Dajah
Last seen for girls in 2023 at #15,194 · Last seen for boys in 2003 at #8,643
Given to girls 99.7% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1999 · 181 births
- Debut · girls
- 7 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 2,013since 1989
Dajah over time
Rank among girls' names. Dajah has never cracked the top 1,000 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | #15,194 | 5 | — | |
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | #11,090 | 8 | — | |
| 2019 | #7,342 | 15 | — | |
| 2018 | #7,409 | 15 | — | |
| 2017 | #8,299 | 13 | — | |
| 2016 | #11,781 | 8 | — | |
| 2015 | #6,036 | 21 | — | |
| 2014 | #10,955 | 9 | — | |
| 2013 | #5,486 | 24 | — | |
| 2012 | #4,296 | 34 | — | |
| 2011 | #5,543 | 24 | — | |
| 2010 | #4,023 | 37 | — | |
| 2009 | #3,800 | 41 | — | |
| 2008 | #3,267 | 51 | — | |
| 2007 | #2,787 | 65 | — | |
| 2006 | #2,248 | 85 | — | |
| 2005 | #2,254 | 80 | — | |
| 2004 | #2,020 | 91 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,769 | 106 | #8,643 | 7 |
| 2002 | #1,594 | 116 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,411 | 134 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,291 | 149 | — | |
| 1999 | #1,099 | 181 | — | |
| 1998 | #1,228 | 148 | — | |
| 1997 | #1,303 | 133 | — | |
| 1996 | #1,164 | 156 | — | |
| 1995 | #1,107 | 160 | — | |
| 1994 | #3,448 | 32 | — | |
| 1993 | #4,393 | 23 | — | |
| 1992 | #4,849 | 20 | — | |
| 1991 | #6,588 | 13 | — | |
| 1990 | #8,501 | 9 | — | |
| 1989 | #9,681 | 7 | — | |
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Dajah! It came in at #9,681, and was given to 7 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 2021–2025, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Dajah is popular in 2000
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Georgia#602 · 1 in 3,697
- Michigan#643 · 1 in 4,336
- Maryland#647 · 1 in 4,100
- Missouri#676 · 1 in 4,905
- Virginia#718 · 1 in 5,075
Best ever in a state: #210 in District of Columbia, 1996.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Georgia | #602 | 13 | 1 in 3,697 |
| Michigan | #643 | 12 | 1 in 4,336 |
| Maryland | #647 | 6 | 1 in 4,100 |
| Missouri | #676 | 6 | 1 in 4,905 |
| Virginia | #718 | 7 | 1 in 5,075 |
| Pennsylvania | #788 | 9 | 1 in 6,451 |
| Illinois | #792 | 13 | 1 in 5,480 |
| Florida | #886 | 12 | 1 in 6,442 |
| Ohio | #887 | 8 | 1 in 7,750 |
| North Carolina | #996 | 6 | 1 in 7,515 |
| New York | #1,354 | 9 | 1 in 11,159 |
| California | #2,170 | 9 | 1 in 24,870 |
| Texas | #2,617 | 5 | 1 in 30,636 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Dajah
- Not published in 2025; last seen 2023
- Debuted 1989
- Peaked 1999 at #1,099 (181 births)
- Births halved by 2005, 6 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 9,800 girls born in 1999 were named Dajah (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 320,916 girls born in 2023 (0.00%)
- 45.6% of all girls named Dajah (918) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 7 | #9,681 (1989) | #9,681 |
| 1990s | 875 | #1,099 (1999) | #3,368 |
| 2000s | 918 | #1,291 (2000) | #2,244 |
| 2010s | 200 | #4,023 (2010) | #7,117 |
| 2020s | 13 | #11,090 (2020) | #13,142 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Dajah in 2000
Top girls' names in 2000
More about 2000
girls
1,816,036 girls got a published name in 2000; 1 in 12,188 of them was named Dajah, which outranked 92.7% of the 17,660 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 10.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,288Cailin150
- #1,288Isela150
- #1,288Kalli150
- #1,291Dajah149
- #1,291Amalia149
- #1,291Brea149
- #1,291Jolene149
- #1,298Bobbie148
- #1,298Mason148
- #1,298Tyana148
Tied with 6 names at #1,291; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.