Deanie
- Last seen for girls in 1997 at #12,070
- Last seen for boys in 1963 at #4,048
- Given to girls 97.3% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1939 · 23 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 729since 1904
Deanie over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Deanie has never cracked the top 1,000 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | — | — | ||
| 2018 | — | — | ||
| 2017 | — | — | ||
| 2016 | — | — | ||
| 2015 | — | — | ||
| 2014 | — | — | ||
| 2013 | — | — | ||
| 2012 | — | — | ||
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | — | — | ||
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | #12,070 | 6 | — | |
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | #13,386 | 5 | — | |
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | #10,912 | 5 | — | |
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | #8,224 | 7 | — | |
| 1981 | #9,110 | 6 | — | |
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | #9,010 | 6 | — | |
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | #8,444 | 6 | — | |
| 1976 | #9,284 | 5 | — | |
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | #8,775 | 5 | — | |
| 1973 | #6,666 | 7 | — | |
| 1972 | #6,558 | 7 | — | |
| 1971 | #6,006 | 8 | — | |
| 1970 | #6,362 | 7 | — | |
| 1969 | #3,199 | 18 | — | |
| 1968 | #4,000 | 12 | — | |
| 1967 | #3,484 | 14 | — | |
| 1966 | #3,148 | 16 | — | |
| 1965 | #2,833 | 19 | — | |
| 1964 | #3,244 | 16 | — | |
| 1963 | #2,780 | 20 | #4,048 | 5 |
| 1962 | #1,858 | 38 | — | |
| 1961 | #3,189 | 16 | #4,065 | 5 |
| 1960 | #3,357 | 14 | — | |
| 1959 | #2,760 | 18 | — | |
| 1958 | #2,862 | 17 | — | |
| 1957 | #4,202 | 9 | — | |
| 1956 | #3,321 | 13 | — | |
| 1955 | #2,839 | 16 | — | |
| 1954 | #2,889 | 15 | — | |
| 1953 | #2,516 | 18 | — | |
| 1952 | #2,921 | 14 | — | |
| 1951 | #2,314 | 19 | — | |
| 1950 | #3,962 | 8 | — | |
| 1949 | #2,726 | 14 | — | |
| 1948 | #2,974 | 12 | — | |
| 1947 | #3,448 | 10 | #3,733 | 5 |
| 1946 | #3,034 | 11 | — | |
| 1945 | #2,060 | 17 | — | |
| 1944 | #2,401 | 14 | — | |
| 1943 | #2,151 | 17 | — | |
| 1942 | #2,416 | 14 | #3,560 | 5 |
| 1941 | #2,532 | 12 | — | |
| 1940 | #3,863 | 6 | — | |
| 1939 | #1,585 | 23 | — | |
| 1938 | #2,447 | 12 | — | |
| 1937 | #2,570 | 11 | — | |
| 1936 | #2,857 | 9 | — | |
| 1935 | #2,439 | 12 | — | |
| 1934 | #2,741 | 10 | — | |
| 1933 | #2,868 | 9 | — | |
| 1932 | #3,568 | 7 | — | |
| 1931 | #4,331 | 5 | — | |
| 1930 | #3,055 | 9 | — | |
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | #4,195 | 6 | — | |
| 1927 | #4,805 | 5 | — | |
| 1926 | #3,046 | 10 | — | |
| 1925 | #3,664 | 8 | — | |
| 1924 | #4,434 | 6 | — | |
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | #4,445 | 6 | — | |
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | #4,975 | 5 | — | |
| 1919 | #3,452 | 8 | — | |
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | #4,417 | 5 | — | |
| 1915 | #2,384 | 12 | — | |
| 1914 | #2,638 | 8 | — | |
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | #1,659 | 6 | — | |
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1904
The first year at least five girls were named Deanie! It came in at #1,659, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1905–1913, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Deanie is popular in 2025
No state had 5 or more girls named Deanie in 2025, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Deanie
Momentum · girls
Faded out
- Not published in 2025; last seen 1997
Rise & fade · girls
35 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1904
- Peaked 1939 at #1,585 (23 births)
- Births halved by 1940, 1 yr later
Top of the charts · girls
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · girls
1 in 45,894
- Highest: 1 in 45,894 girls born in 1904 were named Deanie (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 290,118 girls born in 1997 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #1,585 in 1939, was only 1 in 47,679 (0.00%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1960s
- 25.1% of all girls named Deanie (183) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 6 | #1,659 (1904) | #1,659 |
| 1910s | 33 | #2,384 (1915) | #3,223 |
| 1920s | 46 | #3,046 (1926) | #4,223 |
| 1930s | 107 | #1,585 (1939) | #2,846 |
| 1940s | 127 | #2,060 (1945) | #2,761 |
| 1950s | 147 | #2,314 (1951) | #3,059 |
| 1960s | 183 | #1,858 (1962) | #3,109 |
| 1970s | 51 | #6,006 (1971) | #7,638 |
| 1980s | 18 | #8,224 (1982) | #9,415 |
| 1990s | 11 | #12,070 (1997) | #12,728 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Deanie ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: