Cora

#113 for girls in 2025, 2,428 births · Last seen for boys in 2015 at #10,644
Given to girls 99.8% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1880 · 1,045 births
Debut · girls
1,045 births
In top 100 · girls
42 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
156,028
since 1880

Cora over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201963peak #15, 1880girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#1132,428—
2024#1032,580—
2023#932,751—
2022#753,076—
2021#873,008—
2020#883,036—
2019#713,602—
2018#733,596—
2017#833,446—
2016#873,374—
2015#883,403#10,6446
2014#1032,967#12,1085
2013#1272,586—
2012#1552,081—
2011#2031,555—
2010#2751,206—
2009#3031,100—
2008#3221,041—
2007#352918—
2006#384844—
2005#452673—
2004#437698—
2003#433695—
2002#467608—
2001#458604—
2000#481564—
1999#491529—
1998#536468—
1997#669325—
1996#673327—
1995#679313—
1994#653329—
1993#718297—
1992#804250—
1991#803255—
1990#855230—
1989#781247—
1988#876201—
1987#873195—
1986#743237—
1985#768221—
1984#730224—
1983#730225—
1982#724239—
1981#747221—
1980#770214—
1979#813194—
1978#702225—
1977#698223—
1976#700211—
1975#774182—
1974#709206—
1973#726195—
1972#712201—
1971#686222#4,9075
1970#678234—
1969#701201#3,0629
1968#629235—
1967#620235—
1966#534312—
1965#493373—
1964#525351—
1963#480403—
1962#478410—
1961#476419—
1960#460454—
1959#454454—
1958#458435—
1957#407516—
1956#374554—
1955#365576—
1954#346614—
1953#323647—
1952#312667—
1951#300672—
1950#289734—
1949#264848#3,2986
1948#266837—
1947#259848—
1946#251800—
1945#244752#3,3385
1944#231816—
1943#225874—
1942#2021,002#2,7128
1941#1861,007#3,5055
1940#191965#2,32210
1939#1831,040—
1938#1781,131#2,18511
1937#1761,141—
1936#1811,008#2,18411
1935#1751,071#2,24611
1934#1681,112#3,6795
1933#1571,157#1,99713
1932#1691,136#3,3616
1931#1601,185#2,47110
1930#1611,272#3,0228
1929#1531,389#2,9808
1928#1551,393#2,16214
1927#1581,493#3,4517
1926#1581,477—
1925#1501,679#3,7416
1924#1551,630#3,2608
1923#1491,691#3,4677
1922#1401,762#3,8726
1921#1401,828#4,3225
1920#1371,819—
1919#1221,940#3,3917
1918#1241,916#2,69910
1917#1261,737#1,81517
1916#1141,899#2,38911
1915#1191,683#2,8298
1914#1051,500#3,2645
1913#1031,288—
1912#981,253#2,5445
1911#911,022—
1910#851,079#1,5895
1909#85969—
1908#83962#1,1137
1907#80969#9998
1906#77952#1,0047
1905#721,044—
1904#70993—
1903#70986#7839
1902#621,081—
1901#581,027—
1900#551,389#9688
1899#581,056—
1898#511,304—
1897#491,246—
1896#521,204—
1895#491,295#7389
1894#461,319#8577
1893#441,308—
1892#391,419#1,0665
1891#351,343#8416
1890#361,386#6679
1889#321,365#7897
1888#311,433#7049
1887#271,257—
1886#281,231#8456
1885#231,253#9365
1884#231,244#6639
1883#241,081—
1882#211,076—
1881#18969#7067
1880#151,045#8096
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Cora was already there! It came in at #15, and was given to 1,045 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1967–1992, when fewer than 260 girls a year got the name.

Where Cora is popular in 1963

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedMNIllinois: #669 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 9,011 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedWIMichigan: #394 for girls · 22 births · 1 in 3,639 girlsMINew York: #573 for girls · 26 births · 1 in 6,279 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedIAIndiana: #461 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 4,709 girlsINOhio: #631 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 9,581 girlsOHPennsylvania: #543 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 7,270 girlsPANew Jersey: #484 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 5,227 girlsNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #597 for girls · 29 births · 1 in 6,004 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedNEMissouri: #439 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 4,563 girlsMOKentucky: #291 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 2,012 girlsKYWest Virginia: #336 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 2,522 girlsWVVirginia: #454 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 4,421 girlsVAMaryland: #350 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 2,715 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedNMKansas: #434 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 3,722 girlsKSArkansas: #304 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 1,944 girlsARTennessee: #394 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 3,474 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #238 for girls · 32 births · 1 in 1,449 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #314 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 2,060 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Cora, so not publishedOKLouisiana: #375 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 2,582 girlsLAMississippi: #268 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 1,390 girlsMSAlabama: #242 for girls · 24 births · 1 in 1,336 girlsALGeorgia: #337 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 2,423 girlsGAHawaii: #262 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 1,014 girlsHITexas: #583 for girls · 21 births · 1 in 5,104 girlsTXFlorida: #557 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 5,391 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. North Carolina#238 · 1 in 1,449
  2. Alabama#242 · 1 in 1,336
  3. Hawaii#262 · 1 in 1,014
  4. Mississippi#268 · 1 in 1,390
  5. Kentucky#291 · 1 in 2,012

Best ever in a state: #7 in Wyoming, 2018.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
North Carolina#238321 in 1,449
Alabama#242241 in 1,336
Hawaii#26261 in 1,014
Mississippi#268171 in 1,390
Kentucky#291151 in 2,012
Arkansas#30491 in 1,944
South Carolina#314121 in 2,060
West Virginia#33661 in 2,522
Georgia#337181 in 2,423
Maryland#350111 in 2,715
Louisiana#375141 in 2,582
Michigan#394221 in 3,639
Tennessee#394101 in 3,474
Kansas#43451 in 3,722
Missouri#43991 in 4,563
Virginia#45491 in 4,421
Indiana#461101 in 4,709
New Jersey#484111 in 5,227
Pennsylvania#543141 in 7,270
Florida#55791 in 5,391
New York#573261 in 6,279
Texas#583211 in 5,104
California#597291 in 6,004
Ohio#631101 in 9,581
Illinois#669111 in 9,011
Alaska———
Arizona———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Idaho———
Iowa———
Maine———
Massachusetts———
Minnesota———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Utah———
Vermont———
Washington———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Cora
Momentum · girls
Falling
  • 10 spots since 2024 (#103 → #113)
  • 25 spots since 2020 (#88 → #113)
  • 25 spots since 2015 (#88 → #113)
  • Biggest jump: 133 spots in 1998 (#669 → #536)
  • Biggest drop: 130 spots in 1987 (#743 → #873)
Rise & fade · girls
Peaked on debut
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1880 at #15 (1,045 births)
  • Births halved by 1957, 77 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 42 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 42 yrs · run 1880–1912
  • Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 87
  • Highest: 1 in 87 girls born in 1880 were named Cora (1.1%)
  • Latest: 1 in 662 girls born in 2025 (0.15%)
Era · girls
The 2010s
  • 17.8% of all girls named Cora (27,816) were born in this decade
  • Comeback: #15 (1880) → #876 (1988) → #71 (2019)
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s11,954#15 (1880)#24
1890s12,880#35 (1891)#46
1900s10,372#55 (1900)#71
1910s15,317#85 (1910)#109
1920s16,161#137 (1920)#150
1930s11,253#157 (1933)#171
1940s8,749#186 (1941)#232
1950s5,869#289 (1950)#363
1960s3,393#460 (1960)#540
1970s2,093#678 (1970)#720
1980s2,224#724 (1982)#774
1990s3,323#491 (1999)#688
2000s7,745#303 (2009)#409
2010s27,816#71 (2019)#127
2020s16,879#75 (2022)#93

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Cora in 1963

girls
#480
403 births · 1 in 4,783 girls

Top girls' names in 1963

  1. #1Lisa56,047
  2. #2Mary41,546
  3. #3Susan33,991
  4. #4Karen32,492
  5. #5Linda27,727
  6. #6Donna25,405
  7. #7Patricia25,374
  8. #8Lori23,899
  9. #9Sandra21,621
  10. #10Cynthia21,589
  11. #480Cora403
More about 1963

girls

1,927,507 girls got a published name in 1963; 1 in 4,783 of them was named Cora, which outranked 93.7% of the 7,661 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 16.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Cora
  1. #476Kendra411
  2. #478Velma407
  3. #478Willie407
  4. #480Cora403
  5. #480Laverne403
  6. #480Robbin403
  7. #480Trisha403
  8. #484Amber401
  9. #485Jessie400
  10. #485Mitzi400

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1962
Risers
  1. ↑ 631Zena#1,323 → #692
  2. ↑ 623Zina#992 → #369
  3. ↑ 540Trisha#1,020 → #480
  4. ↑ 457Shirl#1,304 → #847
  5. ↑ 396Glynis#992 → #596
Fallers
  1. ↓ 1,195Marnita#727 → #1,922
  2. ↓ 255Velvet#623 → #878
  3. ↓ 235Delphine#904 → #1,139
  4. ↓ 224Rosita#934 → #1,158
  5. ↓ 197Lindy#885 → #1,082

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1963 →