Connor
#7,491 for girls in 2025, 14 births · #166 for boys in 2025, 2,211 births
Given to boys 99.3% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2004 · 10,049 births
- Debut · boys
- 7 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 30 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 234,546since 1913
Connor over time
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #7,491 | 14 | #166 | 2,211 |
| 2024 | #5,443 | 23 | #136 | 2,611 |
| 2023 | #5,390 | 23 | #126 | 2,861 |
| 2022 | #6,464 | 18 | #118 | 3,213 |
| 2021 | #6,967 | 16 | #98 | 3,764 |
| 2020 | #7,212 | 15 | #78 | 4,414 |
| 2019 | #4,653 | 29 | #68 | 5,161 |
| 2018 | #5,152 | 25 | #58 | 6,086 |
| 2017 | #5,517 | 23 | #56 | 6,422 |
| 2016 | #5,622 | 23 | #54 | 7,037 |
| 2015 | #5,833 | 22 | #55 | 6,772 |
| 2014 | #5,025 | 27 | #52 | 7,231 |
| 2013 | #11,000 | 9 | #56 | 7,117 |
| 2012 | #8,632 | 13 | #59 | 6,983 |
| 2011 | #9,723 | 11 | #54 | 7,410 |
| 2010 | #8,701 | 13 | #49 | 8,051 |
| 2009 | #7,066 | 18 | #52 | 8,101 |
| 2008 | #7,742 | 16 | #57 | 7,817 |
| 2007 | #7,092 | 18 | #55 | 8,330 |
| 2006 | #4,576 | 31 | #53 | 8,676 |
| 2005 | #4,581 | 29 | #48 | 9,321 |
| 2004 | #2,503 | 67 | #38 | 10,049 |
| 2003 | #3,532 | 40 | #43 | 9,670 |
| 2002 | #3,241 | 43 | #47 | 8,409 |
| 2001 | #2,963 | 48 | #49 | 8,082 |
| 2000 | #2,426 | 63 | #50 | 7,530 |
| 1999 | #2,051 | 75 | #48 | 7,597 |
| 1998 | #1,709 | 93 | #47 | 7,906 |
| 1997 | #1,303 | 133 | #52 | 7,140 |
| 1996 | #1,343 | 126 | #54 | 6,911 |
| 1995 | #1,337 | 123 | #55 | 6,619 |
| 1994 | #1,293 | 131 | #59 | 6,318 |
| 1993 | #1,352 | 122 | #57 | 6,452 |
| 1992 | #1,274 | 134 | #80 | 4,609 |
| 1991 | #2,356 | 54 | #133 | 2,462 |
| 1990 | #10,193 | 7 | #221 | 1,377 |
| 1989 | #5,545 | 15 | #266 | 937 |
| 1988 | #9,244 | 7 | #293 | 787 |
| 1987 | #7,987 | 8 | #342 | 585 |
| 1986 | #10,912 | 5 | #535 | 276 |
| 1985 | — | #661 | 177 | |
| 1984 | — | #703 | 154 | |
| 1983 | — | #725 | 142 | |
| 1982 | — | #950 | 89 | |
| 1981 | — | #920 | 95 | |
| 1980 | #9,095 | 6 | #1,031 | 77 |
| 1979 | — | #1,128 | 63 | |
| 1978 | — | #1,186 | 56 | |
| 1977 | — | #1,948 | 25 | |
| 1976 | — | #2,417 | 18 | |
| 1975 | — | #2,540 | 16 | |
| 1974 | — | #3,558 | 9 | |
| 1973 | — | #4,054 | 7 | |
| 1972 | — | #2,418 | 15 | |
| 1971 | — | #2,464 | 15 | |
| 1970 | — | #3,282 | 9 | |
| 1969 | — | #2,217 | 15 | |
| 1968 | — | #2,576 | 11 | |
| 1967 | — | #3,231 | 7 | |
| 1966 | — | #2,784 | 9 | |
| 1965 | — | #3,244 | 7 | |
| 1964 | — | #2,665 | 10 | |
| 1963 | — | #4,048 | 5 | |
| 1962 | — | #4,033 | 5 | |
| 1961 | — | #4,065 | 5 | |
| 1960 | — | #2,685 | 10 | |
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | #3,024 | 8 | |
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | #2,764 | 9 | |
| 1954 | — | #3,827 | 5 | |
| 1953 | — | #3,798 | 5 | |
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | #3,364 | 6 | |
| 1950 | — | #3,329 | 6 | |
| 1949 | — | #2,606 | 9 | |
| 1948 | — | #2,788 | 8 | |
| 1947 | — | #3,733 | 5 | |
| 1946 | — | #3,173 | 6 | |
| 1945 | — | #3,338 | 5 | |
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | #3,231 | 6 | |
| 1942 | — | #3,212 | 6 | |
| 1941 | — | #3,505 | 5 | |
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | #3,480 | 5 | |
| 1938 | — | #2,868 | 7 | |
| 1937 | — | #3,175 | 6 | |
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | #4,001 | 5 | |
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | #3,780 | 6 | |
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | #3,023 | 9 | |
| 1923 | — | #3,467 | 7 | |
| 1922 | — | #3,872 | 6 | |
| 1921 | — | #2,986 | 9 | |
| 1920 | — | #2,765 | 10 | |
| 1919 | — | #4,168 | 5 | |
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | #3,981 | 5 | |
| 1916 | — | #3,516 | 6 | |
| 1915 | — | #2,829 | 8 | |
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | #2,273 | 7 | |
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Connor! It came in at #2,273, and was given to 7 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1914, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Connor is popular in 2010
