Darleen
#9,457 for girls in 2025, 10 births
- Peak · girls
- 1943 · 227 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 8,332since 1914
Darleen over time
Rank among girls' names. Darleen has never cracked the top 400 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | #9,457 | 10 |
| 2024 | #10,271 | 9 |
| 2023 | #11,169 | 8 |
| 2022 | #8,542 | 12 |
| 2021 | #9,562 | 10 |
| 2020 | #7,969 | 13 |
| 2019 | #5,163 | 25 |
| 2018 | #6,248 | 19 |
| 2017 | #3,627 | 42 |
| 2016 | #6,401 | 19 |
| 2015 | #7,613 | 15 |
| 2014 | #7,302 | 16 |
| 2013 | #7,031 | 17 |
| 2012 | #4,836 | 29 |
| 2011 | #5,358 | 25 |
| 2010 | #5,414 | 25 |
| 2009 | #5,709 | 24 |
| 2008 | #5,434 | 26 |
| 2007 | #6,323 | 21 |
| 2006 | #6,125 | 21 |
| 2005 | #4,581 | 29 |
| 2004 | #6,768 | 17 |
| 2003 | #6,299 | 18 |
| 2002 | #5,897 | 19 |
| 2001 | #5,822 | 19 |
| 2000 | #4,649 | 25 |
| 1999 | #8,805 | 10 |
| 1998 | #6,719 | 14 |
| 1997 | #5,868 | 16 |
| 1996 | #6,723 | 13 |
| 1995 | #4,348 | 23 |
| 1994 | #4,238 | 24 |
| 1993 | #5,955 | 15 |
| 1992 | #4,528 | 22 |
| 1991 | #5,659 | 16 |
| 1990 | #4,230 | 23 |
| 1989 | #4,848 | 18 |
| 1988 | #3,893 | 23 |
| 1987 | #3,743 | 23 |
| 1986 | #4,347 | 18 |
| 1985 | #3,419 | 25 |
| 1984 | #3,527 | 23 |
| 1983 | #4,686 | 15 |
| 1982 | #2,770 | 33 |
| 1981 | #2,928 | 30 |
| 1980 | #3,992 | 19 |
| 1979 | #2,112 | 47 |
| 1978 | #2,741 | 30 |
| 1977 | #2,257 | 40 |
| 1976 | #2,486 | 32 |
| 1975 | #2,136 | 40 |
| 1974 | #1,709 | 53 |
| 1973 | #1,622 | 56 |
| 1972 | #1,655 | 54 |
| 1971 | #1,389 | 76 |
| 1970 | #1,369 | 76 |
| 1969 | #1,139 | 95 |
| 1968 | #1,177 | 84 |
| 1967 | #951 | 114 |
| 1966 | #922 | 120 |
| 1965 | #870 | 132 |
| 1964 | #861 | 146 |
| 1963 | #915 | 132 |
| 1962 | #837 | 158 |
| 1961 | #769 | 185 |
| 1960 | #838 | 152 |
| 1959 | #747 | 185 |
| 1958 | #650 | 231 |
| 1957 | #719 | 193 |
| 1956 | #752 | 167 |
| 1955 | #783 | 151 |
| 1954 | #859 | 122 |
| 1953 | #756 | 146 |
| 1952 | #755 | 139 |
| 1951 | #686 | 162 |
| 1950 | #652 | 171 |
| 1949 | #585 | 200 |
| 1948 | #601 | 193 |
| 1947 | #590 | 208 |
| 1946 | #547 | 209 |
| 1945 | #564 | 169 |
| 1944 | #582 | 158 |
| 1943 | #493 | 227 |
| 1942 | #572 | 166 |
| 1941 | #524 | 177 |
| 1940 | #598 | 135 |
| 1939 | #546 | 150 |
| 1938 | #548 | 155 |
| 1937 | #620 | 119 |
| 1936 | #622 | 112 |
| 1935 | #664 | 99 |
| 1934 | #680 | 96 |
| 1933 | #620 | 110 |
| 1932 | #639 | 109 |
| 1931 | #644 | 107 |
| 1930 | #622 | 124 |
| 1929 | #656 | 112 |
| 1928 | #642 | 120 |
| 1927 | #643 | 125 |
| 1926 | #757 | 91 |
| 1925 | #727 | 102 |
| 1924 | #893 | 71 |
| 1923 | #966 | 59 |
| 1922 | #906 | 65 |
| 1921 | #1,258 | 38 |
| 1920 | #1,550 | 28 |
| 1919 | #2,063 | 17 |
| 1918 | #1,411 | 30 |
| 1917 | #1,996 | 17 |
| 1916 | #2,028 | 16 |
| 1915 | #3,434 | 7 |
| 1914 | #3,188 | 6 |
| 1913 | — | |
| 1912 | — | |
| 1911 | — | |
| 1910 | — | |
| 1909 | — | |
| 1908 | — | |
| 1907 | — | |
| 1906 | — | |
