Chloe
#23 for girls in 2025, 6,203 births · #9,714 for boys in 2025, 7 births
Given to girls 99.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2009 · 11,922 births
- Debut · girls
- 20 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 28 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 254,389since 1880
Chloe over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #23 | 6,203 | #9,714 | 7 |
| 2024 | #20 | 6,406 | — | |
| 2023 | #26 | 5,997 | — | |
| 2022 | #19 | 6,482 | — | |
| 2021 | #25 | 6,347 | #9,714 | 7 |
| 2020 | #25 | 6,153 | #10,605 | 6 |
| 2019 | #24 | 6,414 | #8,889 | 8 |
| 2018 | #25 | 6,679 | #9,670 | 7 |
| 2017 | #22 | 6,982 | #8,840 | 8 |
| 2016 | #20 | 7,484 | #6,349 | 13 |
| 2015 | #17 | 7,950 | #7,491 | 10 |
| 2014 | #18 | 8,562 | #10,717 | 6 |
| 2013 | #14 | 8,801 | #5,659 | 15 |
| 2012 | #11 | 9,672 | #5,720 | 15 |
| 2011 | #10 | 11,007 | #6,578 | 12 |
| 2010 | #9 | 11,765 | #6,359 | 13 |
| 2009 | #9 | 11,922 | #6,095 | 14 |
| 2008 | #10 | 11,836 | #5,767 | 15 |
| 2007 | #16 | 10,759 | #5,434 | 16 |
| 2006 | #18 | 10,404 | #5,303 | 16 |
| 2005 | #19 | 9,598 | #5,578 | 14 |
| 2004 | #23 | 8,729 | #1,834 | 67 |
| 2003 | #24 | 9,082 | #6,258 | 11 |
| 2002 | #25 | 8,902 | #4,502 | 17 |
| 2001 | #30 | 8,177 | #5,390 | 13 |
| 2000 | #38 | 7,094 | #5,920 | 11 |
| 1999 | #63 | 4,964 | #7,139 | 8 |
| 1998 | #87 | 3,794 | #8,479 | 6 |
| 1997 | #109 | 3,015 | — | |
| 1996 | #112 | 2,782 | #7,971 | 6 |
| 1995 | #136 | 2,332 | — | |
| 1994 | #155 | 2,079 | — | |
| 1993 | #158 | 1,957 | — | |
| 1992 | #161 | 1,893 | — | |
| 1991 | #179 | 1,671 | — | |
| 1990 | #212 | 1,371 | — | |
| 1989 | #302 | 864 | #4,527 | 11 |
| 1988 | #479 | 475 | — | |
| 1987 | #439 | 506 | — | |
| 1986 | #461 | 466 | — | |
| 1985 | #562 | 351 | — | |
| 1984 | #587 | 309 | — | |
| 1983 | #842 | 182 | — | |
| 1982 | #850 | 183 | — | |
| 1981 | #1,079 | 130 | — | |
| 1980 | #1,030 | 139 | — | |
| 1979 | #1,270 | 100 | — | |
| 1978 | #1,096 | 119 | — | |
| 1977 | #1,275 | 93 | — | |
| 1976 | #1,286 | 85 | — | |
| 1975 | #1,527 | 66 | — | |
| 1974 | #1,733 | 52 | — | |
| 1973 | #1,832 | 46 | — | |
| 1972 | #2,398 | 30 | — | |
| 1971 | #2,542 | 29 | — | |
| 1970 | #2,779 | 25 | — | |
| 1969 | #2,515 | 27 | — | |
| 1968 | #2,630 | 23 | — | |
| 1967 | #2,868 | 19 | — | |
| 1966 | #3,266 | 15 | — | |
| 1965 | #3,264 | 15 | — | |
| 1964 | #2,675 | 22 | — | |
| 1963 | #2,704 | 21 | — | |
| 1962 | #2,463 | 24 | — | |
| 1961 | #3,060 | 17 | — | |
| 1960 | #2,649 | 21 | — | |
| 1959 | #1,794 | 38 | — | |
| 1958 | #2,862 | 17 | — | |
| 1957 | #2,651 | 19 | — | |
| 1956 | #2,249 | 24 | — | |
| 1955 | #2,156 | 25 | — | |
| 1954 | #1,909 | 30 | — | |
| 1953 | #1,503 | 42 | — | |
| 1952 | #1,978 | 26 | — | |
| 1951 | #1,528 | 38 | — | |
| 1950 | #1,524 | 37 | — | |
| 1949 | #1,697 | 31 | — | |
| 1948 | #1,499 | 38 | — | |
| 1947 | #1,302 | 49 | — | |
| 1946 | #1,121 | 57 | — | |
| 1945 | #1,374 | 34 | — | |
| 1944 | #1,140 | 47 | — | |
| 1943 | #952 | 68 | — | |
| 1942 | #960 | 66 | — | |
| 1941 | #815 | 78 | — | |
| 1940 | #820 | 75 | — | |
| 1939 | #862 | 66 | — | |
| 1938 | #775 | 81 | — | |
| 1937 | #746 | 83 | — | |
| 1936 | #700 | 91 | — | |
| 1935 | #805 | 71 | — | |
| 1934 | #756 | 78 | — | |
| 1933 | #769 | 73 | — | |
| 1932 | #748 | 81 | — | |
| 1931 | #887 | 60 | — | |
| 1930 | #717 | 94 | — | |
| 1929 | #814 | 75 | — | |
| 1928 | #924 | 64 | — | |
| 1927 | #911 | 67 | — | |
| 1926 | #931 | 64 | — | |
| 1925 | #944 | 62 | — | |
| 1924 | #849 | 78 | — | |
| 1923 | #864 | 72 | — | |
| 1922 | #852 | 74 | — | |
| 1921 | #761 | 92 | — | |
| 1920 | #729 | 98 | — | |
| 1919 | #812 | 75 | — | |
| 1918 | #723 | 99 | — | |
| 1917 | #665 | 104 | — | |
| 1916 | #596 | 127 | — | |
| 1915 | #599 | 119 | — | |
| 1914 | #701 | 68 | — | |
| 1913 | #618 | 70 | — | |
| 1912 | #582 | 69 | — | |
| 1911 | #496 | 69 | — | |
| 1910 | #584 | 50 | — | |
| 1909 | #614 | 40 | — | |
| 1908 | #574 | 42 | — | |
| 1907 | #554 | 43 | — | |
| 1906 | #472 | 52 | — | |
| 1905 | #528 | 42 | — | |
| 1904 | #450 | 52 | — | |
| 1903 | #425 | 56 | — | |
| 1902 | #485 | 42 | — | |
| 1901 | #499 | 37 | — | |
| 1900 | #390 | 72 | — | |
| 1899 | #390 | 54 | — | |
| 1898 | #385 | 65 | — | |
| 1897 | #414 | 50 | — | |
| 1896 | #387 | 53 | — | |
| 1895 | #334 | 73 | — | |
| 1894 | #340 | 67 | — | |
| 1893 | #311 | 76 | — | |
| 1892 | #311 | 76 | — | |
| 1891 | #359 | 48 | — | |
| 1890 | #326 | 60 | — | |
| 1889 | #301 | 64 | — | |
| 1888 | #303 | 62 | — | |
| 1887 | #332 | 41 | — | |
| 1886 | #365 | 34 | — | |
| 1885 | #341 | 34 | — | |
| 1884 | #326 | 36 | — | |
| 1883 | #435 | 19 | — | |
| 1882 | #306 | 33 | — | |
| 1881 | #447 | 14 | — | |
| 1880 | #367 | 20 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Chloe was already there! It came in at #367, and was given to 20 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1881, when fewer than 21 girls a year got the name.
Where Chloe is popular in 2003
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Oklahoma#7 · 1 in 100
- Arkansas#8 · 1 in 95
- West Virginia#9 · 1 in 75
- Tennessee#10 · 1 in 98
- Louisiana#10 · 1 in 105
Best ever in a state: #1 in Hawaii, 2008.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma | #7 | 167 | 1 in 100 |
| Arkansas | #8 | 126 | 1 in 95 |
| West Virginia | #9 | 96 | 1 in 75 |
| Indiana | #10 | 299 | 1 in 108 |
| Louisiana | #10 | 197 | 1 in 105 |
| Tennessee | #10 | 310 | 1 in 98 |
| Maine | #12 | 51 | 1 in 85 |
| Hawaii | #13 | 34 | 1 in 104 |
| Iowa | #13 | 134 | 1 in 102 |
| Vermont | #13 | 21 | 1 in 77 |
| Kansas | #14 | 119 | 1 in 115 |
| Oregon | #14 | 130 | 1 in 125 |
| Kentucky | #15 | 168 | 1 in 117 |
| North Dakota | #15 | 29 | 1 in 89 |
| Alaska | #16 | 23 | 1 in 97 |
| Mississippi | #16 | 101 | 1 in 114 |
| Missouri | #16 | 229 | 1 in 124 |
| Nebraska | #17 | 78 | 1 in 106 |
| South Dakota | #17 | 29 | 1 in 110 |
| Washington | #17 | 219 | 1 in 132 |
| Michigan | #18 | 358 | 1 in 137 |
| North Carolina | #18 | 311 | 1 in 140 |
| Ohio | #18 | 443 | 1 in 132 |
| Georgia | #20 | 309 | 1 in 161 |
| Colorado | #21 | 152 | 1 in 166 |
| Alabama | #22 | 138 | 1 in 142 |
| Montana | #22 | 23 | 1 in 126 |
| District of Columbia | #23 | 26 | 1 in 130 |
| Idaho | #24 | 42 | 1 in 152 |
| Wyoming | #24 | 13 | 1 in 90 |
| Florida | #25 | 421 | 1 in 190 |
| New Hampshire | #25 | 42 | 1 in 109 |
| Utah | #25 | 105 | 1 in 172 |
| Texas | #27 | 726 | 1 in 218 |
| Minnesota | #28 | 173 | 1 in 150 |
| Rhode Island | #28 | 28 | 1 in 139 |
| South Carolina | #28 | 106 | 1 in 160 |
| Wisconsin | #28 | 178 | 1 in 141 |
| Illinois | #29 | 358 | 1 in 194 |
| Pennsylvania | #30 | 340 | 1 in 166 |
| Arizona | #32 | 153 | 1 in 220 |
| Nevada | #32 | 60 | 1 in 172 |
| Virginia | #33 | 193 | 1 in 187 |
| Connecticut | #39 | 82 | 1 in 180 |
| Maryland | #39 | 129 | 1 in 188 |
| Massachusetts | #39 | 152 | 1 in 199 |
| California | #41 | 881 | 1 in 257 |
| New York | #46 | 390 | 1 in 252 |
| New Jersey | #57 | 154 | 1 in 274 |
| Delaware | #61 | 16 | 1 in 199 |
| New Mexico | #113 | 20 | 1 in 406 |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Chloe
- 3 spots since 2024 (#20 → #23)
- 2 spots since 2020 (#25 → #23)
- 6 spots since 2015 (#17 → #23)
- Biggest jump: 255 spots in 1984 (#842 → #587)
- Biggest drop: 188 spots in 1944 (#952 → #1,140)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 2009 at #9 (11,922 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: 4 yrs · run 2008–2011
- Top 100: 28 yrs · run 1998–2025
- Top 1,000: 108 yrs · run 1880–1943
- Highest: 1 in 151 girls born in 2010 were named Chloe (0.66%)
- Latest: 1 in 259 girls born in 2025 (0.39%)
- Its best rank, #9 in 2009, was only 1 in 154 (0.65%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 37.9% of all girls named Chloe (96,503) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 357 | #301 (1889) | #352 |
| 1890s | 622 | #311 (1892) | #356 |
| 1900s | 478 | #390 (1900) | #499 |
| 1910s | 850 | #496 (1911) | #638 |
| 1920s | 746 | #729 (1920) | #858 |
| 1930s | 778 | #700 (1936) | #777 |
| 1940s | 543 | #815 (1941) | #1,168 |
| 1950s | 296 | #1,503 (1953) | #2,015 |
| 1960s | 204 | #2,463 (1962) | #2,809 |
| 1970s | 645 | #1,096 (1978) | #1,774 |
| 1980s | 3,605 | #302 (1989) | #663 |
| 1990s | 25,858 | #63 (1999) | #137 |
| 2000s | 96,503 | #9 (2009) | #21 |
| 2010s | 85,316 | #9 (2010) | #17 |
| 2020s | 37,588 | #19 (2022) | #23 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Chloe in 2003
Top girls' names in 2003
Top boys' names in 2003
More about 2003
girls
1,827,145 girls got a published name in 2003; 1 in 201 of them was named Chloe, which outranked 99.9% of the 18,439 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.6% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,975,349 boys got a published name in 2003; 1 in 179,577 of them was named Chloe, which outranked 51.0% of the 12,761 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 11.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #5,877Zekiah12
- #5,877Zeshan12
- #5,877Ziaire12
- #6,258Chloe11
- #6,258Aaronjames11
- #6,258Aayden11
- #6,258Adarian11
- #6,715Aadam10
- #6,715Aadarsh10
- #6,715Aalijah10
Tied with 456 names at #6,258; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.