Ceola
Last seen for girls in 1988 at #11,798 · Last seen for boys in 1936 at #3,147
Given to girls 99.0% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1906 · 21 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 2,164since 1890
Ceola over time
Rank among girls' names. Ceola has never cracked the top 700 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | — | — | ||
| 2018 | — | — | ||
| 2017 | — | — | ||
| 2016 | — | — | ||
| 2015 | — | — | ||
| 2014 | — | — | ||
| 2013 | — | — | ||
| 2012 | — | — | ||
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | — | — | ||
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | #11,798 | 5 | — | |
| 1987 | #7,353 | 9 | — | |
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | #9,144 | 6 | — | |
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | #9,652 | 5 | — | |
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | #6,080 | 8 | — | |
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | #6,619 | 7 | — | |
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | #5,809 | 6 | — | |
| 1965 | #4,494 | 9 | — | |
| 1964 | #4,636 | 9 | — | |
| 1963 | #3,801 | 12 | — | |
| 1962 | #4,533 | 9 | — | |
| 1961 | #2,957 | 18 | — | |
| 1960 | #2,369 | 25 | — | |
| 1959 | #2,980 | 16 | — | |
| 1958 | #2,862 | 17 | — | |
| 1957 | #2,486 | 21 | — | |
| 1956 | #2,725 | 18 | — | |
| 1955 | #2,341 | 22 | — | |
| 1954 | #3,718 | 10 | — | |
| 1953 | #2,236 | 22 | — | |
| 1952 | #2,266 | 21 | — | |
| 1951 | #1,583 | 36 | — | |
| 1950 | #1,955 | 24 | — | |
| 1949 | #1,666 | 32 | — | |
| 1948 | #1,858 | 26 | — | |
| 1947 | #1,661 | 33 | — | |
| 1946 | #1,394 | 39 | — | |
| 1945 | #2,060 | 17 | — | |
| 1944 | #1,742 | 23 | — | |
| 1943 | #1,423 | 34 | — | |
| 1942 | #1,497 | 30 | — | |
| 1941 | #1,446 | 29 | — | |
| 1940 | #1,591 | 24 | — | |
| 1939 | #1,638 | 22 | — | |
| 1938 | #1,140 | 40 | — | |
| 1937 | #1,234 | 34 | — | |
| 1936 | #1,115 | 40 | #3,147 | 6 |
| 1935 | #1,197 | 35 | #3,645 | 5 |
| 1934 | #981 | 49 | — | |
| 1933 | #999 | 48 | — | |
| 1932 | #969 | 53 | — | |
| 1931 | #1,022 | 47 | — | |
| 1930 | #1,052 | 49 | — | |
| 1929 | #1,174 | 40 | — | |
| 1928 | #994 | 56 | — | |
| 1927 | #990 | 59 | — | |
| 1926 | #1,079 | 48 | #4,201 | 5 |
| 1925 | #1,008 | 55 | — | |
| 1924 | #903 | 70 | #4,347 | 5 |
| 1923 | #1,027 | 54 | — | |
| 1922 | #906 | 65 | — | |
| 1921 | #1,045 | 52 | — | |
| 1920 | #1,206 | 40 | — | |
| 1919 | #933 | 57 | — | |
| 1918 | #1,018 | 50 | — | |
| 1917 | #1,241 | 34 | — | |
| 1916 | #840 | 65 | — | |
| 1915 | #944 | 49 | — | |
| 1914 | #1,003 | 35 | — | |
| 1913 | #946 | 32 | — | |
| 1912 | #809 | 38 | — | |
| 1911 | #958 | 21 | — | |
| 1910 | #859 | 25 | — | |
| 1909 | #813 | 25 | — | |
| 1908 | #1,044 | 15 | — | |
| 1907 | #871 | 19 | — | |
| 1906 | #793 | 21 | — | |
| 1905 | #926 | 16 | — | |
| 1904 | #1,170 | 10 | — | |
| 1903 | #931 | 14 | — | |
| 1902 | #1,219 | 9 | — | |
| 1901 | #1,227 | 8 | — | |
| 1900 | #1,053 | 13 | — | |
| 1899 | #1,596 | 5 | — | |
| 1898 | #1,171 | 9 | — | |
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | #1,426 | 6 | — | |
| 1894 | #1,485 | 5 | — | |
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | #1,338 | 5 | — | |
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Ceola! It came in at #1,338, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1890–1894, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Ceola is popular in 1912
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Mississippi#237 · 1 in 1,351
- Georgia#325 · 1 in 2,828
Best ever in a state: #237 in Mississippi, 1912.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mississippi | #237 | 9 | 1 in 1,351 |
| Georgia | #325 | 7 | 1 in 2,828 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Ceola
- Not published in 2025; last seen 1988
- Biggest jump: 288 spots in 1903 (#1,219 → #931)
- Biggest drop: 401 spots in 1917 (#840 → #1,241)
- Debuted 1890
- Peaked 1906 at #793 (21 births)
- Births halved by 1954, 48 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 19 yrs · run 1909–1913
- Highest: 1 in 13,889 girls born in 1909 were named Ceola (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 356,171 girls born in 1988 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #793 in 1906, was only 1 in 14,062 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 24.9% of all girls named Ceola (539) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 30 | #1,171 (1898) | #1,403 |
| 1900s | 150 | #793 (1906) | #1,005 |
| 1910s | 406 | #809 (1912) | #955 |
| 1920s | 539 | #903 (1924) | #1,033 |
| 1930s | 417 | #969 (1932) | #1,135 |
| 1940s | 287 | #1,394 (1946) | #1,634 |
| 1950s | 207 | #1,583 (1951) | #2,515 |
| 1960s | 88 | #2,369 (1960) | #4,086 |
| 1970s | 20 | #6,080 (1973) | #7,450 |
| 1980s | 20 | #7,353 (1987) | #9,432 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Ceola in 1912
Top girls' names in 1912
More about 1912
girls
558,119 girls got a published name in 1912; 1 in 14,687 of them was named Ceola, which outranked 76.5% of the 3,445 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).