Danica
#1,631 for girls in 2025, 127 births
- Peak · girls
- 2007 · 1,109 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 16,522since 1916
Danica over time
Rank among girls' names. Danica has never cracked the top 300 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,631 | 127 |
| 2024 | #1,553 | 137 |
| 2023 | #1,534 | 139 |
| 2022 | #1,309 | 180 |
| 2021 | #1,075 | 233 |
| 2020 | #1,158 | 203 |
| 2019 | #1,096 | 226 |
| 2018 | #994 | 263 |
| 2017 | #870 | 314 |
| 2016 | #865 | 325 |
| 2015 | #708 | 403 |
| 2014 | #557 | 553 |
| 2013 | #558 | 524 |
| 2012 | #509 | 599 |
| 2011 | #459 | 647 |
| 2010 | #425 | 737 |
| 2009 | #377 | 861 |
| 2008 | #336 | 991 |
| 2007 | #307 | 1,109 |
| 2006 | #353 | 935 |
| 2005 | #611 | 465 |
| 2004 | #1,118 | 204 |
| 2003 | #1,227 | 172 |
| 2002 | #1,185 | 173 |
| 2001 | #1,348 | 142 |
| 2000 | #1,075 | 192 |
| 1999 | #1,159 | 168 |
| 1998 | #1,133 | 167 |
| 1997 | #1,079 | 174 |
| 1996 | #1,042 | 178 |
| 1995 | #837 | 234 |
| 1994 | #775 | 262 |
| 1993 | #719 | 296 |
| 1992 | #773 | 267 |
| 1991 | #728 | 285 |
| 1990 | #638 | 351 |
| 1989 | #639 | 328 |
| 1988 | #860 | 207 |
| 1987 | #970 | 163 |
| 1986 | #955 | 165 |
| 1985 | #856 | 188 |
| 1984 | #797 | 200 |
| 1983 | #880 | 172 |
| 1982 | #950 | 156 |
| 1981 | #955 | 153 |
| 1980 | #925 | 161 |
| 1979 | #894 | 167 |
| 1978 | #964 | 144 |
| 1977 | #921 | 152 |
| 1976 | #1,104 | 109 |
| 1975 | #1,066 | 110 |
| 1974 | #1,107 | 105 |
| 1973 | #1,458 | 65 |
| 1972 | #1,502 | 63 |
| 1971 | #1,613 | 58 |
| 1970 | #1,343 | 78 |
| 1969 | #1,609 | 55 |
| 1968 | #1,607 | 51 |
| 1967 | #1,947 | 36 |
| 1966 | #2,249 | 28 |
| 1965 | #1,801 | 40 |
| 1964 | #2,412 | 26 |
| 1963 | #3,176 | 16 |
| 1962 | #3,293 | 15 |
| 1961 | #3,189 | 16 |
| 1960 | #5,168 | 7 |
| 1959 | #4,300 | 9 |
| 1958 | #4,520 | 8 |
| 1957 | #4,202 | 9 |
| 1956 | — | |
| 1955 | #5,828 | 5 |
| 1954 | — | |
| 1953 | #5,673 | 5 |
| 1952 | — | |
| 1951 | #4,833 | 6 |
| 1950 | — | |
| 1949 | — | |
| 1948 | — | |
| 1947 | — | |
| 1946 | — | |
| 1945 | — | |
| 1944 | — | |
| 1943 | — | |
| 1942 | — | |
| 1941 | — | |
| 1940 | — | |
| 1939 | — | |
| 1938 | — | |
| 1937 | — | |
| 1936 | — | |
| 1935 | — | |
| 1934 | — | |
| 1933 | — | |
| 1932 | — | |
| 1931 | — | |
| 1930 | — | |
| 1929 | — | |
| 1928 | — | |
| 1927 | — | |
| 1926 | — | |
| 1925 | — | |
| 1924 | — | |
| 1923 | — | |
| 1922 | — | |
| 1921 | — | |
| 1920 | — | |
| 1919 | — | |
| 1918 | #4,809 | 5 |
| 1917 | — | |
| 1916 | #4,417 | 5 |
| 1915 | — | |
| 1914 | — | |
| 1913 | — | |
| 1912 | — | |
| 1911 | — | |
| 1910 | — | |
| 1909 | — | |
| 1908 | — | |
| 1907 | — | |
| 1906 | — | |
| 1905 | — | |
| 1904 | — | |
| 1903 | — | |
| 1902 | — | |
| 1901 | — | |
| 1900 | — | |
| 1899 | — | |
| 1898 | — | |
| 1897 | — | |
| 1896 | — | |
| 1895 | — | |
| 1894 | — | |
| 1893 | — | |
| 1892 | — | |
| 1891 | — | |
| 1890 | — | |
| 1889 | — | |
| 1888 | — | |
| 1887 | — | |
| 1886 | — | |
| 1885 | — | |
| 1884 | — | |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | — | |
| 1881 | — | |
| 1880 | — | |
The first year at least five girls were named Danica! It came in at #4,417, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1916–1950, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Danica is popular in 2009
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- North Dakota#122 · 1 in 376
- South Dakota#125 · 1 in 379
- Maine#146 · 1 in 494
- Iowa#151 · 1 in 601
- Montana#170 · 1 in 492
Best ever in a state: #49 in North Dakota, 2007.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| North Dakota | #122 | 7 | 1 in 376 |
| South Dakota | #125 | 8 | 1 in 379 |
| Maine | #146 | 8 | 1 in 494 |
| Iowa | #151 | 22 | 1 in 601 |
| Montana | #170 | 6 | 1 in 492 |
| New Hampshire | #176 | 6 | 1 in 657 |
| Nebraska | #192 | 12 | 1 in 684 |
| Oklahoma | #245 | 18 | 1 in 957 |
| Washington | #251 | 29 | 1 in 1,081 |
| Indiana | #253 | 28 | 1 in 1,132 |
| Pennsylvania | #256 | 44 | 1 in 1,242 |
| Ohio | #275 | 40 | 1 in 1,361 |
| Arizona | #290 | 26 | 1 in 1,289 |
| Nevada | #290 | 10 | 1 in 1,146 |
| Colorado | #316 | 18 | 1 in 1,325 |
| Utah | #336 | 14 | 1 in 1,360 |
| Minnesota | #338 | 17 | 1 in 1,458 |
| Wisconsin | #350 | 16 | 1 in 1,532 |
| California | #354 | 119 | 1 in 1,834 |
| Virginia | #357 | 22 | 1 in 1,668 |
| New York | #374 | 50 | 1 in 1,895 |
| New Mexico | #388 | 6 | 1 in 1,337 |
| Texas | #393 | 86 | 1 in 1,938 |
| Kansas | #404 | 8 | 1 in 1,720 |
| Tennessee | #418 | 16 | 1 in 1,907 |
| Florida | #424 | 37 | 1 in 2,225 |
| Arkansas | #427 | 7 | 1 in 1,686 |
| Michigan | #440 | 19 | 1 in 2,250 |
| Alabama | #461 | 10 | 1 in 2,002 |
| New Jersey | #465 | 17 | 1 in 2,254 |
| Oregon | #467 | 8 | 1 in 1,954 |
| North Carolina | #513 | 18 | 1 in 2,579 |
| Maryland | #514 | 10 | 1 in 2,472 |
| Louisiana | #558 | 8 | 1 in 2,582 |
| Illinois | #586 | 21 | 1 in 3,011 |
| Kentucky | #604 | 6 | 1 in 3,214 |
| Missouri | #604 | 9 | 1 in 3,112 |
| South Carolina | #657 | 6 | 1 in 3,093 |
| Massachusetts | #725 | 6 | 1 in 4,374 |
| Georgia | #797 | 12 | 1 in 4,227 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Danica
- 78 spots since 2024 (#1,553 → #1,631)
- 473 spots since 2020 (#1,158 → #1,631)
- 923 spots since 2015 (#708 → #1,631)
- Biggest jump: 507 spots in 2005 (#1,118 → #611)
- Biggest drop: 205 spots in 1996 (#837 → #1,042)
- Debuted 1916
- Peaked 2007 at #307 (1,109 births)
- Births halved by 2013, 6 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 33 yrs · run 1977–1995
- Highest: 1 in 1,734 girls born in 2007 were named Danica (0.06%)
- Latest: 1 in 12,656 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
- 31.7% of all girls named Danica (5,244) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 10 | #4,417 (1916) | #4,613 |
| 1920s | 0 | — | — |
| 1930s | 0 | — | — |
| 1940s | 0 | — | — |
| 1950s | 42 | #4,202 (1957) | #4,893 |
| 1960s | 290 | #1,607 (1968) | #2,645 |
| 1970s | 1,051 | #894 (1979) | #1,197 |
| 1980s | 1,893 | #639 (1989) | #879 |
| 1990s | 2,382 | #638 (1990) | #888 |
| 2000s | 5,244 | #307 (2007) | #794 |
| 2010s | 4,591 | #425 (2010) | #704 |
| 2020s | 1,019 | #1,075 (2021) | #1,377 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Danica in 2009
Top girls' names in 2009
More about 2009
girls
1,837,114 girls got a published name in 2009; 1 in 2,134 of them was named Danica, which outranked 98.1% of the 20,199 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.6% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).