Curtis
Last seen for girls in 2000 at #15,031 · #984 for boys in 2025, 232 births
Given to boys 99.1% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1963 · 5,376 births
- Debut · boys
- 68 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 46 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 260,554since 1880
Curtis over time
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #984 | 232 | |
| 2024 | — | #930 | 249 | |
| 2023 | — | #905 | 257 | |
| 2022 | — | #820 | 302 | |
| 2021 | — | #780 | 317 | |
| 2020 | — | #702 | 361 | |
| 2019 | — | #669 | 393 | |
| 2018 | — | #615 | 438 | |
| 2017 | — | #612 | 431 | |
| 2016 | — | #563 | 508 | |
| 2015 | — | #527 | 542 | |
| 2014 | — | #530 | 525 | |
| 2013 | — | #474 | 585 | |
| 2012 | — | #442 | 625 | |
| 2011 | — | #437 | 624 | |
| 2010 | — | #424 | 652 | |
| 2009 | — | #391 | 767 | |
| 2008 | — | #380 | 809 | |
| 2007 | — | #335 | 953 | |
| 2006 | — | #339 | 916 | |
| 2005 | — | #327 | 960 | |
| 2004 | — | #322 | 950 | |
| 2003 | — | #326 | 907 | |
| 2002 | — | #291 | 1,024 | |
| 2001 | — | #273 | 1,124 | |
| 2000 | #15,031 | 5 | #265 | 1,240 |
| 1999 | — | #249 | 1,270 | |
| 1998 | — | #226 | 1,408 | |
| 1997 | — | #208 | 1,496 | |
| 1996 | — | #191 | 1,645 | |
| 1995 | #11,783 | 6 | #183 | 1,709 |
| 1994 | #13,430 | 5 | #170 | 1,869 |
| 1993 | #10,588 | 7 | #153 | 2,097 |
| 1992 | — | #142 | 2,321 | |
| 1991 | #7,987 | 10 | #126 | 2,590 |
| 1990 | #5,286 | 17 | #121 | 2,800 |
| 1989 | #4,522 | 20 | #111 | 2,965 |
| 1988 | #3,690 | 25 | #105 | 2,907 |
| 1987 | #3,031 | 31 | #100 | 2,909 |
| 1986 | #3,360 | 26 | #100 | 2,910 |
| 1985 | #3,246 | 27 | #98 | 2,943 |
| 1984 | #3,874 | 20 | #96 | 2,959 |
| 1983 | #3,151 | 26 | #100 | 2,847 |
| 1982 | #3,172 | 27 | #101 | 2,940 |
| 1981 | #3,066 | 28 | #94 | 3,198 |
| 1980 | #3,215 | 26 | #89 | 3,332 |
| 1979 | #3,147 | 26 | #91 | 3,200 |
| 1978 | #2,942 | 27 | #96 | 2,825 |
| 1977 | #2,666 | 31 | #100 | 2,605 |
| 1976 | #3,287 | 21 | #105 | 2,451 |
| 1975 | #4,141 | 15 | #113 | 2,327 |
| 1974 | #4,041 | 15 | #98 | 2,589 |
| 1973 | #3,481 | 18 | #98 | 2,690 |
| 1972 | #2,356 | 31 | #92 | 3,080 |
| 1971 | #2,874 | 24 | #88 | 3,426 |
| 1970 | #2,522 | 29 | #88 | 3,615 |
| 1969 | #2,396 | 29 | #81 | 3,675 |
| 1968 | #2,296 | 28 | #75 | 3,855 |
| 1967 | #2,432 | 25 | #77 | 3,966 |
| 1966 | #2,839 | 19 | #75 | 4,242 |
| 1965 | #1,829 | 39 | #75 | 4,687 |
| 1964 | #2,348 | 27 | #75 | 5,064 |
| 1963 | #2,172 | 30 | #72 | 5,376 |
| 1962 | #2,031 | 33 | #73 | 5,569 |
| 1961 | #1,838 | 39 | #75 | 5,447 |
| 1960 | #1,747 | 42 | #79 | 5,363 |
| 1959 | #2,021 | 31 | #75 | 5,536 |
| 1958 | #1,630 | 43 | #82 | 5,261 |
| 1957 | #1,474 | 52 | #80 | 5,342 |
| 1956 | #1,871 | 33 | #80 | 5,157 |
| 1955 | #1,691 | 37 | #79 | 4,981 |
| 1954 | #1,769 | 34 | #84 | 4,594 |
| 1953 | #2,017 | 26 | #86 | 4,353 |
| 1952 | #2,327 | 20 | #86 | 4,175 |
| 1951 | #1,772 | 30 | #91 | 3,716 |
| 1950 | #2,121 | 21 | #97 | 3,209 |
| 1949 | #1,666 | 32 | #97 | 3,088 |
| 1948 | #2,070 | 22 | #101 | 3,091 |
| 1947 | #1,863 | 27 | #99 | 3,037 |
| 1946 | #2,094 | 20 | #99 | 2,723 |
| 1945 | #1,514 | 29 | #97 | 2,393 |
| 1944 | #1,364 | 35 | #97 | 2,465 |
| 1943 | #1,492 | 31 | #100 | 2,525 |
| 1942 | #1,559 | 28 | #98 | 2,420 |
| 1941 | #1,954 | 18 | #100 | 2,164 |
| 1940 | #1,347 | 31 | #97 | 2,103 |
| 1939 | #2,038 | 16 | #98 | 2,012 |
| 1938 | #1,945 | 17 | #101 | 2,002 |
| 1937 | #1,493 | 25 | #109 | 1,790 |
| 1936 | #1,413 | 27 | #107 | 1,797 |
| 1935 | #1,449 | 26 | #108 | 1,753 |
| 1934 | #1,481 | 25 | #103 | 1,844 |
| 1933 | #1,262 | 32 | #107 | 1,679 |
| 1932 | #1,293 | 32 | #103 | 1,775 |
| 1931 | #2,024 | 16 | #108 | 1,635 |
| 1930 | #1,232 | 37 | #106 | 1,721 |
| 1929 | #1,282 | 34 | #99 | 1,946 |
| 1928 | #1,239 | 38 | #101 | 1,920 |
| 1927 | #1,523 | 29 | #118 | 1,590 |
| 1926 | #1,589 | 27 | #112 | 1,626 |
| 1925 | #1,891 | 21 | #118 | 1,520 |
| 1924 | #1,301 | 38 | #117 | 1,529 |
| 1923 | #1,388 | 33 | #116 | 1,538 |
| 1922 | #1,730 | 24 | #113 | 1,547 |
| 1921 | #1,298 | 36 | #122 | 1,479 |
| 1920 | #1,439 | 31 | #120 | 1,443 |
| 1919 | #1,393 | 31 | #120 | 1,346 |
| 1918 | #1,203 | 39 | #123 | 1,335 |
| 1917 | #1,847 | 19 | #121 | 1,243 |
| 1916 | #1,630 | 22 | #120 | 1,174 |
| 1915 | #1,523 | 23 | #128 | 1,058 |
| 1914 | #1,665 | 16 | #120 | 915 |
| 1913 | #1,405 | 17 | #119 | 676 |
| 1912 | #1,421 | 15 | #121 | 566 |
| 1911 | #1,545 | 10 | #118 | 321 |
| 1910 | #1,421 | 11 | #114 | 277 |
| 1909 | #1,369 | 10 | #114 | 244 |
| 1908 | #1,357 | 10 | #123 | 203 |
| 1907 | #1,142 | 12 | #115 | 208 |
| 1906 | #1,951 | 5 | #121 | 177 |
| 1905 | #1,696 | 6 | #118 | 182 |
| 1904 | #1,877 | 5 | #139 | 144 |
| 1903 | #1,318 | 8 | #135 | 138 |
| 1902 | #1,075 | 11 | #145 | 129 |
| 1901 | #1,679 | 5 | #143 | 114 |
| 1900 | #1,231 | 10 | #147 | 144 |
| 1899 | #1,596 | 5 | #149 | 103 |
| 1898 | #1,502 | 6 | #139 | 128 |
| 1897 | — | #154 | 102 | |
| 1896 | — | #155 | 107 | |
| 1895 | — | #179 | 89 | |
| 1894 | #1,136 | 8 | #171 | 88 |
| 1893 | — | #180 | 80 | |
| 1892 | — | #188 | 83 | |
| 1891 | — | #199 | 62 | |
| 1890 | — | #164 | 86 | |
| 1889 | — | #195 | 67 | |
| 1888 | — | #169 | 89 | |
| 1887 | — | #196 | 61 | |
| 1886 | — | #189 | 72 | |
| 1885 | — | #187 | 70 | |
| 1884 | — | #186 | 73 | |
| 1883 | — | #205 | 53 | |
| 1882 | — | #188 | 70 | |
| 1881 | — | #168 | 72 | |
| 1880 | — | #186 | 68 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Curtis was already there! It came in at #186, and was given to 68 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1887, when fewer than 74 boys a year got the name.
Where Curtis is popular in 1933
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Mississippi#38 · 1 in 191
- Alabama#43 · 1 in 212
- Georgia#46 · 1 in 231
- North Dakota#47 · 1 in 172
- South Dakota#47 · 1 in 188
Best ever in a state: #27 in North Dakota, 1946.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mississippi | #38 | 98 | 1 in 191 |
| Alabama | #43 | 121 | 1 in 212 |
| Georgia | #46 | 117 | 1 in 231 |
| North Dakota | #47 | 33 | 1 in 172 |
| South Dakota | #47 | 28 | 1 in 188 |
| Virginia | #47 | 86 | 1 in 248 |
| Florida | #52 | 49 | 1 in 224 |
| South Carolina | #55 | 68 | 1 in 265 |
| North Carolina | #57 | 103 | 1 in 319 |
| Arkansas | #59 | 63 | 1 in 274 |
| Louisiana | #60 | 71 | 1 in 247 |
| Minnesota | #69 | 65 | 1 in 296 |
| Tennessee | #74 | 61 | 1 in 397 |
| Kentucky | #78 | 64 | 1 in 386 |
| Texas | #81 | 142 | 1 in 377 |
| Oklahoma | #86 | 57 | 1 in 384 |
| West Virginia | #102 | 29 | 1 in 547 |
| Maryland | #113 | 14 | 1 in 788 |
| Washington | #122 | 13 | 1 in 671 |
| Wisconsin | #124 | 29 | 1 in 768 |
| Oregon | #125 | 8 | 1 in 637 |
| Missouri | #128 | 37 | 1 in 722 |
| Montana | #129 | 5 | 1 in 695 |
| Pennsylvania | #136 | 55 | 1 in 1,256 |
| Maine | #137 | 8 | 1 in 751 |
| Connecticut | #148 | 7 | 1 in 1,350 |
| Kansas | #150 | 15 | 1 in 882 |
| Illinois | #151 | 40 | 1 in 1,236 |
| Iowa | #152 | 23 | 1 in 787 |
| Ohio | #164 | 30 | 1 in 1,436 |
| Indiana | #166 | 17 | 1 in 1,296 |
| Michigan | #173 | 23 | 1 in 1,548 |
| Nebraska | #175 | 9 | 1 in 1,136 |
| Colorado | #193 | 6 | 1 in 1,281 |
| New Jersey | #207 | 8 | 1 in 3,065 |
| Massachusetts | #209 | 8 | 1 in 3,470 |
| New York | #214 | 33 | 1 in 2,529 |
| California | #236 | 17 | 1 in 2,000 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Curtis
- 54 spots since 2024 (#930 → #984)
- 282 spots since 2020 (#702 → #984)
- 457 spots since 2015 (#527 → #984)
- Biggest jump: 31 spots in 1890 (#195 → #164)
- Biggest drop: 85 spots in 2023 (#820 → #905)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1963 at #72 (5,376 births)
- Births halved by 1974, 11 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 46 yrs · run 1949–1974
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
- Highest: 1 in 371 boys born in 1962 were named Curtis (0.27%)
- Latest: 1 in 7,362 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
- Its best rank, #72 in 1963, was only 1 in 378 (0.26%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 18.1% of all boys named Curtis (47,244) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 695 | #168 (1881) | #187 |
| 1890s | 928 | #139 (1898) | #168 |
| 1900s | 1,683 | #114 (1909) | #130 |
| 1910s | 8,911 | #114 (1910) | #120 |
| 1920s | 16,138 | #99 (1929) | #114 |
| 1930s | 18,008 | #98 (1939) | #105 |
| 1940s | 26,009 | #97 (1949) | #99 |
| 1950s | 46,324 | #75 (1959) | #84 |
| 1960s | 47,244 | #72 (1963) | #76 |
| 1970s | 28,808 | #88 (1970) | #97 |
| 1980s | 29,910 | #89 (1980) | #99 |
| 1990s | 19,205 | #121 (1990) | #177 |
| 2000s | 9,650 | #265 (2000) | #325 |
| 2010s | 5,323 | #424 (2010) | #529 |
| 2020s | 1,718 | #702 (2020) | #854 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Curtis in 1933
Top girls' names in 1933
Top boys' names in 1933
More about 1933
girls
1,007,932 girls got a published name in 1933; 1 in 31,498 of them was named Curtis, which outranked 74.0% of the 4,858 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.8% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,244Ronald33
- #1,244Ruthann33
- #1,244Wynell33
- #1,262Curtis32
- #1,262Abigail32
- #1,262Alba32
- #1,262Ardys32
- #1,289Athena31
- #1,289Betsey31
- #1,289Clyde31
Tied with 26 names at #1,262; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
991,524 boys got a published name in 1933; 1 in 591 of them was named Curtis, which outranked 97.4% of the 4,156 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.