Cora

#113 for girls in 2025, 2,428 births · Last seen for boys in 2015 at #10,644
Given to girls 99.8% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1880 · 1,045 births
Debut · girls
1,045 births
In top 100 · girls
42 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
156,028
since 1880

Cora over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201959peak #15, 1880girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#1132,428—
2024#1032,580—
2023#932,751—
2022#753,076—
2021#873,008—
2020#883,036—
2019#713,602—
2018#733,596—
2017#833,446—
2016#873,374—
2015#883,403#10,6446
2014#1032,967#12,1085
2013#1272,586—
2012#1552,081—
2011#2031,555—
2010#2751,206—
2009#3031,100—
2008#3221,041—
2007#352918—
2006#384844—
2005#452673—
2004#437698—
2003#433695—
2002#467608—
2001#458604—
2000#481564—
1999#491529—
1998#536468—
1997#669325—
1996#673327—
1995#679313—
1994#653329—
1993#718297—
1992#804250—
1991#803255—
1990#855230—
1989#781247—
1988#876201—
1987#873195—
1986#743237—
1985#768221—
1984#730224—
1983#730225—
1982#724239—
1981#747221—
1980#770214—
1979#813194—
1978#702225—
1977#698223—
1976#700211—
1975#774182—
1974#709206—
1973#726195—
1972#712201—
1971#686222#4,9075
1970#678234—
1969#701201#3,0629
1968#629235—
1967#620235—
1966#534312—
1965#493373—
1964#525351—
1963#480403—
1962#478410—
1961#476419—
1960#460454—
1959#454454—
1958#458435—
1957#407516—
1956#374554—
1955#365576—
1954#346614—
1953#323647—
1952#312667—
1951#300672—
1950#289734—
1949#264848#3,2986
1948#266837—
1947#259848—
1946#251800—
1945#244752#3,3385
1944#231816—
1943#225874—
1942#2021,002#2,7128
1941#1861,007#3,5055
1940#191965#2,32210
1939#1831,040—
1938#1781,131#2,18511
1937#1761,141—
1936#1811,008#2,18411
1935#1751,071#2,24611
1934#1681,112#3,6795
1933#1571,157#1,99713
1932#1691,136#3,3616
1931#1601,185#2,47110
1930#1611,272#3,0228
1929#1531,389#2,9808
1928#1551,393#2,16214
1927#1581,493#3,4517
1926#1581,477—
1925#1501,679#3,7416
1924#1551,630#3,2608
1923#1491,691#3,4677
1922#1401,762#3,8726
1921#1401,828#4,3225
1920#1371,819—
1919#1221,940#3,3917
1918#1241,916#2,69910
1917#1261,737#1,81517
1916#1141,899#2,38911
1915#1191,683#2,8298
1914#1051,500#3,2645
1913#1031,288—
1912#981,253#2,5445
1911#911,022—
1910#851,079#1,5895
1909#85969—
1908#83962#1,1137
1907#80969#9998
1906#77952#1,0047
1905#721,044—
1904#70993—
1903#70986#7839
1902#621,081—
1901#581,027—
1900#551,389#9688
1899#581,056—
1898#511,304—
1897#491,246—
1896#521,204—
1895#491,295#7389
1894#461,319#8577
1893#441,308—
1892#391,419#1,0665
1891#351,343#8416
1890#361,386#6679
1889#321,365#7897
1888#311,433#7049
1887#271,257—
1886#281,231#8456
1885#231,253#9365
1884#231,244#6639
1883#241,081—
1882#211,076—
1881#18969#7067
1880#151,045#8096
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Cora was already there! It came in at #15, and was given to 1,045 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1967–1992, when fewer than 260 girls a year got the name.

Where Cora is popular in 1959

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedNHWashington: #541 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 5,707 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedMNIllinois: #445 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 4,712 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedWIMichigan: #446 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 5,007 girlsMINew York: #601 for girls · 22 births · 1 in 7,654 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedIAIndiana: #427 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 4,551 girlsINOhio: #394 for girls · 26 births · 1 in 4,073 girlsOHPennsylvania: #543 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 7,624 girlsPANew Jersey: #678 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 11,438 girlsNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #560 for girls · 29 births · 1 in 5,736 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedUTColorado: #372 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 2,701 girlsCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedNEMissouri: #418 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 4,499 girlsMOKentucky: #293 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 2,356 girlsKYWest Virginia: #264 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 1,832 girlsWVVirginia: #396 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 3,690 girlsVAMaryland: #462 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 5,082 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedDEArizona: #390 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 2,399 girlsAZNew Mexico: #322 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 1,715 girlsNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedKSArkansas: #268 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 1,619 girlsARTennessee: #310 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 2,439 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #308 for girls · 22 births · 1 in 2,231 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #263 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 1,564 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedDCOklahoma: #389 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 3,047 girlsOKLouisiana: #364 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 2,478 girlsLAMississippi: #199 for girls · 27 births · 1 in 962 girlsMSAlabama: #294 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 1,863 girlsALGeorgia: #278 for girls · 25 births · 1 in 1,790 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedHITexas: #453 for girls · 32 births · 1 in 3,556 girlsTXFlorida: #476 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 4,437 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Mississippi#199 · 1 in 962
  2. South Carolina#263 · 1 in 1,564
  3. West Virginia#264 · 1 in 1,832
  4. Arkansas#268 · 1 in 1,619
  5. Georgia#278 · 1 in 1,790

Best ever in a state: #7 in Wyoming, 2018.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Mississippi#199271 in 962
South Carolina#263171 in 1,564
West Virginia#264101 in 1,832
Arkansas#268111 in 1,619
Georgia#278251 in 1,790
Kentucky#293141 in 2,356
Alabama#294191 in 1,863
North Carolina#308221 in 2,231
Tennessee#310151 in 2,439
New Mexico#32271 in 1,715
Louisiana#364161 in 2,478
Colorado#37271 in 2,701
Oklahoma#38971 in 3,047
Arizona#39061 in 2,399
Ohio#394261 in 4,073
Virginia#396111 in 3,690
Missouri#418101 in 4,499
Indiana#427111 in 4,551
Illinois#445231 in 4,712
Michigan#446181 in 5,007
Texas#453321 in 3,556
Maryland#46261 in 5,082
Florida#476111 in 4,437
Washington#54151 in 5,707
Pennsylvania#543151 in 7,624
California#560291 in 5,736
New York#601221 in 7,654
New Jersey#67851 in 11,438
Alaska———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Maine———
Massachusetts———
Minnesota———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
North Dakota———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Utah———
Vermont———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Cora
Momentum · girls
Falling
  • 10 spots since 2024 (#103 → #113)
  • 25 spots since 2020 (#88 → #113)
  • 25 spots since 2015 (#88 → #113)
  • Biggest jump: 133 spots in 1998 (#669 → #536)
  • Biggest drop: 130 spots in 1987 (#743 → #873)
Rise & fade · girls
Peaked on debut
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1880 at #15 (1,045 births)
  • Births halved by 1957, 77 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 42 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 42 yrs · run 1880–1912
  • Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 87
  • Highest: 1 in 87 girls born in 1880 were named Cora (1.1%)
  • Latest: 1 in 662 girls born in 2025 (0.15%)
Era · girls
The 2010s
  • 17.8% of all girls named Cora (27,816) were born in this decade
  • Comeback: #15 (1880) → #876 (1988) → #71 (2019)
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s11,954#15 (1880)#24
1890s12,880#35 (1891)#46
1900s10,372#55 (1900)#71
1910s15,317#85 (1910)#109
1920s16,161#137 (1920)#150
1930s11,253#157 (1933)#171
1940s8,749#186 (1941)#232
1950s5,869#289 (1950)#363
1960s3,393#460 (1960)#540
1970s2,093#678 (1970)#720
1980s2,224#724 (1982)#774
1990s3,323#491 (1999)#688
2000s7,745#303 (2009)#409
2010s27,816#71 (2019)#127
2020s16,879#75 (2022)#93

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Cora in 1959

girls
#454
454 births · 1 in 4,457 girls

Top girls' names in 1959

  1. #1Mary54,502
  2. #2Susan41,617
  3. #3Linda40,410
  4. #4Karen36,784
  5. #5Donna36,468
  6. #6Patricia35,223
  7. #7Debra31,388
  8. #8Cynthia30,186
  9. #9Deborah29,546
  10. #10Lisa25,699
  11. #454Cora454
More about 1959

girls

2,023,462 girls got a published name in 1959; 1 in 4,457 of them was named Cora, which outranked 93.7% of the 7,202 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 17.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Cora
  1. #451Geneva457
  2. #452Mitzi456
  3. #453Sheree455
  4. #454Cora454
  5. #454Helene454
  6. #456Elisa450
  7. #457Monique443
  8. #458Guadalupe440

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1958
Risers
  1. ↑ 1,090Alesia#1,985 → #895
  2. ↑ 948Tori#1,791 → #843
  3. ↑ 440Taryn#1,211 → #771
  4. ↑ 437Venus#1,007 → #570
  5. ↑ 393Vilma#1,364 → #971
Fallers
  1. ↓ 283Dani#961 → #1,244
  2. ↓ 257Nicki#973 → #1,230
  3. ↓ 235Lanita#973 → #1,208
  4. ↓ 219Concetta#973 → #1,192
  5. ↓ 197Gisele#766 → #963

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1959 →