Carson
- #1,173 for girls in 2025, 197 births
- #124 for boys in 2025, 2,883 births
- Given to boys 94.2% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2018 · 5,259 births
- Debut · boys
- 9 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 18 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 132,774since 1880
Carson over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,173 | 197 | #124 | 2,883 |
| 2024 | #1,326 | 173 | #124 | 2,901 |
| 2023 | #1,238 | 188 | #112 | 3,210 |
| 2022 | #1,367 | 170 | #110 | 3,408 |
| 2021 | #1,312 | 172 | #97 | 3,777 |
| 2020 | #1,159 | 202 | #84 | 4,196 |
| 2019 | #1,357 | 166 | #82 | 4,522 |
| 2018 | #1,162 | 207 | #70 | 5,259 |
| 2017 | #1,236 | 193 | #83 | 4,766 |
| 2016 | #1,291 | 186 | #81 | 4,931 |
| 2015 | #1,329 | 178 | #89 | 4,761 |
| 2014 | #1,352 | 173 | #91 | 4,625 |
| 2013 | #1,466 | 152 | #90 | 4,540 |
| 2012 | #1,477 | 153 | #87 | 4,597 |
| 2011 | #1,311 | 179 | #85 | 4,927 |
| 2010 | #1,263 | 189 | #82 | 5,098 |
| 2009 | #1,288 | 188 | #88 | 4,997 |
| 2008 | #1,242 | 202 | #89 | 5,127 |
| 2007 | #1,239 | 200 | #91 | 5,120 |
| 2006 | #1,151 | 212 | #87 | 5,012 |
| 2005 | #1,105 | 214 | #101 | 4,354 |
| 2004 | #997 | 236 | #101 | 4,379 |
| 2003 | #862 | 280 | #89 | 4,861 |
| 2002 | #800 | 293 | #105 | 3,600 |
| 2001 | #703 | 352 | #95 | 3,943 |
| 2000 | #655 | 377 | #119 | 3,239 |
| 1999 | #560 | 447 | #156 | 2,347 |
| 1998 | #729 | 299 | #218 | 1,471 |
| 1997 | #824 | 251 | #268 | 1,047 |
| 1996 | #810 | 251 | #275 | 1,010 |
| 1995 | #925 | 204 | #297 | 893 |
| 1994 | #926 | 204 | #314 | 833 |
| 1993 | #981 | 189 | #346 | 699 |
| 1992 | #952 | 202 | #358 | 662 |
| 1991 | #1,290 | 129 | #421 | 537 |
| 1990 | #1,989 | 68 | #456 | 471 |
| 1989 | #2,986 | 36 | #490 | 377 |
| 1988 | #3,225 | 30 | #547 | 283 |
| 1987 | #3,743 | 23 | #574 | 250 |
| 1986 | #3,277 | 27 | #561 | 252 |
| 1985 | #3,517 | 24 | #548 | 256 |
| 1984 | #4,166 | 18 | #571 | 221 |
| 1983 | #4,686 | 15 | #626 | 185 |
| 1982 | #4,167 | 18 | #632 | 189 |
| 1981 | #3,253 | 26 | #675 | 164 |
| 1980 | #3,992 | 19 | #696 | 156 |
| 1979 | #4,420 | 16 | #688 | 154 |
| 1978 | #4,931 | 13 | #717 | 137 |
| 1977 | #4,652 | 14 | #737 | 135 |
| 1976 | #5,215 | 11 | #700 | 140 |
| 1975 | #3,404 | 20 | #750 | 123 |
| 1974 | #5,776 | 9 | #786 | 103 |
| 1973 | #4,871 | 11 | #790 | 101 |
| 1972 | #5,959 | 8 | #788 | 103 |
| 1971 | #6,006 | 8 | #886 | 84 |
| 1970 | — | #798 | 104 | |
| 1969 | #4,723 | 10 | #856 | 80 |
| 1968 | #7,016 | 5 | #794 | 87 |
| 1967 | — | #848 | 71 | |
| 1966 | — | #819 | 79 | |
| 1965 | — | #786 | 89 | |
| 1964 | — | #815 | 85 | |
| 1963 | — | #813 | 87 | |
| 1962 | #4,865 | 8 | #822 | 85 |
| 1961 | — | #748 | 106 | |
| 1960 | — | #804 | 90 | |
| 1959 | #5,566 | 6 | #773 | 98 |
| 1958 | — | #740 | 99 | |
| 1957 | — | #719 | 108 | |
| 1956 | #5,952 | 5 | #694 | 113 |
