Chadwick
Last seen for girls in 1987 at #11,325 · #4,139 for boys in 2025, 25 births
Given to boys 99.8% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1975 · 707 births
- Debut · boys
- 6 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 13,276since 1914
Chadwick over time
Rank among boys' names. Chadwick has never cracked the top 200 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #4,139 | 25 | |
| 2024 | — | #4,200 | 25 | |
| 2023 | — | #3,416 | 34 | |
| 2022 | — | #2,616 | 51 | |
| 2021 | — | #2,972 | 41 | |
| 2020 | — | #3,570 | 30 | |
| 2019 | — | #4,806 | 20 | |
| 2018 | — | #2,994 | 39 | |
| 2017 | — | #3,781 | 28 | |
| 2016 | — | #5,124 | 18 | |
| 2015 | — | #2,966 | 39 | |
| 2014 | — | #3,371 | 32 | |
| 2013 | — | #3,339 | 32 | |
| 2012 | — | #3,231 | 34 | |
| 2011 | — | #3,235 | 34 | |
| 2010 | — | #3,308 | 33 | |
| 2009 | — | #2,623 | 47 | |
| 2008 | — | #2,753 | 44 | |
| 2007 | — | #2,643 | 46 | |
| 2006 | — | #2,398 | 51 | |
| 2005 | — | #2,129 | 57 | |
| 2004 | — | #1,701 | 75 | |
| 2003 | — | #1,630 | 77 | |
| 2002 | — | #1,571 | 78 | |
| 2001 | — | #1,481 | 82 | |
| 2000 | — | #1,514 | 79 | |
| 1999 | — | #1,235 | 101 | |
| 1998 | — | #1,246 | 97 | |
| 1997 | — | #1,027 | 124 | |
| 1996 | — | #985 | 127 | |
| 1995 | — | #862 | 157 | |
| 1994 | — | #917 | 142 | |
| 1993 | — | #800 | 175 | |
| 1992 | — | #704 | 213 | |
| 1991 | — | #650 | 244 | |
| 1990 | — | #593 | 282 | |
| 1989 | — | #529 | 328 | |
| 1988 | — | #497 | 336 | |
| 1987 | #11,325 | 5 | #454 | 383 |
| 1986 | — | #503 | 303 | |
| 1985 | — | #520 | 282 | |
| 1984 | — | #477 | 309 | |
| 1983 | — | #480 | 309 | |
| 1982 | — | #435 | 371 | |
| 1981 | — | #419 | 392 | |
| 1980 | — | #395 | 425 | |
| 1979 | — | #331 | 551 | |
| 1978 | — | #340 | 517 | |
| 1977 | #9,652 | 5 | #318 | 586 |
| 1976 | — | #297 | 619 | |
| 1975 | #7,173 | 7 | #272 | 707 |
| 1974 | — | #303 | 609 | |
| 1973 | — | #311 | 565 | |
| 1972 | #8,292 | 5 | #301 | 619 |
| 1971 | — | #329 | 566 | |
| 1970 | — | #425 | 370 | |
| 1969 | — | #485 | 250 | |
| 1968 | — | #561 | 182 | |
| 1967 | — | #628 | 143 | |
| 1966 | — | #747 | 98 | |
| 1965 | — | #942 | 61 | |
| 1964 | — | #1,288 | 37 | |
| 1963 | — | #1,318 | 35 | |
| 1962 | — | #1,805 | 20 | |
| 1961 | — | #2,070 | 16 | |
| 1960 | — | #2,535 | 11 | |
| 1959 | — | #2,530 | 11 | |
| 1958 | — | #2,093 | 15 | |
| 1957 | — | #2,190 | 14 | |
| 1956 | — | #2,015 | 16 | |
| 1955 | — | #1,538 | 25 | |
| 1954 | — | #2,114 | 14 | |
| 1953 | — | #2,905 | 8 | |
| 1952 | — | #2,251 | 12 | |
| 1951 | — | #2,246 | 12 | |
| 1950 | — | #1,879 | 16 | |
| 1949 | — | #2,225 | 12 | |
| 1948 | — | #1,703 | 19 | |
| 1947 | — | #1,850 | 17 | |
| 1946 | — | #1,557 | 21 | |
| 1945 | — | #2,743 | 7 | |
| 1944 | — | #2,633 | 8 | |
| 1943 | — | #2,074 | 13 | |
| 1942 | — | #3,212 | 6 | |
| 1941 | — | #2,491 | 9 | |
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | #2,829 | 7 | |
| 1938 | — | #2,646 | 8 | |
| 1937 | — | #2,332 | 10 | |
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | #3,252 | 6 | |
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | #2,542 | 9 | |
| 1932 | — | #3,361 | 6 | |
| 1931 | — | #2,864 | 8 | |
| 1930 | — | #3,289 | 7 | |
| 1929 | — | #2,589 | 10 | |
| 1928 | — | #2,048 | 15 | |
| 1927 | — | #2,408 | 12 | |
| 1926 | — | #2,904 | 9 | |
| 1925 | — | #2,936 | 9 | |
| 1924 | — | #3,023 | 9 | |
| 1923 | — | #2,446 | 12 | |
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | #2,376 | 13 | |
| 1920 | — | #2,459 | 12 | |
| 1919 | — | #2,877 | 9 | |
| 1918 | — | #3,096 | 8 | |
| 1917 | — | #2,732 | 9 | |
| 1916 | — | #3,897 | 5 | |
| 1915 | — | #2,621 | 9 | |
| 1914 | — | #2,915 | 6 | |
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Chadwick! It came in at #2,915, and was given to 6 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1922, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Chadwick is popular in 1972
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Georgia#132 · 1 in 687
- Mississippi#147 · 1 in 711
- South Carolina#157 · 1 in 837
- West Virginia#158 · 1 in 1,257
- Iowa#161 · 1 in 1,277
Best ever in a state: #108 in Tennessee, 1973.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Georgia | #132 | 59 | 1 in 687 |
| Mississippi | #147 | 28 | 1 in 711 |
| South Carolina | #157 | 26 | 1 in 837 |
| West Virginia | #158 | 11 | 1 in 1,257 |
| Iowa | #161 | 15 | 1 in 1,277 |
| Tennessee | #162 | 32 | 1 in 1,004 |
| Hawaii | #164 | 8 | 1 in 756 |
| Alabama | #178 | 28 | 1 in 987 |
| North Carolina | #178 | 37 | 1 in 1,124 |
| Virginia | #189 | 26 | 1 in 1,284 |
| Wisconsin | #190 | 18 | 1 in 1,689 |
| Louisiana | #219 | 28 | 1 in 1,116 |
| Kansas | #227 | 8 | 1 in 1,793 |
| Kentucky | #237 | 13 | 1 in 2,041 |
| Michigan | #237 | 33 | 1 in 2,088 |
| Minnesota | #253 | 9 | 1 in 2,976 |
| Indiana | #255 | 17 | 1 in 2,449 |
| Missouri | #271 | 14 | 1 in 2,510 |
| Oregon | #280 | 6 | 1 in 2,420 |
| Ohio | #287 | 25 | 1 in 3,255 |
| Illinois | #302 | 33 | 1 in 2,507 |
| Oklahoma | #317 | 7 | 1 in 2,700 |
| Maryland | #326 | 6 | 1 in 3,931 |
| Washington | #336 | 6 | 1 in 3,632 |
| Colorado | #340 | 6 | 1 in 3,018 |
| Florida | #368 | 15 | 1 in 3,366 |
| Texas | #370 | 37 | 1 in 2,876 |
| California | #603 | 17 | 1 in 8,832 |
| New York | #603 | 13 | 1 in 9,375 |
| Pennsylvania | #622 | 5 | 1 in 15,833 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Chadwick
- 61 spots since 2024 (#4,200 → #4,139)
- 569 spots since 2020 (#3,570 → #4,139)
- 1,173 spots since 2015 (#2,966 → #4,139)
- Biggest jump: 346 spots in 1965 (#1,288 → #942)
- Biggest drop: 123 spots in 1996 (#862 → #985)
- Debuted 1914
- Peaked 1975 at #272 (707 births)
- Births halved by 1983, 8 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 32 yrs · run 1965–1996
- Highest: 1 in 2,208 boys born in 1975 were named Chadwick (0.05%)
- Latest: 1 in 68,323 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 43.0% of all boys named Chadwick (5,709) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 46 | #2,621 (1915) | #3,023 |
| 1920s | 101 | #2,048 (1928) | #2,577 |
| 1930s | 61 | #2,332 (1937) | #2,889 |
| 1940s | 112 | #1,557 (1946) | #2,276 |
| 1950s | 143 | #1,538 (1955) | #2,176 |
| 1960s | 853 | #485 (1969) | #1,238 |
| 1970s | 5,709 | #272 (1975) | #323 |
| 1980s | 3,438 | #395 (1980) | #471 |
| 1990s | 1,662 | #593 (1990) | #902 |
| 2000s | 636 | #1,481 (2001) | #2,044 |
| 2010s | 309 | #2,966 (2015) | #3,616 |
| 2020s | 206 | #2,616 (2022) | #3,486 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Chadwick in 1972
Top girls' names in 1972
Top boys' names in 1972
More about 1972
girls
1,521,244 girls got a published name in 1972; 1 in 304,249 of them was named Chadwick, which outranked 14.2% of the 9,666 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 17.6% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Tied with 1,374 names at #8,292; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,621,608 boys got a published name in 1972; 1 in 2,620 of them was named Chadwick, which outranked 94.8% of the 5,751 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 26.5% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.