Camilla
- #361 for girls in 2025, 847 births
- Last seen for boys in 1918 at #3,728
- Given to girls >99.9% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2020 · 1,169 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 30,276since 1880
Camilla over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Camilla has never cracked the top 200 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #361 | 847 | — | |
| 2024 | #322 | 956 | — | |
| 2023 | #336 | 926 | — | |
| 2022 | #314 | 1,020 | — | |
| 2021 | #307 | 1,041 | — | |
| 2020 | #263 | 1,169 | — | |
| 2019 | #271 | 1,224 | — | |
| 2018 | #303 | 1,099 | — | |
| 2017 | #308 | 1,060 | — | |
| 2016 | #342 | 976 | — | |
| 2015 | #374 | 874 | — | |
| 2014 | #363 | 893 | — | |
| 2013 | #400 | 767 | — | |
| 2012 | #442 | 707 | — | |
| 2011 | #458 | 649 | — | |
| 2010 | #506 | 591 | — | |
| 2009 | #553 | 552 | — | |
| 2008 | #634 | 487 | — | |
| 2007 | #730 | 399 | — | |
| 2006 | #823 | 330 | — | |
| 2005 | #874 | 290 | — | |
| 2004 | #912 | 265 | — | |
| 2003 | #889 | 271 | — | |
| 2002 | #1,022 | 212 | — | |
| 2001 | #961 | 226 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,199 | 166 | — | |
| 1999 | #1,231 | 153 | — | |
| 1998 | #1,141 | 166 | — | |
| 1997 | #1,133 | 165 | — | |
| 1996 | #1,238 | 141 | — | |
| 1995 | #1,131 | 155 | — | |
| 1994 | #1,285 | 132 | — | |
| 1993 | #1,185 | 146 | — | |
| 1992 | #1,322 | 127 | — | |
| 1991 | #1,371 | 118 | — | |
| 1990 | #1,479 | 105 | — | |
| 1989 | #1,326 | 117 | — | |
| 1988 | #1,204 | 125 | — | |
| 1987 | #1,136 | 130 | — | |
| 1986 | #1,241 | 110 | — | |
| 1985 | #1,178 | 120 | — | |
| 1984 | #1,260 | 101 | — | |
| 1983 | #1,060 | 131 | — | |
| 1982 | #1,131 | 124 | — | |
| 1981 | #1,089 | 128 | — | |
| 1980 | #1,268 | 102 | — | |
| 1979 | #1,136 | 118 | — | |
| 1978 | #986 | 140 | — | |
| 1977 | #1,257 | 95 | — | |
| 1976 | #1,086 | 112 | — | |
| 1975 | #1,127 | 103 | — | |
| 1974 | #992 | 123 | — | |
| 1973 | #943 | 128 | — | |
| 1972 | #918 | 135 | — | |
| 1971 | #1,000 | 125 | — | |
| 1970 | #867 | 154 | — | |
| 1969 | #766 | 175 | — | |
| 1968 | #868 | 139 | — | |
| 1967 | #770 | 163 | — | |
| 1966 | #826 | 145 | — | |
| 1965 | #784 | 159 | — | |
| 1964 | #786 | 173 | — | |
| 1963 | #805 | 166 | — | |
| 1962 | #890 | 141 | — | |
| 1961 | #840 | 158 | — | |
| 1960 | #832 | 153 | — | |
| 1959 | #883 | 138 | — | |
| 1958 | #888 | 132 | — | |
| 1957 | #989 | 110 | — | |
| 1956 | #893 | 125 | — | |
| 1955 | #763 | 156 | — | |
| 1954 | #780 | 144 | — | |
| 1953 | #837 | 122 | — | |
| 1952 | #775 | 133 | — | |
| 1951 | #744 | 139 | — | |
| 1950 | #689 | 155 | — | |
| 1949 | #702 | 145 | — | |
| 1948 | #661 | 159 | — | |
| 1947 | #697 | 147 | — | |
| 1946 | #662 | 144 | — | |
| 1945 | #654 | 126 | — | |
| 1944 | #484 | 219 | — | |
| 1943 | #681 | 124 | — | |
| 1942 | #663 | 127 | — | |
| 1941 | #628 | 127 | — | |
| 1940 | #635 | 123 | — | |
| 1939 | #599 | 126 | — | |
| 1938 | #659 | 108 | — | |
| 1937 | #634 | 114 | — | |
| 1936 | #672 | 97 | — | |
| 1935 | #629 | 107 | — | |
| 1934 | #732 | 83 | — | |
| 1933 | #616 | 111 | — | |
| 1932 | #624 | 114 | — | |
| 1931 | #631 | 110 | — | |
| 1930 | #646 | 114 | — | |
| 1929 | #612 | 125 | — | |
| 1928 | #620 | 129 | — | |
| 1927 | #711 | 103 | — | |
| 1926 | #696 | 107 | — | |
| 1925 | #664 | 123 | — | |
| 1924 | #637 | 138 | — | |
| 1923 | #599 | 147 | — | |
| 1922 | #624 | 139 | — | |
| 1921 | #641 | 134 | — | |
| 1920 | #622 | 132 | — | |
| 1919 | #633 | 121 | — | |
| 1918 | #538 | 170 | #3,728 | 6 |
| 1917 | #632 | 116 | — | |
| 1916 | #577 | 135 | — | |
| 1915 | #565 | 129 | — | |
| 1914 | #608 | 88 | — | |
| 1913 | #594 | 75 | — | |
| 1912 | #576 | 70 | — | |
| 1911 | #676 | 41 | — | |
| 1910 | #620 | 46 | — | |
| 1909 | #587 | 43 | — | |
| 1908 | #729 | 28 | — | |
| 1907 | #529 | 46 | — | |
| 1906 | #633 | 32 | — | |
| 1905 | #570 | 37 | — | |
| 1904 | #576 | 34 | — | |
| 1903 | #558 | 34 | — | |
| 1902 | #716 | 23 | — | |
| 1901 | #615 | 26 | — | |
| 1900 | #531 | 40 | — | |
| 1899 | #490 | 36 | — | |
| 1898 | #581 | 31 | — | |
| 1897 | #660 | 22 | — | |
| 1896 | #565 | 29 | — | |
| 1895 | #538 | 30 | — | |
| 1894 | #597 | 24 | — | |
| 1893 | #630 | 21 | — | |
| 1892 | #616 | 21 | — | |
| 1891 | #608 | 19 | — | |
| 1890 | #558 | 22 | — | |
| 1889 | #687 | 14 | — | |
| 1888 | #663 | 15 | — | |
| 1887 | #524 | 18 | — | |
| 1886 | #606 | 14 | — | |
| 1885 | #557 | 15 | — | |
| 1884 | #520 | 16 | — | |
| 1883 | #561 | 12 | — | |
| 1882 | #530 | 12 | — | |
| 1881 | #503 | 11 | — | |
| 1880 | #738 | 6 | — | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Camilla was already there! It came in at #738, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1880, when fewer than 7 girls a year got the name.
Where Camilla is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Delaware#140 · 1 in 376
- New Mexico#143 · 1 in 467
- Massachusetts#190 · 1 in 829
- Arizona#219 · 1 in 910
- Idaho#221 · 1 in 716
Best ever in a state: #105 in Rhode Island, 2024.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Delaware | #140 | 6 | 1 in 376 |
| New Mexico | #143 | 10 | 1 in 467 |
| Massachusetts | #190 | 29 | 1 in 829 |
| Arizona | #219 | 31 | 1 in 910 |
| Idaho | #221 | 10 | 1 in 716 |
| California | #236 | 141 | 1 in 1,147 |
| Washington | #246 | 29 | 1 in 995 |
| Connecticut | #248 | 13 | 1 in 885 |
| Texas | #263 | 130 | 1 in 1,235 |
| Kentucky | #307 | 14 | 1 in 1,232 |
| Oregon | #320 | 11 | 1 in 1,187 |
| Iowa | #323 | 10 | 1 in 1,177 |
| New Jersey | #323 | 25 | 1 in 1,420 |
| Florida | #326 | 56 | 1 in 1,549 |
| Louisiana | #342 | 13 | 1 in 1,259 |
| Georgia | #364 | 30 | 1 in 1,507 |
| Nevada | #374 | 7 | 1 in 1,314 |
| Pennsylvania | #414 | 26 | 1 in 1,796 |
| Oklahoma | #437 | 9 | 1 in 1,642 |
| Missouri | #442 | 13 | 1 in 1,869 |
| Colorado | #456 | 12 | 1 in 1,944 |
| Virginia | #465 | 17 | 1 in 1,985 |
| Illinois | #494 | 20 | 1 in 2,216 |
| Kansas | #497 | 6 | 1 in 1,968 |
| North Carolina | #510 | 21 | 1 in 2,213 |
| Indiana | #511 | 13 | 1 in 2,147 |
| Ohio | #514 | 20 | 1 in 2,364 |
| South Carolina | #519 | 9 | 1 in 2,032 |
| Alabama | #520 | 9 | 1 in 2,035 |
| Wisconsin | #564 | 8 | 1 in 2,532 |
| New York | #585 | 28 | 1 in 2,797 |
| Minnesota | #659 | 7 | 1 in 3,068 |
| Utah | #704 | 5 | 1 in 3,415 |
| Tennessee | #707 | 10 | 1 in 3,207 |
| Maryland | #731 | 6 | 1 in 3,331 |
| Michigan | #965 | 7 | 1 in 5,104 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Camilla
Momentum · girls
Falling
- 98 spots since 2020 (#263 → #361)
- 13 spots since 2015 (#374 → #361)
- Biggest jump: 271 spots in 1978
- Biggest drop: 200 spots in 1908
Rise & fade · girls
140 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 2020 at #263 (1,169 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 120 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 120 yrs · run 1880–1974
Share of babies · girls
1 in 1,371
- Highest: 1 in 1,371 girls born in 2019 were named Camilla (0.07%)
- Latest: 1 in 1,898 girls born in 2025 (0.05%)
- Its best rank, #263 in 2020, was only 1 in 1,383 (0.07%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 2010s
- 29.2% of all girls named Camilla (8,840) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 133 | #503 (1881) | #589 |
| 1890s | 255 | #490 (1899) | #584 |
| 1900s | 343 | #529 (1907) | #604 |
| 1910s | 991 | #538 (1918) | #602 |
| 1920s | 1,277 | #599 (1923) | #643 |
| 1930s | 1,084 | #599 (1939) | #644 |
| 1940s | 1,441 | #484 (1944) | #647 |
| 1950s | 1,354 | #689 (1950) | #824 |
| 1960s | 1,572 | #766 (1969) | #817 |
| 1970s | 1,233 | #867 (1970) | #1,031 |
| 1980s | 1,188 | #1,060 (1983) | #1,189 |
| 1990s | 1,408 | #1,131 (1995) | #1,252 |
| 2000s | 3,198 | #553 (2009) | #860 |
| 2010s | 8,840 | #271 (2019) | #377 |
| 2020s | 5,959 | #263 (2020) | #317 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Camilla ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: