Consuelo
#7,885 for girls in 2025, 13 births · Last seen for boys in 1992 at #8,435
Given to girls 99.5% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1930 · 368 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 16,955since 1890
Consuelo over time
Rank among girls' names. Consuelo has never cracked the top 300 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #7,885 | 13 | — | |
| 2024 | #6,642 | 17 | — | |
| 2023 | #7,640 | 14 | — | |
| 2022 | #6,707 | 17 | — | |
| 2021 | #7,250 | 15 | — | |
| 2020 | #6,325 | 18 | — | |
| 2019 | #6,176 | 19 | — | |
| 2018 | #5,152 | 25 | — | |
| 2017 | #5,517 | 23 | — | |
| 2016 | #7,602 | 15 | — | |
| 2015 | #6,452 | 19 | — | |
| 2014 | #4,892 | 28 | — | |
| 2013 | #6,462 | 19 | — | |
| 2012 | #4,296 | 34 | — | |
| 2011 | #5,728 | 23 | — | |
| 2010 | #5,247 | 26 | — | |
| 2009 | #3,870 | 40 | — | |
| 2008 | #2,923 | 60 | — | |
| 2007 | #3,376 | 49 | — | |
| 2006 | #3,316 | 49 | — | |
| 2005 | #2,756 | 60 | — | |
| 2004 | #2,998 | 52 | — | |
| 2003 | #2,840 | 54 | — | |
| 2002 | #2,100 | 81 | — | |
| 2001 | #2,236 | 72 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,985 | 84 | — | |
| 1999 | #1,719 | 94 | — | |
| 1998 | #1,958 | 77 | — | |
| 1997 | #1,624 | 97 | — | |
| 1996 | #1,348 | 125 | — | |
| 1995 | #1,651 | 89 | — | |
| 1994 | #1,714 | 86 | — | |
| 1993 | #1,409 | 115 | — | |
| 1992 | #1,673 | 90 | #8,435 | 5 |
| 1991 | #1,505 | 103 | — | |
| 1990 | #1,543 | 99 | — | |
| 1989 | #1,461 | 100 | — | |
| 1988 | #1,454 | 94 | — | |
| 1987 | #1,202 | 120 | — | |
| 1986 | #1,260 | 107 | — | |
| 1985 | #1,276 | 105 | — | |
| 1984 | #1,137 | 120 | — | |
| 1983 | #918 | 162 | — | |
| 1982 | #958 | 155 | — | |
| 1981 | #906 | 165 | — | |
| 1980 | #934 | 160 | — | |
| 1979 | #931 | 158 | — | |
| 1978 | #867 | 169 | — | |
| 1977 | #811 | 185 | — | |
| 1976 | #662 | 231 | — | |
| 1975 | #622 | 253 | — | |
| 1974 | #625 | 248 | — | |
| 1973 | #590 | 267 | — | |
| 1972 | #546 | 306 | — | |
| 1971 | #605 | 282 | — | |
| 1970 | #867 | 154 | — | |
| 1969 | #903 | 137 | — | |
| 1968 | #868 | 139 | — | |
| 1967 | #926 | 122 | — | |
| 1966 | #821 | 147 | — | |
| 1965 | #862 | 134 | — | |
| 1964 | #1,001 | 114 | — | |
| 1963 | #827 | 159 | — | |
| 1962 | #967 | 121 | — | |
| 1961 | #963 | 125 | — | |
| 1960 | #939 | 129 | — | |
| 1959 | #965 | 119 | — | |
| 1958 | #906 | 128 | — | |
| 1957 | #885 | 133 | — | |
| 1956 | #822 | 144 | — | |
| 1955 | #853 | 129 | — | |
| 1954 | #798 | 138 | — | |
| 1953 | #758 | 145 | — | |
| 1952 | #710 | 157 | — | |
| 1951 | #658 | 175 | — | |
| 1950 | #543 | 230 | — | |
| 1949 | #570 | 216 | — | |
| 1948 | #560 | 220 | — | |
| 1947 | #579 | 218 | — | |
| 1946 | #558 | 202 | — | |
| 1945 | #564 | 169 | — | |
| 1944 | #498 | 210 | — | |
| 1943 | #550 | 188 | #2,405 | 10 |
| 1942 | #581 | 162 | — | |
| 1941 | #565 | 152 | — | |
| 1940 | #572 | 148 | — | |
| 1939 | #569 | 141 | — | |
| 1938 | #515 | 169 | #3,534 | 5 |
| 1937 | #521 | 160 | — | |
| 1936 | #477 | 180 | — | |
| 1935 | #471 | 183 | #3,645 | 5 |
| 1934 | #453 | 207 | #2,022 | 13 |
| 1933 | #409 | 242 | — | |
| 1932 | #418 | 246 | #3,776 | 5 |
| 1931 | #364 | 315 | #2,207 | 12 |
| 1930 | #339 | 368 | #2,781 | 9 |
| 1929 | #367 | 332 | — | |
| 1928 | #347 | 379 | #3,076 | 8 |
| 1927 | #362 | 357 | #3,780 | 6 |
| 1926 | #364 | 342 | #4,201 | 5 |
| 1925 | #365 | 349 | — | |
| 1924 | #389 | 311 | — | |
| 1923 | #368 | 327 | — | |
| 1922 | #404 | 266 | #3,532 | 7 |
| 1921 | #433 | 248 | — | |
| 1920 | #410 | 262 | — | |
| 1919 | #466 | 203 | — | |
| 1918 | #475 | 200 | — | |
| 1917 | #494 | 177 | — | |
| 1916 | #602 | 125 | — | |
| 1915 | #589 | 122 | — | |
| 1914 | #624 | 85 | — | |
| 1913 | #615 | 71 | — | |
| 1912 | #620 | 63 | — | |
| 1911 | #564 | 57 | — | |
| 1910 | #691 | 38 | — | |
| 1909 | #731 | 30 | — | |
| 1908 | #768 | 25 | — | |
| 1907 | #871 | 19 | — | |
| 1906 | #917 | 16 | — | |
| 1905 | #1,057 | 13 | — | |
| 1904 | #880 | 17 | — | |
| 1903 | #695 | 23 | — | |
| 1902 | #818 | 18 | — | |
| 1901 | #1,067 | 10 | — | |
| 1900 | #1,008 | 14 | — | |
| 1899 | #983 | 11 | — | |
| 1898 | #679 | 23 | — | |
| 1897 | #715 | 19 | — | |
| 1896 | #728 | 19 | — | |
| 1895 | #788 | 16 | — | |
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | #1,338 | 5 | — | |
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Consuelo! It came in at #1,338, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1890–1894, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Consuelo is popular in 1932
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- New Mexico#55 · 1 in 206
- Arizona#80 · 1 in 269
- Texas#112 · 1 in 498
- California#145 · 1 in 685
- Hawaii#163 · 1 in 668
Best ever in a state: #17 in Arizona, 1924.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Mexico | #55 | 23 | 1 in 206 |
| Arizona | #80 | 14 | 1 in 269 |
| Texas | #112 | 113 | 1 in 498 |
| California | #145 | 50 | 1 in 685 |
| Hawaii | #163 | 5 | 1 in 668 |
| Indiana | #280 | 8 | 1 in 2,847 |
| New York | #512 | 9 | 1 in 9,789 |
| Illinois | #573 | 5 | 1 in 10,102 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Consuelo
- 1,243 spots since 2024 (#6,642 → #7,885)
- 1,560 spots since 2020 (#6,325 → #7,885)
- 1,433 spots since 2015 (#6,452 → #7,885)
- Biggest jump: 262 spots in 1971 (#867 → #605)
- Biggest drop: 304 spots in 1899 (#679 → #983)
- Debuted 1890
- Peaked 1930 at #339 (368 births)
- Births halved by 1935, 5 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 85 yrs · run 1906–1963
- Highest: 1 in 3,043 girls born in 1928 were named Consuelo (0.03%)
- Latest: 1 in 123,636 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #339 in 1930, was only 1 in 3,060 (0.03%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 18.7% of all girls named Consuelo (3,173) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 93 | #679 (1898) | #872 |
| 1900s | 185 | #695 (1903) | #881 |
| 1910s | 1,141 | #466 (1919) | #574 |
| 1920s | 3,173 | #347 (1928) | #381 |
| 1930s | 2,211 | #339 (1930) | #454 |
| 1940s | 1,885 | #498 (1944) | #560 |
| 1950s | 1,498 | #543 (1950) | #790 |
| 1960s | 1,327 | #821 (1966) | #908 |
| 1970s | 2,253 | #546 (1972) | #713 |
| 1980s | 1,288 | #906 (1981) | #1,151 |
| 1990s | 975 | #1,348 (1996) | #1,614 |
| 2000s | 601 | #1,985 (2000) | #2,840 |
| 2010s | 231 | #4,296 (2012) | #5,752 |
| 2020s | 94 | #6,325 (2020) | #7,075 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Consuelo in 1932
Top girls' names in 1932
Top boys' names in 1932
More about 1932
girls
1,067,148 girls got a published name in 1932; 1 in 4,338 of them was named Consuelo, which outranked 91.8% of the 5,098 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,044,157 boys got a published name in 1932; 1 in 208,831 of them was named Consuelo, which outranked 11.9% of the 4,284 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.6% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Tied with 508 names at #3,776; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.