Chloe

#23 for girls in 2025, 6,203 births · #9,714 for boys in 2025, 7 births
Given to girls 99.9% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
2009 · 11,922 births
Debut · girls
20 births
In top 100 · girls
28 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
254,389
since 1880

Chloe over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201983peak #9, 2009girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#236,203#9,7147
2024#206,406—
2023#265,997—
2022#196,482—
2021#256,347#9,7147
2020#256,153#10,6056
2019#246,414#8,8898
2018#256,679#9,6707
2017#226,982#8,8408
2016#207,484#6,34913
2015#177,950#7,49110
2014#188,562#10,7176
2013#148,801#5,65915
2012#119,672#5,72015
2011#1011,007#6,57812
2010#911,765#6,35913
2009#911,922#6,09514
2008#1011,836#5,76715
2007#1610,759#5,43416
2006#1810,404#5,30316
2005#199,598#5,57814
2004#238,729#1,83467
2003#249,082#6,25811
2002#258,902#4,50217
2001#308,177#5,39013
2000#387,094#5,92011
1999#634,964#7,1398
1998#873,794#8,4796
1997#1093,015—
1996#1122,782#7,9716
1995#1362,332—
1994#1552,079—
1993#1581,957—
1992#1611,893—
1991#1791,671—
1990#2121,371—
1989#302864#4,52711
1988#479475—
1987#439506—
1986#461466—
1985#562351—
1984#587309—
1983#842182—
1982#850183—
1981#1,079130—
1980#1,030139—
1979#1,270100—
1978#1,096119—
1977#1,27593—
1976#1,28685—
1975#1,52766—
1974#1,73352—
1973#1,83246—
1972#2,39830—
1971#2,54229—
1970#2,77925—
1969#2,51527—
1968#2,63023—
1967#2,86819—
1966#3,26615—
1965#3,26415—
1964#2,67522—
1963#2,70421—
1962#2,46324—
1961#3,06017—
1960#2,64921—
1959#1,79438—
1958#2,86217—
1957#2,65119—
1956#2,24924—
1955#2,15625—
1954#1,90930—
1953#1,50342—
1952#1,97826—
1951#1,52838—
1950#1,52437—
1949#1,69731—
1948#1,49938—
1947#1,30249—
1946#1,12157—
1945#1,37434—
1944#1,14047—
1943#95268—
1942#96066—
1941#81578—
1940#82075—
1939#86266—
1938#77581—
1937#74683—
1936#70091—
1935#80571—
1934#75678—
1933#76973—
1932#74881—
1931#88760—
1930#71794—
1929#81475—
1928#92464—
1927#91167—
1926#93164—
1925#94462—
1924#84978—
1923#86472—
1922#85274—
1921#76192—
1920#72998—
1919#81275—
1918#72399—
1917#665104—
1916#596127—
1915#599119—
1914#70168—
1913#61870—
1912#58269—
1911#49669—
1910#58450—
1909#61440—
1908#57442—
1907#55443—
1906#47252—
1905#52842—
1904#45052—
1903#42556—
1902#48542—
1901#49937—
1900#39072—
1899#39054—
1898#38565—
1897#41450—
1896#38753—
1895#33473—
1894#34067—
1893#31176—
1892#31176—
1891#35948—
1890#32660—
1889#30164—
1888#30362—
1887#33241—
1886#36534—
1885#34134—
1884#32636—
1883#43519—
1882#30633—
1881#44714—
1880#36720—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Chloe was already there! It came in at #367, and was given to 20 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1880–1881, when fewer than 21 girls a year got the name.

Where Chloe is popular in 1983

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedNHWashington: #519 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 3,896 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedMNIllinois: #896 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 9,098 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedWIMichigan: #669 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 6,905 girlsMINew York: #680 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 5,714 girlsNYMassachusetts: #607 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 6,568 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedINOhio: #885 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 11,477 girlsOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #664 for girls · 36 births · 1 in 5,214 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedUTColorado: #554 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 4,362 girlsCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedNEMissouri: #618 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 6,384 girlsMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: #247 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 1,144 girlsDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedOKLouisiana: #578 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 4,396 girlsLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedHITexas: #916 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 9,164 girlsTXFlorida: #966 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 9,809 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. District of Columbia#247 · 1 in 1,144
  2. Washington#519 · 1 in 3,896
  3. Colorado#554 · 1 in 4,362
  4. Louisiana#578 · 1 in 4,396
  5. Massachusetts#607 · 1 in 6,568

Best ever in a state: #1 in Hawaii, 2008.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
District of Columbia#24751 in 1,144
Washington#51971 in 3,896
Colorado#55451 in 4,362
Louisiana#57871 in 4,396
Massachusetts#60751 in 6,568
Missouri#61851 in 6,384
California#664361 in 5,214
Michigan#66981 in 6,905
New York#680181 in 5,714
Ohio#88561 in 11,477
Illinois#89681 in 9,098
Texas#916141 in 9,164
Florida#96661 in 9,809
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Maine———
Maryland———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Chloe
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 3 spots since 2024 (#20 → #23)
  • 2 spots since 2020 (#25 → #23)
  • 6 spots since 2015 (#17 → #23)
  • Biggest jump: 255 spots in 1984 (#842 → #587)
  • Biggest drop: 188 spots in 1944 (#952 → #1,140)
Rise & fade · girls
129 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 2009 at #9 (11,922 births)
  • Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 10 for 4 yrs
  • Top 10: 4 yrs · run 2008–2011
  • Top 100: 28 yrs · run 1998–2025
  • Top 1,000: 108 yrs · run 1880–1943
Share of babies · girls
1 in 151
  • Highest: 1 in 151 girls born in 2010 were named Chloe (0.66%)
  • Latest: 1 in 259 girls born in 2025 (0.39%)
  • Its best rank, #9 in 2009, was only 1 in 154 (0.65%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 2000s
  • 37.9% of all girls named Chloe (96,503) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s357#301 (1889)#352
1890s622#311 (1892)#356
1900s478#390 (1900)#499
1910s850#496 (1911)#638
1920s746#729 (1920)#858
1930s778#700 (1936)#777
1940s543#815 (1941)#1,168
1950s296#1,503 (1953)#2,015
1960s204#2,463 (1962)#2,809
1970s645#1,096 (1978)#1,774
1980s3,605#302 (1989)#663
1990s25,858#63 (1999)#137
2000s96,503#9 (2009)#21
2010s85,316#9 (2010)#17
2020s37,588#19 (2022)#23

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Chloe in 1983

girls
#842
182 births · 1 in 9,179 girls

Top girls' names in 1983

  1. #1Jennifer54,353
  2. #2Jessica45,283
  3. #3Amanda33,749
  4. #4Ashley33,289
  5. #5Sarah27,228
  6. #6Melissa23,475
  7. #7Nicole22,400
  8. #8Stephanie22,329
  9. #9Heather20,747
  10. #10Elizabeth19,842
  11. #842Chloe182
More about 1983

girls

1,670,609 girls got a published name in 1983; 1 in 9,179 of them was named Chloe, which outranked 93.0% of the 12,074 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 18.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Chloe
  1. #838Kristan183
  2. #838Marta183
  3. #838Shara183
  4. #842Chloe182
  5. #842Falon182
  6. #842Hailey182
  7. #845Echo181
  8. #845June181
  9. #845Sherita181

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1982
Risers
  1. ↑ 6,772Ciji#7,469 → #697
  2. ↑ 6,751Kirby#7,469 → #718
  3. ↑ 2,656Dwan#3,530 → #874
  4. ↑ 1,888Mallory#2,220 → #332
  5. ↑ 987Marquita#1,099 → #112
Fallers
  1. ↓ 656Syreeta#717 → #1,373
  2. ↓ 572Jenilee#817 → #1,389
  3. ↓ 538Tenika#947 → #1,485
  4. ↓ 396Toccara#541 → #937
  5. ↓ 333Venus#950 → #1,283

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1983 →