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Vermont#4 · 1 in 53
- Alaska#16 · 1 in 99
- Maine#17 · 1 in 85
- North Dakota#21 · 1 in 101
- New Hampshire#25 · 1 in 96
Best ever in a state: #2 in Vermont, 2005.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vermont | #4 | 35 | 1 in 53 |
| Alaska | #16 | 35 | 1 in 99 |
| Maine | #17 | 56 | 1 in 85 |
| North Dakota | #21 | 35 | 1 in 101 |
| New Hampshire | #25 | 52 | 1 in 96 |
| Rhode Island | #31 | 38 | 1 in 106 |
| Wyoming | #31 | 17 | 1 in 112 |
| Washington | #35 | 206 | 1 in 173 |
| Massachusetts | #36 | 236 | 1 in 127 |
| Missouri | #36 | 199 | 1 in 164 |
| Ohio | #36 | 399 | 1 in 152 |
| Wisconsin | #36 | 176 | 1 in 158 |
| Kentucky | #37 | 145 | 1 in 155 |
| Nebraska | #37 | 62 | 1 in 159 |
| Pennsylvania | #38 | 433 | 1 in 141 |
| South Carolina | #38 | 132 | 1 in 159 |
| South Dakota | #39 | 27 | 1 in 147 |
| Virginia | #39 | 253 | 1 in 164 |
| Idaho | #40 | 49 | 1 in 171 |
| Louisiana | #40 | 113 | 1 in 211 |
| Michigan | #40 | 294 | 1 in 164 |
| North Carolina | #40 | 279 | 1 in 185 |
| Colorado | #41 | 153 | 1 in 180 |
| Connecticut | #41 | 101 | 1 in 145 |
| West Virginia | #41 | 57 | 1 in 141 |
| Arkansas | #42 | 81 | 1 in 178 |
| Montana | #42 | 24 | 1 in 162 |
| Arizona | #43 | 190 | 1 in 196 |
| Minnesota | #43 | 160 | 1 in 173 |
| Illinois | #44 | 352 | 1 in 198 |
| Iowa | #46 | 88 | 1 in 174 |
| Oregon | #46 | 94 | 1 in 195 |
| Kansas | #48 | 88 | 1 in 186 |
| Delaware | #49 | 24 | 1 in 151 |
| Florida | #49 | 416 | 1 in 223 |
| Indiana | #49 | 187 | 1 in 193 |
| New York | #49 | 451 | 1 in 236 |
| Maryland | #50 | 145 | 1 in 194 |
| Nevada | #51 | 68 | 1 in 201 |
| New Jersey | #52 | 197 | 1 in 217 |
| Oklahoma | #52 | 97 | 1 in 212 |
| Georgia | #58 | 211 | 1 in 265 |
| Utah | #58 | 94 | 1 in 235 |
| District of Columbia | #61 | 19 | 1 in 205 |
| Hawaii | #61 | 22 | 1 in 218 |
| Tennessee | #62 | 156 | 1 in 225 |
| Alabama | #74 | 83 | 1 in 281 |
| Mississippi | #75 | 49 | 1 in 282 |
| California | #80 | 672 | 1 in 348 |
| Texas | #87 | 480 | 1 in 372 |
| New Mexico | #128 | 21 | 1 in 477 |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Connor
- 30 spots since 2024 (#136 → #166)
- 88 spots since 2020 (#78 → #166)
- 111 spots since 2015 (#55 → #166)
- Biggest jump: 225 spots in 1983 (#950 → #725)
- Biggest drop: 30 spots in 1982 (#920 → #950)
- Debuted 1913
- Peaked 2004 at #38 (10,049 births)
- Births halved by 2020, 16 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 30 yrs · run 1992–2021
- Top 1,000: 45 yrs · run 1981–2025
- Highest: 1 in 198 boys born in 2004 were named Connor (0.51%)
- Latest: 1 in 773 boys born in 2025 (0.13%)
- 36.7% of all boys named Connor (85,985) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 31 | #2,273 (1913) | #3,353 |
| 1920s | 47 | #2,765 (1920) | #3,316 |
| 1930s | 23 | #2,868 (1938) | #3,381 |
| 1940s | 50 | #2,606 (1949) | #3,198 |
| 1950s | 39 | #2,764 (1955) | #3,351 |
| 1960s | 84 | #2,217 (1969) | #3,155 |
| 1970s | 233 | #1,128 (1979) | #2,500 |
| 1980s | 3,319 | #266 (1989) | #643 |
| 1990s | 57,391 | #47 (1998) | #81 |
| 2000s | 85,985 | #38 (2004) | #49 |
| 2010s | 68,270 | #49 (2010) | #56 |
| 2020s | 19,074 | #78 (2020) | #120 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Connor in 2010
Top girls' names in 2010
Top boys' names in 2010
More about 2010
girls
1,777,595 girls got a published name in 2010; 1 in 136,738 of them was named Connor, which outranked 56.1% of the 19,841 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #8,271Zuley14
- #8,271Zulma14
- #8,271Zyniah14
- #8,701Connor13
- #8,701Aamira13
- #8,701Abbigaile13
- #8,701Abrar13
- #9,231Aamani12
- #9,231Aasiya12
- #9,231Abeer12
Tied with 529 names at #8,701; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,918,676 boys got a published name in 2010; 1 in 238 of them was named Connor, which outranked 99.7% of the 14,270 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.0% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.