0.51%)
- Latest: 1 in 244 girls born in 2025 (0.41%)
Era · girls
The 2010s
- 46.7% of all girls named Camila (57,896) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 29 | #3,134 (1915) | #3,402 |
| 1920s | 54 | #2,780 (1922) | #3,875 |
| 1930s | 16 | #3,847 (1938) | #4,090 |
| 1940s | 22 | #3,388 (1945) | #3,979 |
| 1950s | 60 | #3,619 (1959) | #4,649 |
| 1960s | 114 | #2,781 (1967) | #4,164 |
| 1970s | 163 | #3,236 (1979) | #4,077 |
| 1980s | 333 | #2,072 (1989) | #3,185 |
| 1990s | 1,602 | #659 (1999) | #1,303 |
| 2000s | 17,566 | #80 (2009) | #295 |
| 2010s | 57,896 | #15 (2019) | #37 |
| 2020s | 45,999 | #11 (2020) | #13 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Camila in 2008
girls
#83
3,847 births · 1 in 492 girls
Top girls' names in 2008
More about 2008
girls
1,890,938 girls got a published name in 2008; 1 in 492 of them was named Camila, which outranked 99.6% of the 20,482 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.5% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Camila
Biggest movers since 2007
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.