Cedar
#2,822 for girls in 2025, 60 births · #1,244 for boys in 2025, 160 births
Given to boys 64.3% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 2022 · 188 births
- Debut · boys
- 6 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 2,629since 1972
Cedar over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,822 | 60 | #1,244 | 160 |
| 2024 | #2,389 | 76 | #1,189 | 173 |
| 2023 | #2,269 | 81 | #1,248 | 155 |
| 2022 | #2,253 | 83 | #1,125 | 188 |
| 2021 | #2,510 | 70 | #1,245 | 153 |
| 2020 | #2,341 | 75 | #1,201 | 158 |
| 2019 | #2,856 | 58 | #1,188 | 161 |
| 2018 | #3,245 | 49 | #1,261 | 145 |
| 2017 | #2,964 | 55 | #1,321 | 136 |
| 2016 | #3,707 | 41 | #1,329 | 134 |
| 2015 | #2,846 | 61 | #1,502 | 110 |
| 2014 | #3,184 | 51 | #1,920 | 75 |
| 2013 | #3,703 | 41 | #1,989 | 69 |
| 2012 | #4,121 | 36 | #2,155 | 62 |
| 2011 | #4,915 | 28 | #2,232 | 58 |
| 2010 | #4,735 | 30 | #2,467 | 50 |
| 2009 | #5,378 | 26 | #2,894 | 41 |
| 2008 | #4,647 | 32 | #2,879 | 41 |
| 2007 | #4,299 | 35 | #2,602 | 47 |
| 2006 | #4,953 | 28 | #2,513 | 48 |
| 2005 | #5,999 | 20 | #3,615 | 26 |
| 2004 | #4,492 | 30 | #3,456 | 27 |
| 2003 | #6,055 | 19 | #3,366 | 27 |
| 2002 | #4,906 | 24 | #3,554 | 24 |
| 2001 | #4,834 | 24 | #2,489 | 39 |
| 2000 | #4,649 | 25 | #4,066 | 19 |
| 1999 | #6,836 | 14 | #3,376 | 23 |
| 1998 | #6,073 | 16 | #3,017 | 26 |
| 1997 | #4,819 | 21 | #3,601 | 19 |
| 1996 | #5,065 | 19 | #3,549 | 19 |
| 1995 | #5,019 | 19 | #5,501 | 10 |
| 1994 | #8,122 | 10 | #4,803 | 12 |
| 1993 | #6,622 | 13 | #5,771 | 9 |
| 1992 | #10,479 | 7 | #5,236 | 10 |
| 1991 | #7,987 | 10 | #5,521 | 9 |
| 1990 | #10,193 | 7 | #7,178 | 6 |
| 1989 | #9,681 | 7 | #4,017 | 13 |
| 1988 | #11,798 | 5 | #5,751 | 7 |
| 1987 | #11,325 | 5 | #3,731 | 12 |
| 1986 | #7,134 | 9 | #6,721 | 5 |
| 1985 | #6,457 | 10 | #6,523 | 5 |
| 1984 | #4,966 | 14 | #3,925 | 10 |
| 1983 | #5,457 | 12 | #6,238 | 5 |
| 1982 | #5,911 | 11 | #4,593 | 8 |
| 1981 | #5,254 | 13 | #4,153 | 9 |
| 1980 | #4,978 | 14 | #3,615 | 11 |
| 1979 | #7,313 | 8 | #3,810 | 10 |
| 1978 | #4,679 | 14 | #4,157 | 8 |
| 1977 | #4,425 | 15 | #2,361 | 19 |
| 1976 | #4,363 | 14 | #2,946 | 13 |
| 1975 | #5,984 | 9 | #4,797 | 6 |
| 1974 | #6,258 | 8 | #4,190 | 7 |
| 1973 | — | #4,505 | 6 | |
| 1972 | — | #4,441 | 6 | |
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1972
The first year at least five boys were named Cedar! It came in at #4,441, and was given to 6 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1983, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
See more about Cedar
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- 55 spots since 2024 (#1,189 → #1,244)
- 43 spots since 2020 (#1,201 → #1,244)
- 258 spots since 2015 (#1,502 → #1,244)
Rise & fade · boys
50 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1972
- Peaked 2022 at #1,125 (188 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · boys
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · boys
1 in 9,287
- Highest: 1 in 9,287 boys born in 2022 were named Cedar (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 10,675 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · boys
The 2010s
- 38.0% of all boys named Cedar (1,000) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 2005
- Mostly girls until 2004, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 75 | #2,361 (1977) | #3,901 |
| 1980s | 85 | #3,615 (1980) | #4,927 |
| 1990s | 143 | #3,017 (1998) | #4,755 |
| 2000s | 339 | #2,489 (2001) | #3,143 |
| 2010s | 1,000 | #1,188 (2019) | #1,736 |
| 2020s | 987 | #1,125 (2022) | #1,209 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Cedar ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: