Deann
Last seen for girls in 2020 at #15,088
- Peak · girls
- 1965 · 425 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 10,185since 1931
Deann over time
Rank among girls' names. Deann has never cracked the top 400 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | |
| 2024 | — | |
| 2023 | — | |
| 2022 | — | |
| 2021 | — | |
| 2020 | #15,088 | 5 |
| 2019 | #15,539 | 5 |
| 2018 | #15,682 | 5 |
| 2017 | — | |
| 2016 | — | |
| 2015 | — | |
| 2014 | #14,558 | 6 |
| 2013 | #14,582 | 6 |
| 2012 | — | |
| 2011 | #13,347 | 7 |
| 2010 | #14,959 | 6 |
| 2009 | #11,459 | 9 |
| 2008 | #8,965 | 13 |
| 2007 | #8,098 | 15 |
| 2006 | #11,417 | 9 |
| 2005 | #8,330 | 13 |
| 2004 | #8,716 | 12 |
| 2003 | #7,998 | 13 |
| 2002 | #6,129 | 18 |
| 2001 | #5,822 | 19 |
| 2000 | #5,312 | 21 |
| 1999 | #4,718 | 23 |
| 1998 | #4,023 | 28 |
| 1997 | #4,239 | 25 |
| 1996 | #3,942 | 27 |
| 1995 | #5,677 | 16 |
| 1994 | #3,098 | 37 |
| 1993 | #3,681 | 29 |
| 1992 | #2,920 | 40 |
| 1991 | #2,738 | 43 |
| 1990 | #2,153 | 60 |
| 1989 | #2,222 | 54 |
| 1988 | #1,863 | 66 |
| 1987 | #1,720 | 70 |
| 1986 | #1,838 | 61 |
| 1985 | #1,445 | 86 |
| 1984 | #1,397 | 83 |
| 1983 | #1,283 | 95 |
| 1982 | #1,237 | 106 |
| 1981 | #1,109 | 125 |
| 1980 | #1,019 | 142 |
| 1979 | #1,085 | 126 |
| 1978 | #1,006 | 135 |
| 1977 | #921 | 152 |
| 1976 | #777 | 184 |
| 1975 | #809 | 169 |
| 1974 | #682 | 216 |
| 1973 | #675 | 221 |
| 1972 | #566 | 292 |
| 1971 | #518 | 358 |
| 1970 | #493 | 407 |
| 1969 | #463 | 437 |
| 1968 | #492 | 388 |
| 1967 | #465 | 414 |
| 1966 | #473 | 401 |
| 1965 | #462 | 425 |
| 1964 | #481 | 404 |
| 1963 | #493 | 388 |
| 1962 | #464 | 438 |
| 1961 | #500 | 378 |
| 1960 | #567 | 301 |
| 1959 | #596 | 276 |
| 1958 | #664 | 221 |
| 1957 | #678 | 212 |
| 1956 | #732 | 174 |
| 1955 | #783 | 151 |
| 1954 | #714 | 167 |
| 1953 | #849 | 120 |
| 1952 | #914 | 102 |
| 1951 | #882 | 104 |
| 1950 | #1,007 | 82 |
| 1949 | #1,056 | 72 |
| 1948 | #1,031 | 73 |
| 1947 | #1,106 | 65 |
| 1946 | #1,023 | 68 |
| 1945 | #1,096 | 52 |
| 1944 | #971 | 64 |
| 1943 | #1,006 | 62 |
| 1942 | #873 | 78 |
| 1941 | #924 | 63 |
| 1940 | #906 | 63 |
| 1939 | #790 | 75 |
| 1938 | #696 | 98 |
| 1937 | #856 | 65 |
| 1936 | #2,263 | 13 |
| 1935 | #3,156 | 8 |
| 1934 | #4,286 | 5 |
| 1933 | #2,868 | 9 |
| 1932 | #4,411 | 5 |
| 1931 | #3,848 | 6 |
| 1930 | — | |
| 1929 | — | |
| 1928 | — | |
| 1927 | — | |
| 1926 | — | |
| 1925 | — | |
| 1924 | — | |
| 1923 | — | |
| 1922 | — | |
| 1921 | — | |
| 1920 | — | |
| 1919 | — | |
| 1918 | — | |
| 1917 | — | |
| 1916 | — | |
| 1915 | — | |
| 1914 | — | |
| 1913 | — | |
| 1912 | — | |
| 1911 | — | |
| 1910 | — | |
| 1909 | — | |
| 1908 | — | |
| 1907 | — | |
| 1906 | — | |
| 1905 | — | |
| 1904 | — | |
| 1903 | — | |
| 1902 | — | |
| 1901 | — | |
| 1900 | — | |
| 1899 | — | |
| 1898 | — | |
| 1897 | — | |
| 1896 | — | |
| 1895 | — | |
| 1894 | — | |
| 1893 | — | |
| 1892 | — | |
| 1891 | — | |
| 1890 | — | |
| 1889 | — | |
| 1888 | — | |
| 1887 | — | |
| 1886 | — | |
| 1885 | — | |
| 1884 | — | |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | — | |
| 1881 | — | |
| 1880 | — | |
The first year at least five girls were named Deann! It came in at #3,848, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 2012, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Deann is popular in 1960
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Utah#129 · 1 in 533
- North Dakota#143 · 1 in 552
- Minnesota#236 · 1 in 1,614
- South Dakota#251 · 1 in 1,415
- Idaho#255 · 1 in 1,285
Best ever in a state: #91 in North Dakota, 1969.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Utah | #129 | 20 | 1 in 533 |
| North Dakota | #143 | 12 | 1 in 552 |
| Minnesota | #236 | 24 | 1 in 1,614 |
| South Dakota | #251 | 5 | 1 in 1,415 |
| Idaho | #255 | 5 | 1 in 1,285 |
| Kansas | #259 | 13 | 1 in 1,617 |
| Nebraska | #265 | 8 | 1 in 1,808 |
| Iowa | #277 | 14 | 1 in 2,010 |
| Oregon | #313 | 8 | 1 in 2,021 |
| Washington | #317 | 14 | 1 in 2,020 |
| Indiana | #356 | 16 | 1 in 3,148 |
| Arkansas | #386 | 6 | 1 in 2,965 |
| Wisconsin | #397 | 9 | 1 in 4,992 |
| Colorado | #418 | 6 | 1 in 3,257 |
| Oklahoma | #427 | 6 | 1 in 3,495 |
| Missouri | #493 | 8 | 1 in 5,595 |
| Illinois | #514 | 19 | 1 in 5,664 |
| Michigan | #532 | 13 | 1 in 6,793 |
| California | #545 | 33 | 1 in 5,232 |
| Pennsylvania | #688 | 9 | 1 in 12,409 |
| Ohio | #801 | 7 | 1 in 15,026 |
| Texas | #903 | 10 | 1 in 11,339 |
| New York | #1,175 | 6 | 1 in 27,950 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Deann
- Not published in 2025; last seen 2020
- Biggest jump: 1,407 spots in 1937 (#2,263 → #856)
- Biggest drop: 144 spots in 1977 (#777 → #921)
- Debuted 1931
- Peaked 1965 at #462 (425 births)
- Births halved by 1975, 10 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 34 yrs · run 1951–1977
- Highest: 1 in 3,860 girls born in 1969 were named Deann (0.03%)
- Latest: 1 in 323,310 girls born in 2020 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #462 in 1965, was only 1 in 4,153 (0.02%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 39.0% of all girls named Deann (3,974) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s | 284 | #696 (1938) | #2,575 |
| 1940s | 660 | #873 (1942) | #999 |
| 1950s | 1,609 | #596 (1959) | #782 |
| 1960s | 3,974 | #462 (1965) | #486 |
| 1970s | 2,260 | #493 (1970) | #753 |
| 1980s | 888 | #1,019 (1980) | #1,513 |
| 1990s | 328 | #2,153 (1990) | #3,719 |
| 2000s | 142 | #5,312 (2000) | #8,225 |
| 2010s | 35 | #13,347 (2011) | #14,778 |
| 2020s | 5 | #15,088 (2020) | #15,088 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Deann in 1960
Top girls' names in 1960
More about 1960
girls
2,021,941 girls got a published name in 1960; 1 in 6,717 of them was named Deann, which outranked 92.3% of the 7,332 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 17.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.