Darcell
- Last seen for girls in 1990 at #10,193
- Last seen for boys in 2017 at #12,246
- Given to girls 74.9% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1958 · 23 births
- Debut · girls
- 12 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 506since 1951
Darcell over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | — | — | ||
| 2018 | — | — | ||
| 2017 | — | #12,246 | 5 | |
| 2016 | — | — | ||
| 2015 | — | — | ||
| 2014 | — | — | ||
| 2013 | — | — | ||
| 2012 | — | — | ||
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | — | #10,994 | 6 | |
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | — | #8,143 | 8 | |
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | #9,631 | 5 | |
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | #7,971 | 6 | |
| 1995 | — | #6,992 | 7 | |
| 1994 | — | #6,372 | 8 | |
| 1993 | — | #6,228 | 8 | |
| 1992 | — | #8,435 | 5 | |
| 1991 | — | #4,005 | 14 | |
| 1990 | #10,193 | 7 | #8,117 | 5 |
| 1989 | #6,955 | 11 | #4,811 | 10 |
| 1988 | #5,321 | 15 | #5,751 | 7 |
| 1987 | #5,613 | 13 | #4,239 | 10 |
| 1986 | #3,554 | 24 | #4,853 | 8 |
| 1985 | #4,635 | 16 | #4,333 | 9 |
| 1984 | #2,781 | 32 | #4,973 | 7 |
| 1983 | #6,212 | 10 | #5,484 | 6 |
| 1982 | #7,469 | 8 | — | |
| 1981 | — | #6,262 | 5 | |
| 1980 | #10,392 | 5 | #4,495 | 8 |
| 1979 | #7,313 | 8 | #5,355 | 6 |
| 1978 | #6,385 | 9 | #5,772 | 5 |
| 1977 | #7,567 | 7 | — | |
| 1976 | — | #4,935 | 6 | |
| 1975 | #7,173 | 7 | #4,797 | 6 |
| 1974 | #7,680 | 6 | — | |
| 1973 | #5,191 | 10 | — | |
| 1972 | #4,523 | 12 | — | |
| 1971 | #5,543 | 9 | — | |
| 1970 | #5,061 | 10 | — | |
| 1969 | #3,958 | 13 | — | |
| 1968 | #4,489 | 10 | — | |
| 1967 | #4,625 | 9 | — | |
| 1966 | #2,937 | 18 | — | |
| 1965 | #3,549 | 13 | — | |
| 1964 | #3,879 | 12 | — | |
| 1963 | #2,780 | 20 | — | |
| 1962 | #4,263 | 10 | — | |
| 1961 | #3,460 | 14 | — | |
| 1960 | #2,820 | 19 | — | |
| 1959 | #2,517 | 21 | — | |
| 1958 | #2,376 | 23 | — | |
| 1957 | #2,563 | 20 | — | |
| 1956 | #2,622 | 19 | — | |
| 1955 | #2,553 | 19 | — | |
| 1954 | #4,278 | 8 | — | |
| 1953 | #2,431 | 19 | — | |
| 1952 | #4,123 | 8 | — | |
| 1951 | #3,106 | 12 | — | |
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1951
The first year at least five girls were named Darcell! It came in at #3,106, and was given to 12 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1976, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Darcell is popular in 2025
No state had 5 or more girls named Darcell in 2025, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Darcell
Momentum · girls
Faded out
- Not published in 2025; last seen 1990
Rise & fade · girls
7 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1951
- Peaked 1958 at #2,376 (23 births)
- Births halved by 1962, 4 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · girls
1 in 52,619
- Highest: 1 in 52,619 girls born in 1984 were named Darcell (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 271,221 girls born in 1990 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #2,376 in 1958, was only 1 in 87,462 (0.00%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1950s
- 29.4% of all girls named Darcell (149) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 1991
- Mostly girls until 1990, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 149 | #2,376 (1958) | #2,952 |
| 1960s | 138 | #2,780 (1963) | #3,676 |
| 1970s | 78 | #4,523 (1972) | #6,271 |
| 1980s | 134 | #2,781 (1984) | #5,881 |
| 1990s | 7 | #10,193 (1990) | #10,193 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Darcell ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: