Celestine

#3,211 for girls in 2025, 49 births · Last seen for boys in 1941 at #3,133
Given to girls 97.7% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1902 · 41 births
Debut · girls
12 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
9,809
since 1880

Celestine over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Celestine has never cracked the top 400 here.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201963peak #490, 1902girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#3,21149—
2024#3,96337—
2023#4,87327—
2022#4,47231—
2021#4,71928—
2020#5,16824—
2019#5,61222—
2018#6,52118—
2017#5,04526—
2016#4,42332—
2015#4,98127—
2014#6,45119—
2013#8,13514—
2012#7,14417—
2011#12,1538—
2010#9,23112—
2009#8,05815—
2008#11,5999—
2007#6,32321—
2006#6,59219—
2005#5,26624—
2004#5,74421—
2003#6,05519—
2002#6,39217—
2001#5,36421—
2000#5,93718—
1999#4,71823—
1998#3,91429—
1997#4,00727—
1996#4,73921—
1995#3,15236—
1994#5,98415—
1993#4,25724—
1992#4,68621—
1991#2,98938—
1990#3,43631—
1989#3,67327—
1988#2,93135—
1987#4,12220—
1986#3,05430—
1985#4,45517—
1984#3,06928—
1983#4,68615—
1982#3,64722—
1981#3,85920—
1980#3,50623—
1979#2,52536—
1978#2,43136—
1977#2,66631—
1976#2,33435—
1975#2,51631—
1974#1,82048—
1973#1,47864—
1972#1,65554—
1971#1,64056—
1970#1,43072—
1969#1,18289—
1968#1,33469—
1967#1,17282—
1966#1,06397—
1965#1,07994—
1964#1,032109—
1963#929129—
1962#939128—
1961#1,070104—
1960#897137—
1959#904133—
1958#844146—
1957#777167—
1956#806152—
1955#748161—
1954#677189—
1953#724157—
1952#634195—
1951#647182—
1950#625183—
1949#611183—
1948#658161—
1947#650164—
1946#723125—
1945#631133—
1944#610146—
1943#651136—
1942#631142—
1941#645121#3,1336
1940#632124—
1939#674101#3,4805
1938#565146—
1937#72686—
1936#635109#2,8547
1935#600118—
1934#667101—
1933#546137#2,36810
1932#565133#3,0927
1931#600122—
1930#661108#3,2897
1929#593132#3,9595
1928#625127#2,38712
1927#664117#2,70310
1926#618133#2,9049
1925#572157#3,7416
1924#587157#2,13215
1923#616142#1,94117
1922#573158#2,24014
1921#573157#3,2148
1920#570158#2,60211
1919#626125#2,51111
1918#697106#1,99816
1917#630117#2,42311
1916#593128#3,8975
1915#603118#2,31011
1914#69269#2,10110
1913#62867#1,67611
1912#68953#1,8858
1911#74134—
1910#57052—
1909#66935—
1908#67832—
1907#63734—
1906#54142—
1905#60034—
1904#71024—
1903#58931—
1902#49041—
1901#65923—
1900#63930—
1899#70420—
1898#54434—
1897#50933—
1896#65123—
1895#63823—
1894#66420—
1893#56125—
1892#79614—
1891#54123—
1890#64217—
1889#62017—
1888#52523—
1887#9377—
1886#8977—
1885#9216—
1884#54115—
1883#57911—
1882#7407—
1881——
1880#49212—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Celestine was already there! It came in at #492, and was given to 12 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1881, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.

Where Celestine is popular in 1963

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedMNIllinois: #669 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 9,011 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedWIMichigan: #707 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 11,437 girlsMINew York: #917 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 16,327 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: #725 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 12,723 girlsPANew Jersey: #715 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 11,499 girlsNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedCTCalifornia: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedWVVirginia: #510 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 5,684 girlsVAMaryland: #434 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 4,267 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: #611 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 7,727 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #464 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 4,119 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedALGeorgia: #532 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 5,452 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Celestine, so not publishedHITexas: #1,087 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 15,312 girlsTXFlorida: #787 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 9,704 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Maryland#434 · 1 in 4,267
  2. South Carolina#464 · 1 in 4,119
  3. Virginia#510 · 1 in 5,684
  4. Georgia#532 · 1 in 5,452
  5. North Carolina#611 · 1 in 7,727

Best ever in a state: #141 in District of Columbia, 1934.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Maryland#43471 in 4,267
South Carolina#46461 in 4,119
Virginia#51071 in 5,684
Georgia#53281 in 5,452
North Carolina#61161 in 7,727
Illinois#669111 in 9,011
Michigan#70771 in 11,437
New Jersey#71551 in 11,499
Pennsylvania#72581 in 12,723
Florida#78751 in 9,704
New York#917101 in 16,327
Texas#1,08771 in 15,312
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
California———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Massachusetts———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Celestine
Momentum · girls
Rising
  • 752 spots since 2024 (#3,963 → #3,211)
  • 1,957 spots since 2020 (#5,168 → #3,211)
  • 1,770 spots since 2015 (#4,981 → #3,211)
  • Biggest jump: 412 spots in 1888 (#937 → #525)
  • Biggest drop: 380 spots in 1885 (#541 → #921)
Rise & fade · girls
22 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1902 at #490 (41 births)
  • Births halved by 1981, 79 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 82 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 82 yrs · run 1882–1960
Share of babies · girls
1 in 6,441
  • Highest: 1 in 6,441 girls born in 1902 were named Celestine (0.02%)
  • Latest: 1 in 32,801 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1950s
  • 17.0% of all girls named Celestine (1,665) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s105#492 (1880)#695
1890s232#509 (1897)#625
1900s326#490 (1902)#621
1910s869#570 (1910)#647
1920s1,438#570 (1920)#599
1930s1,161#546 (1933)#624
1940s1,435#610 (1944)#644
1950s1,665#625 (1950)#739
1960s1,038#897 (1960)#1,070
1970s463#1,430 (1970)#2,050
1980s237#2,931 (1988)#3,700
1990s265#2,989 (1991)#4,188
2000s184#5,266 (2005)#6,733
2010s195#4,423 (2016)#6,970
2020s196#3,211 (2025)#4,401

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Celestine in 1963

girls
#929
129 births · 1 in 14,942 girls

Top girls' names in 1963

  1. #1Lisa56,047
  2. #2Mary41,546
  3. #3Susan33,991
  4. #4Karen32,492
  5. #5Linda27,727
  6. #6Donna25,405
  7. #7Patricia25,374
  8. #8Lori23,899
  9. #9Sandra21,621
  10. #10Cynthia21,589
  11. #929Celestine129
More about 1963

girls

1,927,507 girls got a published name in 1963; 1 in 14,942 of them was named Celestine, which outranked 87.9% of the 7,661 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 16.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Celestine
  1. #923Donita130
  2. #923Janeen130
  3. #923Lona130
  4. #929Celestine129
  5. #929Lisha129
  6. #929Mollie129
  7. #929Roxie129
  8. #934Athena128
  9. #934Delisa128
  10. #934Francesca128

Tied with 4 names at #929; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1962
Risers
  1. ↑ 631Zena#1,323 → #692
  2. ↑ 623Zina#992 → #369
  3. ↑ 540Trisha#1,020 → #480
  4. ↑ 457Shirl#1,304 → #847
  5. ↑ 396Glynis#992 → #596
Fallers
  1. ↓ 1,195Marnita#727 → #1,922
  2. ↓ 255Velvet#623 → #878
  3. ↓ 235Delphine#904 → #1,139
  4. ↓ 224Rosita#934 → #1,158
  5. ↓ 197Lindy#885 → #1,082

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1963 →