| 1955 | — | #654 | 126 | |
| 1954 | — | #632 | 136 | |
| 1953 | #3,269 | 12 | #611 | 141 |
| 1952 | #4,483 | 7 | #638 | 121 |
| 1951 | #3,714 | 9 | #559 | 150 |
| 1950 | #4,315 | 7 | #626 | 120 |
| 1949 | #5,244 | 5 | #585 | 133 |
| 1948 | #4,651 | 6 | #626 | 117 |
| 1947 | #3,240 | 11 | #584 | 135 |
| 1946 | — | #556 | 131 | |
| 1945 | — | #610 | 98 | |
| 1944 | — | #745 | 69 | |
| 1943 | — | #572 | 122 | |
| 1942 | — | #580 | 115 | |
| 1941 | — | #609 | 97 | |
| 1940 | — | #576 | 106 | |
| 1939 | — | #530 | 117 | |
| 1938 | — | #640 | 87 | |
| 1937 | — | #579 | 99 | |
| 1936 | — | #617 | 89 | |
| 1935 | — | #647 | 84 | |
| 1934 | — | #657 | 84 | |
| 1933 | — | #721 | 71 | |
| 1932 | — | #560 | 111 | |
| 1931 | — | #638 | 86 | |
| 1930 | — | #584 | 105 | |
| 1929 | — | #742 | 72 | |
| 1928 | — | #608 | 101 | |
| 1927 | — | #607 | 105 | |
| 1926 | — | #585 | 113 | |
| 1925 | — | #617 | 103 | |
| 1924 | — | #547 | 132 | |
| 1923 | — | #610 | 108 | |
| 1922 | — | #586 | 120 | |
| 1921 | — | #656 | 97 | |
| 1920 | — | #630 | 99 | |
| 1919 | — | #593 | 103 | |
| 1918 | — | #604 | 103 | |
| 1917 | — | #623 | 90 | |
| 1916 | — | #540 | 113 | |
| 1915 | — | #583 | 95 | |
| 1914 | — | #500 | 96 | |
| 1913 | — | #648 | 47 | |
| 1912 | — | #608 | 45 | |
| 1911 | — | #481 | 37 | |
| 1910 | — | #582 | 24 | |
| 1909 | — | #558 | 22 | |
| 1908 | — | #779 | 12 | |
| 1907 | — | #664 | 15 | |
| 1906 | — | #674 | 13 | |
| 1905 | — | #699 | 12 | |
| 1904 | — | #760 | 10 | |
| 1903 | — | #595 | 14 | |
| 1902 | — | #521 | 17 | |
| 1901 | — | #637 | 11 | |
| 1900 | — | #623 | 16 | |
| 1899 | — | #661 | 10 | |
| 1898 | — | #523 | 16 | |
| 1897 | — | #1,057 | 5 | |
| 1896 | — | #826 | 8 | |
| 1895 | — | #685 | 10 | |
| 1894 | — | #594 | 12 | |
| 1893 | — | #1,035 | 5 | |
| 1892 | — | #597 | 12 | |
| 1891 | — | #766 | 7 | |
| 1890 | — | #739 | 8 | |
| 1889 | — | #789 | 7 | |
| 1888 | — | #704 | 9 | |
| 1887 | — | #461 | 14 | |
| 1886 | — | #694 | 8 | |
| 1885 | — | #641 | 9 | |
| 1884 | — | #520 | 13 | |
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | #489 | 14 | |
| 1881 | — | #781 | 6 | |
| 1880 | — | #640 | 9 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Carson was already there! It came in at #640, and was given to 9 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1883, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Carson is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- West Virginia#36 · 1 in 171
- Kentucky#50 · 1 in 250
- New Hampshire#52 · 1 in 180
- Pennsylvania#61 · 1 in 284
- Ohio#73 · 1 in 343
Best ever in a state: #9 in South Dakota, 2007.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| West Virginia | #36 | 36 | 1 in 171 |
| Kentucky | #50 | 82 | 1 in 250 |
| New Hampshire | #52 | 25 | 1 in 180 |
| Pennsylvania | #61 | 184 | 1 in 284 |
| Ohio | #73 | 153 | 1 in 343 |
| Alabama | #79 | 62 | 1 in 347 |
| Michigan | #79 | 115 | 1 in 350 |
| Mississippi | #79 | 33 | 1 in 328 |
| Vermont | #80 | 6 | 1 in 202 |
| Arkansas | #81 | 38 | 1 in 331 |
| Tennessee | #86 | 98 | 1 in 375 |
| Minnesota | #88 | 69 | 1 in 355 |
| Missouri | #89 | 71 | 1 in 392 |
| North Carolina | #93 | 130 | 1 in 396 |
| Alaska | #94 | 8 | 1 in 284 |
| Oklahoma | #96 | 45 | 1 in 393 |
| Nevada | #98 | 31 | 1 in 364 |
| Wisconsin | #99 | 61 | 1 in 384 |
| Connecticut | #100 | 36 | 1 in 367 |
| Delaware | #101 | 10 | 1 in 295 |
| Indiana | #102 | 75 | 1 in 422 |
| Georgia | #105 | 110 | 1 in 457 |
| South Dakota | #105 | 12 | 1 in 320 |
| Louisiana | #106 | 47 | 1 in 407 |
| Nebraska | #116 | 22 | 1 in 401 |
| Maine | #119 | 11 | 1 in 349 |
| North Dakota | #120 | 10 | 1 in 336 |
| Virginia | #122 | 70 | 1 in 532 |
| Florida | #126 | 172 | 1 in 555 |
| Oregon | #133 | 31 | 1 in 486 |
| New Mexico | #134 | 14 | 1 in 464 |
| Kansas | #138 | 27 | 1 in 520 |
| Rhode Island | #140 | 8 | 1 in 391 |
| Utah | #140 | 37 | 1 in 531 |
| Iowa | #143 | 29 | 1 in 477 |
| South Carolina | #143 | 39 | 1 in 544 |
| Maryland | #145 | 41 | 1 in 558 |
| Hawaii | #146 | 7 | 1 in 417 |
| Massachusetts | #146 | 49 | 1 in 551 |
| Arizona | #147 | 60 | 1 in 545 |
| Washington | #154 | 54 | 1 in 607 |
| New York | #163 | 117 | 1 in 722 |
| Illinois | #168 | 70 | 1 in 708 |
| New Jersey | #187 | 53 | 1 in 750 |
| Texas | #190 | 200 | 1 in 875 |
| Idaho | #196 | 13 | 1 in 664 |
| Colorado | #202 | 32 | 1 in 839 |
| California | #222 | 168 | 1 in 1,044 |
| Montana | #227 | 5 | 1 in 753 |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Carson
- Held #124 since 2024
- 40 spots since 2020 (#84 → #124)
- Biggest jump: 534 spots in 1898
- Biggest drop: 438 spots in 1893
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 2018 at #70 (5,259 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 18 yrs · run 2006–2021
- Top 1,000: 143 yrs · run 1898–2025
- Highest: 1 in 345 boys born in 2018 were named Carson (0.29%)
- Latest: 1 in 592 boys born in 2025 (0.17%)
- 36.2% of all boys named Carson (48,026) were born in this decade
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 89 | #461 (1887) | #635 |
| 1890s | 93 | #523 (1898) | #748 |
| 1900s | 142 | #521 (1902) | #651 |
| 1910s | 753 | #481 (1911) | #576 |
| 1920s | 1,050 | #547 (1924) | #619 |
| 1930s | 933 | #530 (1939) | #617 |
| 1940s | 1,123 | #556 (1946) | #604 |
| 1950s | 1,212 | #559 (1951) | #665 |
| 1960s | 859 | #748 (1961) | #811 |
| 1970s | 1,184 | #688 (1979) | #764 |
| 1980s | 2,333 | #490 (1989) | #592 |
| 1990s | 9,970 | #156 (1999) | #311 |
| 2000s | 44,632 | #87 (2006) | #97 |
| 2010s | 48,026 | #70 (2018) | #84 |
| 2020s | 20,375 | #84 (2020) | #109 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Carson ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: