Claudia
#1,096 for girls in 2025, 219 births · Last seen for boys in 2002 at #10,667
Given to girls 99.4% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1952 · 3,383 births
- Debut · girls
- 48 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 128,318since 1880
Claudia over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Claudia has never cracked the top 100 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,096 | 219 | — | |
| 2024 | #1,086 | 227 | — | |
| 2023 | #1,081 | 229 | — | |
| 2022 | #1,095 | 228 | — | |
| 2021 | #1,029 | 246 | — | |
| 2020 | #1,021 | 246 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,050 | 244 | — | |
| 2018 | #865 | 313 | — | |
| 2017 | #832 | 326 | — | |
| 2016 | #762 | 374 | — | |
| 2015 | #743 | 379 | — | |
| 2014 | #729 | 384 | — | |
| 2013 | #657 | 434 | — | |
| 2012 | #595 | 485 | — | |
| 2011 | #604 | 475 | — | |
| 2010 | #512 | 585 | — | |
| 2009 | #480 | 642 | — | |
| 2008 | #418 | 771 | — | |
| 2007 | #403 | 814 | — | |
| 2006 | #342 | 966 | — | |
| 2005 | #313 | 1,022 | — | |
| 2004 | #270 | 1,202 | — | |
| 2003 | #251 | 1,303 | — | |
| 2002 | #224 | 1,396 | #10,667 | 5 |
| 2001 | #212 | 1,495 | — | |
| 2000 | #200 | 1,609 | — | |
| 1999 | #186 | 1,660 | #9,912 | 5 |
| 1998 | #179 | 1,706 | — | |
| 1997 | #167 | 1,837 | — | |
| 1996 | #174 | 1,807 | #6,496 | 8 |
| 1995 | #172 | 1,750 | — | |
| 1994 | #198 | 1,506 | #5,868 | 9 |
| 1993 | #183 | 1,593 | #4,447 | 13 |
| 1992 | #190 | 1,596 | #5,236 | 10 |
| 1991 | #191 | 1,569 | #3,105 | 20 |
| 1990 | #197 | 1,496 | #2,865 | 22 |
| 1989 | #192 | 1,417 | #3,094 | 19 |
| 1988 | #207 | 1,268 | #2,509 | 23 |
| 1987 | #206 | 1,304 | #2,838 | 18 |
| 1986 | #195 | 1,333 | #2,510 | 21 |
| 1985 | #193 | 1,398 | #2,504 | 20 |
| 1984 | #198 | 1,353 | #2,292 | 22 |
| 1983 | #195 | 1,353 | #2,787 | 16 |
| 1982 | #190 | 1,439 | #2,059 | 26 |
| 1981 | #181 | 1,530 | #2,680 | 17 |
| 1980 | #191 | 1,405 | #3,430 | 12 |
| 1979 | #203 | 1,308 | #3,168 | 13 |
| 1978 | #214 | 1,199 | #3,614 | 10 |
| 1977 | #206 | 1,233 | #3,203 | 12 |
| 1976 | #182 | 1,413 | #3,471 | 10 |
| 1975 | #180 | 1,444 | #2,902 | 13 |
| 1974 | #167 | 1,609 | #2,549 | 15 |
| 1973 | #176 | 1,566 | #2,513 | 15 |
| 1972 | #203 | 1,365 | — | |
| 1971 | #237 | 1,250 | #2,813 | 12 |
| 1970 | #252 | 1,228 | #2,293 | 16 |
| 1969 | #259 | 1,123 | #2,682 | 11 |
| 1968 | #274 | 994 | #4,136 | 5 |
| 1967 | #282 | 908 | #3,559 | 6 |
| 1966 | #315 | 797 | — | |
| 1965 | #314 | 820 | #3,244 | 7 |
| 1964 | #291 | 999 | #4,039 | 5 |
| 1963 | #291 | 1,005 | — | |
| 1962 | #290 | 1,000 | — | |
| 1961 | #264 | 1,161 | #4,065 | 5 |
| 1960 | #259 | 1,192 | #4,038 | 5 |
| 1959 | #221 | 1,424 | #3,290 | 7 |
| 1958 | #206 | 1,580 | #2,642 | 10 |
| 1957 | #204 | 1,663 | — | |
| 1956 | #186 | 1,915 | #3,942 | 5 |
| 1955 | #151 | 2,410 | #3,505 | 6 |
| 1954 | #145 | 2,515 | — | |
| 1953 | #126 | 2,858 | #3,425 | 6 |
| 1952 | #111 | 3,383 | — | |
| 1951 | #123 | 2,866 | #2,844 | 8 |
| 1950 | #126 | 2,536 | #2,770 | 8 |
| 1949 | #127 | 2,519 | #2,802 | 8 |
| 1948 | #122 | 2,624 | #2,443 | 10 |
| 1947 | #122 | 2,766 | #2,498 | 10 |
| 1946 | #124 | 2,308 | #2,271 | 11 |
| 1945 | #127 | 1,911 | #1,772 | 15 |
| 1944 | #120 | 2,220 | #2,633 | 8 |
| 1943 | #159 | 1,584 | — | |
| 1942 | #172 | 1,360 | #2,523 | 9 |
| 1941 | #185 | 1,019 | #3,133 | 6 |
| 1940 | #205 | 863 | #3,459 | 5 |
| 1939 | #198 | 901 | #2,449 | 9 |
| 1938 | #208 | 837 | #2,646 | 8 |
| 1937 | #209 | 795 | #3,518 | 5 |
| 1936 | #207 | 792 | #2,854 | 7 |
| 1935 | #233 | 719 | #3,645 | 5 |
| 1934 | #274 | 500 | #2,742 | 8 |
| 1933 | #301 | 411 | #3,268 | 6 |
| 1932 | #347 | 331 | — | |
| 1931 | #330 | 375 | #3,763 | 5 |
| 1930 | #366 | 338 | — | |
| 1929 | #380 | 312 | #2,980 | 8 |
| 1928 | #349 | 376 | #3,697 | 6 |
| 1927 | #357 | 361 | #4,210 | 5 |
| 1926 | #337 | 386 | #2,904 | 9 |
| 1925 | #349 | 376 | #4,197 | 5 |
| 1924 | #350 | 380 | #3,867 | 6 |
| 1923 | #352 | 356 | #3,822 | 6 |
| 1922 | #324 | 401 | #2,240 | 14 |
| 1921 | #322 | 419 | #2,265 | 14 |
| 1920 | #329 | 389 | #2,765 | 10 |
| 1919 | #338 | 355 | #3,391 | 7 |
| 1918 | #309 | 428 | #3,728 | 6 |
| 1917 | #336 | 342 | #2,562 | 10 |
| 1916 | #320 | 361 | #2,543 | 10 |
| 1915 | #295 | 387 | #2,829 | 8 |
| 1914 | #309 | 285 | — | |
| 1913 | #310 | 235 | — | |
| 1912 | #301 | 224 | — | |
| 1911 | #293 | 178 | — | |
| 1910 | #335 | 137 | — | |
| 1909 | #290 | 155 | — | |
| 1908 | #306 | 134 | — | |
| 1907 | #290 | 143 | — | |
| 1906 | #278 | 142 | — | |
| 1905 | #304 | 122 | — | |
| 1904 | #327 | 100 | — | |
| 1903 | #315 | 98 | — | |
| 1902 | #318 | 97 | — | |
| 1901 | #331 | 84 | — | |
| 1900 | #293 | 125 | #1,310 | 5 |
| 1899 | #316 | 89 | — | |
| 1898 | #310 | 103 | — | |
| 1897 | #316 | 85 | — | |
| 1896 | #304 | 92 | — | |
| 1895 | #288 | 96 | — | |
| 1894 | #263 | 108 | — | |
| 1893 | #280 | 89 | — | |
| 1892 | #272 | 95 | — | |
| 1891 | #276 | 81 | — | |
| 1890 | #258 | 95 | — | |
| 1889 | #248 | 88 | — | |
| 1888 | #255 | 81 | — | |
| 1887 | #243 | 74 | — | |
| 1886 | #270 | 59 | — | |
| 1885 | #246 | 67 | — | |
| 1884 | #275 | 50 | — | |
| 1883 | #234 | 58 | — | |
| 1882 | #247 | 49 | — | |
| 1881 | #208 | 52 | — | |
| 1880 | #223 | 48 | — | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Claudia was already there! It came in at #223, and was given to 48 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1886, when fewer than 68 girls a year got the name.
Where Claudia is popular in 1910
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Georgia#156 · 1 in 821
- Florida#181 · 1 in 805
- South Carolina#195 · 1 in 1,170
- Oklahoma#208 · 1 in 1,039
- North Carolina#225 · 1 in 1,401
Best ever in a state: #30 in Texas, 1973.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Georgia | #156 | 19 | 1 in 821 |
| Florida | #181 | 5 | 1 in 805 |
| South Carolina | #195 | 8 | 1 in 1,170 |
| Oklahoma | #208 | 7 | 1 in 1,039 |
| North Carolina | #225 | 9 | 1 in 1,401 |
| Alabama | #229 | 9 | 1 in 1,456 |
| Mississippi | #254 | 7 | 1 in 1,495 |
| Virginia | #257 | 5 | 1 in 2,155 |
| Kentucky | #265 | 6 | 1 in 1,773 |
| Tennessee | #272 | 6 | 1 in 1,746 |
| Texas | #289 | 13 | 1 in 1,486 |
| Illinois | #290 | 7 | 1 in 2,627 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Claudia
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 10 spots since 2024 (#1,086 → #1,096)
- 75 spots since 2020 (#1,021 → #1,096)
- 353 spots since 2015 (#743 → #1,096)
- Biggest jump: 46 spots in 1933 (#347 → #301)
- Biggest drop: 185 spots in 2019 (#865 → #1,050)
Rise & fade · girls
72 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1952 at #111 (3,383 births)
- Births halved by 1957, 5 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 139 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 139 yrs · run 1880–2018
Share of babies · girls
1 in 548
- Highest: 1 in 548 girls born in 1952 were named Claudia (0.18%)
- Latest: 1 in 7,339 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · girls
The 1950s
- 18.0% of all girls named Claudia (23,150) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 626 | #208 (1881) | #245 |
| 1890s | 933 | #258 (1890) | #288 |
| 1900s | 1,200 | #278 (1906) | #305 |
| 1910s | 2,932 | #293 (1911) | #315 |
| 1920s | 3,756 | #322 (1921) | #345 |
| 1930s | 5,999 | #198 (1939) | #267 |
| 1940s | 19,174 | #120 (1944) | #146 |
| 1950s | 23,150 | #111 (1952) | #160 |
| 1960s | 9,999 | #259 (1960) | #284 |
| 1970s | 13,615 | #167 (1974) | #202 |
| 1980s | 13,800 | #181 (1981) | #195 |
| 1990s | 16,520 | #167 (1997) | #184 |
| 2000s | 11,220 | #200 (2000) | #311 |
| 2010s | 3,999 | #512 (2010) | #735 |
| 2020s | 1,395 | #1,021 (2020) | #1,068 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Claudia in 1910
girls
#335
137 births · 1 in 2,894 girls
Top girls' names in 1910
More about 1910
girls
396,503 girls got a published name in 1910; 1 in 2,894 of them was named Claudia, which outranked 88.0% of the 2,790 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 21.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).