Deanna
#2,173 for girls in 2025, 85 births · Last seen for boys in 2004 at #11,356
Given to girls 99.8% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1969 · 4,068 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 3 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 134,477since 1899
Deanna over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,173 | 85 | — | |
| 2024 | #2,303 | 80 | — | |
| 2023 | #2,050 | 95 | — | |
| 2022 | #2,006 | 97 | — | |
| 2021 | #1,910 | 103 | — | |
| 2020 | #1,769 | 112 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,668 | 126 | — | |
| 2018 | #1,488 | 147 | — | |
| 2017 | #1,400 | 164 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,286 | 187 | — | |
| 2015 | #1,193 | 210 | — | |
| 2014 | #1,092 | 233 | — | |
| 2013 | #915 | 279 | — | |
| 2012 | #917 | 281 | — | |
| 2011 | #817 | 325 | — | |
| 2010 | #712 | 396 | — | |
| 2009 | #604 | 499 | — | |
| 2008 | #594 | 525 | — | |
| 2007 | #549 | 557 | — | |
| 2006 | #529 | 573 | — | |
| 2005 | #478 | 639 | — | |
| 2004 | #451 | 674 | #11,356 | 5 |
| 2003 | #421 | 714 | — | |
| 2002 | #348 | 855 | — | |
| 2001 | #353 | 842 | — | |
| 2000 | #303 | 1,051 | — | |
| 1999 | #277 | 1,132 | — | |
| 1998 | #244 | 1,246 | — | |
| 1997 | #222 | 1,344 | — | |
| 1996 | #210 | 1,390 | — | |
| 1995 | #187 | 1,586 | — | |
| 1994 | #165 | 1,875 | — | |
| 1993 | #161 | 1,938 | #6,816 | 7 |
| 1992 | #155 | 1,976 | — | |
| 1991 | #158 | 1,879 | — | |
| 1990 | #159 | 1,854 | #6,415 | 7 |
| 1989 | #162 | 1,757 | #5,615 | 8 |
| 1988 | #163 | 1,738 | #5,751 | 7 |
| 1987 | #170 | 1,638 | #4,573 | 9 |
| 1986 | #164 | 1,664 | #6,721 | 5 |
| 1985 | #156 | 1,817 | #6,523 | 5 |
| 1984 | #151 | 1,916 | — | |
| 1983 | #149 | 1,923 | #4,499 | 8 |
| 1982 | #156 | 1,894 | #3,482 | 12 |
| 1981 | #146 | 1,940 | — | |
| 1980 | #149 | 1,868 | — | |
| 1979 | #145 | 1,950 | — | |
| 1978 | #136 | 2,033 | #3,400 | 11 |
| 1977 | #138 | 2,093 | — | |
| 1976 | #128 | 2,116 | — | |
| 1975 | #126 | 2,276 | #3,941 | 8 |
| 1974 | #115 | 2,558 | #2,946 | 12 |
| 1973 | #111 | 2,796 | #3,013 | 11 |
| 1972 | #107 | 3,039 | #2,819 | 12 |
| 1971 | #95 | 3,791 | #2,126 | 19 |
| 1970 | #90 | 4,331 | #2,621 | 13 |
| 1969 | #88 | 4,068 | #3,314 | 8 |
| 1968 | #104 | 3,414 | #2,907 | 9 |
| 1967 | #104 | 3,348 | #3,231 | 7 |
| 1966 | #105 | 3,298 | #2,627 | 10 |
| 1965 | #110 | 3,406 | — | |
| 1964 | #115 | 3,575 | #3,282 | 7 |
| 1963 | #133 | 3,122 | #2,539 | 11 |
| 1962 | #138 | 3,060 | #2,504 | 11 |
| 1961 | #156 | 2,683 | — | |
| 1960 | #173 | 2,295 | #4,038 | 5 |
| 1959 | #194 | 1,828 | — | |
| 1958 | #220 | 1,381 | — | |
| 1957 | #236 | 1,287 | — | |
| 1956 | #238 | 1,207 | — | |
| 1955 | #254 | 1,072 | — | |
| 1954 | #268 | 980 | — | |
| 1953 | #279 | 886 | — | |
| 1952 | #284 | 818 | — | |
| 1951 | #256 | 910 | — | |
| 1950 | #253 | 891 | — | |
| 1949 | #240 | 968 | — | |
| 1948 | #228 | 1,063 | — | |
| 1947 | #210 | 1,263 | — | |
| 1946 | #193 | 1,276 | — | |
| 1945 | #175 | 1,187 | — | |
| 1944 | #167 | 1,304 | #3,109 | 6 |
| 1943 | #160 | 1,573 | — | |
| 1942 | #160 | 1,447 | — | |
| 1941 | #137 | 1,856 | #2,872 | 7 |
| 1940 | #136 | 1,802 | #2,871 | 7 |
| 1939 | #133 | 1,805 | #3,113 | 6 |
| 1938 | #115 | 2,254 | #3,175 | 6 |
| 1937 | #139 | 1,624 | #2,905 | 7 |
| 1936 | #768 | 77 | — | |
| 1935 | #1,356 | 29 | — | |
| 1934 | #2,087 | 15 | — | |
| 1933 | #2,275 | 13 | — | |
| 1932 | #3,901 | 6 | — | |
| 1931 | #2,750 | 10 | — | |
| 1930 | #3,658 | 7 | — | |
| 1929 | #2,737 | 11 | — | |
| 1928 | #3,436 | 8 | — | |
| 1927 | #2,256 | 16 | — | |
| 1926 | #2,257 | 16 | — | |
| 1925 | #3,116 | 10 | — | |
| 1924 | #1,992 | 20 | — | |
| 1923 | #2,021 | 19 | — | |
| 1922 | #2,186 | 17 | — | |
| 1921 | #5,099 | 5 | — | |
| 1920 | #4,975 | 5 | — | |
| 1919 | #3,452 | 8 | — | |
| 1918 | #4,809 | 5 | — | |
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | #4,417 | 5 | — | |
| 1915 | #4,274 | 5 | — | |
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | #1,935 | 7 | — | |
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | #1,596 | 5 | — | |
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Deanna! It came in at #1,596, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1899–1909, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Deanna is popular in 1938
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Utah#15 · 1 in 71
- Nevada#24 · 1 in 58
- South Dakota#29 · 1 in 107
- Oregon#29 · 1 in 118
- Wyoming#30 · 1 in 99
Best ever in a state: #15 in Utah, 1938.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Utah | #15 | 67 | 1 in 71 |
| Nevada | #24 | 7 | 1 in 58 |
| Oregon | #29 | 53 | 1 in 118 |
| South Dakota | #29 | 43 | 1 in 107 |
| Wyoming | #30 | 16 | 1 in 99 |
| Montana | #31 | 30 | 1 in 130 |
| Idaho | #38 | 26 | 1 in 161 |
| Washington | #42 | 61 | 1 in 179 |
| Kansas | #46 | 61 | 1 in 202 |
| Nebraska | #49 | 45 | 1 in 201 |
| Minnesota | #57 | 92 | 1 in 228 |
| California | #58 | 197 | 1 in 226 |
| Iowa | #59 | 73 | 1 in 259 |
| Michigan | #65 | 153 | 1 in 276 |
| Wisconsin | #71 | 74 | 1 in 323 |
| Indiana | #73 | 79 | 1 in 330 |
| Colorado | #80 | 29 | 1 in 306 |
| Ohio | #90 | 123 | 1 in 415 |
| Missouri | #91 | 64 | 1 in 419 |
| Vermont | #92 | 7 | 1 in 336 |
| New Hampshire | #97 | 8 | 1 in 384 |
| Illinois | #100 | 121 | 1 in 456 |
| Louisiana | #102 | 56 | 1 in 397 |
| New York | #105 | 172 | 1 in 497 |
| North Dakota | #110 | 12 | 1 in 439 |
| Connecticut | #113 | 17 | 1 in 580 |
| Pennsylvania | #116 | 129 | 1 in 576 |
| Massachusetts | #118 | 38 | 1 in 739 |
| Arizona | #119 | 12 | 1 in 391 |
| West Virginia | #121 | 35 | 1 in 544 |
| Maine | #124 | 11 | 1 in 568 |
| New Jersey | #124 | 38 | 1 in 650 |
| Maryland | #126 | 20 | 1 in 622 |
| Oklahoma | #143 | 30 | 1 in 678 |
| Kentucky | #165 | 35 | 1 in 806 |
| Hawaii | #169 | 5 | 1 in 605 |
| Florida | #178 | 18 | 1 in 754 |
| Texas | #178 | 73 | 1 in 790 |
| New Mexico | #194 | 7 | 1 in 792 |
| Virginia | #195 | 21 | 1 in 1,135 |
| Arkansas | #201 | 21 | 1 in 891 |
| Tennessee | #234 | 19 | 1 in 1,428 |
| North Carolina | #253 | 20 | 1 in 1,848 |
| Georgia | #331 | 11 | 1 in 2,801 |
| Mississippi | #360 | 8 | 1 in 2,819 |
| Alabama | #480 | 5 | 1 in 5,865 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Deanna
- 130 spots since 2024 (#2,303 → #2,173)
- 404 spots since 2020 (#1,769 → #2,173)
- 980 spots since 2015 (#1,193 → #2,173)
- Biggest jump: 629 spots in 1937 (#768 → #139)
- Biggest drop: 177 spots in 2014 (#915 → #1,092)
- Debuted 1899
- Peaked 1969 at #88 (4,068 births)
- Births halved by 1978, 9 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 3 yrs · run 1969–1971
- Top 1,000: 78 yrs · run 1936–2013
- Highest: 1 in 404 girls born in 1970 were named Deanna (0.25%)
- Latest: 1 in 18,909 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
- Its best rank, #88 in 1969, was only 1 in 415 (0.24%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 24.0% of all girls named Deanna (32,269) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 5 | #1,596 (1899) | #1,596 |
| 1900s | 0 | — | — |
| 1910s | 30 | #1,935 (1910) | #3,777 |
| 1920s | 127 | #1,992 (1924) | #3,008 |
| 1930s | 5,840 | #115 (1938) | #1,718 |
| 1940s | 13,739 | #136 (1940) | #181 |
| 1950s | 11,260 | #194 (1959) | #248 |
| 1960s | 32,269 | #88 (1969) | #123 |
| 1970s | 26,983 | #90 (1970) | #119 |
| 1980s | 18,155 | #146 (1981) | #157 |
| 1990s | 16,220 | #155 (1992) | #194 |
| 2000s | 6,929 | #303 (2000) | #463 |
| 2010s | 2,348 | #712 (2010) | #1,149 |
| 2020s | 572 | #1,769 (2020) | #2,035 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Deanna in 1938
Top girls' names in 1938
Top boys' names in 1938
More about 1938
girls
1,103,456 girls got a published name in 1938; 1 in 490 of them was named Deanna, which outranked 97.7% of the 4,995 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,109,147 boys got a published name in 1938; 1 in 184,858 of them was named Deanna, which outranked 21.3% of the 4,035 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.5% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #2,868Worthy7
- #2,868York7
- #2,868Zeke7
- #3,175Deanna6
- #3,175Abelino6
- #3,175Adolphe6
- #3,175Adolpho6
- #3,534Able5
- #3,534Abundio5
- #3,534Adams5
Tied with 358 names at #3,175; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.