| 1905 | — | |
| 1904 | — | |
| 1903 | — | |
| 1902 | — | |
| 1901 | — | |
| 1900 | — | |
| 1899 | — | |
| 1898 | — | |
| 1897 | — | |
| 1896 | — | |
| 1895 | — | |
| 1894 | — | |
| 1893 | — | |
| 1892 | — | |
| 1891 | — | |
| 1890 | — | |
| 1889 | — | |
| 1888 | — | |
| 1887 | — | |
| 1886 | — | |
| 1885 | — | |
| 1884 | — | |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | — | |
| 1881 | — | |
| 1880 | — | |
The first year at least five girls were named Darleen! It came in at #3,188, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1914–1915, when fewer than 8 girls a year got the name.
Where Darleen is popular in 1943
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Wisconsin#200 · 1 in 1,883
- Michigan#255 · 1 in 2,684
- Connecticut#289 · 1 in 3,270
- California#303 · 1 in 2,437
- Minnesota#337 · 1 in 4,191
Best ever in a state: #125 in North Dakota, 1938.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wisconsin | #200 | 15 | 1 in 1,883 |
| Michigan | #255 | 21 | 1 in 2,684 |
| Connecticut | #289 | 5 | 1 in 3,270 |
| California | #303 | 32 | 1 in 2,437 |
| Minnesota | #337 | 6 | 1 in 4,191 |
| New York | #345 | 29 | 1 in 3,947 |
| New Jersey | #370 | 7 | 1 in 5,166 |
| Missouri | #399 | 7 | 1 in 4,701 |
| Illinois | #452 | 12 | 1 in 5,842 |
| Ohio | #483 | 8 | 1 in 8,117 |
| Texas | #568 | 13 | 1 in 5,718 |
| Pennsylvania | #593 | 7 | 1 in 12,879 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Darleen
- 814 spots since 2024 (#10,271 → #9,457)
- 1,488 spots since 2020 (#7,969 → #9,457)
- 1,844 spots since 2015 (#7,613 → #9,457)
- Biggest jump: 352 spots in 1922 (#1,258 → #906)
- Biggest drop: 226 spots in 1968 (#951 → #1,177)
- Debuted 1914
- Peaked 1943 at #493 (227 births)
- Births halved by 1968, 25 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 46 yrs · run 1922–1967
- Highest: 1 in 6,147 girls born in 1943 were named Darleen (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 160,727 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 22.1% of all girls named Darleen (1,842) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 93 | #1,411 (1918) | #2,353 |
| 1920s | 811 | #642 (1928) | #900 |
| 1930s | 1,181 | #546 (1939) | #621 |
| 1940s | 1,842 | #493 (1943) | #566 |
| 1950s | 1,667 | #650 (1958) | #736 |
| 1960s | 1,318 | #769 (1961) | #928 |
| 1970s | 504 | #1,369 (1970) | #1,948 |
| 1980s | 227 | #2,770 (1982) | #3,815 |
| 1990s | 176 | #4,230 (1990) | #5,707 |
| 2000s | 219 | #4,581 (2005) | #5,761 |
| 2010s | 232 | #3,627 (2017) | #5,899 |
| 2020s | 62 | #7,969 (2020) | #9,495 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Darleen in 1943
Top girls' names in 1943
More about 1943
girls
1,395,293 girls got a published name in 1943; 1 in 6,147 of them was named Darleen, which outranked 90.8% of the 5,367 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 24.4% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).