Deangelo
- Last seen for girls in 1989 at #9,681
- #1,668 for boys in 2025, 99 births
- Given to boys 99.8% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1989 · 429 births
- Debut · boys
- 7 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 12,279since 1960
Deangelo over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Deangelo has never cracked the top 400 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #1,668 | 99 | |
| 2024 | — | #1,735 | 95 | |
| 2023 | — | #1,369 | 136 | |
| 2022 | — | #1,468 | 123 | |
| 2021 | — | #1,365 | 135 | |
| 2020 | — | #1,127 | 174 | |
| 2019 | — | #1,118 | 175 | |
| 2018 | — | #992 | 209 | |
| 2017 | — | #1,064 | 186 | |
| 2016 | — | #1,121 | 174 | |
| 2015 | — | #977 | 211 | |
| 2014 | — | #965 | 218 | |
| 2013 | — | #902 | 231 | |
| 2012 | — | #863 | 244 | |
| 2011 | — | #797 | 277 | |
| 2010 | — | #823 | 260 | |
| 2009 | — | #811 | 274 | |
| 2008 | — | #741 | 307 | |
| 2007 | — | #843 | 253 | |
| 2006 | — | #794 | 259 | |
| 2005 | — | #786 | 247 | |
| 2004 | — | #878 | 197 | |
| 2003 | — | #913 | 182 | |
| 2002 | — | #819 | 205 | |
| 2001 | — | #880 | 179 | |
| 2000 | — | #651 | 279 | |
| 1999 | — | #620 | 293 | |
| 1998 | — | #634 | 283 | |
| 1997 | — | #534 | 372 | |
| 1996 | — | #491 | 430 | |
| 1995 | — | #620 | 276 | |
| 1994 | — | #648 | 258 | |
| 1993 | — | #591 | 304 | |
| 1992 | — | #534 | 360 | |
| 1991 | — | #464 | 453 | |
| 1990 | — | #454 | 478 | |
| 1989 | #9,681 | 7 | #453 | 429 |
| 1988 | #7,691 | 9 | #478 | 371 |
| 1987 | #11,325 | 5 | #477 | 345 |
| 1986 | — | #500 | 306 | |
| 1985 | — | #540 | 263 | |
| 1984 | — | #558 | 239 | |
| 1983 | — | #622 | 188 | |
| 1982 | — | #782 | 126 | |
| 1981 | — | #882 | 102 | |
| 1980 | — | #764 | 131 | |
| 1979 | — | #821 | 112 | |
| 1978 | — | #908 | 90 | |
| 1977 | — | #913 | 86 | |
| 1976 | — | #768 | 117 | |
| 1975 | — | #945 | 75 | |
| 1974 | — | #1,052 | 61 | |
| 1973 | — | #1,176 | 49 | |
| 1972 | — | #1,050 | 59 | |
| 1971 | — | #1,309 | 41 | |
| 1970 | — | #1,658 | 27 | |
| 1969 | — | #1,680 | 24 | |
| 1968 | — | #1,206 | 40 | |
| 1967 | — | #1,287 | 34 | |
| 1966 | — | #1,510 | 26 | |
| 1965 | — | #1,513 | 26 | |
| 1964 | — | #1,581 | 25 | |
| 1963 | — | #1,255 | 38 | |
| 1962 | — | #3,640 | 6 | |
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | #3,337 | 7 | |
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1960
The first year at least five boys were named Deangelo! It came in at #3,337, and was given to 7 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1961, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Deangelo is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- Louisiana#775 · 1 in 3,826
- Michigan#999 · 1 in 6,699
- Illinois#1,023 · 1 in 7,079
- Pennsylvania#1,094 · 1 in 8,710
- North Carolina#1,144 · 1 in 8,578
Best ever in a state: #61 in District of Columbia, 1991.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Louisiana | #775 | 5 | 1 in 3,826 |
| Michigan | #999 | 6 | 1 in 6,699 |
| Illinois | #1,023 | 7 | 1 in 7,079 |
| Pennsylvania | #1,094 | 6 | 1 in 8,710 |
| North Carolina | #1,144 | 6 | 1 in 8,578 |
| Florida | #1,478 | 7 | 1 in 13,648 |
| Texas | #1,483 | 12 | 1 in 14,588 |
| California | #1,582 | 10 | 1 in 17,547 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Deangelo
Momentum · boys
Falling
- 67 spots since 2024 (#1,735 → #1,668)
- 541 spots since 2020 (#1,127 → #1,668)
- Biggest jump: 177 spots in 1976
- Biggest drop: 229 spots in 2001
Rise & fade · boys
29 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1960
- Peaked 1989 at #453 (429 births)
- Births halved by 2001, 12 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 42 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 42 yrs · run 1975–2015
Share of babies · boys
1 in 4,297
- Highest: 1 in 4,297 boys born in 1990 were named Deangelo (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 17,253 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
- Its best rank, #453 in 1989, was only 1 in 4,664 (0.02%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 1990s
- 28.6% of all boys named Deangelo (3,507) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 226 | #1,206 (1968) | #1,890 |
| 1970s | 717 | #768 (1976) | #1,060 |
| 1980s | 2,500 | #453 (1989) | #606 |
| 1990s | 3,507 | #454 (1990) | #559 |
| 2000s | 2,382 | #651 (2000) | #812 |
| 2010s | 2,185 | #797 (2011) | #962 |
| 2020s | 762 | #1,127 (2020) | #1,455 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Deangelo ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: