Chauncey
Last seen for girls in 2014 at #16,513 · #4,396 for boys in 2025, 23 births
Given to boys 95.0% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1890 · 37 births
- Debut · boys
- 32 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 9,685since 1880
Chauncey over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Chauncey has never cracked the top 200 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #4,396 | 23 | |
| 2024 | — | #2,915 | 43 | |
| 2023 | — | #3,712 | 30 | |
| 2022 | — | #3,533 | 32 | |
| 2021 | — | #3,180 | 37 | |
| 2020 | — | #3,074 | 37 | |
| 2019 | — | #2,808 | 44 | |
| 2018 | — | #2,445 | 53 | |
| 2017 | — | #2,755 | 44 | |
| 2016 | — | #3,161 | 36 | |
| 2015 | — | #2,355 | 55 | |
| 2014 | #16,513 | 5 | #1,920 | 75 |
| 2013 | #16,547 | 5 | #2,044 | 66 |
| 2012 | — | #2,066 | 66 | |
| 2011 | — | #1,675 | 89 | |
| 2010 | — | #1,778 | 83 | |
| 2009 | — | #1,654 | 95 | |
| 2008 | #17,504 | 5 | #1,478 | 111 |
| 2007 | #17,636 | 5 | #1,445 | 111 |
| 2006 | — | #1,417 | 110 | |
| 2005 | — | #1,266 | 123 | |
| 2004 | #10,690 | 9 | #1,231 | 123 |
| 2003 | #13,844 | 6 | #1,364 | 99 |
| 2002 | #12,187 | 7 | #1,543 | 80 |
| 2001 | #8,196 | 12 | #1,287 | 102 |
| 2000 | — | #1,241 | 107 | |
| 1999 | #11,385 | 7 | #1,194 | 107 |
| 1998 | #7,532 | 12 | #950 | 147 |
| 1997 | #7,283 | 12 | #922 | 147 |
| 1996 | #8,132 | 10 | #1,049 | 116 |
| 1995 | #13,386 | 5 | #1,053 | 113 |
| 1994 | #4,376 | 23 | #1,053 | 112 |
| 1993 | #5,419 | 17 | #1,168 | 91 |
| 1992 | #3,968 | 26 | #1,055 | 108 |
| 1991 | #5,659 | 16 | #1,095 | 99 |
| 1990 | #4,003 | 25 | #949 | 119 |
| 1989 | #4,121 | 23 | #878 | 131 |
| 1988 | #4,653 | 18 | #858 | 122 |
| 1987 | #5,074 | 15 | #836 | 124 |
| 1986 | #4,186 | 19 | #803 | 128 |
| 1985 | #4,635 | 16 | #795 | 125 |
| 1984 | #4,478 | 16 | #719 | 147 |
| 1983 | #6,212 | 10 | #725 | 142 |
| 1982 | #3,647 | 22 | #686 | 159 |
| 1981 | #4,746 | 15 | #647 | 173 |
| 1980 | #5,245 | 13 | #687 | 159 |
| 1979 | #6,189 | 10 | #696 | 151 |
| 1978 | #4,931 | 13 | #666 | 158 |
| 1977 | #5,532 | 11 | #808 | 111 |
| 1976 | #6,048 | 9 | #911 | 83 |
| 1975 | #5,516 | 10 | #759 | 120 |
| 1974 | #5,776 | 9 | #761 | 113 |
| 1973 | #6,666 | 7 | #817 | 94 |
| 1972 | #6,558 | 7 | #889 | 81 |
| 1971 | #8,324 | 5 | #928 | 77 |
| 1970 | #5,413 | 9 | #818 | 98 |
| 1969 | #6,617 | 6 | #911 | 70 |
| 1968 | — | #799 | 86 | |
| 1967 | #6,042 | 6 | #900 | 64 |
| 1966 | #6,564 | 5 | #812 | 80 |
| 1965 | — | #934 | 62 | |
| 1964 | — | #881 | 75 | |
| 1963 | — | #829 | 83 | |
| 1962 | #6,578 | 5 | #862 | 77 |
| 1961 | — | #846 | 82 | |
| 1960 | — | #996 | 59 | |
| 1959 | — | #987 | 61 | |
| 1958 | #5,408 | 6 | #892 | 71 |
| 1957 | #6,086 | 5 | #936 | 65 |
| 1956 | — | #1,056 | 51 | |
| 1955 | — | #885 | 70 | |
| 1954 | — | #876 | 70 | |
| 1953 | — | #932 | 59 | |
| 1952 | #5,563 | 5 | #1,027 | 49 |
| 1951 | — | #852 | 67 | |
| 1950 | — | #1,006 | 48 | |
| 1949 | — | #1,063 | 44 | |
| 1948 | — | #1,063 | 44 | |
| 1947 | — | #1,108 | 43 | |
| 1946 | — | #1,076 | 41 | |
| 1945 | — | #1,006 | 40 | |
| 1944 | — | #1,152 | 33 | |
| 1943 | — | #1,280 | 29 | |
| 1942 | — | #928 | 51 | |
| 1941 | — | #1,051 | 38 | |
| 1940 | — | #1,227 | 30 | |
| 1939 | — | #1,052 | 37 | |
| 1938 | — | #939 | 45 | |
| 1937 | — | #967 | 42 | |
| 1936 | — | #906 | 46 | |
| 1935 | — | #872 | 52 | |
| 1934 | — | #1,059 | 38 | |
| 1933 | — | #885 | 49 | |
| 1932 | — | #786 | 65 | |
| 1931 | — | #858 | 55 | |
| 1930 | — | #815 | 63 | |
| 1929 | — | #940 | 51 | |
| 1928 | — | #862 | 59 | |
| 1927 | — | #849 | 63 | |
| 1926 | — | #783 | 69 | |
| 1925 | — | #822 | 65 | |
| 1924 | — | #823 | 67 | |
| 1923 | — | #815 | 68 | |
| 1922 | — | #717 | 83 | |
| 1921 | — | #715 | 84 | |
| 1920 | — | #775 | 73 | |
| 1919 | — | #783 | 68 | |
| 1918 | — | #733 | 76 | |
| 1917 | #4,083 | 6 | #694 | 76 |
| 1916 | — | #734 | 68 | |
| 1915 | — | #698 | 70 | |
| 1914 | — | #687 | 55 | |
| 1913 | — | #711 | 42 | |
| 1912 | — | #622 | 44 | |
| 1911 | — | #793 | 17 | |
| 1910 | — | #492 | 32 | |
| 1909 | — | #679 | 16 | |
| 1908 | — | #744 | 13 | |
| 1907 | — | #699 | 14 | |
| 1906 | — | #568 | 17 | |
| 1905 | — | #574 | 17 | |
| 1904 | — | #452 | 22 | |
| 1903 | — | #411 | 23 | |
| 1902 | — | #440 | 22 | |
| 1901 | — | #596 | 12 | |
| 1900 | — | #490 | 22 | |
| 1899 | — | #438 | 18 | |
| 1898 | — | #435 | 21 | |
| 1897 | — | #422 | 20 | |
| 1896 | — | #438 | 20 | |
| 1895 | — | #340 | 29 | |
| 1894 | — | #336 | 28 | |
| 1893 | — | #371 | 23 | |
| 1892 | — | #298 | 38 | |
| 1891 | — | #325 | 27 | |
| 1890 | — | #282 | 37 | |
| 1889 | — | #322 | 29 | |
| 1888 | — | #377 | 24 | |
| 1887 | — | #311 | 28 | |
| 1886 | — | #383 | 21 | |
| 1885 | — | #344 | 25 | |
| 1884 | — | #386 | 21 | |
| 1883 | — | #298 | 30 | |
| 1882 | — | #437 | 17 | |
| 1881 | — | #318 | 26 | |
| 1880 | — | #291 | 32 | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Chauncey was already there! It came in at #291, and was given to 32 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1901, when fewer than 13 boys a year got the name.
Where Chauncey is popular in 1900
The SSA only publishes names by state from 1910 on.
See more about Chauncey
Momentum · boys
Falling
- 1,481 spots since 2024 (#2,915 → #4,396)
- 1,322 spots since 2020 (#3,074 → #4,396)
- 2,041 spots since 2015 (#2,355 → #4,396)
- Biggest jump: 187 spots in 1910 (#679 → #492)
- Biggest drop: 352 spots in 1943 (#928 → #1,280)
Rise & fade · boys
10 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1890 at #282 (37 births)
- Births halved by 1899, 9 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 99 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 99 yrs · run 1880–1933
Share of babies · boys
1 in 3,001
- Highest: 1 in 3,001 boys born in 1890 were named Chauncey (0.03%)
- Latest: 1 in 74,264 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · boys
The 1980s
- 14.6% of all boys named Chauncey (1,410) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 253 | #291 (1880) | #347 |
| 1890s | 261 | #282 (1890) | #369 |
| 1900s | 178 | #411 (1903) | #565 |
| 1910s | 548 | #492 (1910) | #695 |
| 1920s | 682 | #715 (1921) | #810 |
| 1930s | 492 | #786 (1932) | #914 |
| 1940s | 393 | #928 (1942) | #1,095 |
| 1950s | 611 | #852 (1951) | #945 |
| 1960s | 738 | #799 (1968) | #877 |
| 1970s | 1,086 | #666 (1978) | #805 |
| 1980s | 1,410 | #647 (1981) | #763 |
| 1990s | 1,159 | #922 (1997) | #1,049 |
| 2000s | 1,061 | #1,231 (2004) | #1,393 |
| 2010s | 611 | #1,675 (2011) | #2,301 |
| 2020s | 202 | #2,915 (2024) | #3,468 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Chauncey in 1900
boys
#490
22 births · 1 in 6,840 boys
Top boys' names in 1900
More about 1900
boys
150,474 boys got a published name in 1900; 1 in 6,840 of them was named Chauncey, which outranked 67.5% of the 1,506 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 34.2% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).