Daisy
- #75 for girls in 2025, 3,206 births
- Last seen for boys in 2022 at #10,863
- Given to girls 99.6% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1882 · 648 births
- Debut · girls
- 564 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 31 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 158,723since 1880
Daisy over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #75 | 3,206 | — | |
| 2024 | #76 | 3,102 | — | |
| 2023 | #110 | 2,426 | — | |
| 2022 | #124 | 2,325 | #10,863 | 6 |
| 2021 | #134 | 2,087 | — | |
| 2020 | #143 | 1,896 | — | |
| 2019 | #164 | 1,742 | — | |
| 2018 | #169 | 1,718 | — | |
| 2017 | #170 | 1,796 | — | |
| 2016 | #189 | 1,732 | — | |
| 2015 | #183 | 1,772 | — | |
| 2014 | #180 | 1,791 | — | |
| 2013 | #198 | 1,633 | — | |
| 2012 | #174 | 1,784 | — | |
| 2011 | #167 | 1,896 | — | |
| 2010 | #151 | 2,020 | #10,766 | 6 |
| 2009 | #153 | 2,074 | — | |
| 2008 | #161 | 2,075 | #12,553 | 5 |
| 2007 | #167 | 2,159 | — | |
| 2006 | #149 | 2,300 | — | |
| 2005 | #150 | 2,323 | — | |
| 2004 | #144 | 2,271 | #8,143 | 8 |
| 2003 | #136 | 2,410 | #7,831 | 8 |
| 2002 | #138 | 2,456 | #7,643 | 8 |
| 2001 | #139 | 2,371 | #7,536 | 8 |
| 2000 | #141 | 2,368 | #6,839 | 9 |
| 1999 | #133 | 2,470 | — | |
| 1998 | #136 | 2,449 | — | |
| 1997 | #140 | 2,303 | #8,110 | 6 |
| 1996 | #124 | 2,514 | #4,613 | 13 |
| 1995 | #145 | 2,224 | #6,992 | 7 |
| 1994 | #177 | 1,668 | #4,290 | 14 |
| 1993 | #185 | 1,579 | #4,697 | 12 |
| 1992 | #187 | 1,654 | #2,747 | 25 |
| 1991 | #185 | 1,609 | #4,476 | 12 |
| 1990 | #193 | 1,521 | #3,607 | 16 |
| 1989 | #218 | 1,256 | #3,446 | 16 |
| 1988 | #225 | 1,166 | #2,367 | 25 |
| 1987 | #312 | 774 | #2,559 | 21 |
| 1986 | #305 | 801 | #2,601 | 20 |
| 1985 | #261 | 958 | #2,942 | 16 |
| 1984 | #225 | 1,145 | #2,364 | 21 |
| 1983 | #214 | 1,175 | #2,912 | 15 |
| 1982 | #366 | 633 | #5,003 | 7 |
| 1981 | #328 | 723 | #3,858 | 10 |
| 1980 | #418 | 528 | — | |
| 1979 | #519 | 371 | — | |
| 1978 | #606 | 282 | — | |
| 1977 | #554 | 316 | — | |
| 1976 | #544 | 320 | — | |
| 1975 | #529 | 328 | — | |
| 1974 | #533 | 314 | #5,227 | 5 |
| 1973 | #561 | 293 | — | |
| 1972 | #628 | 247 | — | |
| 1971 | #577 | 303 | #4,907 | 5 |
| 1970 | #575 | 309 | — | |
| 1969 | #569 | 298 | — | |
| 1968 | #585 | 268 | #4,136 | 5 |
| 1967 | #565 | 281 | — | |
| 1966 | #529 | 317 | — | |
| 1965 | #520 | 337 | — | |
| 1964 | #507 | 374 | — | |
| 1963 | #492 | 390 | — | |
| 1962 | #488 | 395 | — | |
| 1961 | #478 | 413 | — | |
| 1960 | #453 | 465 | — | |
| 1959 | #449 | 460 | — | |
| 1958 | #400 | 531 | — | |
| 1957 | #420 | 493 | — | |
| 1956 | #407 | 493 | — | |
| 1955 | #394 | 497 | #3,505 | 6 |
| 1954 | #385 | 500 | — | |
| 1953 | #362 | 550 | — | |
| 1952 | #369 | 502 | #3,734 | 5 |
| 1951 | #343 | 540 | — | |
| 1950 | #336 | 533 | — | |
| 1949 | #321 | 580 | — | |
| 1948 | #302 | 646 | — | |
| 1947 | #304 | 678 | — | |
| 1946 | #307 | 579 | — | |
| 1945 | #271 | 636 | — | |
| 1944 | #242 | 741 | — | |
| 1943 | #255 | 760 | — | |
| 1942 | #240 | 799 | — | |
| 1941 | #233 | 741 | #3,505 | 5 |
| 1940 | #218 | 774 | #3,130 | 6 |
| 1939 | #210 | 822 | #2,609 | 8 |
| 1938 | #216 | 786 | #2,084 | 12 |
| 1937 | #204 | 812 | #3,518 | 5 |
| 1936 | #212 | 777 | #3,147 | 6 |
| 1935 | #194 | 903 | #3,252 | 6 |
| 1934 | #187 | 939 | #2,742 | 8 |
| 1933 | #197 | 873 | #1,997 | 13 |
| 1932 | #176 | 1,078 | #2,465 | 10 |
| 1931 | #178 | 1,009 | #2,864 | 8 |
| 1930 | #181 | 1,064 | #3,022 | 8 |
| 1929 | #182 | 1,080 | #2,766 | 9 |
| 1928 | #169 | 1,245 | #3,076 | 8 |
| 1927 | #172 | 1,242 | #4,210 | 5 |
| 1926 | #171 | 1,288 | #3,139 | 8 |
| 1925 | #169 | 1,400 | #3,741 | 6 |
| 1924 | #166 | 1,460 | #2,473 | 12 |
| 1923 | #163 | 1,443 | — | |
| 1922 | #157 | 1,530 | #3,532 | 7 |
| 1921 | #160 | 1,481 | #3,517 | 7 |
| 1920 | #155 | 1,489 | #2,765 | 10 |
| 1919 | #148 | 1,496 | #2,877 | 9 |
| 1918 | #149 | 1,525 | #2,882 | 9 |
| 1917 | #150 | 1,417 | #3,545 | 6 |
| 1916 | #137 | 1,511 | #2,730 | 9 |
| 1915 | #131 | 1,518 | #3,825 | 5 |
| 1914 | #126 | 1,202 | #3,264 | 5 |
| 1913 | #123 | 1,052 | #2,821 | 5 |
| 1912 | #112 | 1,044 | #2,045 | 7 |
| 1911 | #108 | 833 | — | |
| 1910 | #101 | 877 | #1,421 | 6 |
| 1909 | #102 | 754 | — | |
| 1908 | #99 | 765 | — | |
| 1907 | #98 | 739 | — | |
| 1906 | #90 | 773 | #1,111 | 6 |
| 1905 | #87 | 776 | — | |
| 1904 | #85 | 772 | #1,205 | 5 |
| 1903 | #82 | 776 | #910 | 7 |
| 1902 | #85 | 748 | #1,013 | 6 |
| 1901 | #87 | 653 | — | |
| 1900 | #81 | 931 | — | |
| 1899 | #85 | 660 | — | |
| 1898 | #84 | 712 | #1,002 | 6 |
| 1897 | #86 | 624 | — | |
| 1896 | #83 | 661 | — | |
| 1895 | #84 | 665 | #1,079 | 5 |
| 1894 | #81 | 645 | — | |
| 1893 | #84 | 573 | #907 | 6 |
| 1892 | #85 | 564 | — | |
| 1891 | #79 | 557 | — | |
| 1890 | #76 | 588 | — | |
| 1889 | #73 | 583 | — | |
| 1888 | #73 | 612 | #755 | 8 |
| 1887 | #67 | 532 | — | |
| 1886 | #63 | 602 | #959 | 5 |
| 1885 | #60 | 607 | — | |
| 1884 | #54 | 685 | — | |
| 1883 | #50 | 659 | #892 | 5 |
| 1882 | #48 | 648 | — | |
| 1881 | #49 | 562 | — | |
| 1880 | #48 | 564 | #909 | 5 |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Daisy was already there! It came in at #48, and was given to 564 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1965–1978, when fewer than 340 girls a year got the name.
Where Daisy is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Utah#28 · 1 in 184
- Idaho#38 · 1 in 199
- Oregon#42 · 1 in 242
- Maine#45 · 1 in 183
- Washington#48 · 1 in 278
Best ever in a state: #13 in Alaska, 1916.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Utah | #28 | 93 | 1 in 184 |
| Idaho | #38 | 36 | 1 in 199 |
| Oregon | #42 | 54 | 1 in 242 |
| Maine | #45 | 17 | 1 in 183 |
| Washington | #48 | 104 | 1 in 278 |
| Missouri | #50 | 81 | 1 in 300 |
| New Mexico | #52 | 20 | 1 in 234 |
| Michigan | #54 | 112 | 1 in 319 |
| Tennessee | #55 | 103 | 1 in 311 |
| Ohio | #56 | 141 | 1 in 335 |
| Mississippi | #57 | 32 | 1 in 278 |
| Indiana | #58 | 89 | 1 in 314 |
| Arizona | #61 | 81 | 1 in 348 |
| Nebraska | #61 | 27 | 1 in 263 |
| Nevada | #61 | 31 | 1 in 297 |
| Colorado | #64 | 71 | 1 in 329 |
| New Hampshire | #66 | 16 | 1 in 237 |
| West Virginia | #67 | 19 | 1 in 267 |
| Iowa | #69 | 39 | 1 in 302 |
| Delaware | #70 | 10 | 1 in 226 |
| Kentucky | #75 | 51 | 1 in 338 |
| Vermont | #75 | 5 | 1 in 195 |
| Rhode Island | #78 | 10 | 1 in 245 |
| South Carolina | #79 | 49 | 1 in 373 |
| Minnesota | #81 | 61 | 1 in 352 |
| Georgia | #82 | 99 | 1 in 457 |
| Arkansas | #83 | 31 | 1 in 342 |
| Massachusetts | #84 | 65 | 1 in 370 |
| Pennsylvania | #84 | 108 | 1 in 432 |
| South Dakota | #84 | 11 | 1 in 277 |
| Illinois | #85 | 97 | 1 in 457 |
| California | #87 | 337 | 1 in 480 |
| Alaska | #90 | 7 | 1 in 236 |
| Texas | #90 | 302 | 1 in 532 |
| Louisiana | #91 | 40 | 1 in 409 |
| Wisconsin | #93 | 50 | 1 in 405 |
| Kansas | #100 | 31 | 1 in 381 |
| Oklahoma | #100 | 36 | 1 in 411 |
| North Carolina | #101 | 102 | 1 in 456 |
| Montana | #105 | 9 | 1 in 314 |
| New York | #107 | 141 | 1 in 556 |
| Alabama | #108 | 40 | 1 in 458 |
| Virginia | #108 | 66 | 1 in 511 |
| Hawaii | #114 | 7 | 1 in 306 |
| Florida | #118 | 146 | 1 in 594 |
| Maryland | #126 | 36 | 1 in 555 |
| New Jersey | #126 | 62 | 1 in 573 |
| North Dakota | #141 | 7 | 1 in 386 |
| Connecticut | #175 | 18 | 1 in 639 |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Daisy
Momentum · girls
Rising
- 68 spots since 2020 (#143 → #75)
- Biggest jump: 152 spots in 1983
- Biggest drop: 52 spots in 1978
Rise & fade · girls
2 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1882 at #48 (648 births)
- Births halved by 1966, 84 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 31 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 31 yrs · run 1880–1908
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 161
- Highest: 1 in 161 girls born in 1880 were named Daisy (0.62%)
- Latest: 1 in 501 girls born in 2025 (0.20%)
- Its best rank, #48 in 1882, was only 1 in 166 (0.60%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 2000s
- 14.4% of all girls named Daisy (22,807) were born in this decade
- Comeback: #48 (1882) → #628 (1972) → #75 (2025)
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 6,054 | #48 (1882) | #59 |
| 1890s | 6,249 | #76 (1890) | #83 |
| 1900s | 7,687 | #81 (1900) | #90 |
| 1910s | 12,475 | #101 (1910) | #129 |
| 1920s | 13,658 | #155 (1920) | #166 |
| 1930s | 9,063 | #176 (1932) | #196 |
| 1940s | 6,934 | #218 (1940) | #269 |
| 1950s | 5,099 | #336 (1950) | #387 |
| 1960s | 3,538 | #453 (1960) | #519 |
| 1970s | 3,083 | #519 (1979) | #563 |
| 1980s | 9,159 | #214 (1983) | #287 |
| 1990s | 19,991 | #124 (1996) | #161 |
| 2000s | 22,807 | #136 (2003) | #148 |
| 2010s | 17,884 | #151 (2010) | #175 |
| 2020s | 15,042 | #75 (2025) | #110 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Daisy ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: