Coty
- Last seen for girls in 2022 at #15,306
- #8,243 for boys in 2025, 9 births
- Given to boys 87.7% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1992 · 558 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 5,525since 1956
Coty over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #8,243 | 9 | |
| 2024 | — | #8,987 | 8 | |
| 2023 | — | #8,921 | 8 | |
| 2022 | #15,306 | 5 | #8,300 | 9 |
| 2021 | — | #7,587 | 10 | |
| 2020 | #15,088 | 5 | #6,620 | 12 |
| 2019 | — | #6,777 | 12 | |
| 2018 | — | #6,036 | 14 | |
| 2017 | — | #5,297 | 17 | |
| 2016 | — | #4,776 | 20 | |
| 2015 | — | #5,058 | 18 | |
| 2014 | — | #5,485 | 16 | |
| 2013 | — | #6,241 | 13 | |
| 2012 | — | #4,390 | 22 | |
| 2011 | — | #5,433 | 16 | |
| 2010 | — | #3,894 | 26 | |
| 2009 | — | #4,748 | 20 | |
| 2008 | #17,504 | 5 | #4,540 | 21 |
| 2007 | — | #4,243 | 23 | |
| 2006 | — | #3,686 | 27 | |
| 2005 | #16,462 | 5 | #4,198 | 21 |
| 2004 | #12,761 | 7 | #2,741 | 38 |
| 2003 | — | #3,186 | 29 | |
| 2002 | — | #2,125 | 50 | |
| 2001 | #15,352 | 5 | #2,007 | 53 |
| 2000 | — | #1,742 | 64 | |
| 1999 | — | #1,517 | 74 | |
| 1998 | #10,122 | 8 | #1,347 | 88 |
| 1997 | #12,070 | 6 | #918 | 148 |
| 1996 | #7,130 | 12 | #780 | 187 |
| 1995 | #3,969 | 26 | #672 | 245 |
| 1994 | #4,238 | 24 | #606 | 297 |
| 1993 | #3,290 | 34 | #491 | 426 |
| 1992 | #2,869 | 41 | #406 | 558 |
| 1991 | #2,886 | 40 | #410 | 556 |
| 1990 | #2,600 | 45 | #447 | 491 |
| 1989 | #2,408 | 48 | #507 | 356 |
| 1988 | #2,051 | 57 | #482 | 365 |
| 1987 | #1,944 | 58 | #520 | 298 |
| 1986 | #2,228 | 46 | #636 | 198 |
| 1985 | #2,137 | 49 | #661 | 177 |
| 1984 | #2,781 | 32 | #879 | 100 |
| 1983 | #2,659 | 33 | #1,153 | 61 |
| 1982 | #3,418 | 24 | #1,342 | 49 |
| 1981 | #4,532 | 16 | #1,479 | 42 |
| 1980 | #2,940 | 30 | #1,569 | 38 |
| 1979 | #3,147 | 26 | #1,670 | 34 |
| 1978 | #3,009 | 26 | #1,965 | 25 |
| 1977 | #4,942 | 13 | #1,780 | 29 |
| 1976 | #8,156 | 6 | #2,508 | 17 |
| 1975 | #5,161 | 11 | #2,751 | 14 |
| 1974 | #6,900 | 7 | #2,674 | 14 |
| 1973 | #6,080 | 8 | #3,013 | 11 |
| 1972 | #5,480 | 9 | #2,991 | 11 |
| 1971 | — | #3,658 | 8 | |
| 1970 | — | #3,282 | 9 | |
| 1969 | — | #3,314 | 8 | |
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | #6,042 | 6 | — | |
| 1966 | #6,564 | 5 | — | |
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | #4,039 | 5 | |
| 1963 | — | #4,048 | 5 | |
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | #3,942 | 5 | |
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1956
The first year at least five boys were named Coty! It came in at #3,942, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1956–1968, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Coty is popular in 2025
No state had 5 or more boys named Coty in 2025, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Coty
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- 744 spots since 2024 (#8,987 → #8,243)
- 1,623 spots since 2020 (#6,620 → #8,243)
- Biggest jump: 274 spots in 1984
- Biggest drop: 429 spots in 1998
Rise & fade · boys
36 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1956
- Peaked 1992 at #406 (558 births)
- Births halved by 1995, 3 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 14 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 14 yrs · run 1984–1997
Share of babies · boys
1 in 3,580
- Highest: 1 in 3,580 boys born in 1992 were named Coty (0.03%)
- Latest: 1 in 189,786 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · boys
The 1990s
- 55.6% of all boys named Coty (3,070) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 1979
- Mostly girls until 1978, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 5 | #3,942 (1956) | #3,942 |
| 1960s | 18 | #3,314 (1969) | #3,800 |
| 1970s | 172 | #1,670 (1979) | #2,629 |
| 1980s | 1,684 | #482 (1988) | #923 |
| 1990s | 3,070 | #406 (1992) | #759 |
| 2000s | 346 | #1,742 (2000) | #3,322 |
| 2010s | 174 | #3,894 (2010) | #5,339 |
| 2020s | 56 | #6,620 (2020) | #8,110 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Coty ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: