Charley
#760 for girls in 2025, 356 births · #1,826 for boys in 2025, 87 births
Given to boys 67.9% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1880 · 305 births
- Debut · boys
- 305 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 15 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 23,974since 1880
Charley over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #760 | 356 | #1,826 | 87 |
| 2024 | #730 | 386 | #1,833 | 88 |
| 2023 | #723 | 388 | #1,727 | 96 |
| 2022 | #700 | 421 | #1,852 | 86 |
| 2021 | #617 | 480 | #1,841 | 84 |
| 2020 | #537 | 561 | #1,798 | 83 |
| 2019 | #551 | 552 | #1,790 | 86 |
| 2018 | #563 | 553 | #1,625 | 100 |
| 2017 | #514 | 611 | #1,644 | 96 |
| 2016 | #557 | 560 | #1,875 | 79 |
| 2015 | #520 | 604 | #1,780 | 85 |
| 2014 | #489 | 641 | #1,873 | 78 |
| 2013 | #515 | 578 | #1,675 | 89 |
| 2012 | #596 | 484 | #1,909 | 75 |
| 2011 | #625 | 462 | #1,730 | 85 |
| 2010 | #827 | 324 | #1,677 | 92 |
| 2009 | #958 | 279 | #1,698 | 92 |
| 2008 | #1,005 | 263 | #1,874 | 77 |
| 2007 | #1,088 | 239 | #1,811 | 80 |
| 2006 | #1,107 | 226 | #2,010 | 66 |
| 2005 | #1,191 | 192 | #1,854 | 69 |
| 2004 | #1,273 | 168 | #1,720 | 74 |
| 2003 | #1,579 | 122 | #2,269 | 47 |
| 2002 | #1,897 | 93 | #2,295 | 45 |
| 2001 | #2,211 | 73 | #2,562 | 37 |
| 2000 | #2,174 | 73 | #2,222 | 44 |
| 1999 | #1,999 | 78 | #2,199 | 42 |
| 1998 | #1,751 | 90 | #2,274 | 39 |
| 1997 | #1,845 | 80 | #2,449 | 33 |
| 1996 | #2,014 | 69 | #1,842 | 49 |
| 1995 | #2,216 | 60 | #1,801 | 48 |
| 1994 | #2,209 | 60 | #1,927 | 43 |
| 1993 | #2,417 | 52 | #1,933 | 42 |
| 1992 | #2,239 | 59 | #2,046 | 38 |
| 1991 | #2,449 | 51 | #1,652 | 50 |
| 1990 | #2,258 | 56 | #1,516 | 56 |
| 1989 | #1,998 | 63 | #1,658 | 47 |
| 1988 | #1,952 | 62 | #1,482 | 51 |
| 1987 | #1,838 | 63 | #1,248 | 61 |
| 1986 | #2,003 | 54 | #1,199 | 63 |
| 1985 | #2,222 | 46 | #1,371 | 50 |
| 1984 | #3,233 | 26 | #1,134 | 64 |
| 1983 | #3,949 | 19 | #1,239 | 55 |
| 1982 | #4,347 | 17 | #1,072 | 72 |
| 1981 | #3,532 | 23 | #986 | 84 |
| 1980 | #4,743 | 15 | #1,022 | 78 |
| 1979 | #4,231 | 17 | #1,044 | 71 |
| 1978 | #3,924 | 18 | #1,040 | 70 |
| 1977 | #4,652 | 14 | #989 | 75 |
| 1976 | #5,215 | 11 | #1,123 | 57 |
| 1975 | #5,984 | 9 | #1,019 | 65 |
| 1974 | — | #961 | 72 | |
| 1973 | — | #992 | 66 | |
| 1972 | — | #943 | 73 | |
| 1971 | #7,388 | 6 | #886 | 84 |
| 1970 | — | #832 | 94 | |
| 1969 | — | #790 | 96 | |
| 1968 | #6,246 | 6 | #821 | 81 |
| 1967 | — | #822 | 76 | |
| 1966 | — | #800 | 83 | |
| 1965 | — | #764 | 93 | |
| 1964 | #6,767 | 5 | #760 | 101 |
| 1963 | — | #640 | 149 | |
| 1962 | — | #729 | 110 | |
| 1961 | — | #776 | 98 | |
| 1960 | — | #676 | 134 | |
| 1959 | — | #657 | 137 | |
| 1958 | — | #669 | 130 | |
| 1957 | #4,202 | 9 | #681 | 125 |
| 1956 | — | #640 | 140 | |
| 1955 | #4,740 | 7 | #629 | 140 |
| 1954 | #5,753 | 5 | #646 | 129 |
| 1953 | #5,040 | 6 | #618 | 138 |
| 1952 | #4,908 | 6 | #559 | 156 |
| 1951 | #3,482 | 10 | #577 | 144 |
| 1950 | #3,662 | 9 | #506 | 175 |
| 1949 | #3,176 | 11 | #507 | 173 |
| 1948 | #3,350 | 10 | #522 | 161 |
| 1947 | #3,448 | 10 | #490 | 188 |
| 1946 | — | #510 | 159 | |
| 1945 | #3,388 | 8 | #480 | 156 |
| 1944 | #2,625 | 12 | #432 | 200 |
| 1943 | #1,994 | 19 | #432 | 208 |
| 1942 | #4,124 | 6 | #438 | 198 |
| 1941 | #2,397 | 13 | #402 | 208 |
| 1940 | #2,297 | 13 | #404 | 201 |
| 1939 | #2,736 | 10 | #411 | 192 |
| 1938 | #2,340 | 13 | #362 | 236 |
| 1937 | #2,317 | 13 | #414 | 188 |
| 1936 | #2,521 | 11 | #350 | 238 |
| 1935 | #1,779 | 19 | #354 | 240 |
| 1934 | #2,187 | 14 | #343 | 254 |
| 1933 | #2,868 | 9 | #341 | 246 |
| 1932 | #1,877 | 18 | #328 | 282 |
| 1931 | #2,307 | 13 | #340 | 258 |
| 1930 | #2,690 | 11 | #323 | 289 |
| 1929 | #1,953 | 18 | #307 | 323 |
| 1928 | #2,094 | 17 | #315 | 321 |
| 1927 | #2,433 | 14 | #303 | 365 |
| 1926 | #2,708 | 12 | #288 | 398 |
| 1925 | #1,847 | 22 | #303 | 350 |
| 1924 | #2,308 | 16 | #275 | 430 |
| 1923 | #2,917 | 11 | #277 | 421 |
| 1922 | #3,379 | 9 | #273 | 435 |
| 1921 | #2,282 | 16 | #263 | 456 |
| 1920 | #2,079 | 18 | #249 | 485 |
| 1919 | #2,384 | 14 | #243 | 470 |
| 1918 | #3,512 | 8 | #247 | 462 |
| 1917 | #2,552 | 12 | #237 | 457 |
| 1916 | #2,028 | 16 | #230 | 461 |
| 1915 | #2,384 | 12 | #239 | 414 |
| 1914 | #2,434 | 9 | #224 | 359 |
| 1913 | — | #225 | 278 | |
| 1912 | — | #200 | 288 | |
| 1911 | — | #193 | 160 | |
| 1910 | #1,773 | 8 | #167 | 181 |
| 1909 | #2,208 | 5 | #166 | 147 |
| 1908 | — | #153 | 155 | |
| 1907 | — | #142 | 164 | |
| 1906 | — | #131 | 157 | |
| 1905 | — | #130 | 168 | |
| 1904 | — | #127 | 166 | |
| 1903 | — | #148 | 126 | |
| 1902 | — | #113 | 168 | |
| 1901 | #1,339 | 7 | #108 | 158 |
| 1900 | — | #103 | 224 | |
| 1899 | — | #132 | 120 | |
| 1898 | — | #110 | 170 | |
| 1897 | — | #112 | 156 | |
| 1896 | — | #111 | 168 | |
| 1895 | — | #105 | 178 | |
| 1894 | — | #99 | 186 | |
| 1893 | — | #94 | 191 | |
| 1892 | — | #92 | 210 | |
| 1891 | — | #82 | 193 | |
| 1890 | — | #93 | 183 | |
| 1889 | — | #88 | 199 | |
| 1888 | — | #77 | 254 | |
| 1887 | — | #75 | 221 | |
| 1886 | — | #81 | 214 | |
| 1885 | — | #65 | 285 | |
| 1884 | — | #63 | 290 | |
| 1883 | — | #63 | 254 | |
| 1882 | — | #67 | 262 | |
| 1881 | — | #62 | 266 | |
| 1880 | — | #58 | 305 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Charley was already there! It came in at #58, and was given to 305 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1992–2003, when fewer than 50 boys a year got the name.
Where Charley is popular in 1909
The SSA only publishes names by state from 1910 on.
See more about Charley
- 7 spots since 2024 (#1,833 → #1,826)
- 28 spots since 2020 (#1,798 → #1,826)
- 46 spots since 2015 (#1,780 → #1,826)
- Biggest jump: 134 spots in 1977 (#1,123 → #989)
- Biggest drop: 120 spots in 1964 (#640 → #760)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1880 at #58 (305 births)
- Births halved by 1899, 19 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 15 yrs · run 1880–1894
- Top 1,000: 97 yrs · run 1880–1974
- Highest: 1 in 362 boys born in 1880 were named Charley (0.28%)
- Latest: 1 in 19,633 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
- 16.6% of all boys named Charley (3,984) were born in this decade
- Mostly boys until 1986, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 2,550 | #58 (1880) | #70 |
| 1890s | 1,755 | #82 (1891) | #103 |
| 1900s | 1,633 | #103 (1900) | #132 |
| 1910s | 3,530 | #167 (1910) | #221 |
| 1920s | 3,984 | #249 (1920) | #285 |
| 1930s | 2,423 | #323 (1930) | #357 |
| 1940s | 1,852 | #402 (1941) | #462 |
| 1950s | 1,414 | #506 (1950) | #618 |
| 1960s | 1,021 | #640 (1963) | #758 |
| 1970s | 727 | #832 (1970) | #983 |
| 1980s | 625 | #986 (1981) | #1,241 |
| 1990s | 440 | #1,516 (1990) | #1,964 |
| 2000s | 631 | #1,698 (2009) | #2,032 |
| 2010s | 865 | #1,625 (2018) | #1,758 |
| 2020s | 524 | #1,727 (2023) | #1,813 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Charley in 1909
Top girls' names in 1909
Top boys' names in 1909
More about 1909
girls
347,228 girls got a published name in 1909; 1 in 69,446 of them was named Charley, which outranked 13.3% of the 2,548 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 21.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
boys
163,996 boys got a published name in 1909; 1 in 1,116 of them was named Charley, which outranked 90.1% of the 1,679 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 31.3% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #162Roland153
- #164Sylvester151
- #165Felix148
- #166Charley147
- #166Edmund147
- #166Emmett147
- #166Johnie147
- #171Phillip146
- #172Nathaniel143
- #173Aaron142
Tied with 4 names at #166; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.