Darnell

Last seen for girls in 2017 at #15,902 · #2,421 for boys in 2025, 56 births
Given to boys 92.3% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · boys
1984 · 741 births
Debut · boys
9 births
In top 100 · boys
never
of 146 years
Total births · boys
28,631
since 1912

Darnell over time

girlsboys

Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201996peak #1,070, 1948peak #281, 1984girlsboys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025—#2,42156
2024—#2,26163
2023—#1,86885
2022—#1,75095
2021—#1,635102
2020—#1,62199
2019—#1,386128
2018—#1,364129
2017#15,9025#1,219150
2016—#1,234151
2015—#1,223150
2014—#1,028197
2013—#1,020191
2012—#983203
2011#16,7645#877238
2010—#886235
2009—#791284
2008—#732313
2007—#712325
2006—#712305
2005—#707289
2004—#709271
2003—#672291
2002—#693262
2001—#683264
2000—#657274
1999#14,4115#600313
1998—#555354
1997#10,8367#552354
1996—#506412
1995—#515395
1994#6,67213#465469
1993#13,4425#475443
1992#7,51211#418532
1991#9,3368#404564
1990#7,88010#354678
1989#6,16013#350656
1988#5,06516#330652
1987#3,98321#309688
1986#4,34718#297692
1985#4,45517#305674
1984#2,99229#281741
1983#3,43123#306644
1982#3,53023#344539
1981#3,34025#358492
1980#3,71921#351516
1979#3,44223#355495
1978#3,09825#314566
1977#2,55733#346518
1976#2,86526#352473
1975#2,35734#361456
1974#2,55629#367428
1973#2,34932#357468
1972#2,22234#359468
1971#1,73052#369473
1970#1,65356#371483
1969#1,45365#374439
1968#1,59452#397385
1967#1,53753#382390
1966#1,38563#400353
1965#1,33767#422339
1964#1,46260#410385
1963#1,37265#422361
1962#1,52554#424354
1961#1,36067#421355
1960#1,50154#445328
1959#1,51651#418358
1958#1,31065#394392
1957#1,40756#419346
1956#1,41355#433307
1955#1,44549#395337
1954#1,34455#420291
1953#1,38949#426273
1952#1,15667#418274
1951#1,10471#464215
1950#1,09970#504176
1949#1,22055#628118
1948#1,07068#647109
1947#1,15061#86165
1946#1,48135#77374
1945#1,18744#83756
1944#1,34036#87852
1943#1,66426#1,03742
1942#1,59227#1,13936
1941#1,11744#93846
1940#1,74521#1,10735
1939#2,12515#97642
1938#2,73010#1,09535
1937#3,8006#1,09435
1936#3,1038#1,35624
1935#2,57511#1,14833
1934#2,56711#1,24129
1933#2,8689#1,20230
1932#3,2748#1,84816
1931—#1,30228
1930—#1,55922
1929#3,3948#1,73119
1928#3,4368#1,70720
1927#4,2866#1,87118
1926#3,5648#1,56523
1925#2,93911#1,80619
1924#3,14410#1,35530
1923—#2,12315
1922#4,4456#1,50325
1921#5,0995#2,15215
1920#3,5988#2,33613
1919#4,8145#2,51111
1918#4,8095#2,69910
1917#4,5945#2,7329
1916—#3,5166
1915—#2,07013
1914——
1913—#2,8215
1912—#1,7469
1911——
1910——
1909——
1908——
1907——
1906——
1905——
1904——
1903——
1902——
1901——
1900——
1899——
1898——
1897——
1896——
1895——
1894——
1893——
1892——
1891——
1890——
1889——
1888——
1887——
1886——
1885——
1884——
1883——
1882——
1881——
1880——
First appearance
1912

The first year at least five boys were named Darnell! It came in at #1,746, and was given to 9 baby boys.


Quietest stretch: 1913–1914, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.

Where Darnell is popular in 1996

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 boys named Darnell, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 boys named Darnell, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 boys named Darnell, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 boys named Darnell, so not publishedNHWashington: #647 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 6,735 boysWAIdaho: fewer than 5 boys named Darnell, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 boys named Darnell, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Darnell, so not publishedNDMinnesota: #428 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 4,736 boysMNIllinois: #361 for boys · 31 births · 1 in 2,611 boysILWisconsin: #483 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 4,880 boysWIMichigan: #293 for boys · 27 births · 1 in 2,207 boysMINew York: #310 for boys · 54 births · 1 in 2,199 boysNYMassachusetts: #414 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 5,310 boysMARhode Island: fewer than 5 boys named Darnell, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 boys named Darnell, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 boys named Darnell, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 boys named Darnell, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Darnell, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 boys named Darnell, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 boys named Darnell, so not publishedINOhio: #260 for boys · 32 births · 1 in 2,198 boysOHPennsylvania: #303 for boys · 25 births · 1 in 2,734 boysPANew Jersey: #345 for boys · 16 births · 1 in 3,041 boysNJConnecticut: #341 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 3,202 boysCTCalifornia: #576 for boys · 39 births · 1 in 6,501 boysCAUtah: fewer than 5 boys named Darnell, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 boys named Darnell, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 boys named Darnell, so not publishedNEMissouri: #319 for boys · 13 births · 1 in 2,654 boysMOKentucky: fewer than 5 boys named Darnell, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 boys named Darnell, so not publishedWVVirginia: #492 for boys · 9 births · 1 in 4,335 boysVAMaryland: #313 for boys · 13 births · 1 in 2,210 boysMDDelaware: fewer than 5 boys named Darnell, so not publishedDEArizona: #517 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 4,789 boysAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 boys named Darnell, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 boys named Darnell, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 boys named Darnell, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 boys named Darnell, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: #555 for boys · 9 births · 1 in 5,098 boysNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 boys named Darnell, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: #150 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 624 boysDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 boys named Darnell, so not publishedOKLouisiana: #303 for boys · 16 births · 1 in 1,668 boysLAMississippi: #415 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 2,524 boysMSAlabama: #504 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 4,176 boysALGeorgia: #584 for boys · 10 births · 1 in 4,846 boysGAHawaii: fewer than 5 boys named Darnell, so not publishedHITexas: #1,051 for boys · 10 births · 1 in 15,585 boysTXFlorida: #485 for boys · 21 births · 1 in 4,042 boysFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · boys
  1. District of Columbia#150 · 1 in 624
  2. Ohio#260 · 1 in 2,198
  3. Michigan#293 · 1 in 2,207
  4. Louisiana#303 · 1 in 1,668
  5. Pennsylvania#303 · 1 in 2,734

Best ever in a state: #77 in District of Columbia, 1986.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
District of Columbia#15081 in 624
Ohio#260321 in 2,198
Michigan#293271 in 2,207
Louisiana#303161 in 1,668
Pennsylvania#303251 in 2,734
New York#310541 in 2,199
Maryland#313131 in 2,210
Missouri#319131 in 2,654
Connecticut#34161 in 3,202
New Jersey#345161 in 3,041
Illinois#361311 in 2,611
Massachusetts#41471 in 5,310
Mississippi#41561 in 2,524
Minnesota#42861 in 4,736
Wisconsin#48361 in 4,880
Florida#485211 in 4,042
Virginia#49291 in 4,335
Alabama#50461 in 4,176
Arizona#51771 in 4,789
North Carolina#55591 in 5,098
California#576391 in 6,501
Georgia#584101 in 4,846
Washington#64751 in 6,735
Texas#1,051101 in 15,585
Alaska———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Delaware———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Maine———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
West Virginia———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Darnell
Momentum · boys
Falling
  • 160 spots since 2024 (#2,261 → #2,421)
  • 800 spots since 2020 (#1,621 → #2,421)
  • 1,198 spots since 2015 (#1,223 → #2,421)
  • Biggest jump: 214 spots in 1948 (#861 → #647)
  • Biggest drop: 201 spots in 1942 (#938 → #1,139)
Rise & fade · boys
72 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1912
  • Peaked 1984 at #281 (741 births)
  • Births halved by 1997, 13 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 71 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 71 yrs · run 1944–2012
Share of babies · boys
1 in 2,436
  • Highest: 1 in 2,436 boys born in 1984 were named Darnell (0.04%)
  • Latest: 1 in 30,501 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · boys
The 1980s
  • 22.0% of all boys named Darnell (6,294) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Never flipped
  • The majority has never changed
all girlsall boys
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1910s63#1,746 (1912)#2,585
1920s197#1,355 (1924)#1,815
1930s294#976 (1939)#1,282
1940s633#628 (1949)#885
1950s2,969#394 (1958)#429
1960s3,689#374 (1969)#410
1970s4,828#314 (1978)#355
1980s6,294#281 (1984)#323
1990s4,514#354 (1990)#484
2000s2,878#657 (2000)#707
2010s1,772#877 (2011)#1,122
2020s500#1,621 (2020)#1,926

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Darnell in 1996

boys
#506
412 births · 1 in 4,598 boys

Top boys' names in 1996

  1. #1Michael38,373
  2. #2Matthew32,077
  3. #3Jacob31,925
  4. #4Christopher30,904
  5. #5Joshua29,175
  6. #6Nicholas27,724
  7. #7Tyler26,956
  8. #8Brandon25,847
  9. #9Austin25,663
  10. #10Andrew25,244
  11. #506Darnell412
More about 1996

boys

1,894,300 boys got a published name in 1996; 1 in 4,598 of them was named Darnell, which outranked 95.2% of the 10,536 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 15.5% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Darnell
  1. #503Ralph415
  2. #504Malachi414
  3. #505Blaine413
  4. #506Darnell412
  5. #507Alonzo407
  6. #507Santiago407
  7. #509Julius405
Biggest movers since 1995
Risers
  1. ↑ 1,398Keyshawn#2,178 → #780
  2. ↑ 1,171Jair#2,055 → #884
  3. ↑ 1,065Kordell#2,055 → #990
  4. ↑ 856Shemar#1,758 → #902
  5. ↑ 686Nasir#1,648 → #962
Fallers
  1. ↓ 1,075Unknown#665 → #1,740
  2. ↓ 649Rashaan#937 → #1,586
  3. ↓ 633Savon#966 → #1,599
  4. ↓ 514Latrell#966 → #1,480
  5. ↓ 351Rakeem#970 → #1,321

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1996 →