Connie
#3,067 for girls in 2025, 53 births · Last seen for boys in 2011 at #12,287
Given to girls 97.5% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1955 · 9,975 births
- Debut · girls
- 12 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 29 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 266,783since 1880
Connie over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #3,067 | 53 | — | |
| 2024 | #3,119 | 51 | — | |
| 2023 | #3,833 | 39 | — | |
| 2022 | #3,313 | 48 | — | |
| 2021 | #3,037 | 54 | — | |
| 2020 | #2,966 | 54 | — | |
| 2019 | #2,752 | 61 | — | |
| 2018 | #2,419 | 74 | — | |
| 2017 | #2,925 | 56 | — | |
| 2016 | #2,463 | 74 | — | |
| 2015 | #2,278 | 82 | — | |
| 2014 | #2,469 | 73 | — | |
| 2013 | #2,568 | 69 | — | |
| 2012 | #2,047 | 94 | — | |
| 2011 | #2,369 | 78 | #12,287 | 5 |
| 2010 | #2,167 | 90 | — | |
| 2009 | #2,041 | 100 | — | |
| 2008 | #2,137 | 94 | — | |
| 2007 | #1,894 | 109 | — | |
| 2006 | #1,961 | 102 | — | |
| 2005 | #1,574 | 129 | — | |
| 2004 | #1,470 | 137 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,325 | 155 | — | |
| 2002 | #1,308 | 149 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,152 | 181 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,150 | 176 | — | |
| 1999 | #1,044 | 195 | — | |
| 1998 | #866 | 244 | — | |
| 1997 | #930 | 213 | — | |
| 1996 | #800 | 257 | — | |
| 1995 | #700 | 301 | #4,791 | 12 |
| 1994 | #596 | 377 | #8,800 | 5 |
| 1993 | #594 | 395 | #5,360 | 10 |
| 1992 | #575 | 405 | #5,660 | 9 |
| 1991 | #540 | 433 | #5,521 | 9 |
| 1990 | #484 | 505 | — | |
| 1989 | #466 | 524 | #6,229 | 7 |
| 1988 | #467 | 482 | #5,200 | 8 |
| 1987 | #435 | 508 | #3,731 | 12 |
| 1986 | #456 | 472 | #3,440 | 13 |
| 1985 | #397 | 567 | #4,052 | 10 |
| 1984 | #342 | 677 | #3,459 | 12 |
| 1983 | #363 | 622 | #3,071 | 14 |
| 1982 | #357 | 655 | #2,709 | 17 |
| 1981 | #313 | 763 | #3,412 | 12 |
| 1980 | #299 | 836 | #2,831 | 16 |
| 1979 | #255 | 943 | #2,465 | 19 |
| 1978 | #224 | 1,103 | #2,669 | 16 |
| 1977 | #208 | 1,211 | #2,910 | 14 |
| 1976 | #190 | 1,314 | #1,677 | 31 |
| 1975 | #184 | 1,407 | #2,205 | 20 |
| 1974 | #164 | 1,634 | #2,459 | 16 |
| 1973 | #144 | 1,937 | #2,216 | 18 |
| 1972 | #130 | 2,336 | #1,680 | 27 |
| 1971 | #125 | 2,750 | #1,272 | 43 |
| 1970 | #116 | 3,326 | #1,494 | 32 |
| 1969 | #105 | 3,545 | #1,124 | 48 |
| 1968 | #87 | 3,955 | #1,233 | 38 |
| 1967 | #75 | 4,583 | #1,061 | 48 |
| 1966 | #70 | 5,102 | #1,178 | 40 |
| 1965 | #61 | 6,155 | #1,020 | 52 |
| 1964 | #64 | 7,035 | #1,025 | 54 |
| 1963 | #55 | 8,165 | #947 | 63 |
| 1962 | #51 | 8,882 | #1,069 | 51 |
| 1961 | #50 | 8,986 | #874 | 76 |
| 1960 | #47 | 8,881 | #762 | 101 |
| 1959 | #48 | 8,655 | #801 | 91 |
| 1958 | #50 | 8,209 | #738 | 100 |
| 1957 | #47 | 8,765 | #734 | 104 |
| 1956 | #43 | 9,361 | #714 | 105 |
| 1955 | #35 | 9,975 | #634 | 137 |
| 1954 | #39 | 9,636 | #684 | 111 |
| 1953 | #47 | 8,575 | #613 | 140 |
| 1952 | #44 | 8,756 | #624 | 126 |
| 1951 | #44 | 8,722 | #585 | 139 |
| 1950 | #44 | 8,145 | #582 | 136 |
| 1949 | #43 | 8,219 | #553 | 147 |
| 1948 | #43 | 8,055 | #501 | 173 |
| 1947 | #43 | 8,645 | #517 | 173 |
| 1946 | #45 | 7,215 | #481 | 177 |
| 1945 | #47 | 5,337 | #471 | 159 |
| 1944 | #51 | 4,796 | #504 | 144 |
| 1943 | #59 | 4,512 | #502 | 153 |
| 1942 | #70 | 3,825 | #478 | 164 |
| 1941 | #79 | 3,205 | #476 | 152 |
| 1940 | #88 | 2,795 | #459 | 159 |
| 1939 | #111 | 2,296 | #503 | 126 |
| 1938 | #110 | 2,407 | #478 | 145 |
| 1937 | #128 | 1,908 | #513 | 126 |
| 1936 | #134 | 1,681 | #497 | 130 |
| 1935 | #140 | 1,535 | #490 | 135 |
| 1934 | #145 | 1,425 | #478 | 142 |
| 1933 | #146 | 1,320 | #470 | 142 |
| 1932 | #153 | 1,304 | #590 | 100 |
| 1931 | #183 | 995 | #518 | 124 |
| 1930 | #219 | 782 | #520 | 132 |
| 1929 | #238 | 667 | #644 | 91 |
| 1928 | #245 | 657 | #663 | 89 |
| 1927 | #237 | 739 | #690 | 88 |
| 1926 | #241 | 723 | #642 | 96 |
| 1925 | #256 | 672 | #730 | 79 |
| 1924 | #261 | 635 | #686 | 90 |
| 1923 | #268 | 576 | #750 | 76 |
| 1922 | #279 | 536 | #714 | 84 |
| 1921 | #288 | 531 | #715 | 84 |
| 1920 | #292 | 494 | #649 | 95 |
| 1919 | #305 | 434 | #638 | 91 |
| 1918 | #303 | 439 | #585 | 108 |
| 1917 | #304 | 416 | #723 | 72 |
| 1916 | #301 | 399 | #671 | 78 |
| 1915 | #329 | 336 | #652 | 79 |
| 1914 | #304 | 293 | #639 | 63 |
| 1913 | #316 | 229 | #592 | 55 |
| 1912 | #336 | 185 | #599 | 46 |
| 1911 | #320 | 151 | #497 | 35 |
| 1910 | #350 | 129 | #621 | 22 |
| 1909 | #316 | 131 | #590 | 20 |
| 1908 | #329 | 116 | #657 | 16 |
| 1907 | #343 | 103 | #559 | 19 |
| 1906 | #349 | 89 | #489 | 21 |
| 1905 | #391 | 74 | #615 | 15 |
| 1904 | #372 | 78 | #723 | 11 |
| 1903 | #361 | 78 | #470 | 20 |
| 1902 | #403 | 58 | #536 | 16 |
| 1901 | #459 | 42 | #683 | 10 |
| 1900 | #431 | 59 | #534 | 20 |
| 1899 | #402 | 52 | #457 | 17 |
| 1898 | #432 | 51 | #701 | 10 |
| 1897 | #420 | 48 | #515 | 15 |
| 1896 | #434 | 44 | #722 | 10 |
| 1895 | #455 | 40 | #501 | 16 |
| 1894 | #446 | 39 | #954 | 6 |
| 1893 | #433 | 39 | #572 | 12 |
| 1892 | #419 | 40 | #641 | 11 |
| 1891 | #457 | 31 | #524 | 12 |
| 1890 | #412 | 37 | #667 | 9 |
| 1889 | #486 | 26 | #525 | 13 |
| 1888 | #548 | 21 | #1,031 | 5 |
| 1887 | #489 | 21 | #544 | 11 |
| 1886 | #476 | 21 | #845 | 6 |
| 1885 | #446 | 22 | #765 | 7 |
| 1884 | #501 | 17 | #663 | 9 |
| 1883 | #651 | 9 | #720 | 7 |
| 1882 | #507 | 13 | #754 | 7 |
| 1881 | #491 | 12 | #653 | 8 |
| 1880 | #492 | 12 | #745 | 7 |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Connie was already there! It came in at #492, and was given to 12 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1883, when fewer than 14 girls a year got the name.
Where Connie is popular in 1930
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Utah#44 · 1 in 199
- New Mexico#83 · 1 in 304
- California#105 · 1 in 471
- Arizona#109 · 1 in 398
- Oregon#133 · 1 in 655
Best ever in a state: #8 in Idaho, 1950.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Utah | #44 | 24 | 1 in 199 |
| New Mexico | #83 | 15 | 1 in 304 |
| California | #105 | 79 | 1 in 471 |
| Arizona | #109 | 11 | 1 in 398 |
| Oregon | #133 | 8 | 1 in 655 |
| Washington | #138 | 13 | 1 in 727 |
| Colorado | #142 | 13 | 1 in 640 |
| Idaho | #144 | 6 | 1 in 575 |
| New Jersey | #159 | 25 | 1 in 1,176 |
| New York | #161 | 97 | 1 in 988 |
| Nebraska | #171 | 11 | 1 in 992 |
| Kansas | #181 | 14 | 1 in 1,011 |
| Michigan | #192 | 29 | 1 in 1,450 |
| North Carolina | #192 | 33 | 1 in 1,075 |
| Illinois | #195 | 40 | 1 in 1,430 |
| North Dakota | #199 | 5 | 1 in 1,182 |
| Maryland | #205 | 7 | 1 in 1,790 |
| Texas | #205 | 61 | 1 in 976 |
| Indiana | #216 | 14 | 1 in 1,793 |
| Minnesota | #216 | 11 | 1 in 1,780 |
| Missouri | #216 | 20 | 1 in 1,397 |
| Ohio | #220 | 28 | 1 in 1,860 |
| Iowa | #224 | 11 | 1 in 1,703 |
| Wisconsin | #233 | 11 | 1 in 2,194 |
| Pennsylvania | #238 | 37 | 1 in 2,218 |
| Tennessee | #240 | 17 | 1 in 1,580 |
| West Virginia | #242 | 12 | 1 in 1,531 |
| South Carolina | #248 | 12 | 1 in 1,653 |
| Oklahoma | #254 | 15 | 1 in 1,585 |
| Virginia | #278 | 10 | 1 in 2,404 |
| Arkansas | #295 | 11 | 1 in 1,723 |
| Alabama | #298 | 13 | 1 in 2,304 |
| Florida | #303 | 6 | 1 in 2,015 |
| Mississippi | #316 | 10 | 1 in 2,209 |
| Georgia | #327 | 11 | 1 in 2,757 |
| Massachusetts | #341 | 5 | 1 in 6,338 |
| Louisiana | #362 | 8 | 1 in 2,646 |
| Kentucky | #372 | 8 | 1 in 3,413 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Connie
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 52 spots since 2024 (#3,119 → #3,067)
- 101 spots since 2020 (#2,966 → #3,067)
- 789 spots since 2015 (#2,278 → #3,067)
- Biggest jump: 150 spots in 1884 (#651 → #501)
- Biggest drop: 178 spots in 1999 (#866 → #1,044)
Rise & fade · girls
75 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1955 at #35 (9,975 births)
- Births halved by 1967, 12 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 29 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 29 yrs · run 1940–1968
- Top 1,000: 119 yrs · run 1880–1998
Share of babies · girls
1 in 196
- Highest: 1 in 196 girls born in 1955 were named Connie (0.51%)
- Latest: 1 in 30,326 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1950s
- 33.3% of all girls named Connie (88,799) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 174 | #446 (1885) | #509 |
| 1890s | 421 | #402 (1899) | #431 |
| 1900s | 828 | #316 (1909) | #375 |
| 1910s | 3,011 | #301 (1916) | #317 |
| 1920s | 6,230 | #237 (1927) | #261 |
| 1930s | 15,653 | #110 (1938) | #147 |
| 1940s | 56,604 | #43 (1947) | #57 |
| 1950s | 88,799 | #35 (1955) | #44 |
| 1960s | 65,289 | #47 (1960) | #67 |
| 1970s | 17,961 | #116 (1970) | #174 |
| 1980s | 6,106 | #299 (1980) | #390 |
| 1990s | 3,325 | #484 (1990) | #713 |
| 2000s | 1,332 | #1,150 (2000) | #1,601 |
| 2010s | 751 | #2,047 (2012) | #2,446 |
| 2020s | 299 | #2,966 (2020) | #3,223 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Connie in 1930
girls
#219
782 births · 1 in 1,440 girls
boys
#520
132 births · 1 in 8,313 boys
Top girls' names in 1930
Top boys' names in 1930
More about 1930
girls
1,125,927 girls got a published name in 1930; 1 in 1,440 of them was named Connie, which outranked 95.8% of the 5,247 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Connie
Biggest movers since 1929
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,097,378 boys got a published name in 1930; 1 in 8,313 of them was named Connie, which outranked 88.6% of the 4,542 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).