Codie
- #6,116 for girls in 2025, 19 births
- #7,679 for boys in 2025, 10 births
- Given to boys 58.1% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1991 · 208 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 2,600since 1916
Codie over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it. Not on the chart: 5 boys in 1916, 8 boys in 1917, 6 boys in 1929 (see the data table).
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #6,116 | 19 | #7,679 | 10 |
| 2024 | #4,772 | 28 | #8,312 | 9 |
| 2023 | #4,746 | 28 | — | |
| 2022 | #5,465 | 23 | #10,863 | 6 |
| 2021 | #4,607 | 29 | #10,799 | 6 |
| 2020 | #4,757 | 27 | #8,739 | 8 |
| 2019 | #5,798 | 21 | #10,803 | 6 |
| 2018 | #4,889 | 27 | #7,617 | 10 |
| 2017 | #5,821 | 21 | #7,546 | 10 |
| 2016 | #5,445 | 24 | #6,726 | 12 |
| 2015 | #7,266 | 16 | #7,066 | 11 |
| 2014 | #6,713 | 18 | #5,252 | 17 |
| 2013 | #6,462 | 19 | #6,603 | 12 |
| 2012 | #5,895 | 22 | #5,256 | 17 |
| 2011 | #9,150 | 12 | #4,983 | 18 |
| 2010 | #8,701 | 13 | #4,099 | 24 |
| 2009 | #7,341 | 17 | #4,278 | 23 |
| 2008 | #7,408 | 17 | #3,344 | 33 |
| 2007 | #7,092 | 18 | #3,591 | 29 |
| 2006 | #6,592 | 19 | #3,024 | 36 |
| 2005 | #9,452 | 11 | #2,614 | 42 |
| 2004 | #5,377 | 23 | #2,376 | 47 |
| 2003 | #5,419 | 22 | #2,545 | 40 |
| 2002 | #4,179 | 30 | #2,046 | 53 |
| 2001 | #3,864 | 33 | #1,912 | 57 |
| 2000 | #4,291 | 28 | #1,466 | 84 |
| 1999 | #4,088 | 28 | #1,329 | 90 |
| 1998 | #3,015 | 42 | #1,189 | 104 |
| 1997 | #3,224 | 36 | #1,212 | 97 |
| 1996 | #2,106 | 65 | #884 | 153 |
| 1995 | #1,819 | 78 | #862 | 157 |
| 1994 | #1,707 | 87 | #772 | 186 |
| 1993 | #1,801 | 81 | #712 | 211 |
| 1992 | #1,713 | 87 | #709 | 209 |
| 1991 | #1,628 | 92 | #702 | 208 |
| 1990 | #1,716 | 85 | #933 | 122 |
| 1989 | #1,851 | 71 | #1,115 | 90 |
| 1988 | #1,911 | 64 | #1,178 | 73 |
| 1987 | #1,733 | 69 | #1,248 | 61 |
| 1986 | #2,116 | 50 | #1,320 | 55 |
| 1985 | #1,833 | 61 | #1,672 | 37 |
| 1984 | #2,018 | 50 | #2,364 | 21 |
| 1983 | #3,340 | 24 | #3,884 | 10 |
| 1982 | #2,288 | 43 | #3,966 | 10 |
| 1981 | #3,340 | 25 | #3,858 | 10 |
| 1980 | #3,992 | 19 | #3,430 | 12 |
| 1979 | #3,147 | 26 | #3,168 | 13 |
| 1978 | #2,629 | 32 | #3,614 | 10 |
| 1977 | #4,942 | 13 | #4,164 | 8 |
| 1976 | #5,215 | 11 | — | |
| 1975 | #4,854 | 12 | #4,797 | 6 |
| 1974 | #5,360 | 10 | #3,837 | 8 |
| 1973 | #3,971 | 15 | — | |
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | #4,810 | 11 | — | |
| 1970 | #5,061 | 10 | — | |
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | #6,804 | 5 | — | |
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | #5,828 | 5 | — | |
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | #3,559 | 6 | |
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | #2,956 | 8 | |
| 1916 | — | #3,897 | 5 | |
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1916
The first year at least five boys were named Codie! It came in at #3,897, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1918–1928, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Codie is popular in 2025
No state had 5 or more boys named Codie in 2025, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Codie
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- 1,060 spots since 2020 (#8,739 → #7,679)
- 613 spots since 2015 (#7,066 → #7,679)
- Biggest jump: 231 spots in 1991
- Biggest drop: 328 spots in 1997
Rise & fade · boys
75 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1916
- Peaked 1991 at #702 (208 births)
- Births halved by 1997, 6 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 7 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 7 yrs · run 1990–1996
Share of babies · boys
1 in 9,295
- Highest: 1 in 9,295 boys born in 1993 were named Codie (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 170,808 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #702 in 1991, was only 1 in 9,713 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 1990s
- 59.1% of all boys named Codie (1,537) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 2012
- Mostly boys until 2011, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 13 | #2,956 (1917) | #3,427 |
| 1920s | 6 | #3,559 (1929) | #3,559 |
| 1930s | 0 | — | — |
| 1940s | 0 | — | — |
| 1950s | 0 | — | — |
| 1960s | 0 | — | — |
| 1970s | 45 | #3,168 (1979) | #3,916 |
| 1980s | 379 | #1,115 (1989) | #2,404 |
| 1990s | 1,537 | #702 (1991) | #930 |
| 2000s | 444 | #1,466 (2000) | #2,720 |
| 2010s | 137 | #4,099 (2010) | #6,595 |
| 2020s | 39 | #7,679 (2025) | #9,278 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Codie ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: