Cleo
#577 for girls in 2025, 516 births · #5,208 for boys in 2025, 18 births
Given to girls 74.4% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1907 · 325 births
- Debut · girls
- 17 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 33,565since 1880
Cleo over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #577 | 516 | #5,208 | 18 |
| 2024 | #607 | 495 | #4,701 | 21 |
| 2023 | #608 | 490 | #4,220 | 25 |
| 2022 | #664 | 445 | #5,445 | 17 |
| 2021 | #793 | 356 | #4,936 | 19 |
| 2020 | #881 | 303 | #5,451 | 16 |
| 2019 | #968 | 270 | #6,777 | 12 |
| 2018 | #1,108 | 222 | #3,993 | 26 |
| 2017 | #1,465 | 153 | #5,111 | 18 |
| 2016 | #1,545 | 145 | #4,943 | 19 |
| 2015 | #1,743 | 120 | #5,507 | 16 |
| 2014 | #1,982 | 100 | #9,642 | 7 |
| 2013 | #2,279 | 81 | #9,655 | 7 |
| 2012 | #1,690 | 124 | #5,482 | 16 |
| 2011 | #2,173 | 87 | #9,600 | 7 |
| 2010 | #2,405 | 78 | #9,693 | 7 |
| 2009 | #2,568 | 72 | #12,491 | 5 |
| 2008 | #3,420 | 48 | #6,393 | 13 |
| 2007 | #2,858 | 63 | #6,622 | 12 |
| 2006 | #2,940 | 58 | #10,662 | 6 |
| 2005 | #3,081 | 51 | #5,875 | 13 |
| 2004 | #3,033 | 51 | #9,948 | 6 |
| 2003 | #2,707 | 58 | #8,643 | 7 |
| 2002 | #2,331 | 69 | #6,088 | 11 |
| 2001 | #2,193 | 74 | #10,556 | 5 |
| 2000 | #2,332 | 66 | #4,573 | 16 |
| 1999 | #2,737 | 50 | #4,762 | 14 |
| 1998 | #2,307 | 61 | #4,873 | 13 |
| 1997 | #2,360 | 56 | #3,455 | 20 |
| 1996 | #2,253 | 59 | #4,185 | 15 |
| 1995 | #2,977 | 39 | #4,508 | 13 |
| 1994 | #2,877 | 41 | #4,290 | 14 |
| 1993 | #3,221 | 35 | #4,020 | 15 |
| 1992 | #2,433 | 53 | #3,220 | 20 |
| 1991 | #2,989 | 38 | #3,224 | 19 |
| 1990 | #2,900 | 39 | #2,488 | 27 |
| 1989 | #3,402 | 30 | #4,017 | 13 |
| 1988 | #3,039 | 33 | #2,599 | 22 |
| 1987 | #2,612 | 38 | #2,215 | 26 |
| 1986 | #2,512 | 39 | #2,226 | 25 |
| 1985 | #2,484 | 39 | #2,504 | 20 |
| 1984 | #3,527 | 23 | #2,292 | 22 |
| 1983 | #2,910 | 29 | #2,140 | 24 |
| 1982 | #3,418 | 24 | #1,774 | 32 |
| 1981 | #3,340 | 25 | #2,086 | 25 |
| 1980 | #3,002 | 29 | #2,058 | 26 |
| 1979 | #2,525 | 36 | #1,788 | 31 |
| 1978 | #2,680 | 31 | #1,474 | 40 |
| 1977 | #2,606 | 32 | #1,515 | 37 |
| 1976 | #3,002 | 24 | #1,828 | 27 |
| 1975 | #2,680 | 28 | #1,304 | 44 |
| 1974 | #2,066 | 40 | #1,886 | 24 |
| 1973 | #2,019 | 40 | #1,464 | 34 |
| 1972 | #2,173 | 35 | #1,771 | 25 |
| 1971 | #2,296 | 34 | #1,466 | 34 |
| 1970 | #2,395 | 31 | #1,416 | 35 |
| 1969 | #2,208 | 33 | #1,265 | 39 |
| 1968 | #1,975 | 37 | #1,393 | 31 |
| 1967 | #1,881 | 39 | #1,312 | 33 |
| 1966 | #1,532 | 53 | #1,016 | 51 |
| 1965 | #1,421 | 60 | #1,081 | 47 |
| 1964 | #1,281 | 75 | #1,044 | 52 |
| 1963 | #1,508 | 55 | #1,121 | 47 |
| 1962 | #1,234 | 79 | #1,215 | 41 |
| 1961 | #1,268 | 76 | #1,001 | 60 |
| 1960 | #1,301 | 71 | #1,083 | 51 |
| 1959 | #1,104 | 94 | #964 | 64 |
| 1958 | #1,059 | 98 | #1,006 | 57 |
| 1957 | #1,015 | 106 | #853 | 77 |
| 1956 | #830 | 142 | #778 | 91 |
| 1955 | #796 | 147 | #745 | 96 |
| 1954 | #782 | 143 | #788 | 83 |
| 1953 | #794 | 135 | #693 | 106 |
| 1952 | #689 | 167 | #673 | 106 |
| 1951 | #765 | 133 | #711 | 95 |
| 1950 | #686 | 156 | #681 | 100 |
| 1949 | #646 | 164 | #656 | 110 |
| 1948 | #643 | 168 | #673 | 100 |
| 1947 | #584 | 212 | #568 | 141 |
| 1946 | #556 | 203 | #562 | 130 |
| 1945 | #542 | 182 | #583 | 107 |
| 1944 | #494 | 213 | #564 | 117 |
| 1943 | #470 | 244 | #543 | 133 |
| 1942 | #438 | 277 | #494 | 155 |
| 1941 | #414 | 275 | #496 | 138 |
| 1940 | #384 | 301 | #495 | 139 |
| 1939 | #372 | 312 | #479 | 141 |
| 1938 | #318 | 387 | #427 | 178 |
| 1937 | #313 | 391 | #442 | 159 |
| 1936 | #333 | 350 | #412 | 179 |
| 1935 | #291 | 426 | #435 | 167 |
| 1934 | #288 | 448 | #380 | 206 |
| 1933 | #297 | 417 | #370 | 215 |
| 1932 | #294 | 455 | #396 | 200 |
| 1931 | #284 | 482 | #375 | 223 |
| 1930 | #290 | 515 | #402 | 208 |
| 1929 | #263 | 584 | #417 | 198 |
| 1928 | #263 | 606 | #377 | 241 |
| 1927 | #256 | 662 | #315 | 335 |
| 1926 | #240 | 730 | #345 | 280 |
| 1925 | #229 | 812 | #334 | 298 |
| 1924 | #218 | 909 | #335 | 300 |
| 1923 | #216 | 883 | #328 | 314 |
| 1922 | #202 | 991 | #329 | 309 |
| 1921 | #201 | 992 | #313 | 345 |
| 1920 | #191 | 1,049 | #305 | 350 |
| 1919 | #190 | 1,013 | #282 | 355 |
| 1918 | #197 | 1,009 | #279 | 363 |
| 1917 | #189 | 1,009 | #298 | 313 |
| 1916 | #180 | 1,031 | #289 | 319 |
| 1915 | #184 | 914 | #257 | 349 |
| 1914 | #197 | 672 | #309 | 215 |
| 1913 | #198 | 536 | #343 | 145 |
| 1912 | #204 | 469 | #311 | 139 |
| 1911 | #200 | 358 | #300 | 78 |
| 1910 | #190 | 357 | #289 | 72 |
| 1909 | #178 | 333 | #292 | 60 |
| 1908 | #191 | 290 | #310 | 50 |
| 1907 | #171 | 325 | #278 | 56 |
| 1906 | #200 | 238 | #273 | 52 |
| 1905 | #193 | 248 | #281 | 49 |
| 1904 | #195 | 230 | #312 | 40 |
| 1903 | #190 | 221 | #297 | 40 |
| 1902 | #211 | 198 | #337 | 33 |
| 1901 | #229 | 160 | #359 | 26 |
| 1900 | #226 | 198 | #402 | 31 |
| 1899 | #241 | 132 | #613 | 11 |
| 1898 | #253 | 139 | #543 | 15 |
| 1897 | #245 | 131 | #384 | 24 |
| 1896 | #237 | 134 | #367 | 27 |
| 1895 | #252 | 125 | #456 | 19 |
| 1894 | #249 | 118 | #631 | 11 |
| 1893 | #238 | 122 | #391 | 21 |
| 1892 | #272 | 95 | #497 | 16 |
| 1891 | #287 | 76 | #597 | 10 |
| 1890 | #279 | 81 | #566 | 12 |
| 1889 | #283 | 70 | #789 | 7 |
| 1888 | #296 | 63 | #580 | 12 |
| 1887 | #354 | 37 | #819 | 6 |
| 1886 | #326 | 42 | #694 | 8 |
| 1885 | #354 | 32 | #700 | 8 |
| 1884 | #366 | 30 | #848 | 6 |
| 1883 | #354 | 26 | — | |
| 1882 | #431 | 18 | — | |
| 1881 | #338 | 23 | — | |
| 1880 | #403 | 17 | #909 | 5 |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Cleo was already there! It came in at #403, and was given to 17 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1882, when fewer than 24 girls a year got the name.
Where Cleo is popular in 1916
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Utah#69 · 1 in 248
- Oregon#74 · 1 in 256
- Arkansas#88 · 1 in 328
- Oklahoma#91 · 1 in 327
- Texas#95 · 1 in 425
Best ever in a state: #50 in Utah, 1919.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Utah | #69 | 18 | 1 in 248 |
| Oregon | #74 | 19 | 1 in 256 |
| Arkansas | #88 | 50 | 1 in 328 |
| Oklahoma | #91 | 56 | 1 in 327 |
| Texas | #95 | 106 | 1 in 425 |
| Georgia | #97 | 76 | 1 in 412 |
| Kansas | #115 | 29 | 1 in 510 |
| Louisiana | #124 | 36 | 1 in 493 |
| Nebraska | #125 | 19 | 1 in 593 |
| South Dakota | #128 | 11 | 1 in 531 |
| North Carolina | #132 | 51 | 1 in 599 |
| Florida | #133 | 16 | 1 in 543 |
| New Mexico | #133 | 7 | 1 in 428 |
| South Carolina | #138 | 31 | 1 in 620 |
| Washington | #140 | 13 | 1 in 645 |
| Indiana | #142 | 29 | 1 in 818 |
| West Virginia | #145 | 21 | 1 in 723 |
| Mississippi | #150 | 28 | 1 in 643 |
| Colorado | #154 | 9 | 1 in 755 |
| Tennessee | #155 | 34 | 1 in 680 |
| Kentucky | #156 | 33 | 1 in 729 |
| Ohio | #159 | 49 | 1 in 979 |
| Iowa | #164 | 23 | 1 in 900 |
| Idaho | #165 | 5 | 1 in 720 |
| Missouri | #166 | 30 | 1 in 962 |
| Alabama | #167 | 30 | 1 in 862 |
| Virginia | #167 | 25 | 1 in 971 |
| Minnesota | #169 | 20 | 1 in 1,082 |
| Montana | #182 | 5 | 1 in 1,024 |
| North Dakota | #203 | 6 | 1 in 1,250 |
| Wisconsin | #203 | 16 | 1 in 1,470 |
| Michigan | #206 | 21 | 1 in 1,537 |
| California | #208 | 15 | 1 in 1,304 |
| Illinois | #224 | 32 | 1 in 1,810 |
| Pennsylvania | #240 | 33 | 1 in 2,705 |
| New Jersey | #343 | 5 | 1 in 5,741 |
| New York | #509 | 8 | 1 in 11,747 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Cleo
- 30 spots since 2024 (#607 → #577)
- 304 spots since 2020 (#881 → #577)
- 1,166 spots since 2015 (#1,743 → #577)
- Biggest jump: 140 spots in 2019 (#1,108 → #968)
- Biggest drop: 185 spots in 1957 (#830 → #1,015)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1907 at #171 (325 births)
- Births halved by 1950, 43 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 84 yrs · run 1880–1956
- Highest: 1 in 980 girls born in 1907 were named Cleo (0.10%)
- Latest: 1 in 3,115 girls born in 2025 (0.03%)
- 24.5% of all girls named Cleo (8,218) were born in this decade
- Mostly boys until 1982, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 358 | #283 (1889) | #351 |
| 1890s | 1,153 | #237 (1896) | #255 |
| 1900s | 2,441 | #171 (1907) | #198 |
| 1910s | 7,368 | #180 (1916) | #193 |
| 1920s | 8,218 | #191 (1920) | #228 |
| 1930s | 4,183 | #284 (1931) | #308 |
| 1940s | 2,239 | #384 (1940) | #517 |
| 1950s | 1,321 | #686 (1950) | #852 |
| 1960s | 578 | #1,234 (1962) | #1,561 |
| 1970s | 331 | #2,019 (1973) | #2,444 |
| 1980s | 309 | #2,484 (1985) | #3,025 |
| 1990s | 471 | #2,253 (1996) | #2,705 |
| 2000s | 610 | #2,193 (2001) | #2,746 |
| 2010s | 1,380 | #968 (2019) | #1,736 |
| 2020s | 2,605 | #577 (2025) | #688 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Cleo in 1916
Top girls' names in 1916
Top boys' names in 1916
More about 1916
girls
1,044,334 girls got a published name in 1916; 1 in 1,013 of them was named Cleo, which outranked 96.5% of the 5,161 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
890,080 boys got a published name in 1916; 1 in 2,790 of them was named Cleo, which outranked 93.6% of the 4,535 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 30.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.