Cole
- #13,208 for girls in 2025, 6 births
- #182 for boys in 2025, 2,003 births
- Given to boys 99.6% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 2002 · 6,038 births
- Debut · boys
- 6 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 15 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 154,093since 1886
Cole over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #13,208 | 6 | #182 | 2,003 |
| 2024 | #13,477 | 6 | #162 | 2,224 |
| 2023 | #7,640 | 14 | #155 | 2,364 |
| 2022 | #11,231 | 8 | #144 | 2,626 |
| 2021 | #8,464 | 12 | #132 | 2,835 |
| 2020 | #9,546 | 10 | #133 | 2,771 |
| 2019 | #7,025 | 16 | #123 | 3,093 |
| 2018 | #8,146 | 13 | #118 | 3,348 |
| 2017 | #8,776 | 12 | #116 | 3,468 |
| 2016 | #6,663 | 18 | #110 | 3,604 |
| 2015 | #7,613 | 15 | #115 | 3,499 |
| 2014 | #10,955 | 9 | #116 | 3,426 |
| 2013 | #8,580 | 13 | #114 | 3,454 |
| 2012 | #9,109 | 12 | #102 | 3,779 |
| 2011 | #8,614 | 13 | #94 | 4,140 |
| 2010 | #16,992 | 5 | #90 | 4,590 |
| 2009 | #8,454 | 14 | #82 | 5,278 |
| 2008 | #6,799 | 19 | #85 | 5,389 |
| 2007 | #8,520 | 14 | #84 | 5,703 |
| 2006 | #4,463 | 32 | #84 | 5,640 |
| 2005 | #7,891 | 14 | #79 | 5,587 |
| 2004 | #5,377 | 23 | #75 | 5,648 |
| 2003 | #15,784 | 5 | #69 | 5,898 |
| 2002 | #6,698 | 16 | #69 | 6,038 |
| 2001 | #8,196 | 12 | #74 | 5,739 |
| 2000 | #5,937 | 18 | #71 | 5,926 |
| 1999 | #6,484 | 15 | #75 | 5,317 |
| 1998 | #7,532 | 12 | #77 | 5,148 |
| 1997 | #6,163 | 15 | #72 | 5,159 |
| 1996 | #7,130 | 12 | #106 | 3,737 |
| 1995 | #5,958 | 15 | #118 | 3,150 |
| 1994 | #7,604 | 11 | #111 | 3,302 |
| 1993 | #8,052 | 10 | #130 | 2,665 |
| 1992 | #6,314 | 14 | #143 | 2,312 |
| 1991 | #6,588 | 13 | #162 | 1,978 |
| 1990 | #7,303 | 11 | #248 | 1,100 |
| 1989 | #9,681 | 7 | #272 | 909 |
| 1988 | #11,798 | 5 | #260 | 904 |
| 1987 | #8,778 | 7 | #234 | 1,003 |
| 1986 | #6,156 | 11 | #220 | 1,070 |
| 1985 | — | #204 | 1,185 | |
| 1984 | #4,966 | 14 | #202 | 1,163 |
| 1983 | #4,884 | 14 | #209 | 1,112 |
| 1982 | #5,534 | 12 | #266 | 806 |
| 1981 | — | #484 | 299 | |
| 1980 | #9,095 | 6 | #516 | 271 |
| 1979 | — | #678 | 158 | |
| 1978 | — | #686 | 149 | |
| 1977 | — | #675 | 157 | |
| 1976 | — | #693 | 144 | |
| 1975 | — | #653 | 158 | |
| 1974 | — | #592 | 181 | |
| 1973 | — | #623 | 159 | |
| 1972 | — | #678 | 140 | |
| 1971 | — | #811 | 99 | |
| 1970 | — | #812 | 99 | |
| 1969 | — | #841 | 83 | |
| 1968 | — | #869 | 69 | |
| 1967 | — | #992 | 53 | |
| 1966 | — | #1,027 | 50 | |
| 1965 | — | #890 | 68 | |
| 1964 | — | #952 | 64 | |
| 1963 | — | #947 | 63 | |
| 1962 | — | #832 | 83 | |
| 1961 | — | #776 | 98 | |
| 1960 | — | #892 | 72 | |
| 1959 | — | #919 | 69 | |
| 1958 | — | #889 | 72 | |
| 1957 | — | #884 | 73 | |
| 1956 | — | #954 | 61 | |
| 1955 | — | #949 | 62 | |
| 1954 | — | #929 | 64 | |
| 1953 | — | #1,170 | 40 | |
| 1952 | — | #1,111 | 43 | |
| 1951 | — | #992 | 50 | |
| 1950 | — | #1,364 | 28 | |
| 1949 | — | #1,322 | 30 | |
| 1948 | — | #1,127 | 40 | |
| 1947 | — | #1,252 | 34 | |
| 1946 | — | #1,692 | 18 | |
| 1945 | — | #2,574 | 8 | |
| 1944 | — | #2,080 | 12 | |
| 1943 | — | #1,486 | 22 | |
| 1942 | — | #1,316 | 28 | |
| 1941 | — | #1,446 | 22 | |
| 1940 | — | #2,322 | 10 | |
| 1939 | — | #2,829 | 7 | |
| 1938 | — | #2,084 | 12 | |
| 1937 | — | #2,088 | 12 | |
| 1936 | — | #1,872 | 14 | |
| 1935 | — | #2,529 | 9 | |
| 1934 | — | #1,658 | 18 | |
| 1933 | — | #2,368 | 10 | |
| 1932 | — | #1,716 | 18 | |
| 1931 | — | #1,843 | 16 | |
| 1930 | — | #2,444 | 11 | |
| 1929 | — | #2,199 | 13 | |
| 1928 | — | #2,048 | 15 | |
| 1927 | — | #2,703 | 10 | |
| 1926 | — | #1,981 | 16 | |
| 1925 | — | #1,870 | 18 | |
| 1924 | — | #2,043 | 16 | |
| 1923 | — | #1,696 | 21 | |
| 1922 | — | #1,883 | 18 | |
| 1921 | — | #1,829 | 19 | |
| 1920 | — | #2,765 | 10 | |
| 1919 | — | #1,576 | 22 | |
| 1918 | — | #1,905 | 17 | |
| 1917 | — | #1,693 | 19 | |
| 1916 | — | #1,374 | 25 | |
| 1915 | — | #1,306 | 26 | |
| 1914 | — | #1,221 | 23 | |
| 1913 | — | #1,173 | 19 | |
| 1912 | — | #935 | 23 | |
| 1911 | — | #1,117 | 10 | |
| 1910 | — | #1,421 | 6 | |
| 1909 | — | #1,440 | 5 | |
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | #1,345 | 5 | |
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | #1,162 | 6 | |
| 1899 | — | #1,051 | 5 | |
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | #845 | 6 | |
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1886
The first year at least five boys were named Cole! It came in at #845, and was given to 6 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1887–1899, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Cole is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- New Hampshire#66 · 1 in 205
- Massachusetts#67 · 1 in 284
- Rhode Island#71 · 1 in 223
- Connecticut#90 · 1 in 339
- New Jersey#104 · 1 in 428
Best ever in a state: #7 in North Dakota, 2001.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Hampshire | #66 | 22 | 1 in 205 |
| Massachusetts | #67 | 95 | 1 in 284 |
| Rhode Island | #71 | 14 | 1 in 223 |
| Connecticut | #90 | 39 | 1 in 339 |
| New Jersey | #104 | 93 | 1 in 428 |
| Pennsylvania | #105 | 121 | 1 in 432 |
| Michigan | #108 | 88 | 1 in 457 |
| New York | #111 | 161 | 1 in 524 |
| Maine | #126 | 10 | 1 in 384 |
| Maryland | #128 | 46 | 1 in 498 |
| Utah | #136 | 38 | 1 in 517 |
| South Dakota | #145 | 9 | 1 in 427 |
| Virginia | #148 | 61 | 1 in 611 |
| Louisiana | #154 | 33 | 1 in 580 |
| Illinois | #155 | 76 | 1 in 652 |
| Missouri | #156 | 45 | 1 in 618 |
| Montana | #159 | 8 | 1 in 471 |
| Colorado | #161 | 44 | 1 in 610 |
| Delaware | #168 | 6 | 1 in 491 |
| District of Columbia | #168 | 5 | 1 in 505 |
| West Virginia | #168 | 11 | 1 in 560 |
| Ohio | #170 | 78 | 1 in 674 |
| Kentucky | #173 | 32 | 1 in 642 |
| Wisconsin | #186 | 33 | 1 in 710 |
| Iowa | #191 | 21 | 1 in 659 |
| Kansas | #196 | 20 | 1 in 702 |
| Arkansas | #199 | 18 | 1 in 699 |
| Minnesota | #208 | 31 | 1 in 790 |
| Florida | #209 | 103 | 1 in 928 |
| New Mexico | #213 | 9 | 1 in 722 |
| Hawaii | #214 | 5 | 1 in 584 |
| Idaho | #214 | 12 | 1 in 719 |
| Mississippi | #215 | 14 | 1 in 774 |
| Washington | #220 | 36 | 1 in 911 |
| North Carolina | #222 | 56 | 1 in 919 |
| Nebraska | #228 | 11 | 1 in 802 |
| Nevada | #230 | 13 | 1 in 869 |
| Oregon | #230 | 18 | 1 in 837 |
| Arizona | #232 | 35 | 1 in 935 |
| Oklahoma | #252 | 19 | 1 in 931 |
| Indiana | #254 | 32 | 1 in 989 |
| California | #259 | 144 | 1 in 1,219 |
| Tennessee | #259 | 34 | 1 in 1,081 |
| South Carolina | #265 | 21 | 1 in 1,009 |
| Texas | #286 | 135 | 1 in 1,297 |
| Alabama | #375 | 14 | 1 in 1,537 |
| Georgia | #428 | 26 | 1 in 1,932 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Cole
Momentum · boys
Falling
- 49 spots since 2020 (#133 → #182)
- Biggest jump: 372 spots in 1951
- Biggest drop: 238 spots in 1913
Rise & fade · boys
116 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1886
- Peaked 2002 at #69 (6,038 births)
- Births halved by 2020, 18 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 100 for 15 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 15 yrs · run 1997–2011
- Top 1,000: 74 yrs · run 1967–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 322
- Highest: 1 in 322 boys born in 2002 were named Cole (0.31%)
- Latest: 1 in 853 boys born in 2025 (0.12%)
Era · boys
The 2000s
- 36.9% of all boys named Cole (56,846) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 6 | #845 (1886) | #845 |
| 1890s | 5 | #1,051 (1899) | #1,051 |
| 1900s | 16 | #1,162 (1900) | #1,316 |
| 1910s | 190 | #935 (1912) | #1,372 |
| 1920s | 156 | #1,696 (1923) | #2,102 |
| 1930s | 127 | #1,658 (1934) | #2,143 |
| 1940s | 224 | #1,127 (1948) | #1,662 |
| 1950s | 562 | #884 (1957) | #1,016 |
| 1960s | 703 | #776 (1961) | #902 |
| 1970s | 1,444 | #592 (1974) | #690 |
| 1980s | 8,722 | #202 (1984) | #287 |
| 1990s | 33,868 | #72 (1997) | #124 |
| 2000s | 56,846 | #69 (2002) | #77 |
| 2010s | 36,401 | #90 (2010) | #110 |
| 2020s | 14,823 | #132 (2021) | #151 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Cole ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: