Cora

#113 for girls in 2025, 2,428 births · Last seen for boys in 2015 at #10,644
Given to girls 99.8% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1880 · 1,045 births
Debut · girls
1,045 births
In top 100 · girls
42 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
156,028
since 1880

Cora over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020202018peak #15, 1880girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#1132,428—
2024#1032,580—
2023#932,751—
2022#753,076—
2021#873,008—
2020#883,036—
2019#713,602—
2018#733,596—
2017#833,446—
2016#873,374—
2015#883,403#10,6446
2014#1032,967#12,1085
2013#1272,586—
2012#1552,081—
2011#2031,555—
2010#2751,206—
2009#3031,100—
2008#3221,041—
2007#352918—
2006#384844—
2005#452673—
2004#437698—
2003#433695—
2002#467608—
2001#458604—
2000#481564—
1999#491529—
1998#536468—
1997#669325—
1996#673327—
1995#679313—
1994#653329—
1993#718297—
1992#804250—
1991#803255—
1990#855230—
1989#781247—
1988#876201—
1987#873195—
1986#743237—
1985#768221—
1984#730224—
1983#730225—
1982#724239—
1981#747221—
1980#770214—
1979#813194—
1978#702225—
1977#698223—
1976#700211—
1975#774182—
1974#709206—
1973#726195—
1972#712201—
1971#686222#4,9075
1970#678234—
1969#701201#3,0629
1968#629235—
1967#620235—
1966#534312—
1965#493373—
1964#525351—
1963#480403—
1962#478410—
1961#476419—
1960#460454—
1959#454454—
1958#458435—
1957#407516—
1956#374554—
1955#365576—
1954#346614—
1953#323647—
1952#312667—
1951#300672—
1950#289734—
1949#264848#3,2986
1948#266837—
1947#259848—
1946#251800—
1945#244752#3,3385
1944#231816—
1943#225874—
1942#2021,002#2,7128
1941#1861,007#3,5055
1940#191965#2,32210
1939#1831,040—
1938#1781,131#2,18511
1937#1761,141—
1936#1811,008#2,18411
1935#1751,071#2,24611
1934#1681,112#3,6795
1933#1571,157#1,99713
1932#1691,136#3,3616
1931#1601,185#2,47110
1930#1611,272#3,0228
1929#1531,389#2,9808
1928#1551,393#2,16214
1927#1581,493#3,4517
1926#1581,477—
1925#1501,679#3,7416
1924#1551,630#3,2608
1923#1491,691#3,4677
1922#1401,762#3,8726
1921#1401,828#4,3225
1920#1371,819—
1919#1221,940#3,3917
1918#1241,916#2,69910
1917#1261,737#1,81517
1916#1141,899#2,38911
1915#1191,683#2,8298
1914#1051,500#3,2645
1913#1031,288—
1912#981,253#2,5445
1911#911,022—
1910#851,079#1,5895
1909#85969—
1908#83962#1,1137
1907#80969#9998
1906#77952#1,0047
1905#721,044—
1904#70993—
1903#70986#7839
1902#621,081—
1901#581,027—
1900#551,389#9688
1899#581,056—
1898#511,304—
1897#491,246—
1896#521,204—
1895#491,295#7389
1894#461,319#8577
1893#441,308—
1892#391,419#1,0665
1891#351,343#8416
1890#361,386#6679
1889#321,365#7897
1888#311,433#7049
1887#271,257—
1886#281,231#8456
1885#231,253#9365
1884#231,244#6639
1883#241,081—
1882#211,076—
1881#18969#7067
1880#151,045#8096
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Cora was already there! It came in at #15, and was given to 1,045 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1967–1992, when fewer than 260 girls a year got the name.

Where Cora is popular in 2018

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: #91 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 256 girlsAKMaine: #26 for girls · 27 births · 1 in 126 girlsMEVermont: #31 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 110 girlsVTNew Hampshire: #74 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 237 girlsNHWashington: #54 for girls · 104 births · 1 in 292 girlsWAIdaho: #30 for girls · 35 births · 1 in 171 girlsIDMontana: #40 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 161 girlsMTNorth Dakota: #20 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 130 girlsNDMinnesota: #26 for girls · 118 births · 1 in 199 girlsMNIllinois: #70 for girls · 138 births · 1 in 388 girlsILWisconsin: #40 for girls · 100 births · 1 in 223 girlsWIMichigan: #62 for girls · 119 births · 1 in 338 girlsMINew York: #114 for girls · 144 births · 1 in 602 girlsNYMassachusetts: #46 for girls · 100 births · 1 in 246 girlsMARhode Island: #80 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 279 girlsRIOregon: #41 for girls · 65 births · 1 in 215 girlsORNevada: #136 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 559 girlsNVWyoming: #7 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 57 girlsWYSouth Dakota: #33 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 161 girlsSDIowa: #25 for girls · 72 births · 1 in 171 girlsIAIndiana: #37 for girls · 123 births · 1 in 242 girlsINOhio: #44 for girls · 200 births · 1 in 255 girlsOHPennsylvania: #53 for girls · 167 births · 1 in 301 girlsPANew Jersey: #92 for girls · 77 births · 1 in 467 girlsNJConnecticut: #71 for girls · 36 births · 1 in 321 girlsCTCalifornia: #130 for girls · 283 births · 1 in 670 girlsCAUtah: #67 for girls · 55 births · 1 in 303 girlsUTColorado: #51 for girls · 75 births · 1 in 297 girlsCONebraska: #30 for girls · 43 births · 1 in 174 girlsNEMissouri: #39 for girls · 112 births · 1 in 237 girlsMOKentucky: #61 for girls · 58 births · 1 in 306 girlsKYWest Virginia: #62 for girls · 21 births · 1 in 268 girlsWVVirginia: #55 for girls · 115 births · 1 in 313 girlsVAMaryland: #56 for girls · 75 births · 1 in 311 girlsMDDelaware: #118 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 355 girlsDEArizona: #107 for girls · 59 births · 1 in 498 girlsAZNew Mexico: #169 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 582 girlsNMKansas: #60 for girls · 42 births · 1 in 287 girlsKSArkansas: #61 for girls · 39 births · 1 in 282 girlsARTennessee: #90 for girls · 71 births · 1 in 439 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #68 for girls · 122 births · 1 in 369 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #98 for girls · 41 births · 1 in 431 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: #72 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 234 girlsDCOklahoma: #106 for girls · 34 births · 1 in 460 girlsOKLouisiana: #182 for girls · 28 births · 1 in 699 girlsLAMississippi: #164 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 632 girlsMSAlabama: #127 for girls · 33 births · 1 in 567 girlsALGeorgia: #107 for girls · 84 births · 1 in 551 girlsGAHawaii: #203 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 578 girlsHITexas: #115 for girls · 258 births · 1 in 616 girlsTXFlorida: #128 for girls · 133 births · 1 in 640 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Wyoming#7 · 1 in 57
  2. North Dakota#20 · 1 in 130
  3. Iowa#25 · 1 in 171
  4. Maine#26 · 1 in 126
  5. Minnesota#26 · 1 in 199

Best ever in a state: #7 in Wyoming, 2018.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Wyoming#7171 in 57
North Dakota#20231 in 130
Iowa#25721 in 171
Maine#26271 in 126
Minnesota#261181 in 199
Idaho#30351 in 171
Nebraska#30431 in 174
Vermont#31101 in 110
South Dakota#33191 in 161
Indiana#371231 in 242
Missouri#391121 in 237
Montana#40171 in 161
Wisconsin#401001 in 223
Oregon#41651 in 215
Ohio#442001 in 255
Massachusetts#461001 in 246
Colorado#51751 in 297
Pennsylvania#531671 in 301
Washington#541041 in 292
Virginia#551151 in 313
Maryland#56751 in 311
Kansas#60421 in 287
Arkansas#61391 in 282
Kentucky#61581 in 306
Michigan#621191 in 338
West Virginia#62211 in 268
Utah#67551 in 303
North Carolina#681221 in 369
Illinois#701381 in 388
Connecticut#71361 in 321
District of Columbia#72131 in 234
New Hampshire#74151 in 237
Rhode Island#80101 in 279
Tennessee#90711 in 439
Alaska#9181 in 256
New Jersey#92771 in 467
South Carolina#98411 in 431
Oklahoma#106341 in 460
Arizona#107591 in 498
Georgia#107841 in 551
New York#1141441 in 602
Texas#1152581 in 616
Delaware#11871 in 355
Alabama#127331 in 567
Florida#1281331 in 640
California#1302831 in 670
Nevada#136191 in 559
Mississippi#164171 in 632
New Mexico#169101 in 582
Louisiana#182281 in 699
Hawaii#20351 in 578

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Cora
Momentum · girls
Falling
  • 10 spots since 2024 (#103 → #113)
  • 25 spots since 2020 (#88 → #113)
  • 25 spots since 2015 (#88 → #113)
  • Biggest jump: 133 spots in 1998 (#669 → #536)
  • Biggest drop: 130 spots in 1987 (#743 → #873)
Rise & fade · girls
Peaked on debut
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1880 at #15 (1,045 births)
  • Births halved by 1957, 77 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 42 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 42 yrs · run 1880–1912
  • Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 87
  • Highest: 1 in 87 girls born in 1880 were named Cora (1.1%)
  • Latest: 1 in 662 girls born in 2025 (0.15%)
Era · girls
The 2010s
  • 17.8% of all girls named Cora (27,816) were born in this decade
  • Comeback: #15 (1880) → #876 (1988) → #71 (2019)
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s11,954#15 (1880)#24
1890s12,880#35 (1891)#46
1900s10,372#55 (1900)#71
1910s15,317#85 (1910)#109
1920s16,161#137 (1920)#150
1930s11,253#157 (1933)#171
1940s8,749#186 (1941)#232
1950s5,869#289 (1950)#363
1960s3,393#460 (1960)#540
1970s2,093#678 (1970)#720
1980s2,224#724 (1982)#774
1990s3,323#491 (1999)#688
2000s7,745#303 (2009)#409
2010s27,816#71 (2019)#127
2020s16,879#75 (2022)#93

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Cora in 2018

girls
#73
3,596 births · 1 in 473 girls

Top girls' names in 2018

  1. #1Emma18,824
  2. #2Olivia18,061
  3. #3Ava15,034
  4. #4Isabella14,575
  5. #5Sophia14,013
  6. #6Charlotte13,038
  7. #7Mia12,742
  8. #8Amelia12,405
  9. #9Harper10,646
  10. #10Evelyn10,433
  11. #73Cora3,596
More about 2018

girls

1,701,074 girls got a published name in 2018; 1 in 473 of them was named Cora, which outranked 99.6% of the 18,152 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Cora
  1. #70Allison3,694
  2. #71Alice3,667
  3. #72Madelyn3,652
  4. #73Cora3,596
  5. #74Ruby3,591
  6. #75Serenity3,570
  7. #76Eva3,569
Biggest movers since 2017
Risers
  1. ↑ 680Meghan#1,387 → #707
  2. ↑ 567Dior#1,360 → #793
  3. ↑ 367Palmer#1,042 → #675
  4. ↑ 361Adalee#1,217 → #856
  5. ↑ 346Oaklynn#888 → #542
Fallers
  1. ↓ 334Audrina#847 → #1,181
  2. ↓ 234Courtney#952 → #1,186
  3. ↓ 232Marjorie#938 → #1,170
  4. ↓ 228Anabelle#969 → #1,197
  5. ↓ 225Angelique#799 → #1,024

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 2018 →