Connie
#3,067 for girls in 2025, 53 births · Last seen for boys in 2011 at #12,287
Given to girls 97.5% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1955 · 9,975 births
- Debut · girls
- 12 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 29 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 266,783since 1880
Connie over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #3,067 | 53 | — | |
| 2024 | #3,119 | 51 | — | |
| 2023 | #3,833 | 39 | — | |
| 2022 | #3,313 | 48 | — | |
| 2021 | #3,037 | 54 | — | |
| 2020 | #2,966 | 54 | — | |
| 2019 | #2,752 | 61 | — | |
| 2018 | #2,419 | 74 | — | |
| 2017 | #2,925 | 56 | — | |
| 2016 | #2,463 | 74 | — | |
| 2015 | #2,278 | 82 | — | |
| 2014 | #2,469 | 73 | — | |
| 2013 | #2,568 | 69 | — | |
| 2012 | #2,047 | 94 | — | |
| 2011 | #2,369 | 78 | #12,287 | 5 |
| 2010 | #2,167 | 90 | — | |
| 2009 | #2,041 | 100 | — | |
| 2008 | #2,137 | 94 | — | |
| 2007 | #1,894 | 109 | — | |
| 2006 | #1,961 | 102 | — | |
| 2005 | #1,574 | 129 | — | |
| 2004 | #1,470 | 137 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,325 | 155 | — | |
| 2002 | #1,308 | 149 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,152 | 181 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,150 | 176 | — | |
| 1999 | #1,044 | 195 | — | |
| 1998 | #866 | 244 | — | |
| 1997 | #930 | 213 | — | |
| 1996 | #800 | 257 | — | |
| 1995 | #700 | 301 | #4,791 | 12 |
| 1994 | #596 | 377 | #8,800 | 5 |
| 1993 | #594 | 395 | #5,360 | 10 |
| 1992 | #575 | 405 | #5,660 | 9 |
| 1991 | #540 | 433 | #5,521 | 9 |
| 1990 | #484 | 505 | — | |
| 1989 | #466 | 524 | #6,229 | 7 |
| 1988 | #467 | 482 | #5,200 | 8 |
| 1987 | #435 | 508 | #3,731 | 12 |
| 1986 | #456 | 472 | #3,440 | 13 |
| 1985 | #397 | 567 | #4,052 | 10 |
| 1984 | #342 | 677 | #3,459 | 12 |
| 1983 | #363 | 622 | #3,071 | 14 |
| 1982 | #357 | 655 | #2,709 | 17 |
| 1981 | #313 | 763 | #3,412 | 12 |
| 1980 | #299 | 836 | #2,831 | 16 |
| 1979 | #255 | 943 | #2,465 | 19 |
| 1978 | #224 | 1,103 | #2,669 | 16 |
| 1977 | #208 | 1,211 | #2,910 | 14 |
| 1976 | #190 | 1,314 | #1,677 | 31 |
| 1975 | #184 | 1,407 | #2,205 | 20 |
| 1974 | #164 | 1,634 | #2,459 | 16 |
| 1973 | #144 | 1,937 | #2,216 | 18 |
| 1972 | #130 | 2,336 | #1,680 | 27 |
| 1971 | #125 | 2,750 | #1,272 | 43 |
| 1970 | #116 | 3,326 | #1,494 | 32 |
| 1969 | #105 | 3,545 | #1,124 | 48 |
| 1968 | #87 | 3,955 | #1,233 | 38 |
| 1967 | #75 | 4,583 | #1,061 | 48 |
| 1966 | #70 | 5,102 | #1,178 | 40 |
| 1965 | #61 | 6,155 | #1,020 | 52 |
| 1964 | #64 | 7,035 | #1,025 | 54 |
| 1963 | #55 | 8,165 | #947 | 63 |
| 1962 | #51 | 8,882 | #1,069 | 51 |
| 1961 | #50 | 8,986 | #874 | 76 |
| 1960 | #47 | 8,881 | #762 | 101 |
| 1959 | #48 | 8,655 | #801 | 91 |
| 1958 | #50 | 8,209 | #738 | 100 |
| 1957 | #47 | 8,765 | #734 | 104 |
| 1956 | #43 | 9,361 | #714 | 105 |
| 1955 | #35 | 9,975 | #634 | 137 |
| 1954 | #39 | 9,636 | #684 | 111 |
| 1953 | #47 | 8,575 | #613 | 140 |
| 1952 | #44 | 8,756 | #624 | 126 |
| 1951 | #44 | 8,722 | #585 | 139 |
| 1950 | #44 | 8,145 | #582 | 136 |
| 1949 | #43 | 8,219 | #553 | 147 |
| 1948 | #43 | 8,055 | #501 | 173 |
| 1947 | #43 | 8,645 | #517 | 173 |
| 1946 | #45 | 7,215 | #481 | 177 |
| 1945 | #47 | 5,337 | #471 | 159 |
| 1944 | #51 | 4,796 | #504 | 144 |
| 1943 | #59 | 4,512 | #502 | 153 |
| 1942 | #70 | 3,825 | #478 | 164 |
| 1941 | #79 | 3,205 | #476 | 152 |
| 1940 | #88 | 2,795 | #459 | 159 |
| 1939 | #111 | 2,296 | #503 | 126 |
| 1938 | #110 | 2,407 | #478 | 145 |
| 1937 | #128 | 1,908 | #513 | 126 |
| 1936 | #134 | 1,681 | #497 | 130 |
| 1935 | #140 | 1,535 | #490 | 135 |
| 1934 | #145 | 1,425 | #478 | 142 |
| 1933 | #146 | 1,320 | #470 | 142 |
| 1932 | #153 | 1,304 | #590 | 100 |
| 1931 | #183 | 995 | #518 | 124 |
| 1930 | #219 | 782 | #520 | 132 |
| 1929 | #238 | 667 | #644 | 91 |
| 1928 | #245 | 657 | #663 | 89 |
| 1927 | #237 | 739 | #690 | 88 |
| 1926 | #241 | 723 | #642 | 96 |
| 1925 | #256 | 672 | #730 | 79 |
| 1924 | #261 | 635 | #686 | 90 |
| 1923 | #268 | 576 | #750 | 76 |
| 1922 | #279 | 536 | #714 | 84 |
| 1921 | #288 | 531 | #715 | 84 |
| 1920 | #292 | 494 | #649 | 95 |
| 1919 | #305 | 434 | #638 | 91 |
| 1918 | #303 | 439 | #585 | 108 |
| 1917 | #304 | 416 | #723 | 72 |
| 1916 | #301 | 399 | #671 | 78 |
| 1915 | #329 | 336 | #652 | 79 |
| 1914 | #304 | 293 | #639 | 63 |
| 1913 | #316 | 229 | #592 | 55 |
| 1912 | #336 | 185 | #599 | 46 |
| 1911 | #320 | 151 | #497 | 35 |
| 1910 | #350 | 129 | #621 | 22 |
| 1909 | #316 | 131 | #590 | 20 |
| 1908 | #329 | 116 | #657 | 16 |
| 1907 | #343 | 103 | #559 | 19 |
| 1906 | #349 | 89 | #489 | 21 |
| 1905 | #391 | 74 | #615 | 15 |
| 1904 | #372 | 78 | #723 | 11 |
| 1903 | #361 | 78 | #470 | 20 |
| 1902 | #403 | 58 | #536 | 16 |
| 1901 | #459 | 42 | #683 | 10 |
| 1900 | #431 | 59 | #534 | 20 |
| 1899 | #402 | 52 | #457 | 17 |
| 1898 | #432 | 51 | #701 | 10 |
| 1897 | #420 | 48 | #515 | 15 |
| 1896 | #434 | 44 | #722 | 10 |
| 1895 | #455 | 40 | #501 | 16 |
| 1894 | #446 | 39 | #954 | 6 |
| 1893 | #433 | 39 | #572 | 12 |
| 1892 | #419 | 40 | #641 | 11 |
| 1891 | #457 | 31 | #524 | 12 |
| 1890 | #412 | 37 | #667 | 9 |
| 1889 | #486 | 26 | #525 | 13 |
| 1888 | #548 | 21 | #1,031 | 5 |
| 1887 | #489 | 21 | #544 | 11 |
| 1886 | #476 | 21 | #845 | 6 |
| 1885 | #446 | 22 | #765 | 7 |
| 1884 | #501 | 17 | #663 | 9 |
| 1883 | #651 | 9 | #720 | 7 |
| 1882 | #507 | 13 | #754 | 7 |
| 1881 | #491 | 12 | #653 | 8 |
| 1880 | #492 | 12 | #745 | 7 |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Connie was already there! It came in at #492, and was given to 12 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1883, when fewer than 14 girls a year got the name.
Where Connie is popular in 1916
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Arizona#106 · 1 in 338
- South Carolina#173 · 1 in 961
- North Carolina#181 · 1 in 985
- Mississippi#191 · 1 in 948
- New York#196 · 1 in 1,270
Best ever in a state: #8 in Idaho, 1950.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arizona | #106 | 7 | 1 in 338 |
| South Carolina | #173 | 20 | 1 in 961 |
| North Carolina | #181 | 31 | 1 in 985 |
| Mississippi | #191 | 19 | 1 in 948 |
| New York | #196 | 74 | 1 in 1,270 |
| Connecticut | #205 | 8 | 1 in 1,634 |
| California | #217 | 14 | 1 in 1,397 |
| Massachusetts | #237 | 13 | 1 in 2,559 |
| Texas | #240 | 38 | 1 in 1,185 |
| Virginia | #245 | 12 | 1 in 2,023 |
| New Jersey | #248 | 10 | 1 in 2,871 |
| Pennsylvania | #274 | 27 | 1 in 3,306 |
| Tennessee | #284 | 11 | 1 in 2,100 |
| Alabama | #287 | 13 | 1 in 1,989 |
| Georgia | #306 | 12 | 1 in 2,612 |
| Indiana | #323 | 7 | 1 in 3,387 |
| Arkansas | #339 | 7 | 1 in 2,342 |
| Illinois | #344 | 15 | 1 in 3,862 |
| Michigan | #420 | 6 | 1 in 5,378 |
| Ohio | #492 | 6 | 1 in 7,996 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Connie
- 52 spots since 2024 (#3,119 → #3,067)
- 101 spots since 2020 (#2,966 → #3,067)
- 789 spots since 2015 (#2,278 → #3,067)
- Biggest jump: 150 spots in 1884 (#651 → #501)
- Biggest drop: 178 spots in 1999 (#866 → #1,044)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1955 at #35 (9,975 births)
- Births halved by 1967, 12 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 29 yrs · run 1940–1968
- Top 1,000: 119 yrs · run 1880–1998
- Highest: 1 in 196 girls born in 1955 were named Connie (0.51%)
- Latest: 1 in 30,326 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 33.3% of all girls named Connie (88,799) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 174 | #446 (1885) | #509 |
| 1890s | 421 | #402 (1899) | #431 |
| 1900s | 828 | #316 (1909) | #375 |
| 1910s | 3,011 | #301 (1916) | #317 |
| 1920s | 6,230 | #237 (1927) | #261 |
| 1930s | 15,653 | #110 (1938) | #147 |
| 1940s | 56,604 | #43 (1947) | #57 |
| 1950s | 88,799 | #35 (1955) | #44 |
| 1960s | 65,289 | #47 (1960) | #67 |
| 1970s | 17,961 | #116 (1970) | #174 |
| 1980s | 6,106 | #299 (1980) | #390 |
| 1990s | 3,325 | #484 (1990) | #713 |
| 2000s | 1,332 | #1,150 (2000) | #1,601 |
| 2010s | 751 | #2,047 (2012) | #2,446 |
| 2020s | 299 | #2,966 (2020) | #3,223 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Connie in 1916
Top girls' names in 1916
Top boys' names in 1916
More about 1916
girls
1,044,334 girls got a published name in 1916; 1 in 2,617 of them was named Connie, which outranked 94.2% of the 5,161 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
890,080 boys got a published name in 1916; 1 in 11,411 of them was named Connie, which outranked 85.2% of the 4,535 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 30.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).