Deanna

#2,173 for girls in 2025, 85 births · Last seen for boys in 2004 at #11,356
Given to girls 99.8% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1969 · 4,068 births
Debut · girls
5 births
In top 100 · girls
3 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
134,477
since 1899

Deanna over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020202015peak #88, 1969girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#2,17385—
2024#2,30380—
2023#2,05095—
2022#2,00697—
2021#1,910103—
2020#1,769112—
2019#1,668126—
2018#1,488147—
2017#1,400164—
2016#1,286187—
2015#1,193210—
2014#1,092233—
2013#915279—
2012#917281—
2011#817325—
2010#712396—
2009#604499—
2008#594525—
2007#549557—
2006#529573—
2005#478639—
2004#451674#11,3565
2003#421714—
2002#348855—
2001#353842—
2000#3031,051—
1999#2771,132—
1998#2441,246—
1997#2221,344—
1996#2101,390—
1995#1871,586—
1994#1651,875—
1993#1611,938#6,8167
1992#1551,976—
1991#1581,879—
1990#1591,854#6,4157
1989#1621,757#5,6158
1988#1631,738#5,7517
1987#1701,638#4,5739
1986#1641,664#6,7215
1985#1561,817#6,5235
1984#1511,916—
1983#1491,923#4,4998
1982#1561,894#3,48212
1981#1461,940—
1980#1491,868—
1979#1451,950—
1978#1362,033#3,40011
1977#1382,093—
1976#1282,116—
1975#1262,276#3,9418
1974#1152,558#2,94612
1973#1112,796#3,01311
1972#1073,039#2,81912
1971#953,791#2,12619
1970#904,331#2,62113
1969#884,068#3,3148
1968#1043,414#2,9079
1967#1043,348#3,2317
1966#1053,298#2,62710
1965#1103,406—
1964#1153,575#3,2827
1963#1333,122#2,53911
1962#1383,060#2,50411
1961#1562,683—
1960#1732,295#4,0385
1959#1941,828—
1958#2201,381—
1957#2361,287—
1956#2381,207—
1955#2541,072—
1954#268980—
1953#279886—
1952#284818—
1951#256910—
1950#253891—
1949#240968—
1948#2281,063—
1947#2101,263—
1946#1931,276—
1945#1751,187—
1944#1671,304#3,1096
1943#1601,573—
1942#1601,447—
1941#1371,856#2,8727
1940#1361,802#2,8717
1939#1331,805#3,1136
1938#1152,254#3,1756
1937#1391,624#2,9057
1936#76877—
1935#1,35629—
1934#2,08715—
1933#2,27513—
1932#3,9016—
1931#2,75010—
1930#3,6587—
1929#2,73711—
1928#3,4368—
1927#2,25616—
1926#2,25716—
1925#3,11610—
1924#1,99220—
1923#2,02119—
1922#2,18617—
1921#5,0995—
1920#4,9755—
1919#3,4528—
1918#4,8095—
1917——
1916#4,4175—
1915#4,2745—
1914——
1913——
1912——
1911——
1910#1,9357—
1909——
1908——
1907——
1906——
1905——
1904——
1903——
1902——
1901——
1900——
1899#1,5965—
1898——
1897——
1896——
1895——
1894——
1893——
1892——
1891——
1890——
1889——
1888——
1887——
1886——
1885——
1884——
1883——
1882——
1881——
1880——
First appearance
1899

The first year at least five girls were named Deanna! It came in at #1,596, and was given to 5 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1899–1909, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.

Where Deanna is popular in 2015

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedNHWashington: #931 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 5,224 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedMNIllinois: #918 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 5,321 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedWIMichigan: #901 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 5,273 girlsMINew York: #1,071 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 6,523 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedIAIndiana: #941 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 5,105 girlsINOhio: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: #1,399 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 10,559 girlsPANew Jersey: #500 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 2,477 girlsNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #1,732 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 14,667 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedUTColorado: #878 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 4,679 girlsCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedVAMaryland: #889 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 4,820 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: #896 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 5,045 girlsNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedOKLouisiana: #884 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 4,258 girlsLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedALGeorgia: #891 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 4,869 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Deanna, so not publishedHITexas: #1,620 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 12,120 girlsTXFlorida: #708 for girls · 22 births · 1 in 3,908 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. New Jersey#500 · 1 in 2,477
  2. Florida#708 · 1 in 3,908
  3. Colorado#878 · 1 in 4,679
  4. Louisiana#884 · 1 in 4,258
  5. Maryland#889 · 1 in 4,820

Best ever in a state: #15 in Utah, 1938.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
New Jersey#500151 in 2,477
Florida#708221 in 3,908
Colorado#87851 in 4,679
Louisiana#88451 in 4,258
Maryland#88951 in 4,820
Georgia#891101 in 4,869
North Carolina#89691 in 5,045
Michigan#90181 in 5,273
Illinois#918111 in 5,321
Washington#93161 in 5,224
Indiana#94161 in 5,105
New York#1,071141 in 6,523
Pennsylvania#1,39951 in 10,559
Texas#1,620141 in 12,120
California#1,732141 in 14,667
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Maine———
Massachusetts———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Deanna
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 130 spots since 2024 (#2,303 → #2,173)
  • 404 spots since 2020 (#1,769 → #2,173)
  • 980 spots since 2015 (#1,193 → #2,173)
  • Biggest jump: 629 spots in 1937 (#768 → #139)
  • Biggest drop: 177 spots in 2014 (#915 → #1,092)
Rise & fade · girls
70 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1899
  • Peaked 1969 at #88 (4,068 births)
  • Births halved by 1978, 9 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 3 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 3 yrs · run 1969–1971
  • Top 1,000: 78 yrs · run 1936–2013
Share of babies · girls
1 in 404
  • Highest: 1 in 404 girls born in 1970 were named Deanna (0.25%)
  • Latest: 1 in 18,909 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
  • Its best rank, #88 in 1969, was only 1 in 415 (0.24%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1960s
  • 24.0% of all girls named Deanna (32,269) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1890s5#1,596 (1899)#1,596
1900s0——
1910s30#1,935 (1910)#3,777
1920s127#1,992 (1924)#3,008
1930s5,840#115 (1938)#1,718
1940s13,739#136 (1940)#181
1950s11,260#194 (1959)#248
1960s32,269#88 (1969)#123
1970s26,983#90 (1970)#119
1980s18,155#146 (1981)#157
1990s16,220#155 (1992)#194
2000s6,929#303 (2000)#463
2010s2,348#712 (2010)#1,149
2020s572#1,769 (2020)#2,035

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Deanna in 2015

girls
#1,193
210 births · 1 in 8,500 girls

Top girls' names in 2015

  1. #1Emma20,487
  2. #2Olivia19,729
  3. #3Sophia17,454
  4. #4Ava16,416
  5. #5Isabella15,667
  6. #6Mia14,943
  7. #7Abigail12,422
  8. #8Emily11,808
  9. #9Charlotte11,415
  10. #10Harper10,311
  11. #1,193Deanna210
More about 2015

girls

1,785,098 girls got a published name in 2015; 1 in 8,500 of them was named Deanna, which outranked 93.8% of the 19,130 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.4% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Deanna
  1. #1,190Emani212
  2. #1,190Kamille212
  3. #1,190Noel212
  4. #1,193Deanna210
  5. #1,193Kaylen210
  6. #1,193Lillyana210
  7. #1,193Theresa210
  8. #1,197Annelise209
  9. #1,197Kalia209
  10. #1,199Ailani208

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 2014
Risers
  1. ↑ 1,984Alaia#2,648 → #664
  2. ↑ 1,835Meilani#2,781 → #946
  3. ↑ 1,733Aitana#2,648 → #915
  4. ↑ 1,387Aislinn#2,351 → #964
  5. ↑ 1,072Taya#2,049 → #977
Fallers
  1. ↓ 1,075Isis#703 → #1,778
  2. ↓ 502Annabell#923 → #1,425
  3. ↓ 500Anabel#911 → #1,411
  4. ↓ 344Cindy#711 → #1,055
  5. ↓ 334Anabella#529 → #863

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 2015 →